1
|
Mahmood B, Sárvári KP, Orosz L, Nagy E, Sóki J. Novel and rare β-lactamase genes of Bacteroides fragilis group species: Detection of the genes and characterization of their genetic backgrounds. Anaerobe 2024; 86:102832. [PMID: 38360202 DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study screened the prevalence of rare β-lactamase genes in Bacteroides fragilis group strains from clinical specimens and normal microbiota and examined the genetic properties of the strains carrying these genes. METHODS blaHGD1, blaOXA347, cblA, crxA, and pbbA were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction in collections of Bacteroides strains from clinical (n = 406) and fecal (n = 184) samples. To examine the genetic backgrounds of the samples, end-point PCR, FT-IR, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry were used. RESULTS All B. uniformis isolates were positive for cblA in both collections. Although crxA was B. xylanisolvens-specific and associated with carbapenem resistance, it was only found in six fecal and three clinical B. xylanisolvens strains. Moreover, the crxA-positive strains were not clonal among B. xylanisolvens (contrary to cfiA in B. fragilis), implicating a rate of mobility or emergence by independent evolutionary events. The Phocaeicola (B.) vulgatus/P. dorei-specific gene blaHGD1 was detected among all P. vulgatus/P. dorei isolates from fecal (n = 36) and clinical (n = 26) samples. No blaOXA347-carrying isolate was found from European collections, but all US samples (n = 6) were positive. For three clinical isolates belonging to B. thetaiotaomicron (n = 2) and B. ovatus (n = 1), pbbA was detected on mobile genetic elements, and pbbA-positive strains displayed non-susceptibility to piperacillin or piperacillin/tazobactam phenotypically. CONCLUSIONS Based on these observations, β-lactamases produced by rare β-lactamase genes in B. fragilis group strains should not be overlooked because they could encode important resistance phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bakhtiyar Mahmood
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre and Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Department of Biology, University of Garmian, Kalar, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
| | - Károly Péter Sárvári
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre and Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Laszló Orosz
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre and Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Elisabeth Nagy
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre and Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - József Sóki
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre and Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
English J, Newberry F, Hoyles L, Patrick S, Stewart L. Genomic analyses of Bacteroides fragilis: subdivisions I and II represent distinct species. J Med Microbiol 2023; 72. [PMID: 37910167 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Bacteroides fragilis is a Gram-negative anaerobe that is a member of the human gastrointestinal microbiota and is frequently found as an extra-intestinal opportunistic pathogen. B. fragilis comprises two distinct groups - divisions I and II - characterized by the presence/absence of genes [cepA and ccrA (cfiA), respectively] that confer resistance to β-lactam antibiotics by either serine or metallo-β-lactamase production. No large-scale analyses of publicly available B. fragilis sequence data have been undertaken, and the resistome of the species remains poorly defined.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Reclassification of divisions I and II B. fragilis as two distinct species has been proposed but additional evidence is required.Aims. To investigate the genomic diversity of GenBank B. fragilis genomes and establish the prevalence of division I and II strains among publicly available B. fragilis genomes, and to generate further evidence to demonstrate that B. fragilis division I and II strains represent distinct genomospecies.Methodology. High-quality (n=377) genomes listed as B. fragilis in GenBank were included in pangenome and functional analyses. Genome data were also subject to resistome profiling using The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database.Results. Average nucleotide identity and phylogenetic analyses showed B. fragilis divisions I and II represent distinct species: B. fragilis sensu stricto (n=275 genomes) and B. fragilis A (n=102 genomes; Genome Taxonomy Database designation), respectively. Exploration of the pangenome of B. fragilis sensu stricto and B. fragilis A revealed separation of the two species at the core and accessory gene levels.Conclusion. The findings indicate that B. fragilis A, previously referred to as division II B. fragilis, is an individual species and distinct from B. fragilis sensu stricto. The B. fragilis pangenome analysis supported previous genomic, phylogenetic and resistome screening analyses collectively reinforcing that divisions I and II are two separate species. In addition, it was confirmed that differences in the accessory genes of B. fragilis divisions I and II are primarily associated with carbohydrate metabolism and suggest that differences other than antimicrobial resistance could also be used to distinguish between these two species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie English
- Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Fiona Newberry
- Department of Biosciences, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lesley Hoyles
- Department of Biosciences, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sheila Patrick
- Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
| | - Linda Stewart
- Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kajihara T, Yahara K, Kitamura N, Hirabayashi A, Hosaka Y, Sugai M. Distribution, Trends, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteroides, Clostridium, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella Species Causing Bacteremia in Japan During 2011-2020: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on National Surveillance Data. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad334. [PMID: 37469615 PMCID: PMC10352651 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of anaerobic bacteremia is a major concern worldwide and requires longitudinal monitoring. Methods We present one of the largest and longest longitudinal studies on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Bacteroides, Clostridium, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella spp. isolated from blood culture samples using national comprehensive surveillance data in Japan during 2011-2020 as part of the Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance. Results Data for 41 949 Bacteroides spp., 40 603 Clostridium spp., 7013 Fusobacterium spp., and 5428 Prevotella spp. isolates were obtained. The incidences of bacteremia caused by Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium perfringens, and Fusobacterium nucleatum significantly increased during the period (P < .0001). Among the 20 species analyzed, 18 showed no significant changes in susceptibility over time, including B. fragilis, C perfringens, and F. nucleatum. However, resistance to clindamycin increased in B. thetaiotaomicron (P = .0312), and resistance to ampicillin increased in B. ovatus (P = .0008). Conclusions Our comprehensive national surveillance data analysis demonstrated a continuous increase in the incidence of anaerobic bacteremia, particularly in B. fragilis, C. perfringens, and F. nucleatum. This may be linked to the increasing number of colorectal cancer cases or advancing methods for species identification and susceptibility testing, requiring cautious interpretation. The discovery of an upsurge in anaerobic bacteremia and potential alterations in susceptibility highlights the necessity for more extensive studies in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Kajihara
- Correspondence: Toshiki Kajihara, MD, Phd, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 4-2-1 Aoba-cho Higashimurayama, Tokyo 189-0002, Japan ()
| | - Koji Yahara
- Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norikazu Kitamura
- Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aki Hirabayashi
- Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yumiko Hosaka
- Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reissier S, Penven M, Guérin F, Cattoir V. Recent Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Anaerobic Clinical Isolates. Microorganisms 2023; 11:1474. [PMID: 37374976 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11061474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Anaerobic bacteria are normal inhabitants of the human commensal microbiota and play an important role in various human infections. Tedious and time-consuming, antibiotic susceptibility testing is not routinely performed in all clinical microbiology laboratories, despite the increase in antibiotic resistance among clinically relevant anaerobes since the 1990s. β-lactam and metronidazole are the key molecules in the management of anaerobic infections, to the detriment of clindamycin. β-lactam resistance is usually mediated by the production of β-lactamases. Metronidazole resistance remains uncommon, complex, and not fully elucidated, while metronidazole inactivation appears to be a key mechanism. The use of clindamycin, a broad-spectrum anti-anaerobic agent, is becoming problematic due to the increase in resistance rate in all anaerobic bacteria, mainly mediated by Erm-type rRNA methylases. Second-line anti-anaerobes are fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, and linezolid. This review aims to describe the up-to-date evolution of antibiotic resistance, give an overview, and understand the main mechanisms of resistance in a wide range of anaerobes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Reissier
- Rennes University Hospital, Department of Clinical Microbiology, F-35033 Rennes, France
- UMR_S1230 BRM, Inserm, University of Rennes, F-35043 Rennes, France
| | - Malo Penven
- Rennes University Hospital, Department of Clinical Microbiology, F-35033 Rennes, France
- UMR_S1230 BRM, Inserm, University of Rennes, F-35043 Rennes, France
| | - François Guérin
- Rennes University Hospital, Department of Clinical Microbiology, F-35033 Rennes, France
- UMR_S1230 BRM, Inserm, University of Rennes, F-35043 Rennes, France
| | - Vincent Cattoir
- Rennes University Hospital, Department of Clinical Microbiology, F-35033 Rennes, France
- UMR_S1230 BRM, Inserm, University of Rennes, F-35043 Rennes, France
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, CEDEX 9, F-35033 Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kierzkowska M, Majewska A, Karłowicz K, Pituch H. Phenotypic and genotypic identification of carbapenem resistance in Bacteroides fragilis clinical strains. Med Microbiol Immunol 2023:10.1007/s00430-023-00765-w. [PMID: 37178261 DOI: 10.1007/s00430-023-00765-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Bacteroides fragilis is an important etiological agent of serious infections in humans. Rapid methods, readily adaptable to use in medical laboratories, are needed to detect antibiotic resistance and decrease the likelihood of therapy failure. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of B. fragilis cfiA-positive isolates. The second purpose was to investigate the carbapenemase activity in B. fragilis strains by Carba NP test. In the study, 5.2% of B. fragilis isolates are phenotypically resistant to meropenem. The cfiA gene was identified in 6.1% of B. fragilis isolates. The MICs of meropenem were significantly higher in cfiA-positive strains. The presence of the cfiA gene along with the IS1186 was detected in one B. fragilis strain which was resistant to meropenem (MIC 1.5 mg/L). The Carba NP test results were positive for all the cfiA-positive strains, including those susceptible to carbapenems based on their MIC values. A review of the literature revealed that the rate of B. fragilis with the cfiA gene varies from 7.6 to 38.9% worldwide. Presented results are in line with the other European studies. Phenotypic testing with the Carba NP test, it seems to be a viable alternative for the cfiA gene detection in B. fragilis isolates. The positive result obtained is of greater clinical importance than the detection of the gene cfiA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Kierzkowska
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Majewska
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Konrad Karłowicz
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Hanna Pituch
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|