Whole genome analysis of a multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolate from a patient with invasive pneumococcal infection developing disseminated intravascular coagulation

Oral Microbes in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: Practice and Research Implications

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired pneumonia accounts for 25% of all health care-associated infections and is classified as either ventilator-associated or non-ventilator-associated pneumonia. Hospital-acquired pneumonia most frequently results from aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs. Although preventive measures for ventilator-associated pneumonia are well established, few preventive measures exist for the nonventilator type.

OBJECTIVE

To (1) explore oral microbes associated with ventilator-associated and non-ventilator-associated pneumonia in acutely ill, adult hospitalized patients, and (2) provide evidence-based recommendations for measures to prevent pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Medline, and the Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

Ten studies were found that identified common oral microbes in ventilator-associated and non-ventilator-associated pneumonia, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, S aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Collectively, oral colonization with E coli, P aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant S aureus, and S aureus increased the risk of nonventilator pneumonia. Findings also suggested microaspiration of colonized oral microbes into the lungs. Non-ventilator-associated pneumonia had similar colonization rates of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, whereas ventilator-associated pneumonia had greater colonization with gram-negative bacteria. The literature did not indicate a standard of oral care effective in all patient populations.

DISCUSSION

Oral care is an effective intervention to prevent hospital-acquired pneumonia by reducing pathogenic oral microbial colonization. The impact of different methods and timing of oral care on oral microbes should be further explored, particularly in patients not receiving mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings reaffirm the importance of consistent oral care in hospitalized patients. In addition, practices should be different in patients receiving mechanical ventilation versus patients not receiving ventilation. Results may also provide knowledge to inform future preventive measures for pneumonia, particularly for nonventilator pneumonia.

Response to pneumococcal vaccine in interstitial lung disease patients: Influence of systemic immunosuppressive treatment

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are severe respiratory diseases, and ILD patients are treated with corticosteroid and immunosuppressive agents. However, it is unclear whether these medications influence the response of pneumococcal vaccine.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccines (PPSV23 and PCV13) in ILD patients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment.

METHODS

ILD patients who were regularly followed at the outpatient clinic were enrolled. Sera were collected before and 4-8 weeks after vaccination. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations against pneumococcal serotype 19F were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

IgG concentrations to serotype 19F were increased in all groups in response to the vaccine. Both PCV13 and PPSV23 induced IgG concentrations in patients immunized for the first time. Response rates for the ILD group were comparable with those for the ILD group undergoing corticosteroid therapy. Only idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy had a significantly lower response.