Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Quality of life and upper limb disability in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A pilot study

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) patients present mainly lower limbs disability, with slowly progressive distal muscle weakness and atrophy, but hands impairment is a relevant problem affecting the quality of life (QoL). The evaluation of the upper limb is of primary importance. Often these patients present subclinical disorders or report difficulties in manipulating objects, with little evidence in the most used outcome measures. We aim to investigate the impact of hand impairment in the perceived QoL of CMT persons and secondly whether the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale can be useful in assessing upper limb abilities in CMT. We recruited 23 patients with confirmed genetic diagnosis of CMT. We performed a clinical evaluation with Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT), Thumb Opposition Test (TOT) and CMT examination score (CMTES). We completed the clinical assessment with DASH scale and the Short form 36 (SF36) questionnaire for a subjective evaluation of upper limb disability and quality of life. All patients also underwent an instrumental evaluation with a hand-held dynamometer measuring hand grip and tripod pinch and a sensor-engineered glove test (SEGT) to evaluate finger opposition movements in a quantitative spatial-temporal way. As expected, we found significant differences between CMT and control group performances in both clinical and instrumental assessment. Concerning QoL, we found that total score of SF36 and the SF36 Physical Composite Score (PCS) correlate with all clinical and instrumental Outcome Measures (OMs), particularly with Tripod pinch strength and TOT, which are considered major determinants of manual dexterity in CMT. DASH scale correlates with most clinical and instrumental OMs. Not surprisingly, we also found a correlation with DASH work, because CMT affects young patients engaged in work activities. However, we found a low correlation with the TOT and the dynamometer suggesting that DASH may not be the best scale for remote monitoring of upper limb disorders in CMT patients. Nevertheless, the results of our study confirm the usefulness of SF36 in recognizing the impact of upper limb disability in these subjects suggesting its use even in the remote monitoring of physical functioning.

Normative data for the Baseline® 5 position hydraulic pinch meter and the relationship between lateral pinch strength and pinch span

INTRODUCTION

The Baseline® 5 position hydraulic pinch meter allows pinch strength assessment at five different pinch spans. The present study used this newly developed meter to assess where pinch span force is the greatest as previous literature is conflicting.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The primary aim of the study was development of normative data using health subjects, whereas the secondary aims were to evaluate meter inter-rater reliability and to identify in which pinch span the greatest force was produced.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a clinical measurement, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Ten occupational therapy student raters examined inter-rater reliability by calculating an average intraclass correlation. Recruitment of normative data subjects occurred across various locations in West Michigan to include a diverse population and followed testing procedures recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Data were stratified by age categories and sex to develop normative standards. Data were analyzed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA and a three-way mixed ANOVA.

RESULTS

Normative data were calculated from a sample of 605 subjects (292 males and 313 females). One-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant difference at the five different spans, noting a small effect size. Also noted were a nonsignificant three-way interaction between age category, pinch spans, and sex using both the right and left hands, along with a significant two-way interaction between spans and sex bilaterally.

DISCUSSION

The meter showed an excellent inter-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation = .98 and indicated the pinch span that produced the greatest amount of force was not consistent with previous literature.

Instruments to assess upper-limb function in children and adolescents with neuromuscular diseases: a systematic review

AIM

To synthesize clinical and scientific evidence regarding the instruments available to assess upper-limb function in paediatric patients with neuromuscular disease (NMD).

METHOD

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines (Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews no. CRD42020140343). Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were cross-sectional or longitudinal studies or randomized controlled trials that used scales or questionnaires to assess upper-limb function in paediatric patients with NMDs. The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and criteria for good measurement properties were applied to assess the methodological quality of the instruments.

RESULTS

In total, 34 articles and 12 instruments were included. The Brooke Upper Extremity (n=16) and Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) (n=12) instruments were the most used tools. The PUL and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) Upper Limb patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) tested more measurement properties and provided higher methodological quality scores for patients with DMD. Likewise, the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) was the most suitable instrument for patients with spinal muscular atrophy. No instrument has been devised to assess upper-limb function in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and no other disease-specific instruments were found.

INTERPRETATION

The PUL, DMD Upper Limb PROM, and RULM are the most suitable instruments to assess upper-limb function in the two most prevalent paediatric NMDs. The identified gaps and methodological flaws of the available instruments indicate a need to develop high-quality instruments to assess other types of paediatric NMDs. What this paper adds The most suitable observer-rater instrument to assess upper-limb function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the Performance of Upper Limb. The most suitable observer-rater instrument to assess upper-limb function in spinal muscular atrophy is the Revised Upper Limb Module. The DMD Upper Limb patient-reported outcome measure is recommended to assess the upper-limb performance of patients with DMD. Literature gaps and methodological flaws indicate the need to develop high-quality instruments to assess other types of paediatric neuromuscular disease.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy detection via smartphone app: a cross-sectional pilot study (Preprint)

Background

Severe chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can cause long-term dysfunction of the hands and feet, interfere with activities of daily living, and diminish the quality of life. Monitoring to identify CIPN and adjust treatment before it progressing to a life-altering severity relies on patients self-reporting subjective symptoms to their clinical team. Objective assessment is not a standard component of CIPN monitoring due to the requirement for specially trained health care professionals and equipment. Smartphone apps have the potential to conveniently collect both subjective and objective CIPN data directly from patients, which could improve CIPN monitoring.

Objective

The objective of this cross-sectional pilot study was to assess the feasibility of functional CIPN assessment via a smartphone app in patients with cancer that have received neurotoxic chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 26 patients who had completed neurotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled and classified as CIPN cases (n=17) or controls (n=9) based on self-report symptoms. All participants completed CIPN assessments within the NeuroDetect app a single time, including patient-reported surveys (CIPN20 [European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-item scale] and PRO-CTCAE [Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events]) and functional assessments (Gait and Balance and 9-Hole Peg Test). Functional assessment data were decomposed into features. The primary analysis was done to identify features indicative of the difference between CIPN cases and controls using partial least squares analyses. Exploratory analyses were performed to test if any features were associated with specific symptom subtypes or patient-reported survey scores. Patient interviews were also conducted to understand the challenges they experienced with the app.

Results

Comparisons between CIPN cases and controls indicate that CIPN cases had shorter step length (P=.007), unique swaying acceleration patterns during a walking task, and shorter hand moving distance in the dominant hands during a manual dexterity task (variable importance in projection scores ≥2). Exploratory analyses showed similar signatures associated with symptoms subtypes, CIPN20, and PRO-CTCAE. The interview results showed that some patients had difficulties due to technical issues, which indicated a need for additional training or oversight during the initial app download.

Conclusions

Our results supported the feasibility of remote CIPN assessment via a smartphone app and suggested that functional assessments may indicate CIPN manifestations in the hands and feet. Additional work is needed to determine which functional assessments are most indicative of CIPN and could be used for CIPN monitoring within clinical care.

Validation and diagnostic accuracy of coin rotation task for manual dexterity and coordination in children with specific learning disorder

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at determining validity, reliability, and diagnostic accuracy of Coin Rotation Task (CRT) in assessing manual dexterity and coordination of children with specific learning disorder (SLD).

METHODS

In this non-experimental cross-sectional study, 120 children (typically developing children = 60, children with SLD = 60, mean age ± SD =9.18 ± 0.55) were recruited. Test-retest reliability and construct validity of CRT were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed on CRT scores by considering age and gender as covariates and children with SLD with mild dexterity impairment and severe dexterity impairment (SDI) as outcome variables. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to derive validity parameters.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability of the CRT scores in both subtests were excellent in children with SLD (ICC_2,1: 0.93-0.95) and good to excellent in typically developing children (ICC_2,1: 0.72-0.82). Acceptable construct validity of CRT was also found. The CRT cut-off points were 23 (sensitivity= 89.29%, specificity= 70.37%) and 28 (sensitivity= 80.33%, specificity= 86.36%) for discriminating children with SLD and SDI from typically developing children in dominant and non-dominant hand, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicated good to excellent test-retest reliability, acceptable validity, and high diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing children with SLD based on their dexterity impairment level.Implications for RehabilitationThe Coin Rotation Task (CRT) was modified and validated for use in children.The CRT is a reliable and valid tool with high diagnostic accuracy.The CRT has a good ability for discriminating children with specific learning disorder with severe dexterity impairment form typically developing children.Treatment plans and research designs can be performed by using this valid, reliable, and easy to administer tool.