Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam treatment is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury in Japanese patients

Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy

This study conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to investigate the association of vancomycin indicators, particularly area under the curve over 24 h (AUC24) and trough concentrations (Ctrough), and their relationship with both nephrotoxicity and efficacy. Literature research was performed in PubMed and Web of Science on vancomycin nephrotoxicity and efficacy in adult inpatients. Vancomycin Ctrough, AUC24, AUC24/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), nephrotoxicity evaluation and treatment outcomes were extracted. Logistic regression and Emax models were conducted, stratified by evaluation criterion for nephrotoxicity and primary outcomes for efficacy. Among 100 publications on nephrotoxicity, 29 focused on AUC24 and 97 on Ctrough, while of 74 publications on efficacy, 27 reported AUC24/MIC and 68 reported Ctrough. The logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between nephrotoxicity and vancomycin Ctrough (odds ratio = 2.193; 95% CI 1.582-3.442, p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve had an area of 0.90, with a cut-off point of 14.55 mg/L. Additionally, 92.3% of the groups with a mean AUC24 within 400-600 mg·h/L showed a mean Ctrough of 10-20 mg/L. However, a subtle, non-statistically significant association was observed between the AUC24 and nephrotoxicity, as well as between AUC24/MIC and Ctrough concerning treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that monitoring vancomycin Ctrough remains a beneficial and valuable approach to proactively identifying patients at risk of nephrotoxicity, particularly when Ctrough exceeds 15 mg/L. Ctrough can serve as a surrogate for AUC24 to some extent. However, no definitive cut-off values were identified for AUC24 concerning nephrotoxicity or for Ctrough and AUC24/MIC regarding efficacy.

Assessing Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Treatment in Adult Patients with Vancomycin-Susceptible Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia

PURPOSE

Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with high mortality and long-term hospitalization. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and evaluate the risk factors for mortality in adult patients treated with vancomycin (VCM) for vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) bacteremia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, record-based study. The data were collected from inpatients at a single university hospital between January 2009 and December 2020. The area under the curve (AUC) of VCM was calculated using the Bayesian approach. The primary outcome was a 30-day in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A univariate analysis showed significant differences in the concomitant use of vasopressors, history of the use of no clinically relevant activity antimicrobial agents against E. faecium, VCM plasma trough concentration, and renal dysfunction during VCM administration between the 30-day in-hospital mortality and survival groups. However, the groups' AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were not significantly different. A multivariate analysis suggested that concomitant vasopressors may be an independent risk factor for 30-day in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 7.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-52.9; p = 0.035). The VCM plasma trough concentrations and the AUC/MIC in the mortality group were higher than those in the surviving group. No association between the AUC/MIC and the treatment effect in E. faecium bacteremia was assumed, because the known, target AUC/MIC were sufficiently achieved in the mortality group.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be no association between the AUC/MIC and the treatment effect in E. faecium bacteremia. When an immunocompromised host develops E. faecium bacteremia with septic shock, especially when a vasopressor is used in a patient with unstable hemodynamics, it may be difficult to treat it, despite efforts to ensure the appropriate AUC/MIC and therapeutic vancomycin concentration levels.

Area-Under-Curve-Guided Versus Trough-Guided Monitoring of Vancomycin and Its Impact on Nephrotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, vancomycin trough levels have been used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Owing to the increasing evidence of trough levels being poor surrogates of area under the curve (AUC) and the advent of advanced pharmacokinetics software, a paradigm shift has been made toward AUC-guided dosing. This study aims to evaluate the impact of AUC-guided versus trough-guided TDM on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google scholar, and Cochrane library databases; articles published from January 01, 2009, to January 01, 2021, were retrieved and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Studies that evaluated trough-guided or AUC-guided vancomycin TDM and vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity were included. Random-effects models were used to compare the differences in nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 1191 retrieved studies, 57 were included. Most studies included adults and older adults (n = 47, 82.45%). The pooled prevalence of nephrotoxicity was lower in AUC-guided TDM [6.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9%-9.5%] than in trough-guided TDM (17.0%; 95% CI: 14.7%-19.2%). Compared with the trough-guided approach, the AUC-guided approach had a lower risk of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.89). The risk of nephrotoxicity was unaffected by the AUC derivation method. AUC thresholds correlated with nephrotoxicity only within the first 96 hours of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUC-guided approach had a lower risk of nephrotoxicity, supporting the updated American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal AUC-derivation methods and clinical utility of repeated measurements of the AUC and trough levels of vancomycin.

Piperacillin–Tazobactam Plus Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: Can Teicoplanin or Other Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams Be Remedies?

Numerous observational studies and meta-analyses have suggested that combination therapy consisting of piperacillin–tazobactam (TZP) and vancomycin (VAN) augments acute kidney injury (AKI) risk when compared to viable alternatives, such as cefepime–vancomycin (FEP–VAN) and meropenem–VAN. However, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear. One major limitation of the existing studies is the utilization of serum creatinine to quantify AKI since serum creatinine is not a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker to truly define the causal relationship between TZP–VAN exposure and nephrotoxicity. Even so, some preventive measures can be taken to reduce the risk of AKI when TZP–VAN is preferred. These measures include limiting the administration of TZP–VAN to 72 h, choosing FEP–VAN in place of TZP–VAN in appropriate cases, monitoring the VAN area under the curve level rather than the VAN trough level, avoiding exposure to other nephrotoxic agents, and minimizing the prescription of TZP–VAN for patients with a high risk of AKI. More data are needed to comment on the beneficial impact of the extended-infusion regimen of TZP on nephrotoxicity. Additionally, TZP and teicoplanin can be reasonable alternatives to TZP–VAN for the purpose of lowering AKI risk. However, the data are scarce to advocate this practice convincingly.

Acute kidney injury in villous cancer patients treated with vancomycin and tazobactam/piperacillin

In this report, we present a 37-year-old woman with villous cancer who developed AKI after co-administration of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. Trough concentration of VCM reach a toxic level. Finally, she recovered on day 17.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam combination therapy: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) has been reported to increase the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the risk factors associated with AKI after VCM and PIPC/TAZ (VPT) administration have not yet been identified. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed patients treated with VPT to investigate the risk factors for AKI development.

METHODS

The study involved patients who were treated with VPT from January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2020. The patients were divided into the AKI or non-AKI group. The clinical characteristics of patients and antimicrobial therapy were compared between the groups. Their association with AKI risk was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 182 patients were included, with 118 in the non-AKI group and 64 in the AKI group. Therefore, the incidence of AKI was 35.2 %. The initiation of VPT combination therapy on the same day and concomitant use of vasopressors were associated with an increased risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95 % confidential interval [CI] 1.20-5.44 and OR 3.22, 95 % CI 1.31-7.89, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the concomitant use of vasopressors and initiating VPT combination therapy on the same day are likely risk factors for AKI development.