Nakao Y, Kawakami H, Saito M, Inoue K, Ikeda S, Yamaguchi O. Cost-Effectiveness of long-term tolvaptan administration for chronic heart failure treatment in Japan.
J Cardiol 2021;
79:408-416. [PMID:
34799217 DOI:
10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.10.026]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Tolvaptan (TLV) is effective for acute heart failure (HF) with congestion, but its long-term administration in patients with chronic HF (CHF) remains controversial. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment has not yet been investigated. Thus, we sought to validate the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment in Japan.
METHODS
A Markov model was developed to compare total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between long-term TLV strategy and the standard strategy using furosemide for CHF. The target population included 75-year-old patients with CHF. The effectiveness of the TLV strategy for CHF treatment was determined based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. We used a 10-year horizon, with sensitivity analyses for significant variables and a scenario analysis for patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide (≥60 mg per day).
RESULTS
In the base case analysis, the total cost of the long-term TLV strategy was higher than that of the standard strategy (\3,243,779 vs. \1,179,964). The total QALYs of the long-term TLV strategy were lower than those of the standard strategy (4.52 vs 4.59). Thus, a standard TLV prescription for CHF treatment has no clinical or economic benefit. In the scenario analysis (i.e. in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide), the long-term TLV strategy was more effective (total QALYs, 5.10 vs. 4.41) but more expensive (total costs, \3,540,558 vs. \1,272,208) than the standard strategy. The ICER of the TLV strategy against the standard strategy (¥3,289,579/QALY) was below the willingness-to-pay of \5,000,000, which suggests that the long-term TLV strategy is cost-effective relative to the standard strategy in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide.
CONCLUSIONS
Long-term TLV administration did not provide a clear benefit for all patients with CHF. However, this treatment strategy may be a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients who require high-dose furosemide.
Collapse