“30-minute-delta” of high-sensitivity troponin I improves diagnostic performance in acute myocardial infarction

Suspected myocardial infarction in the emergency department: An evaluation of clinical thresholds for the Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine rapid rule-out (RRO) criteria for the outcome of myocardial infarction (MI) using the Beckman Coulter Access high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay. Secondary objectives were to explore cut-points for rapid rule-in (RRI) and amount of change at 3-h (3-h delta) indicative of MI.

METHODS

A retrospective study included ED patients with suspected MI between June and September 2019. hs-cTnI levels were performed at baseline and after 3 h. The performance benchmark for RRO criteria was a negative predictive value (NPV) for MI with a lower 95% confidence limit >99%, and for RRI and 3-h delta cut-points was a positive predictive value (PPV) for MI >70%. Delta calculation required rising hs-cTnI levels, with at least one above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit. Analyses utilised receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and contingency tables.

RESULTS

Baseline hs-cTnI levels from 935 patients were available for RRO analyses. Of tested criteria, baseline hs-cTnI <6 ng/L (females) or <11 ng/L (males) plus symptom onset >2 h met the performance benchmark (NPV: 100% [95% confidence interval 99-100]). hs-cTnI levels were available for RRI and 3-h delta analyses from 935 and 52 patients, respectively. A 3-h delta cut-point >35 ng/L met the performance benchmark (PPV: 81% [95% confidence interval 58-95]) but no RRI cut-point did so.

CONCLUSIONS

For the Beckman Coulter Access hs-cTnI assay, RRO criteria of baseline hs-cTnI <6 ng/L (females) or <11 ng/L (males) plus symptom onset >2 h met our performance benchmark. A 3-h delta cut-point >35 ng/L met the performance benchmark, but poor precision means further adequately powered research is required.

Absolute Versus Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponins in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is one of the leading causes of death globally. Rapid diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) will enable earlier initiation of the treatment and improve patient outcomes. Practice guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) had listed the diagnostic performance of absolute versus relative changes in evidence gaps. We aimed to address this evidence gap by examining the diagnostic accuracy of absolute versus relative changes in cardiac troponins at various time intervals in diagnosing MI. Grey literature, conference abstracts, animal studies, and reports published before 2009 and in languages other than English were excluded. We included reports that investigated absolute or relative changes in highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) or sensitive/highly sensitive cardiac troponin I (s/hs-cTnI) assays after specific time intervals (1, 2, or 3 h) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of the acute coronary syndrome. After screening, we arranged the reports in 12 separate groups based on the variables for which the data was reported. Quality assessment of the diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted summary area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each pool. We then performed two-sided (or two-tailed) tests to compare independent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. MedCalc version 20.106 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) was used for all statistical analysis. We included eight reports with 23,450 patients in the meta-analysis.

Weighted summary estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) under random-effects model for ROC-AUC are as follows: absolute hs-cTnI at 1 h - 0.94 (95% CI: 0.922 to 0.959, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 1 h - 0.921 (95% CI: 0.902 to 0.941, p < 0.001); absolute s/hs-cTnI at 2 h - 0.953 (95% CI: 0.926 to 0.980, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 2 h 0.951 (95% CI: 0.940 to 0.962, p < 0.001); relative hs-cTnT at 2 h - 0.818 (95% CI: 0.733 to 0.903, p < 0.001); relative s/hs-cTnI at 2 h - 0.762 (95% CI: 0.726 to 0.798, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnI at 3 h - 0.967 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.984, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 3 h - 0.959 (95% CI: 0.950 to 0.968, p < 0.001); and relative hs-cTnT at 3 h - 0.926 (95% CI: 0.907 to 0.945, p < 0.001). P-values of comparison of absolute and relative changes are as follows: hs-cTnT at 1 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnI at 1 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnT at 2 h: 0.0024; s/hs-cTnI at 2 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnT at 3 h: 0.0022; and hs-cTnI at 3 h: 0.0005. Our analysis found absolute changes to be superior to relative changes in both hs-cTnT and s/hs-cTnI at 1, 2, and 3 h in the diagnosis of MI. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing s/hs-cTnI vs. hs-cTnT using absolute or relative changes at any time interval. Our findings suggest that future research investigating a potential 0 h/30 min algorithm should use absolute Δ over relative Δ. A suboptimal number of reports in the groups limited our ability to establish the robustness of the results. We did not receive any funding for this review.

Potential impact of a novel pathway for suspected myocardial infarction utilising a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays promise high diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction (MI). In an ED where conventional cTnI was in use, we evaluated an assessment pathway using the new Access hsTnI assay.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis recruited ED patients with suspected MI between June and September 2019. All patients received routine care with a conventional cTnI assay (AccuTnI +3: limit of detection (LoD) 10 ng/L, 99th centile upper reference limit (URL) 40 ng/L, abnormal elevation cut-point 80 ng/L). Arrival, then 90-minute or 360-minute cTnI levels for low and non-low risk patients, respectively (ED Assessment of Chest pain score) guided diagnosis and disposition which was at treating physician discretion. The same patients had arrival and 90-minute or 180-minute samples drawn for hs-cTnI levels (Access hsTnI: LoD 2 ng/L, 99th centile URL 10 ng/L (females) and 20 ng/L (males); abnormal elevation above the URL and delta >30%). Treating physicians were blinded to the hs-cTnI results. Using the hs-cTnI values, investigators retrospectively assigned likely diagnosis, disposition and likelihood of a 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Admission was recommended for significantly rising hs-cTnI elevations. The primary objective was to demonstrate an acceptable unexpected 30-day post-discharge MACE rate of <1%. cTnI elevation rates, diagnostic outcomes and ED disposition were also compared between pathways.

RESULTS

For the 935 patients, unexpected 30-day post-discharge MACE rates were 0/935 (0%, 95% CI 0% to 0.4%) with the conventional or novel pathway. For the high-sensitivity and conventional assays, respectively, abnormal elevation rates were 29% (95% CI 26% to 32%) and 19% (95% CI 17% to 22%), for MI were 9% (95% CI 8% to 11%) and 8% (95% CI 6% to 10%), and for hospital admission were 42% (95% CI 39% to 45%) and 43% (95% CI 40% to 47%).

CONCLUSION

The novel pathway using the Access hsTnI assay has an acceptably low 30-day MACE rate.

High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may allow rapid rule out of myocardial infarction and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for the management of adults presenting with acute chest pain, in particular for the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Sixteen databases were searched up to September 2019. Review methods followed published guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using appropriate risk-of-bias tools. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies; otherwise, random-effects logistic regression was used. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different troponin testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and a state-transition cohort model. A lifetime time horizon (of 60 years) was used.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies (123 publications) were included in the review. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test strategies evaluated are defined by the combination of four factors (i.e. assay, number and timing of tests, and threshold concentration), resulting in a large number of possible combinations. Clinical opinion indicated a minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity of 97%. When considering single test strategies, only those using a threshold at or near to the limit of detection for the assay, in a sample taken at presentation, met the minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity criterion. The majority of the multiple test strategies that met this criterion comprised an initial rule-out step, based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels in a sample taken on presentation and a minimum symptom duration, and a second stage for patients not meeting the initial rule-out criteria, based on presentation levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and absolute change after 1, 2 or 3 hours. Two large cluster randomised controlled trials found that implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and rate of hospital admission without increasing cardiac events. In the base-case analysis, standard troponin testing was both the most effective and the most costly. Other testing strategies with a sensitivity of 100% (subject to uncertainty) were almost equally effective, resulting in the same life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gain at up to four decimal places. Comparisons based on the next best alternative showed that for willingness-to-pay values below £8455 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Access High Sensitivity Troponin I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) [(symptoms > 3 hours AND < 4 ng/l at 0 hours) OR (< 5 ng/l AND Δ < 5 ng/l at 0 to 2 hours)] would be cost-effective. For thresholds between £8455 and £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Elecsys® Troponin-T high sensitive (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (< 12 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 3 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective. For a threshold > £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Dimension Vista® High-Sensitivity Troponin I (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) (< 5 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 2 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing may be cost-effective compared with standard troponin testing.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154716.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Absolute Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I at Three Hours After Presentation is Useful for Diagnosing Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department

Background

A rise and/or fall in cardiac troponin value with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit is essential for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) measurements in AMI diagnosis, in terms of the predictability of absolute and relative changes.

Methods

For this retrospective, forward observational study, we enrolled 281 patients older than 18 years who presented with chest pain at the emergency department (ED) between August 2015 and December 2016. The patients were grouped as AMI and non-AMI, and 73 (26%) were diagnosed as having AMI. Hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA) was measured at presentation and 3 hours later. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the absolute and relative changes in hs-cTnI.

Results

The cut-off values to predict AMI were 16.2 ng/L and 42.1% for the absolute and relative hs-cTnI changes, respectively. The area under the curve of hs-cTnI for AMI diagnosis was larger for absolute changes than for relative changes [0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–0.98) vs 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.93)] (P=0.014).

Conclusions

The absolute hs-cTnI change at 3 hours after presentation was superior to the relative change, and a rise and/or fall in hs-cTnI of >16.2 ng/L at 3 hours after presentation was useful to identify AMI in patients presenting at the ED.

Clinical outcomes for chest pain patients discharged home from emergency departments using high-sensitivity versus conventional cardiac troponin assays

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays enhance detection of lower circulating troponin concentrations, but the impact on outcomes in clinical practice is unclear. Our objective was to compare outcomes of chest pain patients discharged from emergency departments (EDs) using hs-cTn and conventional troponin (cTn) assays.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of chest pain patients aged 40-105 years who presented to an ED from April 1, 2013, to March 31, 2017, and were discharged home. We compared 30-day and 1-year outcomes of EDs that used hs-cTn versus cTn assays. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Comparisons were conducted with (1) no adjustment; (2) adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, and hospital characteristics; and (3) full clinical adjustment.

RESULTS

Among the 394,910 patients, 62,138 (15.7%) were evaluated at hs-cTn EDs and 332,772 (84.3%) were evaluated at cTn EDs. Patients discharged from hs-cTn EDs were less likely to have diabetes, hypertension, or prior heart disease. At 30 days, the unadjusted primary outcome rate was lower in hs-cTn EDs (0.9% vs 1.0%, P < .001). The 30-day hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.92) for no adjustment and 0.98 (95% CI 0.88-1.08) for full adjustment. Over 1 year, patients discharged from hs-cTn EDs had significantly fewer primary outcomes (3.7% vs 4.1%, P < .001) and lower hazard ratio (0.93; 95% CI 0.89-0.98) even after full adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hs-cTn testing was associated with a significantly lower adjusted hazard of myocardial infarction, angina, and all-cause hospitalization at 1 year but not 30 days.

Rapid use of high-sensitive cardiac troponin I for ruling-in and ruling-out of acute myocardial infarction (RACING-MI): study protocol

Introduction

The European Society of Cardiology has suggested an accelerated algorithm for ruling-in and ruling-out myocardial infarction (MI) with high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measured at admission (0 hour) and after 1 hour (1 hour) as an alternative to standard measurements at 0 hour and 3 hours. However, the 0 hour/1 hour algorithm has only been tested in a limited amount of patient cohorts and not for all hs-cTn assays. Moreover, it is unknown if MI can be ruled-out faster than 1 hour. In this single-centre, clinical trial, we will investigate whether MI safely can be ruled-in or ruled-out after 30 min and 1 hour.

Methods and analysis

Patients with chest pain suggestive of MI admitted to the emergency department will be subjected to hs-cTn measurements at the following time points: 0 hour, 30 min, 1 hour and 3 hours. Chest pain characteristics will be recorded. In total, 1000 patients with all four blood samples will be included. The diagnostic algorithms will be derived based on the first 500 patients and validated in the subsequent 500 patients. The primary endpoint is the negative predictive value of the 0 hour/30 min and the 0 hour/1 hour algorithms. Secondary endpoints include positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. Results will be compared with the standard 0 hour/3 hour algorithm.

Ethics and dissemination

Oral and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. The trial is approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics and the Danish Data Protection Agency. Data will be disseminated and submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journals and meetings irrespective of study outcome.

Trial registration number

NCT03634384