1
|
Chambers DA, Emmons KM. Navigating the field of implementation science towards maturity: challenges and opportunities. Implement Sci 2024; 19:26. [PMID: 38481286 PMCID: PMC10936041 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01352-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The field of implementation science has significantly expanded in size and scope over the past two decades, although work related to understanding implementation processes have of course long preceded the more systematic efforts to improve integration of evidence-based interventions into practice settings. While this growth has had significant benefits to research, practice, and policy, there are some clear challenges that this period of adolescence has uncovered. MAIN BODY This invited commentary reflects on the development of implementation science, its rapid growth, and milestones in its establishment as a viable component of the biomedical research enterprise. The authors reflect on progress in research and training, and then unpack some of the consequences of rapid growth, as the field has grappled with the competing challenges of legitimacy among the research community set against the necessary integration and engagement with practice and policy partners. The article then enumerates a set of principles for the field's next developmental stage and espouses the aspirational goal of a "big tent" to support the next generation of impactful science. CONCLUSION For implementation science to expand its relevance and impact to practice and policy, researchers must not lose sight of the original purpose of the field-to support improvements in health and health care at scale, the importance of building a community of research and practice among key partners, and the balance of rigor, relevance, and societal benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 3E-414, Rockville, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA.
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang XJ, Lin J, Feng L, Ou M, Gong FQ. Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074752. [PMID: 38000814 PMCID: PMC10679995 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Healthcare ultimately aims to eradicate diseases and restore normality to people's lives. However, until this is achieved for every person, there is a need to support and assist patients with psoriasis using non-pharmacological interventions. These 'adjuvant' approaches have received little attention, whereas dermatologists and researchers strive for better pharmacological therapy. Here, we aimed to perform a scoping review to identify and catalogue non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis. DESIGN A scoping review. SETTING All healthcare settings. SEARCH STRATEGY EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to June 2022. Irrespective of the study type, the studies included non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis. This theme was extracted from the included articles. Two reviewers independently screened and analysed the data. RESULTS From 1322 initial records, 71 studies were identified and analysed. Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis include two levels: organisational and individual. The organisational non-pharmacological interventions included the nationwide healthcare model (PsPSP, ProvenCare, German PsoHealth and Psoriasis Network, IMPROVE model and PsoWell clinic), innovative teledermatology models (mHealth app, electronic Targeted Intervention for Psoriasis study and therapist-guided internet-based cognitive and behavioural treatments) and multidisciplinary interventions. The individual non-pharmacological interventions included educational interventions (therapeutic patient education, psychoeducational intervention and self-management education), psychosocial interventions (cognitive and behavioural treatments, self-help and peer-to-peer support programmes) and others (happify and motivational interviewing-based training). CONCLUSIONS Based on previous literature, a nationwide healthcare model protocol was constructed for patients with psoriasis. This provided the direction for developing a new psoriasis healthcare model and a basis for summarising the non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis, which helps them adjust to changes in the skin disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu-Jie Zhang
- School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
- Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Dalian, China
| | - Jingrong Lin
- Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Dalian, China
| | - Li Feng
- Department of Dermatology, Dalian Dermatology Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Minxing Ou
- Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Dalian, China
| | - Fu-Qing Gong
- School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leshem YA, Simpson EL, Apfelbacher C, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Schmitt J, Howells L, Gerbens LAA, Jacobson ME, Katoh N, Williams HC. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) implementation roadmap. Br J Dermatol 2023; 189:710-718. [PMID: 37548315 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Core outcome sets (COS) are consensus-driven sets of minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials. COS aim to reduce heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting, and selective outcome reporting. Implementing COS into clinical trials is challenging. Guidance to improve COS uptake in dermatology is lacking. OBJECTIVES To develop a structured practical guide to COS implementation. METHODS Members of the Harmonising Outcome Measurement for Eczema (HOME) executive committee developed an expert opinion-based roadmap founded on a combination of a review of the COS implementation literature, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative resources, input from HOME members and experience in COS development and clinical trials. RESULTS The data review and input from HOME members was synthesized into themes, which guided roadmap development: (a) barriers and facilitators to COS uptake based on stakeholder awareness/engagement and COS features; and (b) key implementation science principles (assessment-driven, data-centred, priority-based and context-sensitive). The HOME implementation roadmap follows three stages. Firstly, the COS uptake scope and goals need to be defined. Secondly, during COS development, preparation for future implementation is supported by establishing the COS as a credible evidence-informed consensus by applying robust COS development methodology, engaging multiple stakeholders, fostering sustained and global engagement, emphasizing COS ease of use and universal applicability, and providing recommendations on COS use. Thirdly, incorporating completed COS into primary (trials) and secondary (reviews) research is an iterative process starting with mapping COS uptake and stakeholders' attitudes, followed by designing and carrying out targeted implementation projects. Main themes for implementation projects identified at HOME are stakeholder awareness/engagement; universal applicability for different populations; and improving ease-of-use by reducing administrative and study burden. Formal implementation frameworks can be used to identify implementation barriers/facilitators and to design implementation strategies. The effect of these strategies on uptake should be evaluated and implementation plans adjusted accordingly. CONCLUSIONS COS can improve the quality and applicability of research and, so, clinical practice but can only succeed if used and reported consistently. The HOME implementation roadmap is an extension of the original HOME roadmap for COS development and provides a pragmatic framework to develop COS implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael A Leshem
- Division of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Eric L Simpson
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Laura Howells
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Louise A A Gerbens
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael E Jacobson
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Norito Katoh
- Department of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raharja A, Arkir Z, Rinaldi G, Tsakok T, Dasandi T, Guard S, McGuire A, Pink AE, Woolf R, Barker JN, Smith CH, Mahil SK. Real-World Implementation and Outcomes of Adalimumab Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psoriasis: A National Specialized Center Experience. J Invest Dermatol 2023; 143:1708-1716.e4. [PMID: 36889663 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Serum adalimumab concentration is a biomarker of treatment response but therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is yet to be implemented in routine psoriasis care. We incorporated adalimumab TDM in a national specialized psoriasis service and evaluated it using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) implementation science framework. We undertook pre-implementation planning (validating local assays) and implementation interventions targeted to patients (pragmatic sampling at routine reviews), clinicians (introduction of a TDM protocol), and healthcare systems (adalimumab TDM as a key performance indicator). Over 5 months, 170 of 229 (74%) individuals treated with adalimumab received TDM. Clinical improvement after TDM-guided dose escalation occurred in 13 of 15 (87%) nonresponders with serum drug concentrations <8.3 μg/ml (median PASI reduction of 3.2 [interquartile range = 2.2-8.2] after 23.4 weeks) and in all nonresponders who had TDM-guided switch in biologic due to supratherapeutic drug concentrations (>8.3 μg/ml; n = 2) or positive antidrug antibody (n = 2) (PASI reduction of 7.8 [interquartile range = 7.5-12.9] after 20.0 weeks). Proactive TDM led to dose reduction in five individuals with clear skin and subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic drug concentrations; four (80%) sustained clear skin after 50 weeks (range = 42-52). Adalimumab TDM based on pragmatic serum sampling is clinically viable and may lead to patient benefit. Context-specific implementation interventions and systematic implementation assessment may bridge the biomarker research-to-practice gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Raharja
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zehra Arkir
- Reference Chemistry, Synnovis, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giulia Rinaldi
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Teresa Tsakok
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tejus Dasandi
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Guard
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arlene McGuire
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew E Pink
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Woolf
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan N Barker
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine H Smith
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Satveer K Mahil
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chu L, Yeung H. Developing and implementing approaches to limit antimicrobial resistance. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 87:e187-e188. [PMID: 35952833 PMCID: PMC10353745 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.03.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Chu
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Howa Yeung
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Clinical Resource Hub, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 7, Decatur, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Briggs SM, Lipoff JB, Collier SM. Using Implementation Science to Understand Teledermatology Implementation Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study (Preprint). JMIR DERMATOLOGY 2021; 5:e33833. [PMID: 35720247 PMCID: PMC9191554 DOI: 10.2196/33833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation science has been recognized for its potential to improve the integration of evidence-based practices into routine dermatologic care. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in rapid teledermatology implementation worldwide. Although several studies have highlighted patient and care provider satisfaction with teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic, less is known about the implementation process. Objective Our goal was to use validated tools from implementation science to develop a deeper understanding of the implementation of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our primary aims were to describe (1) the acceptability and feasibility of the implementation of teledermatology and (2) organizational readiness for the implementation of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also sought to offer an example of how implementation science can be used in dermatologic research. Methods An anonymous, web-based survey was distributed to Association of Professors of Dermatology members. It focused on (1) the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of teledermatology and (2) organizational readiness for implementing teledermatology. It incorporated subscales from the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment—a validated measure of organizational characteristics that predict implementation success. Results Of the 518 dermatologists emailed, 35 (7%) responded, and all implemented or scaled up teledermatology during the pandemic. Of the 11 care providers with the highest level of organizational readiness, 11 (100%) said that they plan to continue using teledermatology after the pandemic. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they had sufficient training (24/35, 69%), financial resources (20/35, 57%), and facilities (20/35, 57%). However, of the 35 respondents, only 15 (43%) agreed or strongly agreed that they had adequate staffing support. Most respondents considered the most acceptable teledermatology modality to be synchronous audio and video visits with supplemental stored digital photos (23/35, 66%) and considered the least acceptable modality to be telephone visits without stored digital photos (6/35, 17%). Overall, most respondents thought that the implementation of synchronous audio and video with stored digital photos (31/35, 89%) and telephone visits with stored digital photos (31/35, 89%) were the most feasible. When asked about types of visits that were acceptable for synchronous video/audio visits (with stored digital photos), 18 of the 31 respondents (58%) said “new patients,” 27 (87%) said “existing patients,” 19 (61%) said “medication monitoring,” 3 (10%) said “total body skin exams,” and 22 (71%) said “lesions of concern.” Conclusions This study serves as an introduction to how implementation science research methods can be used to understand the implementation of novel technologies in dermatology. Our work builds upon prior studies by further characterizing the acceptability and feasibility of different teledermatology modalities. Our study may suggest initial insights on how dermatology practices and health care systems can support dermatologists in successfully incorporating teledermatology after the pandemic.
Collapse
|
7
|
Williams HC, Rogers NK, Chalmers JR, Thomas KS. Scoping the international impact from four independent national dermatology trials. Clin Exp Dermatol 2020; 46:657-662. [PMID: 33179251 DOI: 10.1111/ced.14506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research impact describes whether and how research results in wider benefits to society beyond academic publication. Little is known about translation of clinical trial research into dermatological practice. AIM We scoped international impact from four independently funded clinical trials published by our group over the past 10 years. METHODS This was a scoping survey of 35 international colleagues from 22 countries followed by a narrative summary of emergent themes. RESULTS All recipients kindly responded to the survey. At least 20 emergent themes were identified, which broadly included: (i) interest and enthusiasm in the concept of trying to document clinical trial impact; (ii) direct impacts such as adoption of the drug as tested and recommended from the trial results, including more confidence using the drug in slightly different ways for the same condition; (iii) the finding that trial impact was dependent on factors such as drug availability and country-specific disease patterns; and (iv) the educational value of good trial design for journal club discussions and improving future clinical trial designs in dermatology. Our survey suggests that uptake into clinical practice was surprisingly rapid and widespread. CONCLUSION Clinical trial research is of little use unless findings are translated into clinical practice for patient benefit. Our international scoping survey suggests that independent clinical trials that address important questions identified by the dermatology community have substantial, diverse and far-reaching impacts on dermatological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, King's Meadow Campus, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - N K Rogers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, King's Meadow Campus, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, King's Meadow Campus, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - K S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, King's Meadow Campus, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|