Relationship of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale to commonly used clinical measures in hand osteoarthritis

Reliability, measurement error, and validity of the Arabic version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders

PURPOSE

To evaluate the measurement properties of the Arabic Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (N = 139) completed the PSFS, Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Global Assessment of Function scale (GAF). The same outcome measures were completed again with one week in addition to the Global Rating of Change Scale. The test-retest reliability, measurement error, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity of the PSFS were examined.

RESULTS

The PSFS demonstrated very good test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.88), with no evidence of floor or ceiling effects. The standard error of measurement was determined to be 0.74 while the minimal detectable change was 1.73 points. The PSFS demonstrated significant negative correlation with DASH, NPRS (-0.58, -0.35), and significant positive correlation with the UEFI and GAF (0.56, 0.50). The PSFS demonstrated statistically higher correlation with the DASH and UEFI compared with the NPRS (p < 0.004) supporting our predefined construct validity hypotheses.

CONCLUSION

The Arabic PSFS is an applicable, reliable, and valid outcome measure of upper-extremity activity limitations for patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

Factors associated with patient-reported mouth opening activity limitations in individuals with persistent intra-articular temporomandibular disorders: A cross-sectional study exploring physical and self-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Individuals living with intra-articular temporomandibular disorders (IA-TMDs) often report limitations with mouth opening activities. While clinical measures such as active range of motion (AROM) and movement quality are often used to assess mouth opening function, it is unclear if and how these relate to patient-reported limitations and whether other factors such as kinesiophobia influence mouth opening activities in those with IA-TMDs.

OBJECTIVES

Compare clinical measures of mouth opening function in those with IA-TMDs to asymptomatic controls. In those with an IA/TMD, explore relationships between patient-reported mouth opening limitations, and mouth opening function and kinesiophobia.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Clinical mouth opening function (AROM, movement quality, pain on movement/10, stiffness on movement/10) was compared between groups (n = 30 IA-TMD, n = 30 controls). Within the IA-TMD group, correlations between patient-reported mouth opening limitations (Patient specific functional scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders) and clinical measures of mouth opening function were explored.

RESULTS

Impairments in AROM (-4 mm, p = 0.04, d = 0.5), movement quality (p < 0.01, φ = 0.6), pain on movement (p < 0.01, d = 0.8) and stiffness on movement (p < 0.01, d = 1.6) were observed in the IA-TMD group compared to controls. Patient-reported mouth opening limitations and kinesiophobia were significantly correlated (r = -0.48, p < 0.01); no correlation was found between patient-reported limitations and clinical mouth opening measures (r < 0.3, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mouth opening function is impaired in IA-TMD. However, kinesiophobia appears more related to patient-reported mouth opening limitations than clinical impairments. Consideration of clinical, kinesiophobia and patient-reported limitation measures are necessary to direct management of IA-TMD in those presenting for care.

Explaining Personalized Activity Limitations in Patients With Hand and Wrist Disorders: Insights from Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Mindset Characteristics

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of sociodemographic, clinical, and mindset characteristics on outcomes measured with a patient-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM); the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondly, we examined whether these factors differ when a fixed-item PROM, the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ), is used as an outcome.

DESIGN

Cohort study, using the aforementioned groups of factors in a hierarchical linear regression.

SETTING

Twenty-six clinics for hand and wrist conditions in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Two samples of patients with various hand and wrist conditions and treatments: n=7111 (PSFS) and n=5872 (MHQ).

INTERVENTIONS

NA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The PSFS and MHQ at 3 months.

RESULTS

The PSFS exhibited greater between-subject variability in baseline, follow-up, and change scores than the MHQ. Better PSFS outcomes were associated with: no involvement in litigation (β[95% confidence interval=-0.40[-0.54;-0.25]), better treatment expectations (0.09[0.06;0.13]), light workload (0.08[0.03;0.14]), not smoking (-0.07[-0.13;-0.01]), men sex (0.07[0.02;0.12]), better quality of life (0.07[0.05;0.10]), moderate workload (0.06[0.00;0.13]), better hand satisfaction (0.05[0.02; 0.07]), less concern (-0.05[-0.08;-0.02]), less pain at rest (-0.04[-0.08;-0.00]), younger age (-0.04[-0.07;-0.01]), better comprehensibility (0.03[0.01;0.06]), better timeline perception (-0.03[-0.06;-0.01]), and better control (-0.02[-0.04;-0.00]). The MHQ model was highly similar but showed a higher R2 than the PSFS model (0.41 vs 0.15), largely due to the R2 of the baseline scores (0.23 for MHQ vs 0.01 for PSFS).

CONCLUSIONS

Health care professionals can improve personalized activity limitations by addressing treatment expectations and illness perceptions, which affect PSFS outcomes. Similar factors affect the MHQ, but the baseline MHQ score has a stronger association with the outcome score than the PSFS. While the PSFS is better for individual patient evaluation, we found that it is difficult to explain PSFS outcomes based on baseline characteristics compared with the MHQ. Using both patient-specific and fixed-item instruments helps health care professionals develop personalized treatment plans that meet individual needs and goals.

Perspectives of patients with osteoarthritis for using digital technology in rehabilitation at a public community centre in the Cape Metropole area: A qualitative study

Objectives

To explore the perspectives of people with osteoarthritis (OA) on the use of digital technology into their rehabilitation program, including their awareness, views on accessibility, affordability and willingness to accept digital modalities for rehabilitation delivery.

Methods

A qualitative, descriptive design was conducted. Patients with OA who receive care at a public community rehabilitation centre in the Western Cape, South Africa were eligible to participants. Semi-structured interviewed were conducted and Atlas.ti 23 software was used for thematic analysis.

Results

The findings showed that the participants had limited awareness and exposure to telerehabilitation (TR), along with minimal digital literacy and skills. They were sceptical about the effectiveness of TR and concerned about the inherent lack of physical interactions with health professionals. However, some acknowledged TR's potential benefits for accessibility, convenience, family involvement and long-term community health improvement. Participants were willing to learn more about TR.

Conclusion

Considering the benefits of TR in lower resource settings such as South Africa, investment to increase awareness and patient education and training in TR may assist in enhancing access and quality of care. Resources dedicated to TR and management buy-in in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) is necessary to facilitate the fit-for-context roll-out of TR.

Effect of a stabilization exercise program versus standard treatment for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A randomized trial

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, interventional trial with 1 year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION

Though recommended, evidence is lacking to support specific exercises to stabilize and strengthen the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint for cases of osteoarthritis (OA).

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine in a naturalistic setting, whether standard treatment plus a home exercise program (ST+HEP) is more effective than standard treatment (ST) alone in improving Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) scores, and secondarily, in other patient-centered (pain, function) and clinical outcomes (range of motion, strength).

METHODS

A total of 190 patients from a hand therapy practice in northwestern PA were enrolled by informed consent and randomized into ST or ST+HEP groups. Average age was 60 years, most were female (78%) with sedentary occupations most common (36%). ST group received orthotic interventions, modalities, joint protection education and adaptive equipment recommendations, while the ST+HEP group received a home exercise program in addition to ST for 6-12 months. Follow-up occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes included grip strength, pinch strength, range of motion (ROM), qDASH, Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and pain ratings. At the 6 month mark, all subjects could change groups if desired. Efficacy data analysis included both parametric and non-parametric tests. The threshold for statistical significance was 0.05 and adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Repeated measures ANOVA failed to show a statistically significant difference in strength and ROM assessments between treatment groups over the 12 month follow-up (P ≥ .398). Differences between groups did not exceed 13%. Both the ST and ST+HEP groups evidenced improvement over time in most patient-focused assessments (P ≤ .011), including improvements exceeding reported clinically important differences in pain with activity and PSFS scores. Scores for these measures were similar at each follow-up period (P ≥ .080) in each group. The presence of CTS exerted no effect on outcomes; longer treatment time was weakly related to poorer qDASH and PSFS scores initially. Of those enrolled, 48% of subjects completed the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a high-frequency home exercise program did not improve clinical or patient-centered outcomes more so than standard care in our sample however, study limitations are numerous. Both groups had decreased pain with activity and improved PSFS scores, meeting the established minimally clinically important difference (MCID) of each at 6 and 12 months. Adherence with the home program was poor and/or unknown.

Development and measurement properties of the PEM/PESE activity questionnaire (PAQ)

BACKGROUND

Existing instruments often are inappropriate to measure the effects of post-exertional malaise (PEM) and post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE) on activities of daily living (ADLs). A validated questionnaire to measure self-reported ability with ADLs would advance research and clinical practice in conditions like myalgic encephalomyelitis and Long Covid.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the measurement properties of the PEM/PESE Activity Questionnaire (PAQ).

METHODS

The PAQ is adapted from the Patient Specific Functional Scale. Respondents rated three self-selected ADLs on two 0-100 scales, including current performance compared to (1) a 'good day' and (2) before illness. Respondents provided a Burden of Functioning rating on a 0-100 scale, anchored at 0 being the activity took "No time, effort, and resources at all" and 10 being "All of my time, effort, and resources." Respondents took the PAQ twice, completing a demographic questionnaire after the first PAQ and before the second PAQ. Descriptive statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each scale to assess test-retest reliability. Minimum detectable change outside the 95% confidence interval (MDC95) was calculated. Ceiling and floor effects were determined when the MDC95 for average and function scores crossed 0 and 100, respectively.

RESULTS

n = 981 responses were recorded, including n = 675 complete surveys. Test-retest reliability was generally fair to excellent, depending on function and scale. MDC95 values generally indicated scale responsiveness. Ceiling and floor effects were noted infrequently for specific functions.

CONCLUSION

The PAQ is valid, reliable, and sensitive. Additional research may explore measurement properties involving functions that were infrequently selected in this sample.

Validation of the patients-specific functional scale in patients with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

A complete functional assessment is essential to measure health status and treatment effects in patients with haemophilia. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is a reliable, valid, simple and quick scale that measures physical function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. However, the reliability and validity of the PSFS have not been evaluated in patients with haemophilia.

AIM

The aim of this study was to validate the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with haemophilia.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with haemophilia participated in the study. They completed the PSFS and the Haemophilia Activity List (HAL) scales by telephone during an initial session, and then repeated the assessment in a follow-up session 1 week apart. Reliability was analysed by the internal correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC). The concurrent validity of the PSFS was determined by correlating the initial score of the PSFS scale to the initial score of the HAL scale. Correlations were calculated by means of scatter plots and Pearson product-moment r correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

ICC and SEM values showed excellent reliability for the PSFS scale, with a SDC of 1. A significant moderate correlation was found between the results of the PSFS and the HAL (r = .57, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The PSFS is a reliable and valid scale to measure the functionality of people with haemophilia.

Dynamic stabilization of the painful thumb: A historical and evidence-informed synthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Expert opinion INTRODUCTION: Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMC) osteoarthritis is a common condition seen in the hand therapy clinic. Prevalence is generally higher in females, and the percentage rises for post-menopausal females. Patients typically present with pain and functional difficulties. Conservative management is recommended before a surgical consult. Evidence is mounting that a dynamic stability modeled approach has a significant effect on pain and improving function.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is two-fold: first, to present the history and development of a dynamic stabilization model for treatment of the patient with thumb CMC osteoarthritis (OA), and second, to provide expert clinical commentary and recommendations for the treatment of thumb CMC OA in light of the best available evidence.

METHODS

Expert clinical commentary is based on an extensive review of relevant literature.

RESULTS

The current literature and expert opinion supports an evidence-informed multimodal intervention: modalities, pain relief techniques, manual release, joint mobilizations as deemed necessary, neuromuscular re-education through proprioceptive exercises, and education in joint protection principles.

CONCLUSION

A rationale for a dynamic stabilization approach is presented. The unique anatomy of the thumb deserves finely tuned care based on high quality research. To advance our knowledge and clinical skills we must not become stagnant, but continue to generate high level evidence. The standard for future thumb CMC OA studies should be well-defined intervention parameters, consistent documentation, and the use of appropriate patient-rated outcome measures.

Measurement Properties of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale and Its Current Uses: An Updated Systematic Review of 57 Studies Using COSMIN Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review measurement properties, including acceptability, feasibility, and interpretability, and current uses of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS).

DESIGN

Systematic review of a patient-reported outcome measure using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

LITERATURE SEARCH

We searched 11 databases from January 2010 to July 2020 for articles on measurement properties or use of PSFS.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

Published primary articles without language restrictions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers screened all records, extracted data, and performed risk of bias assessments using COSMIN guidelines. We qualitatively synthesized findings for each measurement property in musculoskeletal and nonmusculoskeletal conditions, and 2 reviewers independently performed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessments. This study was preregistered with the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/42UZT).

RESULTS

Of the 985 articles screened, we included 57 articles on measurement properties and 255 articles on the use of PSFS. The PSFS had sufficient test-retest reliability in musculoskeletal (22 studies, 845 participants, low-to-moderate certainty) and nonmusculoskeletal conditions (6 studies, 197 participants, very low certainty), insufficient construct validity as a measure of physical function (21 studies, 2 945 participants, low-to-moderate certainty), and sufficient responsiveness (32 studies, 13 770 participants, moderate-to-high certainty). The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.35 to 1.5. The PSFS was used in 87 unique health conditions, some without prior evidence of validity.

CONCLUSION

The PSFS is an easy-to-use, reliable, and responsive scale in numerous musculoskeletal conditions, but the construct validity of PSFS remains uncertain. Further study of the measurement properties of the PSFS in nonmusculoskeletal conditions is necessary before clinical use. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(5):262-275. Epub: 05 Feb 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10727.

The use of occupation-based interventions and assessments in hand therapy: A cross-sectional survey

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to gather information on how hand therapists incorporate occupation-based interventions in their clinical practice and what outcome measures hand therapists use to measure the occupational performance of their clients STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Survey Design.

METHODS

The 16-item Survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Hand Therapists on two occasions.

RESULTS

Three hundred eleven hand therapists responded to the survey. Hand therapists use a variety of occupation-based interventions (OBI) in clinical practice and most believe they are important. Findings from this study reveal that incorporating an occupation-based assessment along with or in place of an assessment of body functions and structures is not performed routinely. One hundred twenty-six (41%) respondents indicated that they use occupation-based activities 26-50% of the time with their clients.

DISCUSSION

The top three OBI interventions used by hand therapists included dressing tasks, cooking and meal preparation, and in hand manipulation of coins and medication. The lack of understanding of the theoretical models regarding occupation-based interventions may be a barrier toward implementation of occupation-based interventions and assessments as many hand therapists may have trained under a medical model.

CONCLUSION

Most respondents to this survey indicated that they believe OBI should be performed by hand therapists and use them routinely in practice. The most frequently used type of assessment was the DASH (Disabilities of the Shoulder Arm & Hand). The least frequently used assessment was the Short Form 36 and patient specific occupation-based assessment.

Convergent validity and responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the evaluation of therapeutic outcomes for patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

STUDY DESIGN

This is a longitudinal, observational, multicenter, cohort study.

INTRODUCTION

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with more pain and restrictions than other hand OA. The use of patient-identified occupational performance goals to guide hand therapy treatment and to measure clinical outcomes is fundamental for a patient-centered intervention. The COPM enables subjects to identify goals for hand therapy and engage in a subject-specific therapeutic process.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the convergent validity and responsiveness of the COPM to evaluate the relationship between the patient's self-perception and satisfaction of performance in everyday living and pain intensity, upper limb function, and manual ability.

METHODS

Eligible participants to multiple hand therapy centers were recruited. Outcomes measures (VAS scale, QuickDASH, MAM-36, and the COPM questionnaire) were measured at the baseline and 3 months after.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five (n = 145) consecutive patients for five different hand rehabilitation centers with symptomatic thumb CMC OA were screened for eligibility criteria. COPM-P and COPM-S were the most responsive instruments, with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.96) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more investigation in this area is necessary to conclude that the COPM is the best option to evaluate the effectiveness of hand therapy interventions for thumb OA. The COPM focuses on function and occupation and, in comparison with others upper limb scales, does not require the use of another complementary scale for addressing both satisfaction and ADL status. COPM is an instrument with a good convergent validity and responsiveness to evaluate the relationship between the patient's self-perception and satisfaction in thumb CMC OA.

Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Arabic version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders

PURPOSE

To cross-culturally adapt the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) into Arabic language and to examine its measurement properties in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The original English version of the PSFS was cross-culturally adapted into modern standard Arabic language following Beaton's guidelines. Patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders (N = 116) were recruited to examine the test-retest reliability, measurement error, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity of the Arabic PSFS. Construct validity was tested by examining eight predefined correlational hypotheses.

RESULTS

Participants in the current study indicated that the Arabic PSFS was clear and understandable. The Arabic PSFS had very good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86) with no floor or ceiling issues. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change of the Arabic PSFS were 0.64 and 1.49 points respectively indicating acceptable measurement error. The majority of the predefined construct validity hypotheses (75%) were supported by the results justifying the construct validity of the Arabic PSFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The Arabic PSFS is a comprehensible and easy to use measure. The Arabic PSFS has very good test-retest reliability, acceptable measurement error, and evidence supporting its construct validity as measure of activity limitation in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation specialist can confidently interpret patient's score in the Arabic PSFS to represent the extent of activity limitation.Patients with unchanged clinical status will have similar scores in the Arabic PSFS with repeated administrations of the scale over time.The Arabic PSFS can be used in daily clinical practice and in research studies to measure activity limitation in Arabic-speakers with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders.The Arabic PSFS enables rehabilitation specialist to quantify activity limitation in a way that is relevant to the culture and life style of Arabic-speakers.

The Patient Perspective on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Elective Hand Surgery: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have traditionally been used for research purposes, but are now being used to evaluate outcomes from the patient's perspective and inform ongoing management and quality of care. We used quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluate the short-version Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) with regard to patient preference and measurement of patient goals and their responsiveness after treatment.

METHODS

Patients 18 years or older undergoing elective hand surgery received the QuickDASH and PSFS questionnaires before and at 6 weeks after surgery. Two additional questions intended to elicit patients' preferences regarding the QuickDASH and PSFS were included. Responsiveness was measured by change in pre- to postoperative score. We analyzed patients' responses to the 2 additional questions to identify themes in PROM preferences. Results from the quantitative and qualitative analyses were combined into a convergent mixed-methods (eg, quantitative and qualitative) analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients completed preoperative questionnaires; 25 (66%) completed postoperative questionnaires. Seventeen patients (77%) preferred the PSFS, 3 (14%) had no preference, 2 (9%) preferred the QuickDASH. The average change from pre- to postoperative QuickDASH was -10 (SD, 20), and that of the PSFS was -27 (SD, 26). Ten patients (40%) reported QuickDASH score changes above the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), 17 patients (68%) reported PSFS score changes above the MCID. Content analysis revealed 4 themes in preference for a PROM: instrument simplicity (ease of instrument understanding and completion), personalized assessment (individualization and relevance), goal directed (having measurable aims or objectives), distinct items (concrete or specific instrument items or functions).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients felt the PSFS better measured their goals because it is a simple, personalized instrument with distinct domains.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Whereas standardized PROMs may better compare across populations, physicians, or conditions, employing PROMs that address patient-specific goals may better assess aspects of care most important to patients. A combination of these 2 types of PROMs can be used to assess outcomes and inform quality of care.

Psychometric properties of Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with upper extremity disorders. A systematic review

PURPOSE

To identify, critically appraise, and synthesise the measurement properties of Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases from January 1999 to November 2020 were searched. Prospective measurement studies that included patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders, that reported on the psychometric properties of PSFS were included. We used the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) 2018 guideline for systematic reviews to appraise the studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible studies were included. Three studies with adequate-very good quality and sufficient properties indicated excellent intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (≥0.75) in patients with shoulder pain (mean age 48 ± 11 years), multiple shoulder disorders (mean age 55 ± 16 years), and hand osteoarthritis (mean age 64 ± 9 years). The construct validity estimates of PSFS were moderate, when compared with Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) (r = 0.50) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (r = 0.51) in patients with combined upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (shoulder/upper arm, wrist/hand and elbow/forearm).

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-specific functional scale can be considered as a reliable, valid, and responsive tool in assessing functional change in patients with shoulder disorders/pain.Implications for rehabilitationThe Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) can be considered as: • a reliable outcome measure in assessing functional change in patients with shoulder pain and hand osteoarthritis; • a valid measure in assessing functional limitation in patients with upper extremity disorders; • a measure that is sensitive to change (displays longitudinal validity) in assessing functional change in patients with upper extremity disorders and in patients with shoulder pain; and • a responsive outcome measure in assessing functional change in patients with upper extremity disorders.

Reproducibility and reliability of performance indicators to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of biofeedback therapy after elbow surgery: An observational case series

Electromyographic biofeedback (EMG-BF) therapy provides information on the state of contraction of the targeted muscles and relaxation of their antagonists, which can facilitate early active range of motion (RoM) after elbow surgery. Our aim in this study was to calculate the minimum detectable change (MDC) during EMG-BF therapy, initiated in the early postoperative period after elbow surgery.This study is an observational case series. EMG-BF of muscle contraction and relaxation was provided during active elbow flexion and extension exercises. Patients completed 3 sets of 10 trials each of flexion and extension over 4 weeks. The total range of flexion-extension motion and scores on the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire and the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation were obtained at baseline and weekly during the 4-week intervention period. A prediction formula was developed from the time-series data obtained during the intervention period, using the least-squares method. The estimated value was calculated by removing the slope from the prediction formula and adding the initial scores to residuals between the measured scores and predicted scores individually. Systematic error, MDC at the 95th percentile cutoff (MDC95), repeatability of the measures, and the change from the baseline to each time-point of intervention were assessed.The MDC95 was obtained for all 3 outcome measures and the range of values was as follows: RoM, 8.3° to 22.5°; Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation score, 17.6 to 30.6 points; and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire subscale: disability and symptoms score, 14.2 to 22.9 points.The efficacy of EMG-BF after elbow surgery was reflected in earlier initiation of elbow RoM after surgery and improvement in patient-reported upper limb function scores. The calculated MDC95 cut-offs could be used as reference values to assess the therapeutic effects of EMG-BF in individuals.

Health Policy in Hand Surgery: Evaluating What Works

Health policy is a complex and fluid topic that addresses care delivery with the goal of improving patient care. Understanding health policy initiatives, their motivation, and their effects, can help ensure hand surgeons are prepared for the changing health care landscape.

Which patient-reported outcomes shall we use in hand surgery?

Nowadays, the use of patient-reported outcome measures to monitor a treatment effect in daily practice or to quantify study outcomes is indispensable. In hand surgery, there is a wide variety available. This article provides an overview about the most common hand-specific, upper-extremity specific and general quality of life patient-reported outcome measurement instruments with adequate psychometric properties. A checklist and a decision tree are provided for choosing the appropriate instrument when evaluating patients with hand conditions.

Clinical Assessments of Hand Function in First Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Do Not Appear to Correlate with Radiographic Findings

BACKGROUND

Thumb carpometacarpal (first CMC) osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative process affecting hand use, is typically assessed by clinical examination and radiographs. This assessment determines treatment, but it may not reflect functional limitations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We aimed to explore the relationship between measures of hand function and radiographs in individuals with and without first CMC OA.

METHODS

We designed a cross-sectional, observational pilot study, enrolling five patients with first CMC OA (nine thumbs with modified Eaton-Littler grades ranging from 1 to 4, using retrospective radiographic data) and nine healthy controls. They underwent evaluation of hand function using four patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS); the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH); and the Modified Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands (M-SACRAH)-and one performance measure, the Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT). Spearman's ρ with 95% subject clustered bootstrapped confidence intervals was calculated to assess for correlations between radiographic findings and measures of hand function.

RESULTS

Only the DASH work score showed strong positive correlation with radiographic OA grade, with PSFS, PRWHE, M-SACRAH, and AHFT scores demonstrating low to moderate correlations. Notable differences were found between patients and control subjects in median scores of the DASH, PSFS, PRWHE, and M-SACRAH, as well as in the grip, pinch, and button scores of the AHFT.

CONCLUSION

While only the DASH work score strongly correlated with radiographic grade of first CMC OA, several measures detected considerable differences in functional hand use between patients and control subjects. The findings of this pilot study suggest that hand function scores be considered in addition to radiographs when determining severity of first CMC OA. The findings can also inform the design of a larger, powered study.