Overview of complications during pharmacological spasm provocation tests

A Review of the Role of Tests of Coronary Reactivity in Clinical Practice

Vasoreactivity testing is used by cardiologists in the diagnosis of coronary spasm endotypes, such as epicardial and microvascular spasm. Intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and ergonovine is defined as a standard class I method according to the Coronary Vasomotion Disorder (COVADIS) Group. Because single vasoreactivity testing may have some clinical limitations in detecting the presence of coronary spasm, supplementary or sequential vasoreactivity testing should be reconsidered. The majority of cardiologists do not consider pseudonegative results when performing these vasoreactivity tests. Vasoreactivity testing may have some limitations when it comes to documenting clinical spasm. In the future, cardiologists around the world should use multiple vasoreactivity tests to verify the presence or absence of epicardial and microvascular spasms in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory.

Pharmacological coronary spasm provocative testing in clinical practice: A French Coronary Atheroma and Interventional Cardiology Group (GACI) position paper

Vasospastic angina, also described as Prinzmetal angina, was first described as a variant form of angina at rest with transient ST-segment elevation; it is common and present in many clinical scenarios, including chronic and acute coronary syndromes, sudden cardiac death, arrhythmia and syncope. However, vasospastic angina remains underdiagnosed, and provocative tests are rarely performed. The gold-standard diagnostic approach uses invasive coronary angiography to induce coronary spasm using ergonovine, methylergonovine or acetylcholine as provocative stimuli. The lack of uniform protocol decreases the use and performance of these tests, accounting for vasospastic angina underestimation. This position paper from the French Coronary Atheroma and Interventional Cardiology Group (GACI) aims to review the indications for provocative tests, the testing conditions, drug protocols and positivity criteria.

Which Coronary Artery Should Be Preferred for Starting the Coronary Spasm Provocation Test?

BACKGROUND

The spasm provocation test (SPT) is a critical test for diagnosing vasospastic angina (VSA). However, the choice of vessel to be preferred for initiating the SPT-the right coronary artery (RCA) or the left coronary artery (LCA)-is unclear. This study aimed to assess SPT results including SPT-related complications while initiating the SPT in the RCA and LCA.

METHODS

We enrolled 225 patients who underwent coronary angiography and SPTs. The SPT was first performed in the RCA in 133 patients (RCA group) and the LCA in 92 patients (LCA group). We defined VSA as >90% narrowing of the coronary artery during the SPT, accompanied by chest pain and/or ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram. When coronary spasm occurs in two or more major coronary arteries, it is referred to as a multivessel spasm (MVS). SPT-related complications comprised atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, and unstable hemodynamics following catecholamine use. Analyses using propensity score matching (PSM) were performed in 120 patients.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the frequencies of VSA and complications were observed between the two groups (RCA: 79% and 19%, respectively; LCA: 85% and 22%, respectively). In both groups, spasms were most frequently provoked in the left anterior descending coronary artery (both p < 0.001) whereas spasms in the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) were higher in the LCA group than in the RCA group (p = 0.015). Furthermore, no significant difference in the frequency of MVS was observed between both groups (RCA: 50%, LCA: 62%; p = 0.122). After PSM, no significant difference in the frequencies of VSA and complications were observed between the two groups (RCA: 82% and 15%, respectively; LCA: 88% and 18%, respectively). The frequencies of LCX spasms (RCA: 8%, LCA: 23%; p = 0.022) and MVS (RCA: 40%, LCA: 62%; p = 0.020) were higher in the LCA group than in the RCA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the diagnostic rate of VSA and frequency of SPT-related complications were similar in the two groups, the frequency of MVS was higher in the LCA group than in the RCA group because of the increase in the number of LCX spasms. A routine SPT may be started from the LCA.

Identification of cell-biologic mechanisms of coronary artery spasm and its ex vivo diagnosis using peripheral blood-derived iPSCs

BACKGROUND

Although vasospastic angina (VSA) is known to be caused by coronary artery spasm, no study has fully elucidated the exact underlying mechanism. Moreover, in order to confirm VSA, patients should undergo invasive coronary angiography with spasm provocation test. Herein, we investigated the pathophysiology of VSA using peripheral blood-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and developed an ex vivo diagnostic method for VSA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

With 10 mL of peripheral blood from patients with VSA, we generated iPSCs and differentiated these iPSCs into target cells. As compared with vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) differentiated from iPSCs of normal subjects with negative provocation test, VSA patient-specific iPSCs-derived VSMCs showed very strong contraction in response to stimulants. Moreover, VSA patient-specific VSMCs exhibited a significant increase in stimulation-induced intracellular calcium efflux (Changes in the relative fluorescence unit [ΔF/F]; Control group vs. VSA group, 2.89 ± 0.34 vs. 10.32 ± 0.51, p < 0.01), and exclusively induced a secondary or tertiary peak of calcium efflux, suggesting that those findings could be diagnostic cut-off values for VSA. The observed hyperreactivity of VSA patient-specific VSMCs were caused by the upregulation of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺-ATPase 2a (SERCA2a) due to its enhanced small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)ylation. This increased activity of SERCA2a was reversed by treatment with ginkgolic acid, an inhibitor of SUMOylated E1 molecules (pi/µg protein; VSA group vs. VSA + ginkgolic acid, 52.36 ± 0.71 vs. 31.93 ± 1.13, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that abnormal calcium handling in sarco/endoplasmic reticulum could be induced by the enhanced SERCA2a activity in patients with VSA, leading to spasm. Such novel mechanisms of coronary artery spasm could be useful for drug development and diagnosis of VSA.

Non-invasive diagnosis of vasospastic angina

Vasospastic angina (VSA), or variant angina, is an under-recognized cause of chest pain and myocardial infarction, especially in Western countries. VSA leads to a declined quality of life and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, the diagnosis of VSA relies on invasive testing that requires the direct intracoronary administration of ergonovine or acetylcholine. However, invasive vasoreactivity testing is underutilized. Several non-invasive imaging alternatives have been proposed to screen for VSA. This review aims to discuss the strengths and limitations of available non-invasive imaging tests for vasospastic angina.

A Practical Approach to Invasive Testing in Ischemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (INOCA)

Up to 65% of women and approximately 30% of men have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD; commonly known as INOCA) on invasive coronary angiography performed for stable angina. INOCA can be due to coronary microvascular dysfunction or coronary vasospasm. Despite the absence of obstructive CAD, those with INOCA have an increased risk of all-cause mortality and adverse outcomes, including recurrent angina and cardiovascular events. These patients often undergo repeat testing, including cardiac catheterization, resulting in lifetime healthcare costs that rival those for obstructive CAD. Patients with INOCA often remain undiagnosed and untreated. This review discusses the symptoms and prognosis of INOCA, offers a systematic approach to the diagnostic evaluation of these patients, and summarizes therapeutic management, including tailored therapy according to underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Pathophysiologic Basis and Diagnostic Approaches for Ischemia With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Literature Review

Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) has gained increasing attention due to its high prevalence, atypical clinical presentations, difficult diagnostic procedures, and poor prognosis. There are two endotypes of INOCA-one is coronary microvascular dysfunction and the other is vasospastic angina. Diagnosis of INOCA lies in evaluating coronary flow reserve, microcirculatory resistance, and vasoreactivity, which is usually obtained via invasive coronary interventional techniques. Non-invasive diagnostic approaches such as echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac positron emission tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are also valuable for assessing coronary blood flow. Some new techniques (e.g., continuous thermodilution and angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve) have been investigated to assist the diagnosis of INOCA. In this review, we aimed to discuss the pathophysiologic basis and contemporary and novel diagnostic approaches for INOCA, to construct a better understanding of INOCA evaluation.

[Methergin pour le diagnostic de l'angor spastique : voie intraveineuse ou intracoronaire ?]

BACKGROUND

Vasospastic angina is an infrequent underlying cause of angina and is under-diagnosed. Ergonovine provocation tests can be performed via intravenous or intracoronary injections. Although the safety profile of intracoronary injection has been well documented, no study has yet compared the intracoronary and intravenous injections regarding the positivity rate of the test.

AIMS

This study sought to compare the positivity rate of intravenous versus intracoronary injection of ergonovine in the diagnosis of vasospastic angina.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and February 2018, 427 patients with suspected vasospastic angina underwent an ergonovine provocation test in 2 tertiary hospitals in France and were retrospectively included in this study. Injection was performed via the intravenous or the intracoronary route. The primary endpoint was the positivity rate of the test. Propensity score matching was used to account for confounding factors.

RESULTS

427 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 60.3 (+/- 12.4) years. There were 247 (58%) females and 97 (23%) smokers. The intracoronary route was used in 199 (47%) patients. The indication for the test was acute coronary syndrome for 121 (28%). No rhythmic complications or deaths were reported. After propensity-matching, the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups (148 patients in each) were comparable. The positivity rate was 24% in the intracoronary group and 9% in the intravenous group (OR [95%CI]: 3.2 [1.6, 6.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary injection of ergonovine is safe and associated with a positivity rate of the test three times higher compared to intravenous injection.

Coronary artery spasm-induced acute myocardial infarction in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

Coronary artery spasm-induced acute myocardial infarction (CASIAMI) is one of the etiologies of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with CASIAMI and non-obstructive coronary arteries. We experienced 62 patients with MINOCA (10 thrombosis, 7 unknown causes, and 45 CASIAMI) among 991 patients with suspected AMI. Pharmacological spasm provocation testing was performed in 37 patients. CASIAMI without obstructive coronary arteries was found in 4.5% of patients with suspected AMI and was observed in 73% of patients with MINOCA. Patients with CASIAMI were frequently males and had relatively small AMIs. Spontaneous spasm was recognized in 8 patients. We could reproduce provoked spasm in 37 patients with MINOCA, including 23 patients with multiple spasm. No patients died during the follow-up period. The clinical outcomes in patients with CASIAMI under optimal coronary vasodilators were satisfactory.

Pathobiology and evolving therapies of coronary artery vasospasm

Coronary artery vasospasm is a known cause of chest pain and requires a high level of clinical suspicion for diagnosis. It also remains in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with type 2 myocardial infarction. There are few randomized controlled trials for guideline-based prevention and treatment for coronary artery vasospasm. In this article, we review updated concepts in coronary artery vasospasm. Specifically, our aim is to provide current evidence of pathophysiology, identify the risk factors, propose a diagnostic algorithm, review available evidence of evolving therapies, and identify patients who would benefit from automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Feasibility of right coronary artery first ergonovine provocation test

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary (IC) provocation angiography is recommended when variant angina is suspected. However, specific procedure-related factors remain uncertain.

METHODS

Intracoronary ergonovine infusion was used for the provocation test. About 10, 20, and 40 μg of ergonovine were sequentially injected into the right coronary artery (RCA). During a negative or intermediate response or depending on the clinician's discretion, the left coronary artery (LCA) was injected with incremental doses of 20, 40, and 80 μg of ergonovine or vice versa. If significant coronary spasm or positive clinical findings were noted, the test was stopped immediately and IC nitroglycerine was injected.

RESULTS

We reviewed a total of 725 patients (male: 402; mean age: 58.5 years). Spasm-positive response was observed in 269 patients (37.1%), intermediate response in 113 patients (15.6%), and negative response in 343 patients (47.3%). The right radial artery approach was used in most cases (92.6%), and the RCA first approach was mainly chosen (95.0%). The provocation results in the RCA and LCA (93.4%, 381/408) were highly consistent, and the clinically significant discrepancy rate (RCA positive/LCA negative or RCA negative/LCA positive) was 1.5% (6/408). The RCA-alone provocation test can identify spasm-positive response in 93.4% of the patients (228/244). The mean procedure time was 39.9 ± 11.0 min, and approximately 3.3% (24/725) of the patients developed acute complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The RCA-first IC ergonovine provocation test is feasible, and the RCA-alone spasm provocation could be acceptable except in an intermediate response, highly clinically suspected cases, or high-risk patients.

Diagnostic approach in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease: emphasising the role of the coronary function test

BACKGROUND

Many patients with angina do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), also referred to as "Ischaemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries" (INOCA). Coronary vascular dysfunction is the underlying cause of this ischaemic heart disease in as much as 59-89% of these patients, including the endotypes of coronary microvascular dysfunction and epicardial coronary vasospasm. Currently, a coronary function test (CFT) is the only comprehensive diagnostic modality to evaluate all endotypes of coronary vascular dysfunction in patients with INOCA.

OBJECTIVE

In this paper we discuss the relevance of performing a CFT, provide considerations for patient selection, and present an overview of the procedure and its safety.

METHODS

We reviewed the latest published data, guidelines and consensus documents, combined with a discussion of novel original data, to present this point of view.

RESULTS

The use of a CFT could lead to a more accurate and timely diagnosis of vascular dysfunction, identifies patients at risk for cardiovascular events, and enables stratified treatment which improves symptoms and quality of life. Current guidelines recommend considering a CFT in patients with INOCA and persistent symptoms. The safety of the procedure is comparable to that of a regular coronary angiography with physiological measurements. Non-invasive alternatives have limited diagnostic accuracy for the identification of coronary vascular dysfunction in patients with INOCA, and a regular coronary angiography and/or coronary computed tomography scan cannot establish the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A complete CFT, including acetylcholine and adenosine tests, should be considered in patients with INOCA.

Bronchial Asthma and Rest Angina: Is It Safe to Perform Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Tests in These Patients?

Objective Acetylcholine (ACh) use in patients with bronchial asthma (BA) is contraindicated. We examined the clinical usefulness and safety of ACh spasm provocation tests in rest angina patients with BA. Patients The study subjects were 495 rest angina patients (mean age: 64.4±10.9 years old, male: 81.0%). Organic stenosis was found in 69 patients (13.9%). Methods We investigated 495 rest angina patients who underwent ACh spasm provocation tests. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery and 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery. Provoked positive spasm was defined as transient ≥90% luminal narrowing and usual chest pain or ischemic electrocardiogram changes. Results Among 495 rest angina patients, 13 (2.6%) were complicated with BA. Eleven patients with BA were controlled under medications, and two patients had a history of medication for BA. The clinical characteristics were not markedly different between rest angina patients with and without BA. The rate of multi-vessel spasm was markedly higher in patients with BA than that in those without BA. No complications during ACh spasm provocation tests were recognized in rest angina patients with BA, whereas major complications in those without BA were observed in eight patients including two ventricular fibrillations, three non-sustained ventricular tachycardias, and three shocks. We were able to perform all 495 ACh spasm provocation tests without any irreversible complications, while electrical defibrillation was necessary for 2 patients without BA. Conclusion We were able to perform ACh spasm provocation tests in rest angina patients with BA irrespective of the off-label use of ACh.

Coronary provocative tests in the catheterization laboratory: Pathophysiological bases, methodological considerations and clinical implications

The paradigm for the management of patients presenting with angina and/or myocardial ischemia has been historically centered on the detection and treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, in a considerable proportion (30-50%) of patients undergoing coronary angiography, obstructive CAD is excluded. Thus, functional mechanisms may be involved in determining myocardial ischemia and should be investigated. In particular, coronary vasomotor disorders both at epicardial and at microvascular level may play a crucial role, but a definitive diagnosis of these disorders can at times be difficult, given the transience of symptoms, and often requires the use of coronary provocative tests. Of importance, these tests may provide relevant information on the pathogenic mechanism of myocardial ischemia, allowing physicians to tailor the therapies of their patients. Furthermore, several studies underscored the important prognostic information deriving from the use of coronary provocative tests. Nevertheless, their use in clinical practice is currently limited and mainly restricted to specialized centers, with only a minority of patients receiving a benefit from this diagnostic approach. In this review, we explain the pathophysiological bases for the use of provocative tests, along with their clinical, prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Role of acetylcholine spasm provocation test as a pathophysiological assessment in nonobstructive coronary artery disease

Coronary angiography (CAG) sometimes shows nonobstructive coronary arteries in patients with suspected angina or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The high prevalence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in those patients has recently been reported not only in Japan but also in Western countries, and is clinically attracting attention. Coronary spasm is considered to be one of the leading causes of both suspected stable angina and ACS with nonobstructive coronary arteries. Coronary spasm could also be associated with left ventricular dysfunction leading to heart failure, which could be improved following the administration of calcium channel blockers. Because we rarely capture spontaneous attacks of coronary spasm with electrocardiograms or Holter recordings, an invasive diagnostic modality, acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test, can be useful in detecting coronary spasm during CAG. Furthermore, we can use the ACh-provocation test to identify high-risk patients with coronary spasm complicated with organic coronary stenosis, and then treat with intensive care. Nonobstructive CAD includes not only epicardial coronary spasm but also microvascular spasm or dysfunction that can be associated with recurrent anginal attacks and poor quality of life. ACh-provocation test could also be helpful for the assessment of microvascular spasm or dysfunction. We hope that cardiologists will increasingly perform ACh-provocation test to assess the pathophysiology of nonobstructive CAD.

Vasospastic angina and overlapping cardiac disorders in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Vasospastic angina (VSA) reportedly accounts for one form of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) testing is useful for diagnosing VSA although invasive provocation testing after SCA is a clinical challenge. In addition, even if the ACh test is positive, any causal relationship between VSA and SCA is often unclear because patients with VSA may have other underlying cardiac disorders.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients without overt structural heart disease who had been fully resuscitated from SCA were included. All patients underwent the ACh provocation test and scrutiny such as cardiac computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were followed up for all-cause death or recurrent SCA including appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

RESULTS

An ACh provocation test was performed 20 ± 17 days after cardiac arrest. Fifteen out of 20 (75.0%) patients had a positive ACh test and 2 (10.0%) had adverse events such as ventricular tachycardia and transient cardiogenic shock during the test. In patients with a positive ACh test, 6 of 15 (40.0%) patients had other overlapping cardiac disorders such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, cardiac sarcoidosis, myocarditis, or cardiomyopathy. Long-term prognosis was not different regardless of a positive ACh test or the presence of other cardiac disorders overlapping with VSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-quarters of the patients who had been resuscitated from SCA had a positive ACh test. Further examinations revealed other overlapping cardiac disorders in addition to VSA in 40% of patients with a positive ACh test.

Pharmacological spasm provocation testing in 2500 patients: provoked spasm incidence, complications and cardiac events

Pharmacological spasm provocation tests such as acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) had been performed in the clinic. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of provoked spasm, complications during testing and the cardiac events after these tests. From January 1991 and October 2018, we performed pharmacological spasm provocation tests in 2500 patients: 1810 ACh tests, 1232 ER tests, 542 both tests, and 310 ACh added after ER tests. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the LCA and 20/50/80 μg into the RCA. ER was administered as a total dose of 64 μg into the LCA and 40 μg into the RCA. When adding ACh after ER, the total dose was 50/80 μg into the RCA and 100/200 μg into the LCA. Positive spasm was defined as ≥ 90% stenosis and usual chest pain or ischemic ECG changes. Mean follow-up duration was 47.5 ± 29.9 months. Overall, provoked positive spasm was found in 1095 patients (43.8%). The incidence of positive provoked spasm during ACh testing was significantly higher than that during other tests (ACh: 48.7% vs. ER: 28.9%, Both: 24%, ACh added after ER: 33.5%, p < 0.001). Multiple spasms were remarkably more frequent during ACh testing compared with the other 3 types of testing (ACh: 28.2% vs. ER: 7.4%, Both: 4.1%, ACh added after ER: 13.2%, p < 0.001). No death or acute myocardial infarction was observed, while major complications during ACh testing were significantly more frequent than during ER testing. Readmission due to recurrent angina pectoris in spasm-positive patients was remarkably more frequent than in spasm-negative patients. The incidence of sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation, and acute coronary syndrome were not different between the spasm-positive and spasm-negative groups during the follow-up periods. We could perform all spasm provocation tests without any irreversible complications. All sequential spasm provocation tests were useful for documenting coronary spasm.

Acetylcholine spasm provocation test by trans-radial artery and brachial vein approach

BACKGROUND

Temporary pace maker is necessary because of transient block or bradycardia during the intracoronary acetylcholine spasm provocation tests based on the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the feasibility and safety of the acetylcholine spasm provocation test via the radial artery and brachial vein approach.

METHODS

We tried to perform the acetylcholine spasm provocation tests in 252 patients via the radial artery and brachial vein approach procedures during 5 years. Acetylcholine was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA) and 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA). Back-up pacing rate was set at 40 beats/min. Positive spasm was defined as transient ≥90% luminal narrowing and ischemic electrocardiographic change or usual chest pain.

RESULTS

The procedure success of radial artery and brachial vein access was 94.4% (238/252) and 93.3% (235/252), respectively. We performed 221 patients (87.7%) with acetylcholine tests by radial artery and brachial vein approach. We changed to the brachial approach due to the failures of radial artery access in 14 patients. We also changed to the femoral vein in 11 patients and internal jugular vein in two patients. Back-up pace maker rhythm was observed in 92.1% (232/252) of all study patients, while it was significantly higher in the RCA testing than that in the LCA tests (84.9% (191/225) vs. 52.2% (131/251), P < 0.001). No irreversible complication was found.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend the radial artery and brachial vein approach for safety and convenience when performing the acetylcholine spasm provocation tests.

Dose maximal acetylcholine dose into the left coronary artery affect the positive provoked spasm in the left circumflex artery?

BACKGROUND

Positive provoked spasm in the left circumflex artery (LCX) is lower than that in the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery (RCA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined the provoked positive spasm in the LCX between the maximal acetylcholine (ACh) 100 μg period (January 1991 to July 2012, 1474 patients: the former period) and the maximal ACh 200 μg period (August 2012 to August 2018, 336 patients: the latter period). ACh was injected in incremental dose of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery and of 20/50/80 μg into the RCA. Positive spasm was defined as at least 90% stenosis and usual chest symptoms or ischemic ECG changes.

RESULTS

Provoked positive spasm in the latter period was significantly higher than that in the former period (65.5 vs. 39.1%, P < 0.001). The positive spasm increase of RCA and left anterior descending artery was 143 and 159%, whereas the increase of LCX was 204%. Multiple-vessel spasm was also increased in the latter period.

CONCLUSION

Maximal ACh dose into the left coronary artery may affect the positive spasm in the LCX and multiplevessel spasm.

A comprehensive clinical diagnostic score system for prediction of coronary artery spasm in patients with acute chest pain

Background

Currently, there is no validated multivariate model to predict probability of coronary artery spasm (CAS) in patients with acute chest pain.

Methods

A total of 976 consecutive patients with acute chest pain were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of significant CAS. To adjust potential confounders, a multivariable analysis was performed and a clinical diagnostic score system for CAS was utilized for score derivation.

Results

Multivariable analysis model selected 6 predictors for CAS. The integer score was assigned to each predictors: angina at rest alone (10 points), positive of hyperventilation test (8 points), allergies (3 points), asthma, ST-segment elevation and myocardial bridge (2 points each). We showed that the clinical diagnostic score system had accuracy in predicting CAS, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), which was 0.952–0.966. The cut-off baseline value for the clinical diagnostic score system was set to 11–12 points with specificity of 91.0–93.3% and sensitivity of 90.7–92.9%, respectively.

Conclusion

A clinical diagnostic score system was derived and validated as an accurate tool for estimating the pretest probability of CAS in patients with acute chest pain.

Catheter-induced Spasm in the Proximal Right Coronary Artery

Objectives The clinical characteristics in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) are controversial. We performed a clinical analysis of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 5,296 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic or follow-up angiography during a 26-year period. During this period, we found 40 patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. We compared the clinical characteristics and procedures of cardiac catheterization in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA with those in patients without such spasm. Results The frequency of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA was 0.75% (40/5,296). We performed pharmacological spasm provocation tests in 36 of 40 patients after spasm relief. Positive spasm was observed in 32 patients (88.9%), and 25 patients (78.1%) had multiple spasms. The catheter procedures, including the approach sites (radial/brachial/femoral), catheter size (4/5/6Fr) and catheter type (Judkins right/Sones/Shared/Judkins left 3.5/Amplatz) were not markedly different between the two groups. A multivariate analysis showed that positive spasm [odds ratio (OR): 7.030, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.920-25.700], a younger age (OR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.910-0.965) and diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.278, 95% CI: 0.083-0.928) were the determinant factors for the catheter-induced spasm. Conclusion Approximately 80% of patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal RCA had coronary spastic angina. Positive provoked spasm was the most powerful determinant factor for catheter-induced spasm.

Coronary spasm: It’s common, but it’s still unsolved

Coronary spasm is caused by a transient coronary narrowing due to the constriction of epicardial coronary artery, which leads to myocardial ischemia. More than 50 years have passed since the first recognition of coronary spasm, and many findings on coronary spasm have been reported. Coronary spasm has been considered as having pivotal roles in the cause of not only rest angina but also exertional angina, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure. In addition, several new findings of the mechanism of coronary spasm have emerged recently. The diagnosis based mainly on coronary angiography and spasm provocation test and the mainstream treatment with a focus on a calcium-channel blocker have been established. At a glance, coronary spasm or vasospastic angina (VSA) has become a common disease. On the contrary, there are several uncertain or unsolved problems regarding coronary spasm, including the presence of medically refractory coronary spasm (intractable VSA), or an appropriate use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with cardiac arrest who have been confirmed as having coronary spasm. This editorial focused on coronary spasm, including recent topics and unsolved problems.

Optimal Medications and Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shocks in Aborted Sudden Cardiac Death Due to Coronary Spasm

Objective Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias are recognized in patients with coronary spastic angina. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in patients with structural heart disease and ventricular fibrillation. However, the optimal medication for patients with aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to coronary artery spasm after the implantation of ICD remains controversial. Methods We investigated the medications and the numbers of appropriate ICD shocks in 137 patients with a history of aborted SCD due to coronary spasm. Results Appropriate ICD shocks were observed in 24.1% (33/137) of patients with aborted SCD due to coronary spasm during 41 months of follow-up. Only 15 (15.6%) of the 96 patients with ICDs received aggressive medical therapy, including two or three calcium-channel antagonists. The rate of appropriate ICD shocks was significantly higher in Western countries than in Asian countries (42.9% vs. 19.3%, p<0.01), whereas the medications did not differ between the two regions. Appropriate ICD shocks successfully resuscitated 33 patients. Three patients died due to second serious fatal arrhythmias. Conclusion Appropriate ICD shocks were recognized in a quarter of patients with aborted SCD due to coronary spasm and ICD implantation was effective for suppressing the next serious fatal arrhythmia in these patients. We should reconsider prescribing more medications after ICD implantation in patients with aborted SCD due to coronary artery spasm.

Two-dimensional myocardial deformation in coronary vasospasm-related Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A case report of a serial echocardiographic study

RATIONALE

Although transient reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction is characteristic of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, little is known about the time-course changes of myocardial deformation in coronary vasospasm-related Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We retrospectively analyzed the time-course changes in left ventricle, right ventricle, and left atrium strain values in a patient with coronary vasospasm-related Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. We found that not only left ventricular strain but also left atrial strain was abnormal during acute Takotsubo cardiomyopathy due to coronary vasospasm. Right ventricular free wall strain was normal.

DIAGNOSES

Coronary vasospasm-related Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

INTERVENTIONS

A serial echocardiographic study.

OUTCOMES

The left ventricular strain was still subnormal despite a normalized left ventricular ejection fraction 2 months later. The left atrial strain was normal when the left ventricular ejection fraction normalized.

LESSONS

From this limited experience, it is suggested that echocardiographic myocardial deformation analysis can provide more information than the standard ejection fraction in evaluating myocardial contractile function.

Differential Incidence and Morphology of Spasm According to Coronary Arterial Location by Intracoronary Ergonovine Spasm Provocation Testing

BACKGROUND

We reported less provoked spasm in the left circumflex artery (LCX) by acetylcholine testing compared with the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and right coronary artery (RCA), so we investigated the clinical characteristics of provoked spasm in the LCX by ergonovine (ER) testing.Methods and Results:We retrospectively analyzed 1,185 consecutive cases of intracoronary ER testing during 25 years. Maximal ER dose was 64 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) and 40 μg into the RCA. Positive spasm was defined as a transient ≥90% narrowing and usual chest symptoms or ischemic ECG changes. Positive provoked spasm was recognized in 347 patients (29.3%), including 207 RCA spasms, 166 LAD spasms, and 79 LCX spasms. Spasm was provoked in the LCX significantly less than in the other vessels (P<0.001). LCX-provoked spasm was obtained in 79 patients consisting of 16 patients (20.3%) with triple-vessel spasm, 38 patients (48.1%) with double-vessel spasm and 25 patients (31.6%) with single-vessel spasm. Less than 70% patients with LCX-provoked spasm had multiple spasms, whereas approximately 60% patients had single-vessel spasm in the RCA (64.3%) or LAD (59.6%). In 25 patients with LCX single-vessel spasm, 18 patients (72.0%) had a focal spasm.

CONCLUSIONS

Under maximal ER dose of 64 μg into the LCA, LCX-provoked spasm occurred significantly less than spasm in the other vessels and less than 70% patients had multiple spasms.

Intracoronary acetylcholine application as a possible probe inducing J waves in patients with early repolarization syndrome

Acetylcholine is widely used for a diagnostic provocation test of coronary spasm in patients with vasospastic angina. Acetylcholine usually induces coronary vasodilatation mediated by muscarinic receptor activation, but sometimes it evokes vasoconstriction of coronary arteries where the endothelium is damaged. Early repolarization syndrome is characterized by a J wave observed at the end of the QRS complex in a surface electrocardiogram. The J wave is attributed to the transmural voltage gradient at the early repolarization phase across the ventricular wall, which stems mainly from prominent transient outward current in the epicardium, but not in the endocardium. Transient high-dose application of acetylcholine into the epicardial coronary arteries provides a unique opportunity to augment net outward current, selectively, in the ventricular epicardium and unmask the J wave, irrespective of the cardiac ischemia based on coronary spasm. Acetylcholine augments cardiac membrane potassium conductance by enhancing acetylcholine-activated potassium current directly and by activating adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium current, in addition to the reduced sodium and calcium currents in the setting of severe ischemia due to vasospasm. However, the role of acetylcholine as an arrhythmogenic probe of the J wave induction in patients with suspected early repolarization syndrome warrants future prospective study.