Factors predicting the cause and prognosis of central line-associated bloodstream infections

Comparison of chlorhexidine impregnated dressing and standard dressing for the prevention of central-line associated blood stream infection and colonization in critically ill pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated dressing and standard dressing with respect to the frequency of central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter-related bloodstream infection, primary bloodstream infection, and catheter colonization in critically ill pediatric patients with short-term central venous catheters.

METHODS

Children who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary institution between May 2018 and December 2019 and received placement of a short-term central venous catheter were included in this single-center randomized controlled trial. Patients were grouped according to the type of catheter fixation applied.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients (151 CHG-impregnated dressing, 156 standard dressing), with 307 catheters (amounting to a collective total of 4,993 catheter days), were included in the study. The CHG-impregnated dressing did not significantly decrease the incidence of CLABSI (6.36 vs 7.59 per 1,000 catheter days; hazard ratio (HR): 0.93, P = 0.76), catheter related bloodstream infection (3.82 vs 4.18 per 1,000 catheter days; HR: 0.98; P = 0.98), and primary bloodstream infection (2.54 vs 3.42 catheter days; HR: 0.79; P = 0.67). The CHG-impregnated dressing significantly decreased the incidence of catheter colonization (3.82 vs 7.59 per 1,000 catheter days; HR: 0.40; P = 0.04). In both groups, the most frequent microorganisms isolated in CLABSI or catheter colonization were Gram-positive bacteria (the majority were coagulase-negative staphylococci).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CHG-impregnated dressing does not decrease CLABSI incidence in critically ill pediatric patients but it significantly reduced catheter colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common microorganisms causing CLABSI or catheter colonization.

Chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not decrease central line‐associated bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Central line‐associated blood stream infections are accompanied by increased mortality and health care costs. The application of different types of dressings in infection control has not been fully investigated to date.

Aim

To assess the effects of two different dressing types on central line‐associated bloodstream infections.

Methods

A randomized, nonblinded, controlled trial was conducted. Central lines were randomly allocated to intervention (chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing, n = 259) and control groups (standard dressing, n = 215). The central line‐associated bloodstream infection rate was assessed.

Results

A statistically nonsignificant difference was noted in the overall central line‐associated bloodstream infection rates between the two groups. The frequency of dressing changes in the patients with the chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing was significantly lower than that in the patients with a standard dressing. The predominant type of infectious microorganisms isolated from the central line‐associated bloodstream infection episodes was Gram‐negative bacteria (57.2%). Gram‐positive bacteria and fungi were noted at lower percentages (28.5% and 14.3%, respectively).

Conclusion

The use of a chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not decrease the central line‐associated bloodstream infection rate, although it decreases the frequency of dressing changes so may save nursing time.

What is already known about this topic?

The use of a chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing has been reported to significantly reduce central line‐associated bloodstream infections or maintain low central line‐associated bloodstream infections in Western countries, but few studies have been carried out in Asian countries.

The chlorhexidine dressing does not decrease central line‐associated bloodstream infections due to the presence of Gram‐negative bacteria.

It has been reported that nurses prefer the chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing over the standard dressing.

What this paper adds?

Compared with the standard dressing, the chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not significantly decrease the central line‐associated bloodstream infection rate.

The predominant infectious microorganisms isolated from central line-associated bloodstream infections episodes were Gram-negative bacteria.

The cost of the chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing was significantly higher than that of the standard dressing, although the former could save nursing time due to the decreased frequency of dressing changes.

The implications of this paper are as follows:

The use of chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not offer any additional benefit in controlling infection.

Further studies are required to identify ways to control the colonization or infection of Gram‐negative bacteria in patients because Gram‐negative bacteria are the predominant infectious microorganisms that cause central line‐associated bloodstream infection.

The use of a chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing is proposed as an alternative choice that can reduce ICU nursing time in hospital settings and therefore should be considered by nursing managers for human resource cost control.

Short-Term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Evidence for Increasing Prevalence of Gram-Negative Microorganisms from a 25-Year Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this study was to describe the etiology and outcome of short-term peripheral venous catheter (PVC)-related bloodstream infections (PVCRBSI) in a 25-year period (1992 to 2016) and to identify predictive factors of Gram-negative PVCRBSI. This was a prospective observational study including all episodes of PVCRBSI. A multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for calendar year was built to explore factors associated with a Gram-negative bacterial etiology. Over the study period, 711 episodes of PVCRBSI were identified. Incidence rate of PVCRBSI increased from 0.06 to 0.13 episodes/1,000 patient-days. A Gram-negative bacterial etiology was demonstrated in 162 (22.8%) episodes. There was a significant increase in the proportion of Gram-negative infections (22.6% in 1992 to 1996 versus 33.2% in 2012 to 2016). Independent predictive factors of Gram-negative PVCRBSI were the following: being in the hospital for more than 7 days with a catheter in situ for more than 3 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 2.69), surgery in the previous month (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.09), and antimicrobial treatment with beta-lactams (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.78). In conclusion, we reported an increase in the prevalence of Gram-negative PVCRBSI over the last 25 years. Factors associated with a Gram-negative bacterial etiology were being in the hospital for more than 7 days with a catheter in situ for more than 3 days, having undergone surgery, and having received antimicrobial treatment with beta-lactams.

A New Scoring System to Predict Blood Stream Infections in Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Hospital in China

BACKGROUND

This purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of blood stream infections (BSIs) on the prognosis of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) and to make predictions based on patients' characteristics on admission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred eighty-seven patients with complicated IAI in 2014 and 2015 were included in our retrospective analysis, except for those diagnosed with central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). Patients with BSIs were compared with patients without BSIs. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify factors associated with BSIs and also the subtypes of BSIs. The predictive score systems were established further.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (39.6%) with complicated IAIs developed BSIs after admission. Four factors evaluated on admission were associated independently with BSIs including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥66 U/L (two scores), insensitivity to initial empirical antibiotic agents (IIEA; three scores), Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of two or more (three scores), and generalized peritonitis (four scores). A total score of five or more was regarded as the critical value in the combined test to predict BSIs, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.73. Blood stream infections were further divided as secondary BSIs and non-secondary BSIs. The risk factors of secondary BSIs included IIEA (three scores), SOFA score of two or more (five scores), and generalized peritonitis (eight scores), where a total score of nine or more was regarded as the critical value in the combined test, with a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.87, whereas the risk factors of non-secondary BSIs included IIEA (three scores), SOFA score of two or more (three scores) and procalcitonin (PCT) ≥0.43 mcg/L (three scores), where a total score of six or more was regarded as the critical value in the combined test, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.70. Moreover, BSIs were linked with the worse clinical outcomes in organ functions, hospitalization costs, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our new scoring methods may have potential advantages on the early prediction and recognition of BSIs in patients with complicated IAIs.

Bacterial contamination upon the opening of injection needles

Introduction

Two opening methods are used for injection needle products: the “peel-apart method” where the adhesive surface of the packaging mount is peeled off, and the “push-off top method,” where the needle hub is pressed against the mount to break it. However, the risks of bacterial contamination as a result of opening method remain unknown. The aim of our study was to evaluate the bacterial contamination of needle hubs upon the opening of injection needles by the peel-apart or push-off top method under various conditions.

Methods

Bacterial contamination upon the opening of injection needles was examined in two materials, paper and plastic. Various concentrations of Staphylococcus aureus were applied to the mount and were maintained under wet or dry conditions. Injection needles were opened using the peel-apart or push-off top method. Needle hub contamination was examined using agar medium colony counting. Clinically assumed conditions (the hands and saliva of anesthesiologists) were also evaluated. Data were statistically examined using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, Jonckheere, and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

The lateral surfaces of needle hubs were contaminated using the push-off top method, but not by the peel-apart method, in a manner that was dependent on S. aureus concentrations. No significant differences were observed between mount materials. Needle hub contamination was significantly more severe for the wet than for the dry opening portion. The clinically assumed condition study revealed that the lateral and bottom surfaces of the needle hub were contaminated significantly more in the saliva contamination group than in the dry and wet hand groups.

Conclusions

The bacterial contamination of needle hubs may occur upon the opening of injection needles when the push-off top method is used and may be affected by hands contaminated with saliva under clinical conditions.

A quality assurance investigation of CLABSI events: are there exceptions to never?

BACKGROUND

In the USA, central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) have been designated as 'never events', prompting initiatives towards a 'zero CLABSIs' standard. We propose that there are cascading risk factors predisposing certain patient cohorts to higher CLABSIs rates.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all CLABSI infections over a 12-month period was undertaken. Risk factors examined included catheter type, insertion site and parenteral nutrition (PN) status. Additional factors analysed included acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-four CLABSIs were identified in 33 adult patients (median age = 57 years). Temporary central venous catheters accounted for 12 (35%), peripherally inserted central catheters for five (14.7%), and permanent catheters for 17 CLABSIs (50%); the median duration from insertion was 15 days (interquartile range = 9-26). Among patient factors, immunosuppression and hyperglycaemia were the most common (n = 19, 55%), followed by PN and CKD (n = 17, 50.0%), AKI (n = 16, 47.1%) and HAIs (n = 13, 38.2%). A majority of patients with CLABSIs (n = 20 58.8%) had at least three risk factors.

DISCUSSION

These findings reflect the complexity of CLABSIs with multiple patient and hospital factors influencing incidence. It suggests the need for further studies to re-calibrate the zero CLABSI model towards one with greater relevance.