Ceftolozane/tazobactam for refractory P. aeruginosa endocarditis: A case report and pharmacokinetic analysis

Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes for patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate clinical outcomes of patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis and identify factors associated with treatment failure.

METHODS

Adult patients meeting definitive Duke's criteria for Pseudomonas endocarditis at 11 hospitals were identified between May 2000 and February 2024. Failure was defined as death or microbiological failure by day 42. First-line therapy consisted of cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam alone or in combination.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 29% were persons who inject drugs and 13% were organ transplant recipients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the causative species in 98% of cases. Patients who experienced 42 day cure were more likely to be initially managed with first-line β-lactam agents compared with those who experienced clinical failure (97% versus 62%, P = 0.004). Treatment with first-line β-lactams was associated with shorter time to treatment initiation and a lower likelihood of infection due to MDR Pseudomonas spp. In the univariate model, patients who experienced 90 day mortality were more likely to have prosthetic valve endocarditis (57% versus 24%, P = 0.02), an intracardiac complication (36% versus 9%, P = 0.04) and a higher median (IQR) Pitt bacteraemia score [2.5 (2-3.8) versus 1 (0-2), P = 0.048]. Combination therapy did not improve clinical outcomes but did increase the rate of adverse effects resulting in drug discontinuation compared with monotherapy, (21% versus 0%, P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study of Pseudomonas endocarditis to date. We identified improved clinical outcomes when cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam were used for initial treatment. We did not identify a clinical benefit for combination treatment.

Jumping into the future: overcoming pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic hurdles to optimize the treatment of severe difficult to treat-Gram-negative infections with novel beta-lactams

INTRODUCTION

The choice of best therapeutic strategy for difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Gram-negative infections currently represents an unmet clinical need.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a critical reappraisal of real-world evidence supporting the role of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) optimization of novel beta-lactams in the management of DTR Gram-negative infections. The aim was to focus on prolonged and/or continuous infusion administration, penetration rates into deep-seated infections, and maximization of PK/PD targets in special renal patient populations. Retrieved findings were applied to the three most critical clinical scenarios of Gram-negative resistance phenotypes (i.e. carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii).

EXPERT OPINION

Several studies supported the role of PK/PD optimization of beta-lactams in the management of DTR Gram-negative infections for both maximizing clinical efficacy and preventing resistance emergence. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy with novel beta-lactams based on the so called 'antimicrobial therapy puzzle' PK/PD concepts may represent a definitive jump into the future toward a personalized patient management of DTR Gram negative infections. Establishing a dedicated and coordinated multidisciplinary team and implementing a real-time TDM-guided personalized antimicrobial exposure optimization of novel beta-lactams based on expert clinical pharmacological interpretation, could represent crucial cornerstones for the proper management of DTR Gram-negative infections.