Evaluation of safety and efficacy of periprocedural use of rivaroxaban and apixaban in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation associated silent cerebral emboli: A narrative review

The incidence of silent cerebral emboli (SCE) associated with atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) is much higher than that of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Interventional electrophysiologists have been increasingly alerted to asymptomatic cerebral infarction over the years. Plentiful studies revealed that diagnostic definitions, detection modalities, energy sources, ablation strategies, perioperative anticoagulation regimens, and patient-related factors were associated with the risk of AFCA-associated SCE. Studies related to non-interventional procedures found that SCE may prompt stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia later in life, suggesting a possible role of AFCA-associated SCE in the cognitive function of patients with AF. However, there is no consistent evidence for this view to date. Given that the majority of patients with AF being elderly and the increased risk of cognitive impairment in AF itself, efforts should be made to minimize the occurrence of AFCA-associated SCE.

Optimal Anticoagulant Strategy for Periprocedural Management of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

This network meta-analysis was performed to rank the safety and efficacy of periprocedural anticoagulant strategies in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulant regimens in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation up to July 1, 2021. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were thromboembolic and major bleeding events, respectively, and the net clinical benefit was investigated as the primary-outcome composite. Seventeen studies were included (n = 6950). The mean age ranged from 59 to 70 years; 74% of patients were men and 55% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Compared with the uninterrupted vitamin-K antagonist strategy, the odds ratios for the composite of primary safety and efficacy outcomes were 0.61 (95%CI: 0.31–1.17) with uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants, 0.63 (95%CI: 0.26–1.54) with interrupted direct oral anticoagulants, and 8.02 (95%CI: 2.35–27.45) with interrupted vitamin-K antagonists. Uninterrupted dabigatran significantly reduced the risk of the composite of primary safety and efficacy outcomes (odds ratio, 0.21; 95%CI, 0.08–0.55). Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants are preferred alternatives to uninterrupted vitamin-K antagonists. Interrupted direct oral anticoagulants may be feasible as alternatives. Our results support the use of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants as the optimal periprocedural anticoagulant strategy for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

The management of anticoagulation therapy around the time of catheter ablation (CA) procedure for adults with arrhythmia is critical and yet is variable in clinical practice. The ideal approach for safe and effective perioperative management should balance the risk of bleeding during uninterrupted anticoagulation while minimising the risk of thromboembolic events with interrupted therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and harms of interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation (CA) in adults with arrhythmias.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and SCI-Expanded on the Web of Science for randomised controlled trials on 5 January 2021. We also searched three registers on 29 May 2021 to identify ongoing or unpublished trials. We performed backward and forward searches on reference lists of included trials and other systematic reviews and contacted experts in the field. We applied no restrictions on language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing uninterrupted anticoagulation with any modality of interruption with or without heparin bridging for CA in adults aged 18 years or older with arrhythmia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors conducted independent screening, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias. A third review author resolved disagreements. We extracted data on study population, interruption strategy, ablation procedure, thromboembolic events (stroke or systemic embolism), major and minor bleeding, asymptomatic thromboembolic events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, quality of life (QoL), length of hospital stay, cost, and source of funding. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.  MAIN RESULTS: We identified 12 studies (4714 participants) that compared uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation with interrupted anticoagulation. Studies performed an interruption strategy by either a complete interruption (one study) or by a minimal interruption (11 studies), of which a single-dose skipped strategy was used (nine studies) or two-dose skipped strategy (two studies), with or without heparin bridging. Studies included participants with a mean age of 65 years or greater, with only two studies conducted in relatively younger individuals (mean age less than 60 years). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was the primary type of AF in all studies, and seven studies included other types of AF (persistent and long-standing persistent). Most participants had CHADS2 or CHADS2-VASc demonstrating a low-moderate risk of stroke, with almost all participants having normal or mildly reduced renal function. Ablation source using radiofrequency energy was the most common (seven studies). Ten studies (2835 participants) were conducted in East Asian countries (Japan, China, and South Korea), while the remaining two studies were conducted in the USA. Eight studies were conducted in a single centre. Postablation follow-up was variable among studies at less than 30 days (three studies), 30 days (six studies), and more than 30 days postablation (three studies). Overall, the meta-analysis showed high uncertainty of the effect between the interrupted strategy compared to uninterrupted strategy on the primary outcomes of thromboembolic events (risk ratio (RR) 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 9.46; I2 = 59%; 6 studies, 3468 participants; very low-certainty evidence). However, subgroup analysis showed that uninterrupted vitamin A antagonist (VKA) is associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic events without increasing the risk of bleeding. There is also uncertainty on the outcome of major bleeding events (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.05; I2 = 6%; 10 studies, 4584 participants; low-certainty evidence). The uncertainty was also evident for the secondary outcomes of minor bleeding (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.22; I2 = 87%; 9 studies, 3843 participants; very low-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.21; 442 participants; low-certainty evidence) and asymptomatic thromboembolic events (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.47; I2 = 56%; 6 studies, 1268 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was a lower risk of the composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality) in the interrupted compared to uninterrupted arm (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.81; 1 study, 442 participants; low-certainty evidence). In general, the low event rates, different comparator anticoagulants, and use of different ablation procedures may be the cause of imprecision and heterogeneity observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that the evidence is uncertain to inform the decision to either interrupt or continue anticoagulation therapy around CA procedure in adults with arrhythmia on outcomes of thromboembolic events, major and minor bleeding, all-cause mortality, asymptomatic thromboembolic events, and a composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality).  Most studies in the review adopted a minimal interruption strategy which has the advantage of reducing the risk of bleeding while maintaining a lower level of anticoagulation to prevent periprocedural thromboembolism, hence low event rates on the primary outcomes of thromboembolism and bleeding. The one study that adopted a complete interruption of VKA showed that uninterrupted VKA reduces the risk of thromboembolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. Hence, future trials with larger samples, tailored to a more generalisable population and using homogeneous periprocedural anticoagulant therapy and ablation source are required to address the safety and efficacy of the optimal management of anticoagulant therapy prior to ablation.

Meta-analysis of controlled studies on minimally interrupted vs. continuous use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Aims

At present, there are no guideline recommendations for minimally interrupted use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (mi-NOAC) during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Current evidence is predominantly based on observational studies, with continuous use of vitamin K antagonist in the control arm. This quantitative summary reflects the first high-level evidence on contemporary regimens, with continuous NOAC use (c-NOAC) as the current gold standard.

Methods and results

Meta-analysis (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science) on prospective, controlled studies comparing contemporary mi-NOAC (without bridging) with c-NOAC. Net adverse clinical events (major bleeding, thrombo-embolic events) were the primary outcome. In addition, we analysed total bleeding, minor bleeding, and silent cerebral embolism.

Eight studies (six randomized, two observational) with 2168 patients were summarized. The primary endpoint occurred in 1.0% (18/1835): 1.1% (11/1005) vs. 0.8% (7/830) for the mi-NOAC and c-NOAC groups, respectively; odds ratio (OR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49–2.92, P = 0.64]. The OR for total bleeding on mi-NOAC was 1.26 (95% CI 0.97–1.63, P = 0.07). ORs for minor bleeding and silent cerebral embolism were 1.17 (95% CI 0.80–1.70, P = 0.34) and 2.62 (95% CI 0.54–12.61, P = 0.12), respectively.

Conclusion

This synopsis provides a quantitative synthesis of high-level evidence on a contemporary strategy of mi-NOAC in CA for AF, and overall clinical outcomes were not different from continuous NOAC use. Despite preprocedural interruption, there was no sign of lower bleeding rates. Additional higher volume datasets are warranted for more precise treatment effect estimations of this everyday alternative anticoagulation strategy in AF ablation.

Uninterrupted versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the safety of uninterrupted versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) for patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing uninterrupted versus interrupted DOAC for patients undergoing CA of AF. Primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included minor bleeding, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or thromboembolism (TE), silent cerebral ischemic events, and cardiac tamponade. Meta-analysis was stratified by study design. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects model and Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool RR.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies (7 randomized, 6 observational) comprising 3595 patients were included. The RCT restricted analysis did not show any difference in terms of major bleeding (risk ratio [RR] = 0.79; [0.35-1.79]), minor bleeding (RR = 0.99 [0.68-1.43]), stroke or TIA or TE (RR = 0.80 [0.19-3.32]), silent cerebral ischemic events (RR = 0.64 [0.32-1.28]), and cardiac tamponade (RR = 0.61 [0.20-1.92]). Observational study restricted analysis showed a protective effect of uninterrupted DOAC on silent cerebral ischemic events (RR = 0.45 [0.31-0.67]) and no difference in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes with uninterrupted versus interrupted DOAC for CA of AF and observational data suggests that uninterrupted DOACs are protective against silent cerebral ischemic lesions.

"One-stop shop": safety and efficacy of combining atrial septal defect occlusion and left atrial appendage closure for patients with atrial septal defect and atrial fibrillation

Background

One-stop occlusion, which is defined as the combination of atrial septal defect [ASD] or patent foramen ovale [PFO] occlusion and left atrial appendage [LAA] closure, in patients with ASD/PFO and atrial fibrillation (AF) has not yet been investigated systematically. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of one-stop occlusion in the treatment of adult patients with ASD/PFO and AF.

Methods

Inpatients with AF and ASD/PFO were recruited between August 2014 and April 2019. Preoperatively, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were conducted to identify the ASD/PFO size and margin, presence of thrombus in the LAA, and LAA orifice width and depth at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°. After confirmation of the indications of LAA closure (LAAC) and ASD/PFO occlusion, the procedures were performed simultaneously under general anesthesia. Oral anticoagulants were administered for 45–60 days, followed with regular evaluation of TTE and TEE.

Results

Forty-nine patients (age, 65.6 ± 9.6 years) were recruited in this study, including 24 patients with ASD and 25 patients with PFO. They were treated with LAAC and ASD/PFO occlusion successfully. The mean ASD size and mean diameter of the ASD occluders were 14.2 ± 7.7 and 25.4 ± 8.5 mm, respectively. The mean PFO size was 3.5 ± 0.4 mm. The mean maximal LAA orifice width and depth were 20.5 ± 3.4 and 28.3 ± 3.6 mm, respectively. All patients were implanted with a Watchman device (diameter, 27.1 ± 2.9 mm). Postoperatively, all patients took anticoagulants orally for 45–60 days, and their mean postoperative follow-up duration was 29.0 ± 12.1 months. Postoperative TEE showed that all had normal positioning of the LAA and ASD/PFO occluders. At 45–60 days after operation, TEE showed that the LAA and ASD/PFO occluder were in the normal position; however, two patients who took warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants, respectively, have developed occluder thrombosis. After adjusted anticoagulant therapy, TEE showed that the thrombus disappeared at 6 months after operation.

Conclusion

One-stop occlusion is safe and effective for the treatment of adult patients with ASD/PFO and AF. It is also feasible to administer warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants after operation.

Peri-procedural novel oral anticoagulants dosing strategy during atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at determining whether uninterrupted novel oral anticoagulant (UI-NOAC) would have similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events as minimally interrupted NOAC (MI-NOAC) at the time of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) as relevant studies are scarce.

METHODS

We searched through the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective observational studies (POSs) or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing UI-NOAC versus MI-NOAC from their establishment to January 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the pooled treatment effect.

RESULTS

Nine studies (three POSs and six RCTs) with 2578 patients were included in the final analysis (55% patients received MI-NOAC). No significant difference was found regarding the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43-2.00, P = .84, I²   = 0%). Both groups were comparable in all subgroups ([Asians: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43-2.36, P = .99, I²   = 0%], [non-Asians: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11-3.88, P = .63, I²   = 0%], [RCTs: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.37-1.97, P = .71, I²   = 0%], and [POSs: OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.19-12.01, P = .69, I²   = 0%]). The risk of minor bleeding (P = .88) or stroke (P = .69) was comparable between the groups. UI-NOAC resulted in a significant reduction in silent stroke (SS) (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83, P = .01, I²   = 72%). No significant difference was found in SS between once-daily and twice-daily NOACs (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.33, P = .64, I²   = 0%) in the MI-NOAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

UI-NOAC, as a peri-procedural anticoagulation strategy for catheter ablation in AF, had similar safety compared with MI-NOAC, but was advantageous in terms of SS.

Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in Japanese patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for perioperative anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published up to June 30, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with a total of 6827 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The experimental group received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban; the control group received warfarin. The safety endpoints were bleeding complications; the efficacy endpoints were thromboembolic complications. Results were as follows: Patients with NOACs had a lower risk of overall bleeding complications (OR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.54, 0.87), P = 0.002), including major bleeding complications (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.84), P = 0.007) and minor bleeding complications (OR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.56, 0.94), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between NOACs and warfarin after CA (OR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.14, 1.10), P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese NVAF patients undergoing CA, NOACs have similar effects to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Moreover, NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of bleeding complications.

Meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of using minimally interrupted novel oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The ideal periprocedural anticoagulation strategy for patients being treated with a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of using a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy versus an uninterrupted NOAC or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) strategy during AF ablation.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized controlled or prospective observational studies that compared a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy with an uninterrupted NOAC or VKA strategy from the time of database establishment up to December 2019. The primary endpoints were major bleeding, minor bleeding, and symptomatic thromboembolism. The secondary endpoint was silent cerebral infarction (SCI) as detected by post-ablation brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A measurement of treatment effect for the endpoint was reported as pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies (6 randomized, 11 observational, and 1 randomized registry) with 6203 patients were included in the final analysis (47% of the patients received minimally interrupted NOAC). There was no significant difference between treatment groups regarding the risk for major bleeding (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.57, P = 0.86, I² = 27%). Different stratification methods did not yield significant difference regarding the risk for major bleeding. There was no difference between groups regarding the risk for minor bleeding (P = 1.00) or symptomatic thromboembolism (P = 0.26). Brain MRI results showed that both uninterrupted NOAC (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83, P = 0.01, I² = 72%) and uninterrupted VKA (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97, P = 0.04, I² = 36%) produced a significant reduction in the rate of SCI when compared with minimally interrupted NOAC.

CONCLUSIONS

A periprocedural anticoagulation strategy of minimally interrupted NOAC is not superior to uninterrupted NOAC or VKA when used during AF ablation. There is evidence favoring the use of uninterrupted NOAC or VKA in terms of the risk for SCI.

A randomized comparison of two direct oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing cardiac ablation with a contemporary warfarin control arm

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of periprocedural use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. We compared the incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism and hemopericardium following AF ablation among patients receiving edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin and between normal- and low-dose use of edoxaban and rivaroxaban.

METHODS

This prospective randomized study included 170 consecutive AF patients. Patients taking DOACs upon admission to our hospital were randomly assigned to an edoxaban group or to a rivaroxaban group. Warfarin was continued in patients receiving warfarin at admission. All patients underwent AF ablation, and cerebral MRI was performed to evaluate asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism the day after the procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were assigned to edoxaban and 63 to rivaroxaban. Warfarin was continued in 46 patients. Although asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism was detected in 25 patients (16.3%), there were no significant differences among the groups. Hemopericardium occurred in 2 patients (one each in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups). The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism was higher in the low-dose group (9 patients, 25.7%) than in the normal-dose group (8 patients, 10.0%) for patients prescribed either edoxaban or rivaroxaban (p < 0.05). The proportion of males (88.0%, 69.5%, p < 0.05), history of prior AF ablation (64.0%, 42.2%, p < 0.05), and hypertension (68.0%, 46.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in patients with cerebral thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism and hemopericardium in AF ablation was similar among patients using edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. However, low doses of DOACs may increase the risk of asymptomatic stroke.

Dynamics of Soluble Thrombomodulin and Circulating miRNAs in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the world and has a high risk of thromboembolism. The most effective approach, catheter ablation, requires evaluation by electrocardiography. The aim of our study was to investigate novel clinical markers that predict restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) after catheter ablation. Seventy-eight consecutive patients with AF underwent catheter ablation and were separated into 2 groups: restored SR and recurrent AF. The levels of 4 blood proteins (serum or plasma) and 3 mature microRNAs (miRNAs) and their primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) in serum were measured before and after ablation, and the associations between each parameter were analyzed statistically. Soluble thrombomodulin (s-TM) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels increased above baseline after ablation in both the restored SR (s-TM 11.55 [2.92] vs 13.75 [3.38], P < .001; PAI-1 25.74 [15.25] vs 37.79 [19.56], P < .001) and recurrent AF (s-TM 10.28 [2.78] vs 11.67 [3.37], P < .001; PAI-1 26.16 [15.70] vs 40.74 [22.55], P < .001) groups. Levels of C-reactive protein and asymmetric dimethylarginine were not significantly changed. Pri-miR-126 levels significantly decreased after ablation in the recurrent AF group, but the other miRNAs and pri-miRNAs did not. The measurement of s-TM and pri-miR-126 in blood was a useful tool to reflect the condition of AF patients with catheter ablation.

Effects of rivaroxaban on activated clotting time in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Chinese patients

PURPOSE

It has been observed that patients on rivaroxaban require more heparin and frequent activated clotting time (ACT) monitoring throughout the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, but the strategy of heparin injection varies in different studies. We sought to examine the determinants of heparin dosage in Chinese patients on rivaroxaban.

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive patients who received rivaroxaban before atrial fibrillation ablation and compared them to patients on no anticoagulant. The dosage of heparin required to achieve ACT > 300 s was evaluated. We then tested determinants of heparin dosage prospectively.

RESULTS

There were 124 patients on rivaroxaban (R group) and 42 on no anticoagulant (NA group) in retrospective study. Heparin dosage required to achieve target ACT was 0.89 ± 0.01 mg/kg in R group and 0.60 ± 0.01 mg/kg in NA group, P < 0.05. The bolus heparin dosage required was 0.77 ± 0.01 mg/kg (96.1 ± 1.1 U/kg) when baseline ACT > 200 s. In the prospective study, 80/90(88.9%) of patients in R group and 79/90(87.8%) in NA group achieved an ACT > 300 s after initial bolus injection of heparin. The ACT 60 min after target ACT (ACT60) in R group was higher than that in NA group (287.5 ± 28.3 VS 238.9 ± 29.5, P < 0.05). Rivaroxaban was the only independent predictor of ACT60. There was no significant difference in ACT or heparin dosage in patients with different duration on or withdrawal of rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation on rivaroxaban, the effective duration of heparin is prolonged and the procedural heparin requirement is significantly greater. Heparin dosage can be predicted by baseline ACT, but not influenced by duration on or withdrawal of rivaroxaban.

Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in patients requiring catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The ideal oral anticoagulant agent during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remained unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are safer and effective compared to uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists (U-VKA) among patients requiring CA for AF.

METHODS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 observational studies (OS) were selected using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and the CENTRAL data bases (Inception-December-2017). Estimates were reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding and main efficacy endpoint was thromboembolism.

RESULTS

In RCTs restricted analysis, NOACs significantly reduced the relative risk of major bleeding by 72% compared to U-VKA (RR, 0.28, 95% CI, 0.14-0.58, P < 0.001). This significant effect was not achieved in OS based analysis (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.42-1.78, P = 0.68). In terms of thromboembolism, both anticoagulation strategies were equally effective in analysis of RCTs (RR, 0.28, 95% CI, 0.05-1.70, P = 0.17) or OS (RR, 1.43, 95% CI, 0.46-4.39, P = 0.54). In sensitivity analysis, there was no difference among uninterrupted NOACs (U-NOACs) and U-VKA in terms of major bleeding [(RCTs: RR, 0.33, 95% CI, 0.10-1.06, P = 0.06); (OS: RR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.28-1.78, P = 0.46)] or thromboembolism [(RCTs: RR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.03-2.29, P = 0.22); (OS: RR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.08-5.53, P = 0.72)].

CONCLUSION

NOACs, either interrupted or un-interrupted, are safer and equally effective drugs compared to U-VKA in AF patients requiring CA.

Prospective observational study in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Rationale and design of the All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry

BACKGROUND

Although anticoagulation effectively prevents stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), it has been underused in elderly AF patients for many reasons, mainly because of knowledge gaps regarding cardiovascular treatment of these populations with multiple comorbidities and poor prognosis. The objectives of the All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry are to collect real-world information about the clinical status of patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) aged ≥75 years, current status of anticoagulant therapy, and prognosis with/without anticoagulation to establish a database for this specific patient population that is increasing remarkably worldwide.

METHODS AND DESIGN

The ANAFIE Registry is an observational, multicenter, prospective study of Japanese patients with NVAF aged ≥75 years that will include 30,000 patients and have the primary endpoint of composite of stroke and systemic embolism over a 2-year follow-up period. In parallel with the main study, seven sub-cohort studies will be conducted with assessments including coagulation-fibrinolysis markers, echocardiography, heart rate, hypertension, cognitive function, frailty, and medication adherence. Subgroup analyses will be performed, and stratified by renal function, HbA1c, and maximum number of drugs used. The study was started in October 2016, with a planned 2-year recruitment period. As of January 31, 2018, 33,213 patients were enrolled; the recruitment was therefore ended 8 months earlier than the original plan.

CONCLUSIONS

The ANAFIE Registry will provide a valuable database for the clinical status, management, and outcomes of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and hemorrhagic events with/without anticoagulation in the increasing population of elderly NVAF patients, and will identify risk factors associated with these clinical events.

Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Uninterrupted Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

This meta-analysis sought to assess the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation. Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared uninterrupted NOACs versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists in the catheter ablation of AF. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, total bleeding, minor bleeding, and cardiac tamponade. Efficacy outcomes were symptomatic thromboembolism and symptomatic stroke/transient ischemic attack. Summary estimate risk ratios (RRs) were constructed primarily with a DerSimonian-Laird model. Thirteen studies (3 RCTs and 10 observational studies) with 4,878 patients were included. The risk of major bleeding (RR 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 1.50, p = 0.53), total bleeding (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.15, p = 0.41), minor bleeding (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.21, p = 0.85), cardiac tamponade (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.69, p = 0.65), symptomatic thromboembolism (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.31, p = 0.90), and symptomatic stroke/transient ischemic attack (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.29 to 3.65, p = 0.97) was similar in both groups. The quality of evidence for both major bleeding and symptomatic thromboembolism was moderate for RCTs and very low for observational studies. In conclusion, the use of uninterrupted NOACs in AF catheter ablation appears to be safe and efficacious. The evidence is not of high quality; thus, further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation With Focus on Apixaban

We performed a meta-analysis of data on the effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with other oral anticoagulants (warfarin or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or edoxaban) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) in different settings of randomized controlled trials, real-world studies, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Thirty studies were searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases reporting comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban with warfarin (n = 23), rivaroxaban (n = 12), dabigatran (n = 13), or edoxaban (n = 2) for stroke prevention in AF. In real-world estimates, apixaban was similar to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systematic thromboembolism (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.14, I² = 82.9%, N = 7), and safer than warfarin in the risks of major bleeding (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70, I² = 18.7%, N = 9) in patients with AF. The risk of stroke or thromboembolism with apixaban was similar to rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban in the settings of real-world studies and RFA. Major bleeding with apixaban was generally lower than rivaroxaban (relative risks 0.45, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.53, I² = 0%, N = 5) and similar to dabigatran in real-world studies (relative risks 1.44, 95% CI 0.33 to 6.30, I² = 97.7%, N = 5), but similar to rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban in RFA. In conclusion, our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive estimate of the effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with other oral anticoagulants (warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban) in patients with AF in different settings of randomized controlled trial, real-world studies, and RFA.