Acute atrial ischemia associates with early but not late new-onset atrial fibrillation in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI: relationship with in-hospital outcomes

Association of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 protein with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

Background

Previous studies have indicated that the soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 protein (sST2) is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the predictive value of sST2 in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been well studied.

Methods

A total of 580 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were consecutively recruited between January 2021 and January 2023. These patients were then categorized into two groups: the NOAF group and the no NOAF groups based on the presence of NOAF during admission. The concentration of sST2 in blood samples was measured in all patients. The clinical data from the two groups were prospectively analyzed to investigate the predictive factors of NOAF in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Results

A total of 41 (7.1%) patients developed NOAF. The presence of NOAF has been found to be associated with various factors, including age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, the left atrial (LA) diameter, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein (CRP), sST2, a Killip class of ≥2, and a final TIMI flow grade of <3. After including multiple factors, it was observed that LA diameter, CRP, sST2, a Killip class of ≥2, and a final TIMI flow grade of <3 remained significant risk factors for developing NOAF. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed the following findings: (1) when the LA diameter exceeded 38.5 mm, the sensitivity and specificity values were observed to be 67.2% and 68.2%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.683 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.545-0.732; p = 0.003]; (2) when the CRP level exceeded 8.59, the sensitivity and specificity values were observed to be 68.6% and 69.2%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.713 (95% CI: 0.621-0.778; p < 0.001); and (3) when the sST2 value exceeded 53.3, the sensitivity and specificity values were 79.2% and 68.7%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.799 (95% CI: 0.675-0.865; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

sST2 has been identified as an independent predictor of NOAF in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.

Prediction of new onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using the C2HEST and mC2HEST scores: A report from the multicenter REALE-ACS registry

BACKGROUND

New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is associated with worse clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Identification of ACS patients at risk of NOAF remains challenging. To test the value of the simple C2HEST score for predicting NOAF in patients with ACS.

METHODS

We studied patients from the prospective ongoing multicenter REALE-ACS registry of patients with ACS. NOAF was the primary endpoint of the study. The C2HEST score was calculated as coronary artery disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1 point each), hypertension (1 point), elderly (age ≥ 75 years, 2 points), systolic heart failure (2 points), thyroid disease (1 point). We also tested the mC2HEST score.

RESULTS

We enrolled 555 patients (mean age 65.6 ± 13.3 years; 22.9% women), of which 45 (8.1%) developed NOAF. Patients with NOAF were older (p < 0.001) and had more prevalent hypertension (p = 0.012), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001) and hyperthyroidism (p = 0.018). Patients with NOAF were more frequently admitted with STEMI (p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (p = 0.008), Killip class ≥2 (p < 0.001) and had higher mean GRACE score (p < 0.001). Patients with NOAF had a higher C2HEST score compared with those without (4.2 ± 1.7 vs 3.0 ± 1.5, p < 0.001). A C2HEST score > 3 was associated with NOAF occurrence (odds ratio 4.33, 95% confidence interval 2.19-8.59, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed good accuracy of the C2HEST score (AUC 0.71, 95%CI 0.67-0.74) and mC2HEST score (AUC 0.69, 95%CI 065-0.73) in predicting NOAF.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple C2HEST score may be a useful tool to identify patients at higher risk of developing NOAF after presentation with ACS.

Effects of Inflammatory Cell Death Caused by Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a serious healthcare burden on society due to its high morbidity and the resulting serious complications such as thrombosis and heart failure. The principle of catheter ablation is to achieve electrical isolation by linear destruction of cardiac tissue, which makes AF a curable disease. Currently, catheter ablation does not have a high long-term success rate. The current academic consensus is that inflammation and fibrosis are central mechanisms in the progression of AF. However, artificially caused inflammatory cell death by catheter ablation may have a significant impact on structural and electrical remodeling, which may affect the long-term prognosis. This review first focused on the inflammatory response induced by apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis and their interaction with arrhythmia. Then, we compared the differences in cell death induced by radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation and pulsed-field ablation. Finally, we discussed the structural and electrical remodeling caused by inflammation and the association between inflammation and the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation. Collectively, pulsed-field ablation will be a revolutionary innovation with faster, safer, better tissue selectivity and less inflammatory response induced by apoptosis-dominated cell death.

Effects of Acute Triiodothyronine Treatment in Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty: Evidence from a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial (ThyRepair Study)

Background: Thyroid hormone has a differential action on healthy and ischemic heart. Triiodothyronine (T3) administration improved postischemic cardiac function while it limited apoptosis in experimentally induced ischemia. Thus, the present study investigated the potential effects of acute liothyronine (LT3) treatment in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Methods: This study is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ThyRepair study). We randomized 52 patients and analyzed data from 37 patients (n = 16 placebo and n = 21 LT3), per prespecified per protocol analysis. We excluded three patients who had died of cardiovascular causes (one in placebo and two in LT3 arm), four with small infarct size below a pre-specified threshold (in the placebo arm), and the rest, who lacked follow-up data. LT3 treatment started after stenting as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection of 0.8 μg/kg of LT3 followed by a constant infusion of 0.113 μg/kg/h i.v. for 48 hours. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at hospital discharge and 6 months follow-up. The primary end point was CMR left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and secondary endpoints were LV volumes, infarct volume (IV), and safety. Results: The CMR LVEF% at 6 months was 53.6 ± 9.5 for the LT3-treated group and 48.6 ± 11 for placebo, p = 0.15. Acute LT3 treatment resulted in a significantly lower LV end-diastolic volume index (92.2 ± 16.8 mL/m² vs. 107.5 ± 22.2, p = 0.022) and LV systolic volume index (47.5 ± 13.9 mL/m² vs. 61.3 ± 21.7, p = 0.024) at hospital discharge, but not at 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in CMR IV at hospital discharge between the groups (p = 0.24). CMR IV tended to be lower in the LT3-treated group at 6 months (18.7 ± 9.5 vs. 25.9 ± 11.7, in placebo, p = 0.05). Serious, life-threatening events related to LT3 treatment were not observed. A tendency for an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in the LT3 group during the first 48 hours (19% for T3 group vs. 5% for placebo, p = 0.13). Conclusion: This pilot randomized, placebo-controlled trial study suggests potential favorable effects (acute cardiac dilatation and 6-month IV) as well as potential concerns regarding a higher risk of AF after LT3 administration early after myocardial infarction, which should be tested in a larger scale study.