Coaching of patients with an isolated minimally displaced fracture of the radial head immediately increases range of motion

Changes in illness perception, pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress following hand surgeon consultation: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Baseline mindset factors are important factors that influence treatment decisions and outcomes. Theoretically, improving the mindset prior to treatment may improve treatment decisions and outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated changes in patients' mindset following hand surgeon consultation. Additionally, we assessed if the change in illness perception differed between surgical and nonsurgical patients.

METHODS

The primary outcome was illness perception, measured using the total score of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ, range 0-80). Secondary outcomes were the B-IPQ subscales, pain catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), and psychological distress (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4).

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients with various hand and wrist conditions completed the mindset questionnaires before and after hand surgeon consultation (median time interval: 15 days). The B-IPQ total score improved from 39.7 (±10.6) before to 35.8 (±11.3) after consultation (p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.36); scores also improved for the B-IPQ subscales Coherence, Concern, Emotional Response, Timeline, Treatment Control, and Identity and the PCS. There were no changes in the other outcomes. Surgical patients improved on the B-IPQ subscales Treatment Control and Timeline, while nonsurgical patients did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Illness perception and pain catastrophizing improved following hand surgeon consultation, suggesting that clinicians may actively influence the patients' mindset during consultations, and that they may try to enhance this effect to improve outcomes. Furthermore, surgical patients improved more in illness perceptions, indicating that nonsurgical patients may benefit from a more targeted strategy for changing mindset.

Recovery After Musculoskeletal Injury: Mental and Social Health

Recovery from injury involves painful movement and activity, painful stretches and muscle strengthening, and adjustment to permanent impairment. Recovery is facilitated by embracing the concept that painful movement can be healthy, which is easier when one has more hope, less worry, and greater social supports and security. Evolution of one's identity to match the new physical status is a hallmark of a healthy outcome and is largely determined by mental and social health factors. When infection, loss of alignment or fixation, and nerve issues or compartment syndrome are unlikely, greater discomfort and incapability that usual for a given pathology or stage of recovery signal opportunities for improved mental and social health. Surgeons may be the clinicians most qualified to make this discernment. A surgeon who has gained a patient's trust can start to noticed despair, worry, and unhelpful thinking such as fear of painful movement. Reorienting people to greater hope and security and a healthier interpretation of the pains associated with the body's recovery can be initiated by the surgeon and facilitated by social workers, psychologist, and physical, occupational and hand therapists trained in treatments that combine mental and physical therapies.

Transitioning from hurting to healing: self-management after distal radius fracture

PURPOSE

Chronic pain and disability after musculoskeletal trauma support the need for non-biomedical perspectives to frame experiences of recovery. Self-management is a specific holistic lens with implications for improving health outcomes. This qualitative study explored how adults made meaning of self-management after distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

Thirty-one individuals aged 45-72 with a unilateral DRF participated in a semi-structured interview 2-4 weeks after discontinuing full-time wrist immobilization. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and constructivist grounded theory techniques were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Participants made meaning of self-management as a process of "transitioning from hurting to healing," which occurred via three underlying processes. "Learning because of my injury" included gaining information for empowerment and understanding by physically living through the experience. "Working and hoping toward healing" involved taking active steps to recovery in the face of uncertainty. "Getting back to my normal self" comprised reconnecting to one's body and identity after injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' lived experiences overlapped with those of self-managing chronic conditions, highlighting the need to consider how individuals actively engage in their recovery after DRF. Findings suggest using supportive interventions to facilitate patients' understanding, activation, and engagement in meaningful activity after DRF.Implication for rehabilitationTo maximize health outcomes after distal radius fracture, clinicians should move beyond impairment remediation to supporting multiple dimensions of recovery, including emotional distress and functional limitations.Clinicians should routinely provide early and ongoing information, such as expected symptoms and recovery time frames, to minimize loss of control related to uncertainty.Clinicians should emphasize active interventions, such as collaborative goal setting and functional tasks, that engage patients in their own healing.Clinicians should support patients' early return to meaningful activity to maintain or restore connection to the body and identity.

An Update on Simple Elbow Dislocations: A Protocol for Early Return to Sport in High School Wrestlers

ABSTRACT

The principles and management of simple elbow dislocations have evolved over time. In the past, a conservative approach of immobilization and slow rehabilitation were used. More modern treatments emphasize an understanding of the soft tissues about the elbow joint and prescribe an aggressive approach to regaining motion. Elbow stiffness is a common effect of the injury. We outline our treatment principles in a series of high school wrestlers with simple elbow dislocation. The ultimate goal is to return to sport in a safe but early timeframe. We recommend a brief period of immobilization with close follow-up and no motion restrictions after immobilization is removed. This review and case series emphasize the importance of aggressive but safe return to sport in high school wrestlers with an elbow dislocation.

What Factors Are Associated With Response Rates for Long-term Follow-up Questionnaire Studies in Hand Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Long-term follow-up studies are an important tool in the evaluation of orthopaedic illness and its treatment options. However, a patient's participation in a follow-up study may be affected by several factors, leading to variability in response rates and the risk of selection bias.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies? (2) What factors are associated with higher and lower response rates to research questionnaires? (3) What factors are associated with higher and lower contact, initial participation, and completion rates?

METHODS

We included 798 adult patients who were enrolled in one of 12 questionnaire follow-up studies in the hand and upper extremity service of our institution. All included studies evaluated patient-reported outcomes for the surgical treatment of upper extremity conditions using questionnaires and all used the same enrollment design. Patients were invited by letter to ask if they would be willing to participate, and we informed them that they would be contacted by telephone at least three times if they did not respond to the letter. Patients were contacted at a median of 6.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7 to 11) after surgery. The successful response rate was 49% (390 of 798 patients). We manually reviewed records to collect data on patient characteristics, and we performed bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the contact rate (percentage of patients reached by either mail, phone, or email), initial response rate (percentage of reached patients who initiated participation), completion rate (percentage of patients who initiated participation and completed the entire follow-up questionnaire), and our primary outcome successful response rate (percentage of patients who were contacted and who completed the entire questionnaire).

RESULTS

The average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies was 49% (390 of 798 patients). In the multivariable analysis, enrollment of women (odds ratio 1.43 [95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.97]; p = 0.031) was independently associated with higher response rates. On the contrary, a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99]; p = 0.015) and multiple researchers contacting patients (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.71]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower response rates. The contact rate was higher for women (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.03 to 2.06]; p = 0.034) and patients with higher income (OR 1.000007 [95% CI 1.000001 to 1.000013]; p = 0.019). The contact rate was lower in patients with a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.90 to 0.97]; p = 0.001). The initial participation rate was lower when patients were contacted by multiple researchers (OR: 0.34 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.52]; p < 0.001). Studies with a lower number of questions (36; IQR 22 to 46) were completed more frequently than studies with a higher number of questions (51; IQR 39 to 67; p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies assessing long-term outcomes that have a large proportion of men and longer follow-up time tend to have lower response rates. When performing a follow-up study, it seems beneficial to have one researcher contact the patients and use a shorter questionnaire. Results of this study can help clarify the response rates in hand surgery follow-up questionnaire studies and help with the planning of future follow-up studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study.

A retrospective analysis of the number of therapy visits after distal radius fractures using a new provider-scored clinical severity scale

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the distal radius are common as is a postfracture referral to occupational therapy (OT). This article examines factors that cause greater morbidity and a greater number of OT visits.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study aims to analyze which of 5 common sequelae of the distal radius fracture is most significant for increasing the number of therapy visits.

METHODS

Three-hundred Sixty charts were reviewed, and 89 were selected. Multiple regression was used to determine which of our 5 independent variables had the greatest predictive power for the total number of therapy visits.

RESULTS

The regression model demonstrated significance at P ≤ .01. Total active motion (TAM) of the digits (P ≤ .01) and TAM of the forearm (P ≤ .01) were the only complications that demonstrated statistical significance and a positive relationship with the number of therapy visits. In addition to this, TAM of the forearm and digits showed a strong correlation with the number of therapy visits. TAM of the wrist, pain, and edema had a weak correlation. Patients with high total group score on the clinical severity scale also had a moderate correlation.

DISCUSSION

The results of the study illustrate the importance of digital contractures on a patient's morbidity, function, and their need for OT visits.

CONCLUSION

The information from this study is important for the clinician as it identifies patients at risk for increased morbidity and identifies the complications that the clinician may want to stress early in the rehabilitation of that patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Creating Value by Prioritizing Mental and Social Health After Injury

Given the strong influence of mental and social health on symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations, attempts to increase value in orthopedic trauma must attend to emotional and social recovery. Low value and potentially harmful interventions after trauma such as excessive reliance on medication, low value surgeries for "delayed healing" or "symptomatic implants," repeated visits with a physical therapist, and other biomedical interventions often reflect misdiagnosis and mismanagement of social and mental health. A better approach is to anticipate emotional and social recovery; to get social and mental health specialists involved immediately after injury; and to develop strategies that set firm limits on biomedical tests and treatments that are unlikely to contribute to health and risk reinforcing stress, distress, and less effective coping strategies.

An epidemic of the use, misuse and overdose of opioids and deaths due to overdose, in the United States and Canada

The United States and Canada are in the midst of an epidemic of the use, misuse and overdose of opioids, and deaths related to overdose. This is the direct result of overstatement of the benefits and understatement of the risks of using opioids by advocates and pharmaceutical companies. Massive amounts of prescription opioids entered the community and were often diverted and misused. Most other parts of the world achieve comparable pain relief using fewer opioids.

The misconceptions about opioids that created this epidemic are finding their way around the world. There is particular evidence of the increased prescription of strong opioids in Europe.

Opioids are addictive and dangerous. Evidence is mounting that the best pain relief is obtained through resilience. Opioids are often prescribed when treatments to increase resilience would be more effective.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:856–64.