Risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal vascular graft infection in an 11-year cohort study

Long-term prognosis following vascular graft infection: a 10-year cohort study

Background

Vascular graft infection (VGI) remains a severe disease with high mortality and relapse rates. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to highlight factors associated with long-term all-cause mortality in patients with vascular graft infection.

Methods

All patients hospitalized in our facility over 10 years for VGI were included. VGI was defined by the presence of a vascular graft or an aortic stent graft (stent or fabric), associated with 2 criteria among clinical, biological, imaging, or microbiological elements in favor of VGI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Empirical antibiotic therapy was considered as appropriate when all involved pathogens were susceptible in vitro to the antibiotics used. The surgical strategy was defined as nonoptimal when the graft was not removed in a late-onset surgery (>3 months) or no surgery was performed.

Results

One hundred forty-six patients were included. Empirical antibiotic therapy was administered in 98 (67%) patients and considered appropriate in 55 (56%) patients. Surgery was performed in 136 patients (96%) and considered as optimal in 106 (73%) patients. In multivariable analysis, appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was associated with a lower probability of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.47 [95% confidence interval, .30–.79]; P = .002). Long-term survival did not differ according to whether the surgical strategy was considered optimal or not (log-rank = 0.66).

Conclusions

Appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy is a cornerstone of the management of VGI. Whenever possible, antibiotics must be associated with optimal surgical management. However, surgery could potentially be avoided in comorbid patients who are treated with appropriate antibiotics.

Inadequate Perioperative Prophylaxis and Postsurgical Complications After Graft Implantation Are Important Risk Factors for Subsequent Vascular Graft Infections: Prospective Results From the Vascular Graft Infection Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Reconstructive vascular surgery has become increasingly common. Vascular graft infections (VGIs) are serious complications, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Previously described risk factors for VGIs include groin incisions, wound infections, and comorbidities. We aimed to identify modifiable predictors for VGIs as targets for infection prevention strategies.

METHODS

Participants of the prospective Vascular Graft Infection Cohort (VASGRA) with surgery between 2013 and 2017 were included. The observation time was calculated from surgery until a confirmed VGI or the last follow-up. Variables were assessed by infection status, using non-parametric tests. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, adjusted for demographic factors, were applied to assess risk factors for a VGI.

RESULTS

A total of 438 predominantly male (83.1%) patients with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63 - 76) contributed to 554 person years of follow-up. Thereof, 39 (8.9%) developed a VGI, amounting to an incidence rate of 7.0/100 person years. We found incisional surgical site infections (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 10.09, 95% CI 2.88 - 35.34); hemorrhage (aHR 4.92, 1.28-18.94); renal insufficiency (aHR 4.85, 1.20 - 19.61); inadequate perioperative prophylaxis in patients with an established antibiotic treatment, compared to the additional application of perioperative prophylaxis (aHR 2.87, 95% CI 1.17 - 7.05); and procedure time increases of 1-hour intervals (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08 - 1.39) to be risk factors for VGIs.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified procedure time; inadequate perioperative prophylaxis, especially among patients with an established antibiotic treatment; and several postsurgical infectious and non-infectious complications as modifiable, predictive factors for VGIs and, therefore, as keys to improved surveillance programs and prevention strategies.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01821664.

Efficacy of Preoperative Antibiotic Therapy for the Treatment of Vascular Graft Infection

Objective: We aimed to assess the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic therapy for the treatment of prosthetic graft infection.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment strategies used for managing patients with prosthetic vascular graft infections between 2000 and 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: early antibiotic (EA) group, those who were administered with antibiotics ≥2 weeks preoperatively and late antibiotic (LA) group, those who were administered with antibiotics <2 weeks preoperatively. We evaluated the outcomes including surgical procedures, length of hospital stay, and surgical revision.

Results: All the surgical procedures performed in the EA group were elective surgeries. Three of the 11 surgeries performed in the LA group were emergency surgeries (P=0.16). No significant differences were observed in the operative procedure (P=0.64), operation time (P=0.37), and blood loss (P=0.63) of the two groups. Although the length of postoperative hospital stay did not significantly differ (P=0.61), the total length of hospital stay was longer in the EA group (P=0.02). Surgical revisions were performed for five patients in the LA group and for none in the EA group (P=0.04).

Conclusion: Preoperative antibiotic therapy provided excellent outcomes in terms of avoiding surgical revisions in the treatment of vascular graft infection.

Medical treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections: Review of the literature and proposals of a Working Group

More than 400000 vascular grafts are inserted annually in the USA. Graft insertion is complicated by infection in 0.5-4% of cases. Vascular graft infections (VGIs) are becoming one of the most frequent prosthesis-related infections and are associated with considerable mortality, ranging from 10 to 25% within 30 days following the diagnosis. Treatment of VGI is based on urgent surgical removal of the infected graft followed by prolonged antibiotherapy. Data regarding the best antibiotherapy to use are lacking since no well designed trial to study antimicrobial treatment of VGI exists. Moreover, since VGIs demonstrate very specific pathophysiology, guidelines on other material-related infections or infective endocarditis treatment cannot be entirely applied to VGI. A French multidisciplinary group gathering infectious diseases specialists, anaesthesiologists, intensivists, microbiologists, radiologists and vascular surgeons was created to review the literature dealing with VGI and to make some proposals regarding empirical and documented antibiotic therapy for these infections. This article reveals these proposals.

Factors predictive of treatment failure in staphylococcal prosthetic vascular graft infections: a prospective observational cohort study: impact of rifampin

BACKGROUND

There exists considerable debate concerning management of prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI), especially in terms of antimicrobial treatment. This report studies factors associated with treatment failure in a cohort of patients with staphylococcal PVGI, along with the impact of rifampin (RIF).

METHODS

All data on patients with PVGI between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. Cure was defined as the absence of evidence of infection during the entire post-treatment follow-up for a minimum of one year. Failure was defined as any other outcome.

RESULTS

84 patients (72 M/12 F, median age 64.5 ± 11 y) with diabetes mellitus (n = 25), obesity (n = 48), coronary artery disease (n = 48), renal failure (n = 24) or COPD (n = 22) were treated for PVGI (median follow-up was 470 ± 469 d). PVGI was primarily intracavitary (n = 47). Staphylococcus aureus (n = 65; including 17 methicillin-resistant S. aureus) and coagulase-negative Staphylocococcus (n = 22) were identified. Surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. In univariate analysis, significant risk factors associated with failure were renal failure (p = 0.04), aortic aneurysm (p = 0.03), fever (p = 0.009), aneurysm disruption (p = 0.02), septic shock in the peri-operative period (p = 0.005) and antibiotic treatment containing RIF (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, 2 variables were independently associated with failure:septic shock [OR 4.98: CI 95% 1.45-16.99; p=0.01] and antibiotic containing rifampin [OR: 0.32: CI95% 0.10-0.96; p=0.04].

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study suggest that fever, septic shock and non-use of antibiotic treatment containing RIF are associated with poor outcome.