A Tetramer–Octamer Equilibrium in Mycobacterium leprae and Escherichia coli RuvA by Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Interaction of branch migration translocases with the Holliday junction-resolving enzyme and their implications in Holliday junction resolution

Double-strand break repair involves the formation of Holliday junction (HJ) structures that need to be resolved to promote correct replication and chromosomal segregation. The molecular mechanisms of HJ branch migration and/or resolution are poorly characterized in Firmicutes. Genetic evidence suggested that the absence of the RuvAB branch migration translocase and the RecU HJ resolvase is synthetically lethal in Bacillus subtilis, whereas a recU recG mutant was viable. In vitro RecU, which is restricted to bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum, binds HJs with high affinity. In this work we found that RecU does not bind simultaneously with RecG to a HJ. RuvB by interacting with RecU bound to the central region of HJ DNA, loses its nonspecific association with DNA, and re-localizes with RecU to form a ternary complex. RecU cannot stimulate the ATPase or branch migration activity of RuvB. The presence of RuvB·ATPγS greatly stimulates RecU-mediated HJ resolution, but the addition of ATP or RuvA abolishes this stimulatory effect. A RecU·HJ·RuvAB complex might be formed. RecU does not increase the RuvAB activities but slightly inhibits them.

Metallo-responsive switching between hexadecameric and octameric supramolecular G-quadruplexes

We report the metallo-responsive high fidelity switching between hexadecameric and octameric supramolecular G-quadruplexes triggered by a change in the metal cation promoter from potassium to strontium, respectively.

Crystallographic and modelling studies on Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA Additional role of RuvB-binding domain and inter species variability

RuvA, along with RuvB, is involved in branch migration of heteroduplex DNA in homologous recombination. The structures of three new crystal forms of RuvA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MtRuvA) have been determined. The RuvB-binding domain is cleaved off in one of them. Detailed models of the complexes of octameric RuvA from different species with the Holliday junction have also been constructed. A thorough examination of the structures presented here and those reported earlier brings to light the hitherto unappreciated role of the RuvB-binding domain in determining inter-domain orientation and oligomerization. These structures also permit an exploration of the interspecies variability of structural features such as oligomerization and the conformation of the loop that carries the acidic pin, in terms of amino acid substitutions. These models emphasize the additional role of the RuvB-binding domain in Holliday junction binding. This role along with its role in oligomerization could have important biological implications.

RecQ helicases: multiple structures for multiple functions?

Approximately 1% of the open reading frames in the human genome encode proteins that function as DNA or RNA helicases. These enzymes act in all aspects of nucleic acid metabolism where the complementary strands of DNA:DNA or DNA:RNA duplexes require to be transiently opened. However, they perform wider roles in nucleic acid metabolism due to their ability to couple the energy derived from hydrolysis of ATP to their unidirectional translocation along strands of DNARNA. In this way, helicases can displace proteins from DNARNA, drive the migration of DNA junctions (such as the Holliday junction recombination intermediate), or generate superhelical tension in nucleic acid duplexes. Here, we review a subgroup of DNA helicase enzymes, the RecQ family, that has attracted considerable interest in recent years due to their role not only in suppression of genome instability, but also in the avoidance of human disease. We focus particularly on the protein structural motifs and the multiple assembly states that characterize RecQ helicases and discuss novel biophysical techniques to study the different RecQ structures present in solution. We also speculate on the roles of the different domains and oligomeric forms in defining which DNA structures will represent substrates for RecQ helicase-mediated transactions.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA induces two distinct types of structural distortions between the homologous and heterologous Holliday junctions

A central step in the process of homologous genetic recombination is the strand exchange between two homologous DNA molecules, leading to the formation of the Holliday junction intermediate. Several lines of evidence, both in vitro and in vivo, suggest a concerted role for the Escherichia coli RuvABC protein complex in the process of branch migration and the resolution of the Holliday junctions. A number of investigations have examined the role of RuvA protein in branch migration of the Holliday junction in conjunction with its natural cellular partner, RuvB. However, it remains unclear whether the RuvABC protein complex or its individual subunits function differently in the context of DNA repair and homologous recombination. In this study, we have specifically investigated the function of RuvA protein using Holliday junctions containing either homologous or heterologous arms. Our data show that Mycobacterium tuberculosis ruvA complements E. coli DeltaruvA mutants for survival to genotoxic stress caused by different DNA-damaging agents, and the purified RuvA protein binds HJ in preference to any other substrates. Strikingly, our analysis revealed two distinct types of structural distortions caused by M. tuberculosis RuvA between the homologous and heterologous Holliday junctions. We interpret these data as evidence that local distortion of base pairing in the arms of homologous Holliday junctions by RuvA might augment branch migration catalyzed by RuvB. The biological significance of two modes of structural distortion caused by M. tuberculosis RuvA and the implications for its role in DNA repair and homologous recombination are discussed.

Electron microscopic single particle analysis of a tetrameric RuvA/RuvB/Holliday junction DNA complex

During the late stage of homologous recombination in prokaryotes, RuvA binds to the Holliday junction intermediate and executes branch migration in association with RuvB. The RuvA subunits form two distinct complexes with the Holliday junction: complex I with the single RuvA tetramer on one side of the four way junction DNA, and complex II with two tetramers on both sides. To investigate the functional roles of complexes I and II, we mutated two residues of RuvA (L125D and E126K) to prevent octamer formation. An electron microscopic analysis indicated that the mutant RuvA/RuvB/Holliday junction DNA complex formed the characteristic tripartite structure, with only one RuvA tetramer bound to one side of the Holliday junction, demonstrating the unexpected stability of this complex. The novel bent images of the complex revealed an intriguing morphological similarity to the structure of SV40 large T antigen, which belongs to the same AAA+ family as RuvB.

Biochemical, biophysical, and proteomic approaches to study DNA helicases

Helicases are a family of enzymes that play an essential role in nearly all DNA metabolic processes, catalyzing the transient opening of DNA duplexes. These motor proteins couple the chemical energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis to the separation of the complementary strands of a DNA or RNA duplex substrate. A full understanding of their mechanism of DNA unwinding can be achieved only through careful investigation of the thermodynamic and kinetic parameters that control this ATP-driven process, as well as through analysis of the helicases' tertiary and quaternary structures associated with nucleic acids and/or nucleotide recognition. This review describes the various biochemical, biophysical, and, more recently, proteomic techniques that have been developed to shed light on the still controversial, and in some aspects elusive, helicase-catalyzed mechanism of DNA unwinding.

RuvA is a sliding collar that protects Holliday junctions from unwinding while promoting branch migration

The RuvAB proteins catalyze branch migration of Holliday junctions during DNA recombination in Escherichia coli. RuvA binds tightly to the Holliday junction, and then recruits two RuvB pumps to power branch migration. Previous investigations have studied RuvA in conjunction with its cellular partner RuvB. The replication fork helicase DnaB catalyzes branch migration like RuvB but, unlike RuvB, is not dependent on RuvA for activity. In this study, we specifically analyze the function of RuvA by studying RuvA in conjunction with DnaB, a DNA pump that does not work with RuvA in the cell. Thus, we use DnaB as a tool to dissect RuvA function from RuvB. We find that RuvA does not inhibit DnaB-catalyzed branch migration of a homologous junction, even at high concentrations of RuvA. Hence, specific protein-protein interaction is not required for RuvA mobilization during branch migration, in contrast to previous proposals. However, low concentrations of RuvA block DnaB unwinding at a Holliday junction. RuvA even blocks DnaB-catalyzed unwinding when two DnaB rings are acting in concert on opposite sides of the junction. These findings indicate that RuvA is intrinsically mobile at a Holliday junction when the DNA is undergoing branch migration, but RuvA is immobile at the same junction during DNA unwinding. We present evidence that suggests that RuvA can slide along a Holliday junction structure during DnaB-catalyzed branch migration, but not during unwinding. Thus, RuvA may act as a sliding collar at Holliday junctions, promoting DNA branch migration activity while blocking other DNA remodeling activities. Finally, we show that RuvA is less mobile at a heterologous junction compared to a homologous junction, as two opposing DnaB pumps are required to mobilize RuvA over heterologous DNA.

Three-dimensional structural views of branch migration and resolution in DNA homologous recombination

The processing of the Holliday junction by various proteins is a major event in DNA homologous recombination and is crucial to the maintenance of genome stability and biological diversity. The proteins RuvA, RuvB and RuvC play central roles in the late stage of recombination in prokaryotes. Recent atomic views of these proteins, including protein-protein and protein-junction DNA complexes, provide new insights into branch migration mechanisms: RuvA is likely to be responsible for base-pair rearrangements, whereas RuvB, classified as a member of the AAA(+) family, functions as a pump to pull DNA duplex arms without segmental unwinding. The mechanism of junction resolution by RuvC in the RuvABC resolvasome remains to be elucidated.

The role of RuvA octamerization for RuvAB function in vitro and in vivo

RuvA plays an essential role in branch migration of the Holliday junction by RuvAB as part of the RuvABC pathway for processing Holliday junctions in Escherichia coli. Two types of RuvA-Holliday junction complexes have been characterized: 1) complex I containing a single RuvA tetramer and 2) complex II in which the junction is sandwiched between two RuvA tetramers. The functional differences between the two forms are still not clear. To investigate the role of RuvA octamerization, we introduced three amino acid substitutions designed to disrupt the E. coli RuvA tetramer-tetramer interface as identified by structural studies. The mutant RuvA was tetrameric and interacted with both RuvB and junction DNA but, as predicted, formed complex I only at protein concentrations up to 500 nm. We present biochemical and surface plasmon resonance evidence for functional and physical interactions of the mutant RuvA with RuvB and RuvC on synthetic junctions. The mutant RuvA with RuvB showed DNA helicase activity and could support branch migration of synthetic four-way and three-way junctions. However, junction binding and the efficiency of branch migration of four-way junctions were affected. The activity of the RuvA mutant was consistent with a RuvAB complex driven by one RuvB hexamer only and lead us to propose that one RuvA tetramer can only support the activity of one RuvB hexamer. Significantly, the mutant failed to complement the UV sensitivity of E. coli DeltaruvA cells. These results indicate strongly that RuvA octamerization is essential for the full biological activity of RuvABC.