Pharmacokinetic study of lascufloxacin in non-elderly healthy men and elderly men

The Drug-Specific Propensity Regarding the Acquisition of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli: An in vitro Challenge and DNA Mutation Analysis

Objective

Many fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, are used clinically. We investigated the relationship between resistance acquisition and exposure duration in each drug through the exposure of fluoroquinolone to Escherichia coli clinical isolates in vitro.

Methods

Eleven E. coli clinical isolates were exposed to each fluoroquinolone, ie, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, garenoxacin, and lascufloxacin, with the concentration of the mutant selection window for 5 days; these procedures were repeated 5-times. In addition, the DNA sequence in the quinolone-resistance determining region (QRDR) and the expression level in the drug efflux pump acrA were analyzed to determine the resistance mechanism.

Results

Although resistant strains were not detected after 5 to 10 days of exposure to fluoroquinolone, after 25 days of exposure to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, 100% and 45% of isolates acquired resistance, respectively. Due to 25 days of exposure to sitafloxacin, garenoxacin, and lascufloxacin, MIC measurement was elevated 2- to 4096-fold for those of the parental strain, and the cross-resistance rate to levofloxacin was 72%, 54%, and 27%, respectively. In strains with high fluoroquinolone resistance, acrA overexpression was observed in addition to QRDR mutation.

Conclusion

In our findings, fluoroquinolone resistance was not observed in the E. coli strain after 5- to 10-days of exposure. However, resistance acquisition was detected frequently after 15- to 25-days of exposure. Among fluoroquinolones, lascufloxacn had the least impact on the resistance acquisition in E. coli.

Overview of Side-Effects of Antibacterial Fluoroquinolones: New Drugs versus Old Drugs, a Step Forward in the Safety Profile?

Antibacterial fluoroquinolones (FQs) are frequently used in treating infections. However, the value of FQs is debatable due to their association with severe adverse effects (AEs). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued safety warnings concerning their side-effects in 2008, followed by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) and regulatory authorities from other countries. Severe AEs associated with some FQs have been reported, leading to their withdrawal from the market. New systemic FQs have been recently approved. The FDA and EMA approved delafloxacin. Additionally, lascufloxacin, levonadifloxacin, nemonoxacin, sitafloxacin, and zabofloxacin were approved in their origin countries. The relevant AEs of FQs and their mechanisms of occurrence have been approached. New systemic FQs present potent antibacterial activity against many resistant bacteria (including resistance to FQs). Generally, in clinical studies, the new FQs were well-tolerated with mild or moderate AEs. All the new FQs approved in the origin countries require more clinical studies to meet FDA or EMA requirements. Post-marketing surveillance will confirm or infirm the known safety profile of these new antibacterial drugs. The main AEs of the FQs class were addressed, highlighting the existing data for the recently approved ones. In addition, the general management of AEs when they occur and the rational use and caution of modern FQs were outlined.

Structural Characterization of the Millennial Antibacterial (Fluoro)Quinolones-Shaping the Fifth Generation

The evolution of the class of antibacterial quinolones includes the introduction in therapy of highly successful compounds. Although many representatives were withdrawn due to severe adverse reactions, a few representatives have proven their therapeutical value over time. The classification of antibacterial quinolones into generations is a valuable tool for physicians, pharmacists, and researchers. In addition, the transition from one generation to another has brought new representatives with improved properties. In the last two decades, several representatives of antibacterial quinolones received approval for therapy. This review sets out to chronologically outline the group of approved antibacterial quinolones since 2000. Special attention is given to eight representatives: besifloxacin, delafoxacin, finafloxacin, lascufloxacin, nadifloxacin and levonadifloxacin, nemonoxacin, and zabofloxacin. These compounds have been characterized regarding physicochemical properties, formulations, antibacterial activity spectrum and advantageous structural characteristics related to antibacterial efficiency. At present these new compounds (with the exception of nadifloxacin) are reported differently, most often in the fourth generation and less frequently in a new generation (the fifth). Although these new compounds' mechanism does not contain essential new elements, the question of shaping a new generation (the fifth) arises, based on higher potency and broad spectrum of activity, including resistant bacterial strains. The functional groups that ensured the biological activity, good pharmacokinetic properties and a safety profile were highlighted. In addition, these new representatives have a low risk of determining bacterial resistance. Several positive aspects are added to the fourth fluoroquinolones generation, characteristics that can be the basis of the fifth generation. Antibacterial quinolones class continues to acquire new compounds with antibacterial potential, among other effects. Numerous derivatives, hybrids or conjugates are currently in various stages of research.