Effects of treatment with once-daily nifedipine CR and twice-daily benidipine on prevention of symptomatic attacks in patients with coronary spastic angina pectoris-Adalat Trial vs Coniel in Tokyo against Coronary Spastic Angina (ATTACK CSA)

Association between the beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, all-cause mortality and length of hospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To establish an association between beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), all-cause mortality, and hospitalization in patients with Heart failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

The present meta-analysis has been performed as per the guidelines of (PRISMA). An inclusive literature search was made without any limitations on language using the electronic databases Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed up to November 2022. The outcomes evaluated in this meta-analysis involved all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. The number of patients with HFpEF and their positive outcomes was extracted and analyzed using RevMan software.

RESULTS

In total, 10 articles were included in the present meta-analysis, with a pooled sample size of 12 940 HFpEF patients. In comparison with placebo, both BB and CCB substantially reduced the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. However, BB are more effective because they provide a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43-0.83; p = .002] and hospitalization (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.37-0.80; p = .002) as compared with CCB with a risk ratio of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.60-0.98; p = .03) and hospitalization (RR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.44-0.90; p < .00001). A random-effects model was used because of high heterogeneity between the studies (I2  > 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis suggests that BBs were more beneficial than CCB in reducing all-cause mortality and hospitalization duration in patients with HFpEF.

Comparison of various calcium antagonist on vasospastic angina: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery vasospasm is an abnormal spasm of coronary arteries that cause transient or complete occlusion without exertion. It causes stable angina to ACS. However, this can be prevented by calcium channel blockers (CCBs) which suppress Ca²⁺ influx into the vascular muscle cells. Nevertheless, several CCBs adverse effects are harmful for these patients. Selecting the right CCBs would give the best clinical practice.

METHOD

The studies were obtained from four major medical databases by various keywords. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented as adult >18 years, observational study, English language and drug of interest. Duplicates were eliminated, and the remaining studies were reviewed. Final full-texts assessment was conducted independently by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Revised Cochrane.

RESULTS

The search found 1378 articles. However, six studies were selected after implementing the study criteria. Diltiazem was found to decrease angina and increase quality of life until 12th week of treatment; however, some adverse effects include atrioventricular block and recurrent angina up till 4th week were found. Meanwhile, nifedipine was found to decrease vasospastic angina (VSA) by the fourth and eighth weeks of treatment. Nevertheless, it caused excessive drop in BP and increase heart rate by eighth week. In addition, slow-release preparation of both CCBs were found to increase efficacy and compliance. Lastly amlodipine was also found to decrease VSA by 17%±140% and 33% after 6 weeks, but further studies needed.

CONCLUSION

Diltiazem, nifedipine and amlodipine are potent in decreasing VSA, however, tailoring specific CCBs adverse reactions to patient condition and the drug preparation would be substantially beneficial for the outcome.

Management of ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA)

Up to half of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for the investigation of chest pain do not present with evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease. These patients are often discharged with a diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain, yet many could have an ischaemic basis for their symptoms. This type of ischaemic chest pain in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease is referred to as INOCA (ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries). This comprehensive review of INOCA management looks at why these patients require treatment, who requires treatment based on diagnostic evaluation, what clinical treatment targets should be considered, how to treat patients using a personalised medicine approach, when to initiate treatment, and where future research is progressing.

Coronary spasm: It’s common, but it’s still unsolved

Coronary spasm is caused by a transient coronary narrowing due to the constriction of epicardial coronary artery, which leads to myocardial ischemia. More than 50 years have passed since the first recognition of coronary spasm, and many findings on coronary spasm have been reported. Coronary spasm has been considered as having pivotal roles in the cause of not only rest angina but also exertional angina, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure. In addition, several new findings of the mechanism of coronary spasm have emerged recently. The diagnosis based mainly on coronary angiography and spasm provocation test and the mainstream treatment with a focus on a calcium-channel blocker have been established. At a glance, coronary spasm or vasospastic angina (VSA) has become a common disease. On the contrary, there are several uncertain or unsolved problems regarding coronary spasm, including the presence of medically refractory coronary spasm (intractable VSA), or an appropriate use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with cardiac arrest who have been confirmed as having coronary spasm. This editorial focused on coronary spasm, including recent topics and unsolved problems.

Increased frequency of angina attacks caused by switching a brand-name vasodilator to a generic vasodilator in patients with vasospastic angina: Two case reports

It is well known that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are the first line of therapy for vasospastic angina (VSA). Here, we report two cases of VSA with an increase in the frequency of angina attacks after switching from a brand-name to a generic CCB. In both cases, angina recurred upon switching from a brand-name CCB to a generic CCB during follow-up. The patients’ condition improved upon switching back to the original CCB. Both cases involved a high severity of VSA, based on the results of spasm provocation testing. These findings suggest that, in some patients with severe VSA, the frequency of angina attacks increases when switching from a brand-name CCB to a generic CCB. Cardiologists should consider this factor when prescribing drugs for angina.

Clinical roles of calcium channel blockers in ischemic heart diseases

Calcium (Ca) channel blockers (CCBs) inhibit Ca²⁺ channels in the myocardium or vascular smooth muscle cells, inhibit myocardium contraction, inhibit the impulse conduction system (anti-arrhythmias) and cause vasodilation. New classifications based on subtypes of Ca channels and α1 subunits have been proposed. Moreover, CCBs have pleiotropic effects on coronary spastic angina (CSA), including variant angina, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST). Although the roles of CCBs in clinical situations remain unknown, further studies in this field are expected to broaden our understanding. In this article, we explain the clinical roles of CCBs in ischemic heart diseases, such as CSA, MI and ST, based on previous knowledge and as demonstrated in representative clinical trials.

An autopsy case of tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy presenting ventricular tachycardia after pacemaker implantation

We herein report a rare autopsy case of tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) presenting ventricular tachycardia after pacemaker implantation. A 69-year-old male received a dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block. He had no chest symptoms after the operation. Three days later, he developed severe chest pain, followed by syncope. Electrocardiogram showed sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Despite the use of amiodarone and frequent electrical defibrillation, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation were repeated incessantly. He died 24 h after the syncope. The autopsy revealed no hemopericardial effusion, or perforation of leads. There were also no obstructive lesions in the coronary arteries. Myocardial necrosis was observed in the entire circumference and the all layers of the left ventricle. Microscopically, myocardial necrosis was plurifocal and contraction band necrosis. We speculate that catecholamine cardiotoxicity caused ventricular tachycardia in this case. Further studies are needed to clarify the heterogeneity of this disease. .

Comparison of the effects of long-acting nifedipine CR and diltiazem R in patients with vasospastic angina: Aomori coronary spastic angina study

OBJECTIVES

We compared the efficacy of once-daily administration of nifedipine CR 40 mg (N) with that of twice-daily diltiazem R 100mg (D) in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) registered in 8 cardiovascular institutes in Aomori Prefecture.

METHODS AND RESULTS

VSA was diagnosed by the ischemic ST segment changes during chest pain attacks at rest and/or acetylcholine induction test done during coronary angiography. Thirty-seven patients were randomly allocated to either the N (n=20) or D group (n=17). The number of symptomatic attacks and amount of short-acting nitrate use were examined based on data in diaries written by the patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The mean number (median number) of attacks per week was significantly decreased in the N group from 2.56 (2.0) at baseline to 0.41 (0.0) after 4 weeks of treatment, to 0.24 (0.0) after 8 weeks, and to 0.36 (0.0) after 12 weeks (all p<0.05 vs. baseline). It was also decreased in D group from 2.71 (2.0) at baseline to 0.55 (0.0) after 4 weeks, to 0.32 (0.0) after 8 weeks, and to 0.27 (0.0) after 12 weeks (all p<0.05 vs. baseline). The numbers of attacks before and after treatment were comparable between N and D groups. In one patient in each of the N and D groups, the allocated drug was crossed over to the other due to recurrence of the attacks. One patient in each group experienced adverse effects and the drug was changed to the other.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily administration of nifedipine CR was as effective as twice-daily diltiazem R in the prevention of VSA attacks.