Targeting high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing contemporary lipid-lowering therapy: a sub-analysis of the HIJ-PROPER trial

Rapid achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals within 1 month after acute coronary syndrome during combination therapy with rosuvastatin, ezetimibe and bempedoic acid: Initial experience from the LAI-REACT study

Rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to target levels immediately following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event is critical to prevent future events. High-dose statins alone often fail to achieve LDL-C goals. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) combined with high-dose statins improves LDL-C goal attainment, but is unaffordable for many patients in India and worldwide. In a real-world open-label study, we demonstrated in a cohort of 122 patients with ACS, concurrent triple therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg/d, ezetimibe 10 mg/d, and bempedoic acid 180 mg/d (REB) started at the time of hospital admission was associated with 57.7%, 61.7%, 61.9% and 60.6% reductions in LDL-C from 115.6 mg/dl at baseline to 48.9 mg/dl at week 1, 44.3 mg/dl at week 2, 44.1 mg/dl at week 4, and 45.6 mg/dl at week 6, respectively (each p < 0.001 compared to baseline; p < 0.001 across repeated measures). REB provided significant reductions in LDL-C within as early as one week and enabled 76.3% and 92.2% of patients to achieve the Lipid Association of India and American College of Cardiology recommended LDL-C targets of <50 mg/dl and <70 mg/dl within 2-weeks, respectively, which were sustained at 4-6 weeks. REB was generally well tolerated. Our study demonstrates the capacity to rapidly achieve LDL-C goals after ACS with triple REB therapy, an affordable regimen in India.

Baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and glycosylated hemoglobinA1c predict adverse outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction

This study explored the ability of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to predict adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

In total, 4083 consecutive patients with CCS undergoing PCI were investigated throughout 2013 at a single center. The primary endpoint was all-cause death at the 5-year follow-up. Hs-CRP and HbA1c data were collected on admission.

Results

The highest quartile of hs-CRP had a significantly increased the risk of all-cause death, with an adjusted HR of 1.747 (95 % CI 1.066-2.863), while, there was no difference in all-cause death among the groups of HbA1c after adjustment, with an adjusted HR of 1.383 (95 % CI 0.716-2.674). The highest quartiles for hs-CRP and HbA1c in the study population had a significantly increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), with an adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 1.263 (95 % confidence intervals [CI] 1.032-1.545) for hs-CRP and an adjusted HR of 1.417 (95 % CI 1.091-1.840) for HbA1c. Remarkably, the incidence of all-cause death and that of MACCE were significantly increased when both hs-CRP and HbA1c were elevated (HR 1.971, 95 % CI 1.079-3.601, P = 0.027 and HR 1.560, 95 % CI 1.191-2.042), P = 0.001, respectively). Addition of hs-CRP and HbA1c to conventional risk factors significantly improved prediction of the risk of all cause death (net reclassification index 0.492, P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement 0.007, P = 0.011) and MACCE (net reclassification index 0.160, P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement 0.006, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Hs-CRP and HbA1c can serve as independent predictors of MACCE in patients with CCS undergoing PCI. Furthermore, a combination of hs-CRP and HbA1c could predict all cause death and MACCE better than each component individually.

Emerging Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Pathophysiologic Perspective

Diagnosis and prognostication in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is achieved using a combination of clinical factors and biomarkers, notably cardiac troponin and B type natriuretic peptide and its N terminal fragment NT-proBNP. However, there are numerous biomarkers that have been shown to be associated with ACS, with variable incremental utility. This brief review focusses on some promising emerging biomarkers in ACS, discussed according to pathophysiologic mechanism, as well as diagnostic and prognostic utility.

The Effect of Statin Therapy on Inflammatory Biomarkers: A Systematic Review

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are commonly used drugs in the management of elevated lipid levels and cardiovascular disease. In cardiovascular diseases, among other common chronic conditions, inflammatory biomarkers are used to monitor disease progression and the risk of recurrent adverse events. We explored whether or not there was a positive effect on these biomarkers using HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The systematic review was conducted by gathering relevant papers mainly from three databases, identified through a generated Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) strategy. Identification of papers was subsequently followed by applying a selected inclusion and exclusion criteria to narrow the papers chosen for review. Post the application of stipulated criteria, 12 papers remained. They were subsequently assessed for risk of bias using a Cochrane risk analysis tool, identifying most as having some concerns of bias or low risk of bias. We found that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors exhibit both a lipid-lowering effect addition to an anti-inflammatory effect.

Effect of Ezetimibe + Pitavastatin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the HIJ-PROPER Study)

Lipid-lowering therapy is necessary to reduce cardiovascular event rates in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy, which comprised pitavastatin and ezetimibe, on patients with STEMI. We therefore undertook a post hoc subanalysis of the HIJ-PROPER study's data that examined the clinical outcomes of the patients with dyslipidemia and STEMI (n = 880) who received pitavastatin and ezetimibe therapy (intensive lipid-lowering therapy group) or pitavastatin monotherapy (standard lipid-lowering therapy group), and we evaluated their cardiovascular events. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, unstable angina, and ischemia-driven revascularization. During the median 3.4-year follow-up period, the cumulative rates of the primary end point were 31.9% and 39.7% in the intensive lipid-lowering therapy and standard lipid-lowering therapy groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.97; p = 0.02). Compared with the standard lipid-lowering therapy group, the intensive lipid-lowering therapy group had significantly lower all-cause death (6.9% vs 3.2%; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.84; p = 0.01) and nonfatal stroke (2.9% vs 1.6%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; p = 0.02) rates. Patients with pitavastatin and ezetimibe therapy, as compared with pitavastatin monotherapy, had a lower cardiovascular event in STEMI patients. In conclusion, adding ezetimibe to statin therapy may be beneficial for patients with dyslipidemia and STEMI.