Identification of smooth and rough forms in cultures of Brucella melitensis strains by flow cytometry

[Flow cytometry: is it a novel tool in microbiological diagnostics?]

Direct detection of pathogens is time- and labor-intensive. There is an increasing demand for new rapid microbiological testing methods, which would be faster and more sensitive than the conventional ones. Initially, automated methods were applied for the testing of bacteremia, urinary tract infections, characterization of antimicrobial susceptibility and quantitation of pathogen specific antibodies. Recently the nucleic acid-based detection methods have also become a routine. The molecular biological methods accelerate diagnosis, enhance specificity and provide an opportunity to identify pathogens with potential difficulties in culturing. However, they do not give any information about the immune status of the host. Yet it should also be borne in mind that detection of pathogen-specific nucleic acids is not equivalent to the presence of living microbes. The greatest advantage of FACS against these techniques is the capability to identify individual microbial cells as well. High speed FACS becomes a priority in the characterization of slow-growing microbes and identification of pathogens in mixed infections. Last but not least, it allows the monitoring of immune status and follow up of antimicrobial therapy.