Diagnostic utility of vimentin, CD117, cytokeratin-7 and caveolin-1 in differentiation between clear cell renal cell carcinoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma

Radical nephrectomy for a giant chromophobe renal cell carcinoma diagnosed > 17 years previously: a case report and literature review

Early diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma relies on imaging tests such as ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Since surgery is associated with a favorable prognosis, the standard treatment for clinically limited renal cell carcinoma remains surgical resection. Among asymptomatic patients with localized renal cell carcinoma, a small number refuse surgical treatment and survive. We report a case involving a 59-year-old female who underwent a difficult radical nephrectomy 17 years after being diagnosed with malignant tumors due to primary renal cell carcinoma.

Establishment of a ccRCC patient-derived chick chorioallantoic membrane model for drug testing

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is an aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma accounting for the majority of deaths in kidney cancer patients. Advanced ccRCC has a high mortality rate as most patients progress and develop resistance to currently approved targeted therapies, highlighting the ongoing need for adequate drug testing models to develop novel therapies. Current animal models are expensive and time-consuming. In this study, we investigated the use of the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), a rapid and cost-effective model, as a complementary drug testing model for ccRCC. Our results indicated that tumor samples from ccRCC patients can be successfully cultivated on the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) within 7 days while retaining their histopathological characteristics. Furthermore, treatment of ccRCC xenografts with sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of metastatic RCC, allowed us to evaluate differential responses of individual patients. Our results indicate that the CAM model is a complementary in vivo model that allows for rapid and cost-effective evaluation of ccRCC patient response to drug therapy. Therefore, this model has the potential to become a useful platform for preclinical evaluation of new targeted therapies for the treatment of ccRCC.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma initially presenting as a unilateral breast lump

Breast metastasis from primary renal cell carcinoma is a rare entity and infrequently reported in the literature. We present a case of a 65-year-old lady who presented to breast clinic with a 4-month history of rapidly growing right sided breast lump. She previously had a left mastectomy for breast cancer and a hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Radiological evaluation with mammography and ultrasound revealed a large heterogeneous right breast lump with prominent vascularity which was biopsied. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were not supportive of a primary breast carcinoma and favored metastasis from a renal tumor. The patient was unfortunately admitted to hospital due to increasing confusion and neurological symptoms and underwent whole-body cross-sectional CT imaging which demonstrated a giant tumor originating from the right kidney with associated intrathoracic, breast and intracranial metastasis. She was diagnosed with eosinophilic variant metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This case highlights the importance of considering alternative diagnoses to primary breast carcinoma in the context of an initial presentation of a unilateral breast lump.

Accuracy of Subclassification and Grading of Renal Tumors on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Alone

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of renal masses can distinguish between benign and malignant neoplasms in 73-94% of cases. Previous studies suggested the correct subclassification of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) by cytomorphology can be achieved in up to 80% of cases. However, as RCCs become increasingly subclassified by molecular signatures, correct subclassification based on cytology alone is increasingly difficult.

DESIGN

Two FNA passes (2 stained with Diff-Quik® and 2 with the Papanicolaou method) were performed on all fresh nephrectomy specimens for a 1-year period. There were 30 cases in this study, with 29 primary renal tumors and 1 case of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Each case was assigned a random number and came with 2 slides (1 from each staining method). Eight cytopathologists were asked to provide a diagnosis and the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grading if applicable. Fleiss' Kappa and Cohen's Kappa equations were used to look at inter-rater variability.

RESULTS

When compared to the surgical pathology diagnosis, the average percent correct diagnosis for all cytopathologist was 35%. Chromophobe RCCs had the best average percent accuracy at 72% followed by clearcell RCC at 48%. Average accuracy for grading RCCs was 40%. Inter-rater variability among the cytopathologists for all RCC diagnoses was fair with a Fleiss' Kappa coefficient of 0.28. For the WHO/ISUP grade, the weighted coefficient for each pathologist ranged from 0.11 to 0.45, ranging from fair to moderate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal tumors are difficult to classify on cytopathology alone. Core needle biopsy and ancillary studies are necessary if diagnosis will change management.

Combined Immunohistochemistry for the "Three 7" Markers (CK7, CD117, and Claudin-7) Is Useful in the Diagnosis of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma and for the Exclusion of Mimics: Diagnostic Experience from a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

There is a morphological overlap among renal epithelial tumors, particularly chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CHRCC), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), renal oncocytoma (RO), and papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Discriminating between these tumors is important but sometimes challenging. This study is aimed at evaluating the clinical usefulness of the combined immunochemistry for the "three 7" markers (CK7, CD117, and Claudin-7) to distinguish chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from these mimics.

METHODS

Immunochemical staining for CK7, CD117, and Claudin-7 was performed in 68 CHRCCs, 199 CCRCCs, 32 ROs, and 30 PRCCs. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed in some cases to exclude CCRCC and PRCC. The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for CHRCC as well as the immunoreactivity of each marker and their combinations were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

High positive rates for CK7 (94%), CD117 (87%), Claudin-7 (94%), and their combinations (CK7+CD117, 79%; CK7+Claudin-7, 88%; CD117+Claudin-7, 82%; CK7+CD117+Claudin-7, 76%) were observed in CHRCC compared to those in CCRCC, RO, and PRCC, with increasingly higher SP when combinations of the "three 7" markers were applied (CK7, 0.80; CD117, 0.82; Claudin-7, 0.78; CK7+CD117, 0.95; CK7+Claudin-7, 0.97; CD117+Claudin-7, 0.97; CK7+CD117+Claudin-7, 1).

CONCLUSION

CK7, CD117, and Claudin-7 are frequently expressed in CHRCC with high specificity. We recommend the routine use of these 3 markers as a routine panel when making a differential diagnosis of CHRCC and excluding other mimics.