Concerted release of substrate domains from GroEL by ATP is demonstrated with FRET

Distinguishing between concerted, sequential and barrierless conformational changes: Folding versus allostery

Characterization of transition and intermediate states of reactions provides insights into their mechanisms and is often achieved through analysis of linear free energy relationships. Such an approach has been used extensively in protein folding studies but less so for analyzing allosteric transitions. Here, we point out analogies in ways to characterize pathways and intermediates in folding and allosteric transitions. Achieving an understanding of the mechanisms by which proteins undergo allosteric switching is important in many cases for obtaining insights into how they function.

Chaperonin Mechanisms: Multiple and (Mis)Understood?

The chaperonins are ubiquitous and essential nanomachines that assist in protein folding in an ATP-driven manner. They consist of two back-to-back stacked oligomeric rings with cavities in which protein (un)folding can take place in a shielding environment. This review focuses on GroEL from Escherichia coli and the eukaryotic chaperonin-containing t-complex polypeptide 1, which differ considerably in their reaction mechanisms despite sharing a similar overall architecture. Although chaperonins feature in many current biochemistry textbooks after being studied intensively for more than three decades, key aspects of their reaction mechanisms remain under debate and are discussed in this review. In particular, it is unclear whether a universal reaction mechanism operates for all substrates and whether it is passive, i.e., aggregation is prevented but the folding pathway is unaltered, or active. It is also unclear how chaperonin clients are distinguished from nonclients and what are the precise roles of the cofactors with which chaperonins interact.

Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biophysics, Volume 51 is May 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Chaperonin-assisted protein folding: a chronologue

This chronologue seeks to document the discovery and development of an understanding of oligomeric ring protein assemblies known as chaperonins that assist protein folding in the cell. It provides detail regarding genetic, physiologic, biochemical, and biophysical studies of these ATP-utilizing machines from both in vivo and in vitro observations. The chronologue is organized into various topics of physiology and mechanism, for each of which a chronologic order is generally followed. The text is liberally illustrated to provide firsthand inspection of the key pieces of experimental data that propelled this field. Because of the length and depth of this piece, the use of the outline as a guide for selected reading is encouraged, but it should also be of help in pursuing the text in direct order.

Unpicking allosteric mechanisms of homo-oligomeric proteins by determining their successive ligand binding constants

Advances in native mass spectrometry and single-molecule techniques have made it possible in recent years to determine the values of successive ligand binding constants for large multi-subunit proteins. Given these values, it is possible to distinguish between different allosteric mechanisms and, thus, obtain insights into how various bio-molecular machines work. Here, we describe for ring-shaped homo-oligomers, in particular, how the relationship between the values of successive ligand binding constants is diagnostic for concerted, sequential and probabilistic allosteric mechanisms.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Allostery and molecular machines'.

Sequential allosteric mechanism of ATP hydrolysis by the CCT/TRiC chaperone is revealed through Arrhenius analysis

Knowing the mechanism of allosteric switching is important for understanding how molecular machines work. The CCT/TRiC chaperonin nanomachine undergoes ATP-driven conformational changes that are crucial for its folding function. Here, we demonstrate that insight into its allosteric mechanism of ATP hydrolysis can be achieved by Arrhenius analysis. Our results show that ATP hydrolysis triggers sequential ‟conformational waves." They also suggest that these waves start from subunits CCT6 and CCT8 (or CCT3 and CCT6) and proceed clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively.

Replacement of GroEL in Escherichia coli by the Group II Chaperonin from the Archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis

Chaperonins are required for correct folding of many proteins. They exist in two phylogenetic groups: group I, found in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles, and group II, found in archaea and eukaryotic cytoplasm. The two groups, while homologous, differ significantly in structure and mechanism. The evolution of group II chaperonins has been proposed to have been crucial in enabling the expansion of the proteome required for eukaryotic evolution. In an archaeal species that expresses both groups of chaperonins, client selection is determined by structural and biochemical properties rather than phylogenetic origin. It is thus predicted that group II chaperonins will be poor at replacing group I chaperonins. We have tested this hypothesis and report here that the group II chaperonin from Methanococcus maripaludis (Mm-cpn) can partially functionally replace GroEL, the group I chaperonin of Escherichia coli. Furthermore, we identify and characterize two single point mutations in Mm-cpn that have an enhanced ability to replace GroEL function, including one that allows E. coli growth after deletion of the groEL gene. The biochemical properties of the wild-type and mutant Mm-cpn proteins are reported. These data show that the two groups are not as functionally diverse as has been thought and provide a novel platform for genetic dissection of group II chaperonins.

IMPORTANCE The two phylogenetic groups of the essential and ubiquitous chaperonins diverged approximately 3.7 billion years ago. They have similar structures, with two rings of multiple subunits, and their major role is to assist protein folding. However, they differ with regard to the details of their structure, their cofactor requirements, and their reaction cycles. Despite this, we show here that a group II chaperonin from a methanogenic archaeon can partially substitute for the essential group I chaperonin GroEL in E. coli and that we can easily isolate mutant forms of this chaperonin with further improved functionality. This is the first demonstration that these two groups, despite the long time since they diverged, still overlap significantly in their functional properties.

Allosteric Mechanisms in Chaperonin Machines

Chaperonins are nanomachines that facilitate protein folding by undergoing energy (ATP)-dependent movements that are coordinated in time and space owing to complex allosteric regulation. They consist of two back-to-back stacked oligomeric rings with a cavity at each end where protein substrate folding can take place. Here, we focus on the GroEL/GroES chaperonin system from Escherichia coli and, to a lesser extent, on the more poorly characterized eukaryotic chaperonin CCT/TRiC. We describe their various functional (allosteric) states and how they are affected by substrates and allosteric effectors that include ATP, ADP, nonfolded protein substrates, potassium ions, and GroES (in the case of GroEL). We also discuss the pathways of intra- and inter-ring allosteric communication by which they interconvert and the coupling between allosteric transitions and protein folding reactions.

Weak intra-ring allosteric communications of the archaeal chaperonin thermosome revealed by normal mode analysis

Chaperonins are molecular machines that use ATP-driven cycles to assist misfolded substrate proteins to reach the native state. During the functional cycle, these machines adopt distinct nucleotide-dependent conformational states, which reflect large-scale allosteric changes in individual subunits. Distinct allosteric kinetics has been described for the two chaperonin classes. Bacterial (group I) chaperonins, such as GroEL, undergo concerted subunit motions within each ring, whereas archaeal and eukaryotic chaperonins (group II) undergo sequential subunit motions. We study these distinct mechanisms through a comparative normal mode analysis of monomer and double-ring structures of the archaeal chaperonin thermosome and GroEL. We find that thermosome monomers of each type exhibit common low-frequency behavior of normal modes. The observed distinct higher-frequency modes are attributed to functional specialization of these subunit types. The thermosome double-ring structure has larger contribution from higher-frequency modes, as it is found in the GroEL case. We find that long-range intersubunit correlation of amino-acid pairs is weaker in the thermosome ring than in GroEL. Overall, our results indicate that distinct allosteric behavior of the two chaperonin classes originates from different wiring of individual subunits as well as of the intersubunit communications.

Structure and allostery of the chaperonin GroEL

Chaperonins are intricate allosteric machines formed of two back-to-back, stacked rings of subunits presenting end cavities lined with hydrophobic binding sites for nonnative polypeptides. Once bound, substrates are subjected to forceful, concerted movements that result in their ejection from the binding surface and simultaneous encapsulation inside a hydrophilic chamber that favors their folding. Here, we review the allosteric machine movements that are choreographed by ATP binding, which triggers concerted tilting and twisting of subunit domains. These movements distort the ring of hydrophobic binding sites and split it apart, potentially unfolding the multiply bound substrate. Then, GroES binding is accompanied by a 100° twist of the binding domains that removes the hydrophobic sites from the cavity lining and forms the folding chamber. ATP hydrolysis is not needed for a single round of binding and encapsulation but is necessary to allow the next round of ATP binding in the opposite ring. It is this remote ATP binding that triggers dismantling of the folding chamber and release of the encapsulated substrate, whether folded or not. The basis for these ordered actions is an elegant system of nested cooperativity of the ATPase machinery. ATP binds to a ring with positive cooperativity, and movements of the interlinked subunit domains are concerted. In contrast, there is negative cooperativity between the rings, so that they act in alternation. It is remarkable that a process as specific as protein folding can be guided by the chaperonin machine in a way largely independent of substrate protein structure or sequence.

Toward a detailed description of the pathways of allosteric communication in the GroEL chaperonin through atomistic simulation

GroEL, along with its coprotein GroES, is essential for ensuring the correct folding of unfolded or newly synthesized proteins in bacteria. GroEL is a complex, allosteric molecule, composed of two heptameric rings stacked back to back, that undergoes large structural changes during its reaction cycle. These structural changes are driven by the cooperative binding and subsequent hydrolysis of ATP, by GroEL. Despite numerous previous studies, the precise mechanisms of allosteric communication and the associated structural changes remain elusive. In this paper, we describe a series of all-atom, unbiased, molecular dynamics simulations over relatively long (50-100 ns) time scales of a single, isolated GroEL subunit and also a heptameric GroEL ring, in the presence and absence of ATP. Combined with results from a distance restraint-biased simulation of the single ring, the atomistic details of the earliest stages of ATP-driven structural changes within this complex molecule are illuminated. Our results are in broad agreement with previous modeling studies of isolated subunits and with a coarse-grained, forcing simulation of the single ring. These are the first reported all-atom simulations of the GroEL single-ring complex and provide a unique insight into the role of charged residues K80, K277, R284, R285, and E388 at the subunit interface in transmission of the allosteric signal. These simulations also demonstrate the feasibility of performing all-atom simulations of very large systems on sufficiently long time scales on typical high performance computing facilities to show the origins of the earliest events in biologically relevant processes.

Characterisation of a GroEL single-ring mutant that supports growth of Escherichia coli and has GroES-dependent ATPase activity

Binding and folding of substrate proteins by the molecular chaperone GroEL alternates between its two seven-membered rings in an ATP-regulated manner. The association of ATP and GroES to a polypeptide-bound ring of GroEL encapsulates the folding proteins in the central cavity of that ring (cis ring) and allows it to fold in a protected environment where the risk of aggregation is reduced. ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring changes the potentials within the system such that ATP binding to the opposite (trans) ring triggers the release of all ligands from the cis ring of GroEL through a complex network of allosteric communication between the rings. Inter-ring allosteric communication thus appears indispensable for the function of GroEL, and an engineered single-ring version (SR1) cannot substitute for GroEL in vivo. We describe here the isolation and characterisation of an active single-ring form of the GroEL protein (SR-A92T), which has an exceptionally low ATPase activity that is strongly stimulated by the addition of GroES. Dissection of the kinetic pathway of the ATP-induced structural changes in this active single ring can be explained by the fact that the mutation effectively blocks progression through the full allosteric pathway of the GroEL reaction cycle, thus trapping an early allosteric intermediate. Addition of GroES is able to overcome this block by binding this intermediate and pulling the allosteric pathway to completion via mass action, explaining how bacterial cells expressing this protein as their only chaperonin are viable.

Common crowding agents have only a small effect on protein-protein interactions

Studies of protein-protein interactions, carried out in polymer solutions, are designed to mimic the crowded environment inside living cells. It was shown that crowding enhances oligomerization and polymerization of macromolecules. Conversely, we have shown that crowding has only a small effect on the rate of association of protein complexes. Here, we investigated the equilibrium effects of crowding on protein heterodimerization of TEM1-beta-lactamase with beta-lactamase inhibitor protein (BLIP) and barnase with barstar. We also contrasted these with the effect of crowding on the weak binding pair CyPet-YPet. We measured the association and dissociation rates as well as the affinities and thermodynamic parameters of these interactions in polyethylene glycol and dextran solutions. For TEM1-BLIP and for barnase-barstar, only a minor reduction in association rate constants compared to that expected based on solution viscosity was found. Dissociation rate constants showed similar levels of reduction. Overall, this resulted in a binding affinity that is quite similar to that in aqueous solutions. On the other hand, for the CyPet-YPet pair, aggregation, and not enhanced dimerization, was detected in polyethylene glycol solutions. The results suggest that typical crowding agents have only a small effect on specific protein-protein dimerization reactions. Although crowding in the cell results from proteins and other macromolecules, one may still speculate that binding in vivo is not very different from that measured in dilute solutions.

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding

The chaperonin ring assembly GroEL provides kinetic assistance to protein folding in the cell by binding non-native protein in the hydrophobic central cavity of an open ring and subsequently, upon binding ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES to the same ring, releasing polypeptide into a now hydrophilic encapsulated cavity where productive folding occurs in isolation. The fate of polypeptide during binding, encapsulation, and folding in the chamber has been the subject of recent experimental studies and is reviewed and considered here. We conclude that GroEL, in general, behaves passively with respect to its substrate proteins during these steps. While binding appears to be able to rescue non-native polypeptides from kinetic traps, such rescue is most likely exerted at the level of maximizing hydrophobic contact, effecting alteration of the topology of weakly structured states. Encapsulation does not appear to involve 'forced unfolding', and if anything, polypeptide topology is compacted during this step. Finally, chamber-mediated folding appears to resemble folding in solution, except that major kinetic complications of multimolecular association are prevented.

The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin folding chamber is an encapsulated space of approximately 65 A diameter with a hydrophilic wall, inside of which many cellular proteins reach the native state. The question of whether the cavity wall actively directs folding reactions or is playing a passive role has been open. We review past and recent observations and conclude that the chamber functions as a passive "Anfinsen cage" that prevents folding monomers from multimolecular aggregation.