Complete right bundle branch block and QRS-T discordance can be the initial clue to detect S-ICD ineligibility

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was inappropriate for use in a patient with aborted sudden cardiac death due to coronary spastic angina: a case report

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with coronary spastic angina and aborted sudden cardiac death. The effectiveness of subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) for patients with coronary artery spastic angina is controversial.

Case summary

A 54-year-old man presented with ventricular fibrillation. Emergent coronary angiography showed diffuse narrowing of the coronary arteries that was reversible with isosorbide dinitrate. He was diagnosed with coronary spastic angina. S-ICD was implanted after the administration of a calcium-channel blocker and nicorandil. Seven months after the implantation, he collapsed again due to sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular block caused by cardiac ischaemia. He developed cardiac arrest at both admissions. Six hours after the admission, electrocardiogram showed transient right bundle branch block. Inappropriate shocks were delivered because of low R-wave amplitude and T-wave oversense. S-ICD was replaced with a transvenous device in order to manage these two arrhythmias and inappropriate shocks.

Discussion

Patients with coronary artery spasm and aborted sudden cardiac death are candidates for implantation of S-ICD, but there are risks of bradycardia and inappropriate shocks in other ischaemic events.

SMART pass will prevent inappropriate operation of S-ICD

BACKGROUND

Compared to screening ECG before implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD), selectable vectors without T-wave oversensing increase after S-ICD implantation. Newer algorithms have recently become available to reduce T-wave oversensing, such as SMART pass (SP). With this function, more selectable vectors are identified after S-ICD implantation. However, this improvement in eligibility utilizing SP has not yet been well validated. We aimed to clarify S-ICD eligibility before and after S-ICD implantation with and without SP.

METHODS

Participants comprised 34 patients implanted with an S-ICD at Okayama University Hospital and its affiliated hospitals between February 2016 and August 2017. A total of 102 S-ICD vectors were assessed for eligibility before and after S-ICD implantation, at rest and during exercise testing. Vector availability was evaluated in the presence and absence of SP after S-ICD implantation.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator eligibility was significantly better after implantation even without SP than S-ICD screening before S-ICD implantation, both at rest (before 65.7% vs after 95.1%, P < 0.01) and during exercise (before 59.3% vs after 90.6%, P < 0.01). SP improved S-ICD eligibility during exercise (SP on 97.9% vs off 90.6%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed the prevalence of S-ICD eligibility increased significantly after S-ICD implantation compared to screening before implantation. SP further increased selectable vectors in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Available vectors increased significantly after S-ICD implantation compared to preoperative vectors as assessed by S-ICD screening ECG. T-wave oversensing during exercise has been an unresolved issue for S-ICD, but SP will help prevent inappropriate operation with S-ICD.

Effect of diurnal variations in the QRS complex and T waves on the eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) are an established therapy for preventing sudden cardiac death. However, a considerable number of patients still undergo inappropriate shocks even after conventional preimplantation electrocardiographic (ECG) screening.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to elucidate the additional effect of diurnal variations in the QRS complex and T waves of 24-hour Holter screening on S-ICD eligibility.

METHODS

Patients with transvenous ICDs who did not need pacing were selected for the study. The ECG was recorded by placing the electrodes to simulate the 3 sensing vectors of the S-ICD, with the patient in the standing and supine positions (conventional), during exercise, and during 24-hour Holter screening. We investigated the additional discrimination of diurnal variations in patients ineligible for S-ICDs as well as characteristics of those patients.

RESULTS

Of the 86 patients (82% men; mean age 54±16 years) analyzed by all 3 screenings, 2 (2.3%) and 3 (3.4%) were considered ineligible by conventional and exercise screening, respectively. An additional 21 patients (24.4%) were found ineligible through Holter screening. A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Brugada syndrome and an increased QRS duration per millisecond were associated with ineligibility (odds ratio 5.74; 95% confidence interval 1.74-20.2; P = .003 and odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.07; P = .007, respectively). T-wave oversensing was mostly observed during 0-6 AM, but no significant diurnal variations were observed in the incorrect QRS profiles.

CONCLUSION

The detection of diurnal variations through Holter monitoring in addition to conventional screening is expected to be useful for determining S-ICD eligibility.