Low atrial septal pacing with dual-chamber pacemakers reduces atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome

Pacemaker-induced atrial fibrillation reconsidered-associations with different pacing sites and prevention approaches

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is significantly higher in patients with pacemakers than in the general population, which could be due to patient characteristics and the diagnostic tool of the pacemaker in detecting atrial high-rate episodes and subclinical AF, but also to the pacemaker itself providing AF-promoting conditions. It is well known that high ventricular pacemaker burden increases the likelihood of AF occurrence. However, the sites of atrial and ventricular pacing may also influence the risk for AF. The conventional sites for atrial and ventricular pacing are in the right atrial appendage and in the right ventricular apex. However, growing evidence suggests that alternative pacing sites may be superior for the prevention of AF. Bachmann bundle pacing, for example, promotes interatrial excitation conduction, resulting in atrial synchronicity and a shorter total atrial activation time, which may be preventive for the occurrence of AF. Moreover, in recent years, new ventricular pacing sites have come into focus with His bundle and left bundle branch pacing. In addition to the hemodynamic and electrophysiological cardiac benefits, these new options may also offer benefits in the prevention of AF. This review provides an overview of pacing-induced AF mechanisms and the association with different pacing sites, as well as approaches for prevention of pacing-induced AF, highlighting different sites and modes of atrial pacing and the newer sites of ventricular pacing.

Prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of site and rate of atrial pacing on long-term progression of atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome: Septal Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Evaluation (SAFE) Study

BACKGROUND

Atrial-based pacing is associated with lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in sick sinus syndrome compared with ventricular pacing; nevertheless, the impact of site and rate of atrial pacing on progression of AF remains unclear. We evaluated whether long-term atrial pacing at the right atrial (RA) appendage versus the low RA septum with (ON) or without (OFF) a continuous atrial overdrive pacing algorithm can prevent the development of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized 385 patients with paroxysmal AF and sick sinus syndrome in whom a pacemaker was indicated to pacing at RA appendage ON (n=98), RA appendage OFF (n=99), RA septum ON (n=92), or RA septum OFF (n=96). The primary outcome was the occurrence of persistent AF (AF documented at least 7 days apart or need for cardioversion). Demographic data were homogeneous across both pacing site (RA appendage/RA septum) and atrial overdrive pacing (ON/OFF). After a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, persistent AF occurred in 99 patients (25.8%; annual rate of persistent AF, 8.3%). Alternative site pacing at the RA septum versus conventional RA appendage (hazard ratio=1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.75; P=0.65) or continuous atrial overdrive pacing ON versus OFF (hazard ratio=1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.74; P=0.69) did not prevent the development of persistent AF.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with paroxysmal AF and sick sinus syndrome requiring pacemaker implantation, an alternative atrial pacing site at the RA septum or continuous atrial overdrive pacing did not prevent the development of persistent AF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT00419640.

Sinus node disease in subjects with type 1 ECG pattern of Brugada syndrome

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of phenotypes related to mutations of the SCN5A gene include Brugada syndrome (BS), long QT syndrome, progressive cardiac conduction defect, and sinus node disease (SND). The present study investigated the incidence of SND in subjects with type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern of BS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 68 individuals (55 males, mean age 44.8±12.8 years) with spontaneous (n=27) or drug-induced (n=41) type 1 ECG pattern of BS. Twenty-eight subjects were symptomatic with a history of syncope (41.2%). SND was observed in 6 symptomatic subjects (8.8%), and was mainly attributed to sino-atrial block with sinus pauses. Two patients were initially diagnosed with SND, and received a pacemaker. Patients with SND displayed an increased P-wave duration in leads II and V2, PR interval in leads II and V2, QRS duration in leads II and V2, and increased QTc interval in lead V2 (p<0.05). AH and HV intervals as well as corrected sinus node recovery time (cSNRT) were significantly prolonged in subjects with SND (p<0.05). During a mean follow-up period of 5.0±3.6 years, five subjects with a history of syncope suffered appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) discharges due to ventricular arrhythmias (7.4%). None of those diagnosed with SND suffered syncope or ICD therapies.

CONCLUSION

SND is not an uncommon finding in subjects with type 1 ECG pattern of BS. The occurrence of SND in relatively young patients may deserve meticulous investigation including sodium channel blocking test.

Cardiac device-related endocarditis: 31-Years' experience

BACKGROUND

Cardiac device-related endocarditis (CDE) is a major complication of the implantation of a pacemaker and defibrillator. The experience in a single high-volume tertiary center is reported.

METHODS

Thirty one years (1980-2011) of cases of CDE were analyzed retrospectively and compared to overall insertion data; the clinical course and management strategies of these patients have been reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 23 cases (16 male, median age 72 years) were identified, 20 of these cases were determined at our institution where 5287 procedures were performed (endocarditis rate 0.38%). Thirteen patients were determined to have a cardiac device pocket infection. Infection in 7 cases (30%) was caused by lead(s). However, in 16 cases (70%) both leads and the pocket of devices were the reason of infection. Median time was 13.5 months for presentation. Patients who had undergone the last procedure within 6 months were admitted earlier than those with longer post procedure time (p<0.05). Transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated lead vegetations in 13 of the 16 cases (81%). Organisms were identified in 18 cases (78%)-78% Staphylococci (56% Staphylococcus aureus). Leads of the device were removed in 17 cases (74%); seven cases by percutaneous simple traction and 10 cases by sternotomy. Six major complications attributable to device-related endocarditis were observed: four deaths (mortality 17.4%); one splenic abscess requiring splenectomy; and one septic pulmonary embolism; median follow-up 49 months.

CONCLUSION

A CDE endocarditis rate of 0.38% was demonstrated. It remains a rare but potentially lethal complication of device implantation.

[Advances in cardiac pacing]

This article contains a review of the current status of remote monitoring and follow-up involving cardiac pacing devices and of the latest developments in cardiac resynchronization therapy. In addition, the most important articles published in the last year are discussed.