High baseline pain is associated with treatment adherence in persons diagnosed with thumb base osteoarthritis: An observational study

Effect of a stabilization exercise program versus standard treatment for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A randomized trial

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, interventional trial with 1 year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION

Though recommended, evidence is lacking to support specific exercises to stabilize and strengthen the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint for cases of osteoarthritis (OA).

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine in a naturalistic setting, whether standard treatment plus a home exercise program (ST+HEP) is more effective than standard treatment (ST) alone in improving Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) scores, and secondarily, in other patient-centered (pain, function) and clinical outcomes (range of motion, strength).

METHODS

A total of 190 patients from a hand therapy practice in northwestern PA were enrolled by informed consent and randomized into ST or ST+HEP groups. Average age was 60 years, most were female (78%) with sedentary occupations most common (36%). ST group received orthotic interventions, modalities, joint protection education and adaptive equipment recommendations, while the ST+HEP group received a home exercise program in addition to ST for 6-12 months. Follow-up occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes included grip strength, pinch strength, range of motion (ROM), qDASH, Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and pain ratings. At the 6 month mark, all subjects could change groups if desired. Efficacy data analysis included both parametric and non-parametric tests. The threshold for statistical significance was 0.05 and adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Repeated measures ANOVA failed to show a statistically significant difference in strength and ROM assessments between treatment groups over the 12 month follow-up (P ≥ .398). Differences between groups did not exceed 13%. Both the ST and ST+HEP groups evidenced improvement over time in most patient-focused assessments (P ≤ .011), including improvements exceeding reported clinically important differences in pain with activity and PSFS scores. Scores for these measures were similar at each follow-up period (P ≥ .080) in each group. The presence of CTS exerted no effect on outcomes; longer treatment time was weakly related to poorer qDASH and PSFS scores initially. Of those enrolled, 48% of subjects completed the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a high-frequency home exercise program did not improve clinical or patient-centered outcomes more so than standard care in our sample however, study limitations are numerous. Both groups had decreased pain with activity and improved PSFS scores, meeting the established minimally clinically important difference (MCID) of each at 6 and 12 months. Adherence with the home program was poor and/or unknown.

Dynamic stabilization of the painful thumb: A historical and evidence-informed synthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Expert opinion INTRODUCTION: Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMC) osteoarthritis is a common condition seen in the hand therapy clinic. Prevalence is generally higher in females, and the percentage rises for post-menopausal females. Patients typically present with pain and functional difficulties. Conservative management is recommended before a surgical consult. Evidence is mounting that a dynamic stability modeled approach has a significant effect on pain and improving function.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is two-fold: first, to present the history and development of a dynamic stabilization model for treatment of the patient with thumb CMC osteoarthritis (OA), and second, to provide expert clinical commentary and recommendations for the treatment of thumb CMC OA in light of the best available evidence.

METHODS

Expert clinical commentary is based on an extensive review of relevant literature.

RESULTS

The current literature and expert opinion supports an evidence-informed multimodal intervention: modalities, pain relief techniques, manual release, joint mobilizations as deemed necessary, neuromuscular re-education through proprioceptive exercises, and education in joint protection principles.

CONCLUSION

A rationale for a dynamic stabilization approach is presented. The unique anatomy of the thumb deserves finely tuned care based on high quality research. To advance our knowledge and clinical skills we must not become stagnant, but continue to generate high level evidence. The standard for future thumb CMC OA studies should be well-defined intervention parameters, consistent documentation, and the use of appropriate patient-rated outcome measures.