Molecular Profiling of Immune Activation Associated with Regression of Melanoma Metastases Induced by Diphencyprone

Modulation of Inflammatory Proteins in Serum May Reflect Cutaneous Immune Responses in Cancer Immunotherapy

Diphencyprone (DPCP), a topical contact sensitizer, has shown efficacy in treating cutaneous melanoma metastases, including at times beyond the directly treated sites, but biomarkers indicative of treatment response have not been characterized. Thus, we performed a proteomic analysis of the skin and serum of five patients with cutaneous melanoma metastases treated with DPCP on days 0, 63, and 112 of the treatment course. In the serum, we found a significant upregulation (P < 0.05) in 13 of 96 assessed immuno-oncology proteins after DPCP treatment. Upregulated proteins included those of the T helper 1 axis (CXCL9, CXCL10), immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1), and various proteins with roles in promoting tumor immunity such as CD80 and TNFRSF4/9. Given the positive clinical response to topical treatment noted in the five patients studied, these proteins may represent prognostic biomarkers in the serum for evaluating the efficacy of DPCP treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases. Because DPCP does not lead to nonspecific immune-related adverse events seen with immune checkpoint inhibitors, our study provides evidence for potential tumor-specific systemic immune activation and systemic antitumor effectors elicited by topical DPCP.

Unique protein signatures evolve during the course of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in human skin

Diphencyprone (DPCP) is a hapten that causes a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction when applied topically. It has clinical uses in the treatment of various conditions such as melanoma metastases, warts, and alopecia areata, but the mechanisms are currently not well understood in humans. To further characterize the immunologic effects of DPCP, the authors performed a proteomic analysis of normal skin of eight healthy volunteers following a single application of DPCP and compared them with placebo-treated skin from the same volunteers. A total of 96 proteins were examined using the Olink immuno-oncology panel at 3 days (peak response), 14 days (partially resolved response), and 120 days (completely resolved response). Our analysis revealed significant upregulation of markers of immune cell activation (interleukin [IL] 8), vascular and tissue remodeling (matrix metallopeptidase 12 [MMP12], nitric oxide synthase 3 [NOS3]), antineoplastic markers (granzyme B [GZMB]), and the Th1 axis (interferon gamma [IFNG], chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand [CXCL] 9, CXCL10, CXCL11) at days 3 and 14 compared with placebo (p < 0.05). In addition, several negative regulators of immune function such as programmed cell death 1 (PD1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) (p < 0.001), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) (p < 0.05) were significantly upregulated at days 3 and 14. This induction of negative regulators may explain the seemingly paradoxical therapeutic benefits of DPCP in autoimmune conditions such as alopecia areata. The current analysis also indicated IL-4 upregulation only at day 3, followed by IL-12 upregulation only at day 14, suggesting a transient Th2 response followed by Th1 polarization. Overall, these data suggest a complex and evolving immunological delayed-type hypersensitivity response to a single application of DPCP over time. Future proteomic studies of samples from patients with melanoma metastases, warts, and alopecia areata treated long term with DPCP are needed to further evaluate its pharmacologic mechanisms.

Proteomic profiling of a patient with cutaneous melanoma metastasis regression following topical contact sensitizer diphencyprone and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as pembrolizumab have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma, but many patients do not respond to ICIs alone, and thus there is need for additional treatment options. Topical immunomodulators such as diphencyprone (DPCP) also have clinical use in advanced melanoma, particularly in the treatment of cutaneous metastases. In a previous report, we characterized the enhanced clinical response to dual agent immunotherapy with pembrolizumab and DPCP in a patient with cutaneous melanoma metastases. To improve mechanistic understanding of this response, we analyzed proteomic data using the Olink immuno-oncology panel of 96 biomarkers from tissue and serum samples of this patient throughout his treatment course. Particular attention was paid to programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) given they are all targeted by ICIs in clinical practice. These proteins were upregulated during the period of DPCP monotherapy, then downregulated during pembrolizumab monotherapy, and then robustly upregulated again during dual therapy. Although not exclusively, the induction of checkpoint inhibitor proteins in the presence of DPCP suggests potential synergy between this agent and ICIs in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases. Large-scale investigation is warranted to further evaluate this potential novel combination therapeutic approach.

Topical and intralesional therapies for in-transitmelanoma

This report surveys the role of topical and intralesional agents in the management of in-transit melanoma. The extent and progression of in-transit disease is highly variable and many patients can have a protracted period of locoregional control. These agents are useful in the management of patients who have progressed beyond local surgical excision in whom more aggressive therapies, such as isolated limb infusion or use of talimogene laherparepvec, are not appropriate or have failed. In general, these agents are modestly effective and associated with frequent but only minor toxicity. As the mechanism of action of many of these agents includes initiation of a local immune response, combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently being explored.