Safety of low-dose dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation and mild renal insufficiency

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) including patients with CKD III. However, data on patient outcomes with DOACs for advanced CKD are limited, while warfarin use is controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with AF using DOACs and CKD stages III-V was conducted. The primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding while on DOAC therapy among CKD IV and V patients. Rates of outcomes from the DOAC trials and from previous studies of warfarin in CKD were referenced.

RESULTS

Of 316 patients reviewed, 152 were included with mean CrCl of 38.8 mL/min. Stroke and systemic embolism occurred at a rate of 1.17 per 100 person-years, with no significant difference between CKD IV/V and CKD III (P = .567). Rates were comparable to DOAC use from the DOAC trials, and lower than rates in studies of warfarin in CKD IV/V patients. There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward increased major bleeding in CKD IV/V patients. Rates of major bleeding in CKD III to V subjects were comparable to published rates for warfarin users with similar levels of renal impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, DOACs appeared to be as efficacious and safe in CKD IV and V as in CKD III. In addition, DOACs appeared to be more effective than, and as safe as warfarin when compared with reference studies of patients with advanced CKD. Our findings support the use of DOACs for thromboembolism prevention in patients with advanced CKD and AF.

WITHDRAWN: Effectiveness and safety of long-term dabigatran among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: J-Dabigatran Surveillance

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in Journal of Cardiology, 73/6 (2018) 507–514, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.12.013. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

Effectiveness and safety of long-term dabigatran among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: J-dabigatran surveillance

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of dabigatran etexilate (DE) have not been elucidated thoroughly in clinical practice for Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In particular, those of DE at a reduced dose due to dose reduction recommendations (DRR) remain unknown.

METHODS

NVAF patients who had newly initiated DE treatment for prevention of thromboembolic events between December 2011 and November 2013 were enrolled. They were followed until August 2016. Outcome events included thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 6443 patients (mean age, 70.9 years; male, 66.9%; and mean CHADS₂ score, 1.8). During a follow-up period of 610 days (median), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE) occurred at 1.4%/year for DE 110mg twice daily (BID) (DE220, n=4759) and 0.8% for dabigatran 150mg BID (DE300, n=1571, unadjusted p=0.0317). Major bleeding occurred at 1.3 and 0.6%/year for DE220 and DE300, respectively (unadjusted p=0.0097). All-cause death occurred at 1.5 and 0.5%/year for DE220 and DE300, respectively (unadjusted p=0.0005). When patients were divided into four groups based on DRR and DE doses (DE300 groups meeting and not meeting DRR, and DE220 groups meeting and not meeting DRR), incidence rates of stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding differed among the four groups (unadjusted p=0.0026 and 0.0194 for trend, respectively); DE220 group meeting DRR had the highest rates (1.7% and 1.4%/year, respectively). However, in multivariate analysis, no differences between doses were observed regarding any outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results are indicative of the favorable benefit-risk profile of dabigatran in Japanese clinical practice. Dabigatran dose was not independently associated with thromboembolic and bleeding events in Japanese NVAF patients.

Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: A review of options for therapeutic anticoagulation to reduce thromboembolism risk

Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease (CKD) commonly occur together, which poses a therapeutic dilemma due to increased risk of both systemic thromboembolism and bleeding. Chronic kidney disease also has implications for medication selection. The objective of this review is to evaluate the options for anticoagulation for thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. We searched PubMed for studies of patients with atrial fibrillation and CKD on warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for thromboembolism prevention through January 1 2018, in addition to evaluating major trials evaluating DOACs and warfarin use as well as society guidelines. For patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease, primarily observational data supports the use of warfarin, and high quality trial data and meta-analyses support the use and possible superiority of DOACs. For patients with severe chronic kidney disease, there are limited data on warfarin which supports its use, and data for DOACs is limited primarily to pharmacologic studies which support dose reductions but lack information on patient outcomes. For patients with end-stage renal disease, studies on warfarin are conflicting, but the majority suggest a lack of benefit and possible harm; studies in DOACs are very limited, but apixaban is the least renally cleared and may be both safe and effective. In conclusion, warfarin or DOACs may be used based on the degree of severity of chronic kidney disease, but further study in needed in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Registry of Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation focused on anticoagulant therapy in the new era: The RAFFINE registry study design and baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND

The management of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved with the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but data on their clinical effectiveness and safety outside clinical trial settings are limited.

METHOD

The RAFFINE registry is an observational, multicenter, prospective registry of Japanese patients with AF, designed to follow clinical events over 3 years. Patient enrollment was conducted from 2013 to 2015 at university hospitals, general hospitals, and private clinics to ensure inclusion of a broad spectrum of representative AF patients. The primary outcome events in this study will be ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding.

RESULT

We enrolled 3901 ambulatory patients with AF from 4 university hospitals and 50 general hospitals/clinics in Japan. The mean patient age was 72.6 years and 68.5% were male. The type of AF was paroxysmal in 37.8%, persistent in 9.3%, and permanent in 51.7%. Major coexisting diseases were hypertension (72.7%), diabetes mellitus (30.3%), congestive heart failure (23.8%), history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (15.1%), and coronary artery disease (13.7%). Of the entire cohort, 44.6% were treated with warfarin and 43.0% were treated with DOACs. The prescription of DOACs exceeded that of warfarin in the general hospitals and clinics. Risk scores such as CHADS₂ score, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score were higher in patients at university hospitals than in patients at general hospitals or clinics.

CONCLUSION

The RAFFINE registry at baseline described the current status of anticoagulation therapy in Japan and long-term follow-up data will identify how outcomes vary between stratified groups in patients with AF in the DOAC era (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000009617).