Anti-SAE antibodies in autoimmune myositis: Identification by unlabelled protein immunoprecipitation in an Italian patient cohort

Recent Updates on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of autoimmune myopathies, with a special focus on the latest advancements in understanding the role of autoantibodies. We will begin by examining the risk factors and triggers associated with myositis. Next, we will delve into recent research on how autoantibodies contribute to disease pathogenesis. Finally, we will explore the latest innovations in treatment strategies and their implications for our understanding of myositis pathogenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research has revealed that myositis-specific autoantibodies can infiltrate muscle cells and disrupt the function of their target autoantigens, playing a crucial role in disease pathogenesis. Significant advances in treatment include CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, JAK-STAT inhibitors, and novel strategies targeting the type 1 interferon pathway in dermatomyositis. Additionally, the ineffectiveness of complement inhibitors in treating immune-mediated necrotizing myositis has challenged established views on disease mechanisms. Autoimmune myopathies are a collection of disorders significantly influenced by specific autoantibodies that drive disease pathogenesis. This review highlights the critical role of autoantibody research in deepening our understanding of these conditions and discusses recent therapeutic advancements targeting key pathogenic pathways.

Patients with anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme-positive dermatomyositis resembling antisynthetase syndrome with poor prognosis: a bicentric international retrospective study and literature review

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe adult Brazilian and Japanese patients with anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SEA)-positive dermatomyositis (DM), as there are few studies in the literature. A literature review was also conducted.

METHODS

This bicentric international retrospective study, conducted between 2012 and 2023, included patients with anti-SAE-positive DM (2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria). All demographic features and clinical, laboratory, therapeutic, and follow-up data were collected from Brazilian and Japanese centers using pre-standardized and parameterized information.

RESULTS

We included 17 adult patients with a median age of 65 (56-76) and a predominance of females (82.4%). Constitutional symptoms at baseline were present in 58.8% of the patients. In addition to classical cutaneous DM lesions, one-third of the patients had myalgia and significant muscle weakness, whereas half presented with dysphagia, interstitial lung disease, and joint manifestations. The first-line treatment consisted of intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin pulse therapy in 41.2% and 28.6% of the patients, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 20 (13-74) months; at the last medical evaluation, half had active disease and were still using oral glucocorticoids (median dosage, 10.0 mg/day). Approximately one-fifth to one-third of the patients were diagnosed with different types of cancer, had severe infections, or died.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with anti-SAE-positive DM not only resemble the phenotype of antisynthetase syndrome but are also associated with a poor prognosis.

Juvenile dermatomyositis with Anti-SAE antibodies in a Moroccan child associated with pseudo-angioedema: a case report

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is the leading cause of non-infectious inflammatory myopathy in children. It is a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases characterized by a variable combination of muscular, dermatological, and visceral involvement. Myositis-specific autoantibodies help define homogeneous subgroups with common clinical characteristics and prognoses. Anti-SAE (small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO-1) activating enzyme) antibodies are among the most recently discovered specific autoantibodies. The presence of these antibodies is very rare, making it challenging to define clinical features and prognosis in the juvenile form. We report the first case of an African patient with juvenile dermatomyositis and positive anti-SAE antibodies.

CASE REPORT

A 5-year-3-month-old Moroccan boy presented to the pediatric emergency department with dysphagia that had been evolving for two days, preceded two months earlier by facial erythema associated with fatigue, lower limb pain, difficulty walking, and progressive inflammatory polyarthralgia. On admission, the child had a heliotrope rash with predominant pseudo-angioedema on the lips, periungual telangiectasia, and Gottron's papules over the bilateral interphalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints. The patient had a more pronounced proximal muscle weakness in the lower limbs. He had no urticaria, fever, arthritis, calcinosis, cutaneous ulcers, or lipodystrophy. The Joint examination was normal, as was the pleuropulmonary examination. The electroneuromyography showed myogenic changes in all four limbs. Laboratory findings showed elevated levels of creatine phosphokinase and lactate dehydrogenase and a mild inflammatory syndrome. The electrocardiogram was normal. The anti-SAE antibodies were positive. The boy was diagnosed with juvenile dermatomyositis. He received methylprednisolone bolus therapy followed by oral prednisone. The latter was gradually tapered in combination with weekly intramuscular methotrexate. As a result, dysphagia disappeared within 48 h. After two weeks, there was an improvement in the muscular score and a significant regression of facial pseudo-angioedema.

CONCLUSION

We report the first African patient with anti-SAE autoantibody-positive JDM. He had a typical dermatological manifestation of JDM associated with pseudo-angioedema predominant on the lips; a rarely reported sign in DM and JDM patients. The patient responded well to corticosteroid therapy and methotrexate.

Antibodies against Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier Activating Enzyme May Be a Protective Factor from Rapid Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients Bearing Antibodies against Melanoma Differentiation Associated Gene 5

Background: Anti-MDA5 antibody-bearing (anti-MDA5+)-dermatomyositis (DM) or polymyositis (PM) is notorious for causing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) and/or cancers with high mortality rate. However, anti-MDA5 antibodies (Abs) are also found in other connective tissue diseases and their link with RPILD, especially with regard to the mortality rate, are unknown. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 71 patients bearing anti-MDA5-Abs in serum, stratified them in terms of a presence or absence of RPILD, and evaluated their clinical features, laboratory findings, associated myositis antibodies, concurrent connective tissue disease (CTD) as well as newly developed malignancies. Results: In total, 39 (55%) patients presented with DM/PM, but 32 (45%) did not. In total, 22 of the former and 11 of the latter developed RPILD eventually, accounting for a total of 46% of all MDA-5 bearing patients. On the other hand, 15 of all 71 (21.1%) patients had cancers. Among the 32 patients who did not have DM/PM, 27 (38.0% of all 71) had other CTDs, indicating that only 5 (7.0% of 71) patients did not have CTDs. Senility (odds ratio (OR) = 1.816, p = 0.032), presence of anti-Ro-52 antibody (OR = 1.676, p = 0.018), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP, OR = 4.354, p < 0.001) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, OR = 2.625, p = 0.005) posed risks for RPILD. High lactose dehydrogenase (LDH, p = 0.009), CRP (p = 0.001) and CEA (p = 0.001), ferritin (p ≤ 0.001) and low albumin (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality. Anti-SAE antibodies were negatively correlated with RPILD as analyzed by univariate (OR = 0.245, p = 0.017) and multivariate (OR = 0.058, p = 0.036) regressions, indicating that they may be a protective factor in relation to RPILD (OR = 0.543, p = 0.008) or fatality (OR = 0.707, p = 0.012), which was also demonstrated in subgroup analyses. Conclusions: In contrast to various risk factors for RPILD or mortality, anti-SAE antibodies might conversely be a protective factor in anti-MDA5+ patients.

Anti-SAE autoantibody in dermatomyositis: original comparative study and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Among specific autoantibodies in DM, the anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody is rare. We aim to describe the clinical characteristics, cancer prevalence, and muscle pathology of anti-SAE-positive DM.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of DM and sera positive for the anti-SAE antibody were recruited from 19 centres in this retrospective observational study. The available muscular biopsies were reviewed. We conducted a comparison with anti-SAE-negative DM and a review of the literature.

RESULTS

Of the patients in the study (n = 49), 84% were women. Skin involvement was typical in 96% of patients, with 10% having calcinosis, 18% ulceration and 12% necrosis; 35% presented with a widespread skin rash. Muscular disease affected 84% of patients, with mild weakness [Medical Research Council (MRC) scale 4 (3, 5)], although 39% of patients had dysphagia. Muscular biopsies showed typical DM lesions. Interstitial lung disease was found in 21% of patients, mainly with organizing pneumonia pattern, and 26% of patients showed dyspnoea. Cancer-associated myositis was diagnosed in 16% of patients and was responsible for the majority of deaths, its prevalence being five times that of the general population. IVIG therapy was administered to 51% of the patients during the course of the disease. Comparison with anti-SAE-negative DM (n = 85) showed less and milder muscle weakness (P = 0.02 and P = 0.006, respectively), lower creatinine kinase levels (P < 0.0001) and less dyspnoea (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Anti-SAE positive DM is a rare subgroup associated with typical skin features but a potentially diffuse rash, a mild myopathy. Interstitial lung disease defines an organizing pneumonia pattern. Cancer associated DM prevalence is five times that of the general population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04637672.

Current Biomarker Strategies in Autoimmune Neuromuscular Diseases

Inflammatory neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of immune-mediated diseases with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. The identification of specific biomarkers has the potential to provide valuable insights into disease pathogenesis, aid in accurate diagnosis, predict disease course, and monitor treatment efficacy. However, the rarity and heterogeneity of these disorders pose significant challenges in the identification and implementation of reliable biomarkers. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of biomarkers currently established in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), myasthenia gravis (MG), and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). It highlights the existing biomarkers in these disorders, including diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and monitoring biomarkers, while emphasizing the unmet need for additional specific biomarkers. The limitations and challenges associated with the current biomarkers are discussed, and the potential implications for disease management and personalized treatment strategies are explored. Collectively, biomarkers have the potential to improve the management of inflammatory neuromuscular disorders. However, novel strategies and further research are needed to establish clinically meaningful biomarkers.

The interferon in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Different signatures and new therapeutic perspectives. A literature review

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), even though sharing common clinical manifestations, are characterized by diversified molecular pathogenetic mechanisms which may account for the partial inefficacy of currently used immunomodulatory drugs. In the last decades, the role of interferon (IFN) in IIM has been extensively elucidated thanks to genomic and proteomic studies which have assessed the molecular signature at the level of affected tissues or in peripheral blood across distinct IIM subtypes. A predominant type I IFN response has been shown in dermatomyositis (DM), being especially enhanced in MDA5+ DM, while a type 2 IFN profile characterizes anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) and inclusion body myositis (IBM); conversely, a less robust IFN footprint has been defined for immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Intracellular IFN signaling is mediated by the janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) through dedicated transmembrane receptors and specific cytoplasmic molecular combinations. These results may have therapeutic implications and led to evaluating the efficacy of new targeted drugs such as the recently introduced janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. In this review we aim to summarize the most significant evidence of IFN role in IIM pathogenesis and to describe the current state of the art about the ongoing clinical trials on IFN-targeting drugs, with particular focus on JAKi.

Juvenile dermatomyositis associated with autoantibodies to small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme: a report of 4 cases from North India and a review of literature

BACKGROUND

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the commonest inflammatory myositis in children. The clinical phenotype is often characterized by the presence of myositis-specific antibodies (MSA). Antibodies to small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) are amongst the rarest MSA reported in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of medical records of all patients diagnosed to have JDM during the period January 1992-April 2022 in our institute was done. Case records of children with JDM who had significant positivity for anti-SAE antibody by myositis immunoblot were analysed in detail.

RESULTS

Of the 140 children with JDM, MSA immunoblot was carried out in 53 patients-4 (7.5%) amongst these had significant positivity for anti-SAE antibodies. Median age of onset of symptoms was 5.5 years (range: 5-11 years). Clinical features at presentation included fever, photosensitivity, heliotrope rash, and Gottron papules. Clinically significant proximal muscle weakness was noted in 3/4 patients; 1 had no discernible weakness but had radiological evidence of myositis. None of the 4 patients had evidence of interstitial lung disease or calcinosis. All patients were treated with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone: subcutaneous weekly methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine. One patient received mycophenolate mofetil because of a relapse of muscle disease, while none received cyclophosphamide or biologics. Median follow-up duration was 21.5 months (range: 6-39 months).

CONCLUSION

Anti-SAE antibodies were found in 4/53 (7.5%) of North Indian children with JDM. All 4 patients had predominant cutaneous manifestations followed by muscle disease. Response to treatment was brisk and sustained. None had developed calcinosis in the follow-up.

KEY MESSAGES

1. We report high prevalence of anti-SAE antibody positivity (7.5%) in North Indian cohort of JDM. 2. Cutaneous disease precedes muscle weakness in children with anti-SAE positive JDM. 3. No evidence of interstitial lung disease/calcinosis was seen in these children.

Autoantibody Markers of Increased Risk of Malignancy in Patients with Dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the skin and muscles. It most commonly occurs in adults with preponderance in females, but pediatric occurrence is also possible. The risk of malignancy in adult patients with dermatomyositis was reported to be 4.66-fold higher compared to that in the general population. A significantly increased risk of malignancy was reported within the first 12 months following the diagnosis of dermatomyositis (standardized incidence ratio equaled 17). One of the characteristic laboratory findings associated with dermatomyositis is the presence of circulating autoantibodies which are classified into two subgroups: myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies. It was shown that specific types of antibodies might be associated with an increased risk of malignancy. Current literature data indicate that the strongest correlation with malignant diseases was reported in anti-TIF1-γ-positive patients who were at a 9.37-fold higher risk of cancer. A 3.68-fold increase in the risk of cancer was also reported among patients with anti-NXP2 antibodies. Malignant diseases were reported in 14-57% of patients with anti-SAE antibodies. The presence of other autoantibodies may also be associated with an increased risk of malignancy. These data indicate that patients with circulating anti-TIF1-γ, anti-NXP2, and anti-SAE should be very closely monitored for dermatomyositis-associated malignant comorbidities. The aim of this review is to summarize the current data regarding the link between malignancy and the presence of specific antibodies in patients with dermatomyositis.

Update on dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes and comments on current knowledge in dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification of dermatomyositis has been challenging by the discovery of clinicopathological features associated with dermatomyositis-specific antibody (DMSA) that were not incorporated in the original criteria. These features include but may not be limited to the presence of perifascicular necrosis in anti-Mi-2 dermatomyositis; presence of diffuse nonperifascicular sarcoplasmic myxovirus resistance protein A expression in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis; and dermatomyositis sine dermatitis in anti-NXP-2 dermatomyositis. Variations and subclassifications within the same DMSA subtypes are observed: anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis is clinically subcategorized into good, intermediate, and poor prognostic subgroups; concurrent anti-CCAR1 and anti-TIF1-γ positivity identify anti-TIF1-γ-positive patient with a lower risk for cancer-associated myositis. Owing to distinct IFN1-signaling pathway activation in dermatomyositis, JAK-STAT inhibitor - the pathway-targeted therapy, have been studied with promising results in refractory dermatomyositis and some new-onset dermatomyositis. In addition, the potential serum biomarkers for IFN1 pathway activation are being investigated for their performance in monitoring the disease activity and the efficacy of the treatment.

SUMMARY

DMSA, evidence of prominent IFN1 pathway activation, and risk/severity-associated biomarkers would likely play major roles in future dermatomyositis classification, disease monitoring, and treatment decision.

Profile of specific and associated autoantibodies in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in a Colombian population

Objectives

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are chronic, autoimmune diseases with several forms of presentation. Diagnosis is mostly clinical in our region. Our aim was to evaluate the autoantibody profile of patients with IIMs.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional study with a prospective recollection of data, conducted between 2019–2021, in a single center in Cali, Colombia. Patients with a clinical diagnosis or suspicion of IIM were included. The presence of myositis-specific/associated antibodies was evaluated by immunoblotting in serum samples. Phenotypic characterization was performed.

Results

A total of 36 patients were included. The mean age was 50.6 (16.7) years, and 20 (55.6%) were female. Eighteen (50%) patients were seropositive, of which 11 (30.5%) presented one positive antibody, with anti-TIF1ɣbeing the most frequent (n = 4, 11.1%), followed by anti-Ro52 (n = 2, 5.6%). Seven patients (19.4%) showed >1 positive antibody. Dermatomyositis was the most frequent type of IIM in seropositive patients (n = 8, 44.4%), followed by anti-synthetase syndrome (n = 4, 22.2%). Weakness was symmetric and presented in the upper and lower extremities in 11 (61.1%) patients each. Both respiratory insufficiency and weight loss were seen in 7 (38.9%) patients, Gottron papules in six (33.3%) patients, and heliotrope rash, esophageal dysmotility, and myalgia in 5 (27.8%) patients. Pulmonary interstitial disease was seen in 4 (22.2%, with antibodies for anti-Ro52, anti-MDA5 + anti-Jo1 + anti-TIF1ɣ, anti-MDA5 + anti-SAE1 + anti-NXP2, and anti-cN1A + anti-Ro52) patients, and malignancy was seen in 2 (11.1%) patients (1 with anti-Mi2β and 1 with anti-TIF1ɣ + anti-Mi2α). In all, 7 (19.4%) patients required intensive care (2 seropositive, 1 with anti-PL7, 1 with anti-MDA5 + anti-Jo1 + anti-TIF1ɣ), and 1 (2.8%) (seronegative) patient died.

Conclusion

This study is the first study in the Southwest of Colombia that evaluates myositis-specific/associated antibodies in IIM. Half of the patients were seropositive. Anti-TIF1ɣwas the most frequent MSA and anti-Ro52 was the most frequent MAA. Several patients presented antibody combinations. Further studies are needed to fully associate phenotypes with antibodies.

A Case of Anti-SAE1 Dermatomyositis

Introduction

Anti-SAE1 antibodies have a low prevalence in dermatomyositis patients. Case Description. A 61-year-old woman presented with progressive shortness of breath, arthralgia, heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules, and erythematous rash. She had an interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a significant decrease in lung function. There was no muscle involvement. Immunological laboratory test results showed strongly positive anti-SAE1 antibodies. Glucocorticoid treatment resulted in remission of dermatomyositis.

Conclusion

Anti-SAE antibodies in dermatomyositis patients are closely linked to unique clinical features.

Myositis Antibodies and Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a heterogeneous group of inflammatory and fibrotic conditions, often resulting in progressive lung function decline and increased mortality. Connective tissue disease (CTD) should be considered in all patients with ILD, as distinguishing between CTD-ILD and other forms of fibrotic lung disease has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) represent a CTD subtype of growing interest to ILD experts. The expansion and availability of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibody testing has allowed for improved disease detection and characterization.

CONTENT

In this review, we highlight the relationship between myositis antibodies and ILD. Select forms of IIM, such as the antisynthetase syndrome and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis can present with rapidly progressive ILD, warranting timely disease diagnosis and management. Disease phenotypes, prevalence, laboratory testing, prognosis, and management strategies are described according to select myositis antibodies.

SUMMARY

Myositis antibodies provide valuable information for clinicians managing patients with ILD. This review aims to increase awareness of their role in disease detection, pathophysiology, and possibly therapeutics.

Myositis-Specific Antibodies and Myositis-Associated Antibodies in Patients With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies From the PANLAR Myositis Study Group

BACKGROUND

Dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are forms of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), which are associated with the production of autoantibodies that are useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs), myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs), and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) in 6 Latin American countries.

METHODS

Two hundred ten patients with IIM were included in this cross-sectional study from 2014 to 2017: 112 from Mexico, 46 from Colombia, 20 from Peru, 16 from the Dominican Republic, 10 from Argentina, and 6 from Guatemala. Antinuclear autoantibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells. MSAs and MAAs were tested by a line immunoassay method. Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 210 IIM patients, 139 (66.2%) had DM, 59 (28%) PM, and 12 (5.7%) juvenile DM. The mean age was 43.5 (6-79 years); 158 (75.2%) were female, and 52 (24.8%) were male. The overall frequency of ANA was 60%. The most frequent patterns were fine speckled (AC-4) (78.3%) and cytoplasmic (AC-19) (6.45%). The most frequent MSA were anti-Mi-2 (38.5%) and anti-Jo-1 (11.9%). Anti-Mi-2 was more frequent in patients from Colombia (40.1%). The MAA more frequent were anti-Ro-52/TRIM21 (17.6%) and anti-PM-Scl75 (7.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study of ANA, MSA, and MAA in patients from 6 countries from the Panamerican League against Rheumatism myositis study group. We observed a general prevalence of 60% of ANA. In relation to MSA and MAA, anti-Mi-2 was the more frequent (38.5%).

A Case of Progressive Dyspnea: Lymphocytic Interstitial Pneumonia in Collagen Vascular Disease

We describe an interesting rare case of a 61-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital for exertional dyspnea, non-productive cough, and generalized weakness of six months duration. Her computed tomography was significant for ground-glass opacities combined with bibasilar consolidations and numerous pulmonary cysts. There can be a significant overlap in imaging findings of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lung disease and interstitial lung disease from autoimmune diseases. We review in extensive detail the differential diagnosis for these imaging findings from a pulmonologist’s perspective and discuss investigations required for further workup. Our patient underwent transbronchial biopsy and was eventually diagnosed with lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia with Sjogren predominant mixed connective tissue disease. We also review in detail the current literature and prognosis for this interesting disease.

Lymphocyte immunophenotyping in inflammatory myositis: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This is a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on predominant immune cell phenotypes involved in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Major circulating immune cell subpopulations described in IIM encompass the lymphocyte compartment. An unbalance in T cell subsets seems to consistently affect the peripheral and muscle compartment, with a predominance of CD4+ T and B cells in dermatomyositis, CD8+ T cells in polymyositis/inclusion body myositis (IBM) and novel findings highlighting novel proinflammatory T subsets, that is, CD8+Tbet+ and CD28- T cells across different IIM subsets. On the other hand, an impairment in Treg cells number and function has been described especially across polymyositis/dermatomyositis and IBM. Total T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, increased in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, skewed toward Tfh2 and Tfh17 in dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and juvenile dermatomyositis. B cell compartment is more rarely described in IIM, yet an unbalance in this pool is as well likely. Evidence of plasma cells increased in polymyositis, dermatomyositis, IBM, and Bregs decreased in dermatomyositis have been reported. Perturbations in the memory and naïve subsets are common in dermatomyositis/polymyositis and antisynthetase syndrome.

SUMMARY

Protean immune cell abnormalities characterize different IIM subsets, reflecting the complexity of these autoimmune conditions. A deeper understanding of B-cell and T-cell immunophenotyping may promote early diagnosis and identification of new potential therapeutic targets.

Myositis-specific antibodies and clinical characteristics in patients with autoimmune inflammatory myopathies: reported by the Argentine Registry of Inflammatory Myopathies of the Argentine Society of Rheumatology

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

To describe clinical features in patients with inflammatory myopathies (IMs) from the Argentine Registry of Inflammatory Myopathies, and their relationship with myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 360 adult patients with dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and inclusion body myositis. Demographics, clinical, and serological characteristics were retrospectively recorded (2016-2019). MSAs were determined by immunoblotting. Patients who were positive for anti-Jo-1, Mi-2, and MDA5 were compared against a group of patients, taken as reference group, who were negative for all MSAs.

RESULTS

Women 72%, median age at diagnosis was 47.3 years (18-82). The most frequent subtypes were DM (43.9%) followed by PM (30%).The most frequent MSAs were anti-Jo-1 (51/317), 16.1%; MDA5 (12/111), 10.8%, and Mi-2 (23/226), 10.2%. Anti-Jo-1 was associated (p < 0.05) with a higher frequency of chronic disease course, interstitial lung disease (ILD), arthritis, and mechanic's hands. Anti-Mi-2 was found in patients who had higher frequency of skin manifestations and higher CK values (p < 0.001). Patients with anti-MDA5 had normal or low CK levels. Anti-MDA5 was associated (p < 0.05) with skin manifestations, arthritis, and ILD. The rest of MSAs had frequencies lower than 8%. Anti-TIF1ϒ was found in eight DM patients and one had cancer. Anti-SRP was found in seven patients who had PM and elevated CK.

CONCLUSION

Anti-Jo-1 was the most frequent MSA, and was associated with ILD; MDA5 was associated with CADM and ILD, and Mi-2, with classical DM. Despite the different prevalence with respect to other cohorts, the clinical characteristics for each MSA group were similar to the data reported in other studies. Key Points • This study describes the prevalence of MSAs in the Argentine Registry of IMs. • Anti-Jo-1 and anti-MDA5 were associated with ILD. • Anti-Mi-2 was the third most frequent MSA, associated with classical DM.

Geographical Latitude Remains as an Important Factor for the Prevalence of Some Myositis Autoantibodies: A Systematic Review

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are characterized by muscular weakness, cutaneous manifestations, muscle damage revealed by increase of muscular enzymes, muscle biopsy, electromyography and changes on magnetic resonance imaging. However, the hallmark of these IIM, is the development of myositis specific antibodies (MSA) or myositis associated antibodies (MAA). The theories about their presence in the serum of IIM is not known. Some studies have suggested that some of these MSA, such as anti-Mi-2 increases according to the intensity of UV radiation. There is scarce information about the environmental factors that might contribute in order to be considered as triggering factors as UV radiation might be. In this review, we analyzed the reported prevalence of MSAs and MAAs regarding to their geographical location and the possible relation with UV radiation. We collected the prevalence data of fifteen MSA and thirteen MAA from 22 countries around the world and we were able to observe a difference in prevalence between countries and continents. We found differences in anti-PL7, anti-Ro52, anti-La and anti-Ku prevalence according to UV radiation level. Otherwise, we observed that anti-Mi-2 prevalence increases near to the Equator meanwhile anti-MJ/NXP2 and anti-ARS prevalence had an opposite behavior increasing their prevalence in the geographical locations farther to the Equator. Our results highlighted the importance to include the UV radiation and other environmental factors in IIM studies, in order to clarify its association with MSA and MAA prevalence as well as its possible role in the immunopathogenesis of these diseases.

A North American Cohort of Anti-SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases

Objective

Antibodies against the small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme (SAE) are one of the rarer specificities associated with dermatomyositis (DM). The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with anti‐SAE autoantibodies in a North American cohort and to ascertain cancer prevalence. We also describe the performance characteristics of the line blotting (Euroimmun) method for antibody detection compared with an immunoprecipitation‐based assay.

Methods

Sera from 2127 patients suspected of having myositis were assayed for myositis‐specific autoantibodies using the Euroimmun platform. Those positive for SAE autoantibodies were assayed by a second method (immunoprecipitation) for confirmation. Only those cases positive by both methods were taken as definite cases of anti‐SAE–positive DM. Chart reviews of these patients were completed to obtain information on clinical characteristics, cancer history, and treatment.

Results

Forty‐three of 2127 sera were anti‐SAE autoantibody positive by Euroimmun (≥15 units, +); of these, only 19 were confirmed positive by immunoprecipitation. All 19 cases had skin involvement and varying presentations of muscle, lung, and joint disease. Cancer occurred coincident with DM in two patients, and cancers were detected more than 5 years from symptom onset in three patients. In a population of suspected inflammatory myositis, a higher cutoff on line blot testing (≥36 units, ++) yielded better agreement with immunoprecipitation methods.

Conclusion

SAE autoantibodies associate with a clinical phenotype of DM, which most commonly presents with a rash first, followed by muscle involvement and varying extramuscular involvement. As coincident cancer was seen in anti‐SAE–positive DM, judicious malignancy screening may be warranted.

Detection of multiple myositis-specific autoantibodies in unique patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: A single centre-experience and literature review: Systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are thought to be mutually exclusive in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) based on studies with immunoprecipitation-based (IP) detection methods. Recently, detection of multiple MSAs in unique patients is increasingly reported, but the extent of this phenomenon remains unclear.

METHODS

At our centre, we reviewed results from two line immunoassays and one dot immunoassay in 145 IIM patients and 240 controls for the presence of multiple MSAs. Pubmed and Embase were systematically searched for articles mentioning detection of multiple MSAs in IIM patients, published until February 2019. We assessed the frequency, detection method, the precise combinations and clinical phenotypes of participants with multiple MSAs.

RESULTS

At our centre, detection of multiple MSAs occurred in 3.4-8.3% of patients with IIM, depending on the assay. However, no cases with full concordance across all three assays were identified. Forty-four articles reported detection of multiple MSAs, representing a total of 133 cases, including four patients with a connective tissue disease other than IIM and two healthy controls. In 101 cases all MSAs were detected using only one detection method: 40 cases with IP-based methods (most frequently used technique) and 61 cases with other assay types. In most cases the phenotype of patients with multiple MSAs matched the predicted presentation associated with one MSA and in few cases the phenotype matched with both MSAs.

CONCLUSION

Detection of multiple MSAs in unique IIM patients is less rare than commonly accepted. Specificity issues of the commercially available multiplex immunoassays may, at least partly, explain the higher frequency compared to IP-based methods. 'True multiple MSA-positive' patients may exist, though they are most likely rare.

Anti-SAE autoantibody-positive Japanese patient with juvenile dermatomyositis complicated with interstitial lung disease - a case report

BACKGROUND

Clinical phenotypes and outcomes in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) have been defined by various myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs). One of the recently described MSAs associated with DM is targeted against the small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 activating enzyme (SAE). We report an anti-SAE autoantibody-positive JDM patient complicated with interstitial lung disease (ILD).

CASE PRESENTATION

An 8-year-8-month-old Japanese girl presented with bilateral eyelid edema and facial erythema. At 8 years 4 months, she had dry cough and papules with erythema on the dorsal side of the interphalangeal joints of both hands. Her facial erythema gradually worsened and did not improve with topical steroids. At the first visit to our department at 8 years 8 months of age, she had a typical heliotrope rash and Gottron's papules, with no fever or weight loss, and a chest computed tomography scan showed ground-glass opacity under visceral pleura. There was no clinical evidence of myositis, muscle weakness, myalgia, or muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. She had mild dry cough, without any signs of respiratory distress. Laboratory tests showed no elevated inflammatory markers. She had a normal serum creatine kinase level with a slightly elevated aldolase level, and serum anti-SAE autoantibody was detected by immunoprecipitation-western blotting. She was diagnosed with juvenile amyopathic DM complicated by ILD and received two courses of methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by oral corticosteroid and cyclosporin A. We gradually reduced the corticosteroid dose as her skin rash improved after treatment initiation. There was no progression of muscle symptoms, dysphagia, or disease flare during a 24-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a patient with anti-SAE autoantibody-positive JDM complicated by interstitial pneumonia. This patient had no progression of muscle symptoms and dysphagia during a 24-month follow-up period, which differs from previous reports in adult patients with MSAs. There have been no previous reports of pediatric patients with SAE presenting with ILD. However, ILD seen in this case was not rapidly progressive and did not require cytotoxic agents. To prevent overtreatment, appropriate treatment choices are required considering the type of ILD.

Dermatomyositis autoantibodies: how can we maximize utility?

The past 15 years has seen significant advances in the characterization of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and their associated phenotypes in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). As more careful studies are performed, it is clear that unique combinations of clinical and pathological phenotypes are associated with each MSA, despite the fact that there is considerable heterogeneity within antibody classes as well as overlap across the groups. Because risk for interstitial lung disease (ILD), internal malignancy, adverse disease trajectory, and, potentially response to therapy differ by DM MSA group, a deeper understanding of MSAs and validation and standardization of assays used for detection are critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment. Like any test, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of assays for various MSAs is not perfect. Currently tests for MSAs are helpful at minimum for a clinician to assess relative risk or contribute to diagnosis and perhaps counsel the appropriate patient about what to expect. With international standardization and larger studies it is likely that more antibody tests will make their way into formal schemata for diagnosis and actionable risk assessment in DM. In this review, we summarize key considerations for interpreting the clinical and pathologic associations with MSA in DM and identify critical gaps in knowledge and practice that will maximize their clinical utility and utility for understanding disease pathogenesis.

Dermatomyositis: An Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Dermatomyositis is a rare inflammatory disease with characteristic cutaneous findings and varying amounts of systemic involvement. Patients may present with skin disease alone, have concomitant muscle disease, or have extracutaneous manifestations such as pulmonary disease or an associated malignancy. Given such diverse presentations, dermatomyositis is both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. However, a prompt diagnosis is of utmost importance to institute adequate therapy and screen patients for an associated malignancy. Dermatologists should play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of patients with dermatomyositis as cutaneous disease tends to be chronic, negatively impact quality of life, and be more recalcitrant to therapy. In this review, we discuss diagnosis, with a focus on myositis-specific antibodies and their associated phenotypes. We also review therapies available for this often refractory skin disease.

Inflammatory muscle disease - An update

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory myopathies whose common feature is immune-mediated muscle injury. There are distinct subgroups including dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), inclusion body myositis, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Antisynthetase syndrome is also emerging as a distinct subgroup with its unique muscle histopathological characteristic of perifascicular necrosis. While the newly updated EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for IIM have brought advancements in diagnosis and the exclusion of mimickers, the use of only one autoantibody in the derivation of the schema limits its use. Similarly, while the advent of multiple novel therapeutics in the treatment of myositis has been exciting, it has also highlighted the scarcity of validated outcome measures. The purpose of our review is to highlight the updated classification criteria of myositis, newly reported clinical phenotypes associated with myositis autoantibodies, the measurement of outcomes, and emerging treatments in the field.

A rare form of dermatomyositis associated with muscle weakness and normal creatine kinase level

We present a case study of a 61-year-old Vietnamese woman who presents with features of dermatomyositis (DM), including Gottron’s papules, heliotrope rash, cutaneous ulcers, generalised weakness and pain, and weight loss with normal levels of creatine kinase (CK). She demonstrated features of interstitial lung disease and subsequently tested positive for anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 and anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 activating enzyme antibodies, which belong to a DM subtype known as clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and do not present with raised CK. She received standard treatment for DM, including oral prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine, mycopheonlate and topical betamethasone. The treatment successfully reversed skin changes; however, the patient remained generally weak and unable to carry out her activities of daily living.

Inflammatory Myopathy-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

Inflammatory myopathies (IM) are auto-immune connective tissue diseases characterized by muscle involvement and by extramuscular manifestations. As such, pulmonary manifestations, which mainly include interstitial lung disease (ILD), often darken two out of four distinct IM, namely dermatomyositis and overlapping myositis. Being the initiation site of the disease and being the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, ILD is of major importance in this context. ILD has a heterogeneous expression among the patients, with various onset mode, various radiological pattern, various severity and finally with different prognoses, which are particularly difficult to predict at the time of IM diagnosis. Therefore, ILD is a challenging issue. Treatments are based on steroids and immunosuppressive or targeted therapies. Their respective place is yet poorly codified however and remains often based on clinician expertise. Dedicated clinical trials are lacking to date and are also difficult to build, due to difficulty of constituting large and homogeneous patient groups and to rigorously evaluate disease outcomes. Indeed, pulmonary function tests alone are being regularly defeated in IM, in which respiratory muscles are often involved. Composite scores, bringing together several lung parameters, should thus be developed and validated in the future, to better assess the disease response to treatment. This review aims to describe the current knowledge of IM immuno-pathogenesis, the clinical features associated with IM related-ILD, focusing of both severity and prognosis, and the actual therapeutic approaches.

Myositis Specific Autoantibodies: A Clinical Perspective

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory condition characterized by myositis and variable skin manifestation. The existence of myositis specific autoantibodies usually manifests with varying degrees of skin or muscle inflammations. The condition has a well-established association with most clinical phenotypes, and these autoantibodies are useful in informing the diagnosis, management and prognosis of the disease. DM-specific autoantibodies include anti-MDA5, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE, anti-Mi-2, anti-ARS, anti-TIF1-gamma. Anti-Mi-2 antibodies are widely associated with DM cases that exhibit mainly cutaneous symptoms, such as cuticular overgrowths, Gottron's papules while being less susceptible to complications like interstitial lung disease or malignancy. The most distinct clinical features of patients with anti-SAE antibodies are their high prevalence of dysphagia and cutaneous manifestations that antecede the development of myopathies. In addition, DM patients with positive anti-PL-7 antibodies tend to have milder myositis characterized by low levels of creatine kinase as compared to patients with positive anti-Jo-1 antibodies. The anti-NXP2 antibodies are associated with transcriptional regulation and production of various proteins targeted by other DM antibodies, while anti- TIF1-γ. facilitates the transcription of deoxyribonucleic acids and regulates the growth and subsequent differentiation of body cells by controlling the signaling of TGF-β. The present review targets DM specific autoantibodies, considering their association, significance, and clinical presentation.

Disease Specific Autoantibodies in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies represent still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in different disciplines including neurology, rheumatology, and dermatology. In recent years, the spectrum of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies has been significantly extended and the different manifestations were described in more detail leading to new classification criteria. A major breakthrough has also occurred with respect to new biomarkers especially with the characterization of new autoantibody-antigen systems, which can be separated in myositis specific antibodies and myositis associated antibodies. These markers are detectable in approximately 80% of patients and facilitate not only the diagnostic procedures, but provide also important information on stratification of patients with respect to organ involvement, risk of cancer and overall prognosis of disease. Therefore, it is not only of importance to know the significance of these markers and to be familiar with the optimal diagnostic tests, but also with potential limitations in detection. This article focuses mainly on antibodies which are specific for myositis providing an overview on the targeted antigens, the available detection procedures and clinical association. As major tasks for the near future, the need of an international standardization is discussed for detection methods of autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Furthermore, additional investigations are required to improve stratification of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies according to their antibody profile with respect to response to different treatment options.

Two cases with autoantibodies to small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme: A potential unique subset of dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease

The presence of anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) or anti-melanoma differential-associated gene 5 (MDA5) is strongly related to interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). Several studies suggest a potential relationship between ILD and anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody in DM patients, but detailed clinical characteristics of anti-SAE-associated ILD still remain unknown. We have experienced 2 cases who were positive for anti-SAE antibody, who presented with ILD in the context of clinically amyopathic DM. These 2 patients had the following common ILD characteristics: an insidious course with preserved pulmonary function; a limited extent of pulmonary lesions with subpleural peripheral-dominant small ground glass opacity/consolidation on high-resolution computed tomography; and a favorable treatment response. These findings suggest that anti-SAE-associated ILD is unique in terms of clinical and imaging features and differs from ILD associated with anti-ARS or anti-MDA5 antibody.

Biomarkers in Adult Dermatomyositis: Tools to Help the Diagnosis and Predict the Clinical Outcome

Dermatomyositis pathophysiology is complex. In recent years, medical research has identified molecules associated with disease activity. Besides providing insights into the driving mechanisms of dermatomyositis, these findings could provide potential biomarkers. Activity markers can be used to monitor disease activity in clinical trials and may also be useful in daily practice. This article reviews molecules that could be used as biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring dermatomyositis disease activity.

Heart⁻Lung⁻Muscle Anti-SAE Syndrome: An Atypical Severe Combination

A 78-year-old man with 3 months of progressive dyspnea, dysphony, dysgeusia, and proximal muscle weakness was diagnosed of probably idiopathic inflammatory myopathy with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Variable degrees of atrioventricular block and persistently elevated cardiac enzymes indicated a diagnosis of myocarditis, confirmed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy. A comprehensive immune work-up revealed anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 activating enzyme (anti-SAE) antibody, a novel myositis-specific antibody, previously described mainly with overt cutaneous dermatomyositis and late skeletal muscle manifestations. Here, heart–lung–muscle involvement combined with anti-SAE antibodies was a severe combination.

[Retrospective analysis of anti-TIF1gamma, anti-NXP2 and anti-SAE1/2 antibodies carriers at Bordeaux university hospital from November 2014 to February 2017]

INTRODUCTION

Dermatomyositis are rare autoimmune diseases. The discovery of specific antibodies such as the anti-TIF1γ, anti-SAE1/2 and anti-NXP2 antibodies has been associated with specific clinical phenotypes. The recent development of standardized kits based on immunodot method is a progress in dermatomyositis diagnosis. Here, we report the clinical characteristics of patients carrying these antibodies with or without clinical setting of dermatomyositis.

METHODS

This single-center french retrospective study was conducted from November 2014 to February 2017 at Bordeaux university hospital. Patients carrying anti-TIF1γ, anti-SAE1/2 and anti-NXP2 antibodies, detected by immunodot, were included.

RESULTS

Among the 58 patients included, only 10 were finally diagnosed with dermatomyositis. Some form of cancer was found in all anti-TIF1γ antibodies positive patients associated with dermatomyositis. Among the 48 anti-TIF1γ, anti-SAE1/2 and anti-NXP2 antibodies positive patients without clinical phenotype of dermatomyositis, 30 had autoimmune or inflammatory condition and 39 patients presented a significant biological autoimmunity. None of them developed dermatomyositis during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The immunodot kit allowed the diagnosis of 10 dermatomyositis. A high number of autoantibody positive patients without dermatomyositis raises the issue of the immunodot's performances in the context of biological autoimmunity.

Dermatomyositis etiopathogenesis: a rebel soldier in the muscle

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the etiopathogenesis of dermatomyositis, including the predisposing factors, triggers, inflammatory cells, pathways and target antigens associated with dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last few years, we have made considerable progress in unveiling the etiopathogenesis of dermatomyositis. In the first place, we have defined genes within the major histocompatibility complex locus as the greatest genetic risk factor for the disease. Second, we have demonstrated that certain environmental factors, as well as tumors, may trigger certain dermatomyositis subtypes. Moreover, we have established the importance of the interferon pathway in dermatomyositis pathogenesis compared with other myositis subtypes. But probably, the most remarkable advance has been the discovery of multiple autoantibodies that define groups of patients with characteristic clinical features, prognosis and response to treatment.

SUMMARY

Dermatomyositis cause and pathogenesis have proven to be a complex and fascinating task for the scientific community and the last decade has been full of new findings on how the disease starts and how it causes damage to different organ systems. However, we have still more questions than answers in this topic, answers that will be critical to understanding autoimmunity and finding effective therapies to dermatomyositis.

Autoantibodies Associated With Connective Tissue Diseases: What Meaning for Clinicians?

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, myositis, Sjögren's syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis are systemic diseases which are often associated with a challenge in diagnosis. Autoantibodies (AAbs) can be detected in these diseases and help clinicians in their diagnosis. Actually, pathophysiology of these diseases is associated with the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In the last decades, many new antibodies were discovered, but their implication in pathogenesis of CTDs remains unclear. Furthermore, the classification of these AAbs is nowadays misused, as their targets can be localized outside of the nuclear compartment. Interestingly, in most cases, each antibody is associated with a specific phenotype in CTDs and therefore help in better defining either the disease subtypes or diseases activity and outcome. Because of recent progresses in their detection and in the comprehension of their pathogenesis implication in CTD-associated antibodies, clinicians should pay attention to the presence of these different AAbs to improve patient's management. In this review, we propose to focus on the different phenotypes and features associated with each autoantibody used in clinical practice in those CTDs.

Bench to bedside review of myositis autoantibodies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies represent a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with systemic involvement. Even though numerous specific autoantibodies have been recognized, they have not been included, with the only exception of anti-Jo-1, into the 2017 Classification Criteria, thus perpetuating a clinical-serologic gap. The lack of homogeneous grouping based on the antibody profile deeply impacts the diagnostic approach, therapeutic choices and prognostic stratification of these patients. This review is intended to highlight the comprehensive scenario regarding myositis-related autoantibodies, from the molecular characterization and biological significance to target antigens, from the detection tools, with a special focus on immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells, to their relative prevalence and ethnic diversity, from the clinical presentation to prognosis. If, on the one hand, a notable body of literature is present, on the other data are fragmented, retrospectively based and collected from small case series, so that they do not sufficiently support the decision-making process (i.e. therapeutic approach) into the clinics.

Anti-MDA5 antibody as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in patients with dermatomyositis

The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies in serum represents an important biomarker in the diagnosis and prediction of prognosis for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Due to conflicting results that have been reported regarding the detection of anti-MDA5 antibodies, the goal of this study was to assess a potential association between the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies and dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM), as well as the diagnostic and prognostic values of anti-MDA5 antibodies for DM/PM. For this, a review of literature published prior to October 15, 2016 was conducted. Eight studies with 286 PM patients and 216 healthy controls and nine studies with 628 DM patients and 221 healthy controls were selected according to specific inclusion criteria. The outcomes of these studies revealed that the presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was associated with DM, especially CADM, and not with PM. Furthermore, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52–0.70), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97–1.00), and 0.9381 for CADM patients versus healthy controls when an immunoprecipitation method was used. The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was also found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of death in DM (relative risk = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.65–6.67, P = 0.001). These findings suggest that anti-MDA5 antibodies correlate with DM and could be used as a biomarker in the clinical diagnosis of CADM. The presence of anti-MDA5 antibodies was also associated with poor prognosis regarding the overall survival of patients with DM.

Distinctive cutaneous and systemic features associated with specific antimyositis antibodies in adults with dermatomyositis: a prospective multicentric study of 117 patients

BACKGROUND

Identification of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) for dermatomyositis (DM) could allow the characterization of an antibody-associated clinical phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define the clinical phenotype of DM and the risk of cancer, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and calcinosis based on MSA.

METHODS

A 3.5-year multicentre prospective study of adult DM patients was conducted to determine the clinical phenotype associated with MSAs and the presence of cancer, ILD and calcinosis.

RESULTS

MSAs were detected in 47.1% of 117 included patients. Patients with antimelanoma differentiation-associated protein-5 antibodies (13.7%) had significantly more palmar violaceous macules/papules [odds ratio (OR) 9.9], mechanic's hands (OR 8), cutaneous necrosis (OR 3.2), articular involvement (OR 15.2) and a higher risk of ILD (OR 25.3). Patients with antitranscriptional intermediary factor-1 antibodies (11.1%), antinuclear matrix protein-2 antibodies (6.8%) and antiaminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetase (5.1%) had, respectively, significantly more poikiloderma (OR 5.9), calcinosis (OR 9.8) and articular involvement (OR 15.2). Cutaneous necrosis was the only clinical manifestation significantly associated with cancer (OR 3.1).

CONCLUSION

Recognition of the adult DM phenotype associated with MSAs would allow more accurate appraisal of the risk of cancer, ILD and calcinosis.