Protein-protein interactions between sigma(70) region 4 of RNA polymerase and Escherichia coli SoxS, a transcription activator that functions by the prerecruitment mechanism: evidence for "off-DNA" and "on-DNA" interactions

Repurposing endogenous type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems for natural product discovery in Streptomyces

The multifunctional proteins of class 2 CRISPR systems such as Cas9, have been employed to activate cryptic biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in Streptomyces, which represent a large and hidden reservoir of natural products. However, such approaches are not applicable to most Streptomyces strains with reasons to be comprehended. Inspired by the prevalence of the class 1 subtype especially the type I-E CRISPR system in Streptomyces, here we report the development of the type I-E CRISPR system into a series of transcriptional regulation tools. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of such activators in nine phylogenetically distant Streptomyces strains. Using these tools, we successfully activate 13 out of 21 BGCs and lead to the identification and characterization of one polyketide, one Ripp and three alkaloid products. Our work is expected to have a profound impact and to facilitate the discovery of numerous structurally diverse compounds from Streptomyces.

Structure and molecular mechanism of bacterial transcription activation

Transcription activation is an important checkpoint of regulation of gene expression which occurs in response to different intracellular and extracellular signals. The key elements in this signal transduction process are transcription activators, which determine when and how gene expression is activated. Recent structural studies on a considerable number of new transcription activation complexes (TACs) revealed the remarkable mechanistic diversity of transcription activation mediated by different factors, necessitating a review and re-evaluation of the transcription activation mechanisms. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of transcription activation mechanisms and propose a new, elaborate, and systematic classification of transcription activation mechanisms, primarily based on the structural features of diverse TAC components.

Interactions between the AraC/XylS-like transcriptional activator InvF of Salmonella Typhimurium, the RNA polymerase alpha subunit and the chaperone SicA

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium causes gastroenteritis and systemic infections in humans. For this bacterium the expression of a type III secretion system (T3SS) and effector proteins encoded in the Salmonella pathogenicity island-1 (SPI-1), is keystone for the virulence of this bacterium. Expression of these is controlled by a regulatory cascade starting with the transcriptional regulators HilD, HilC and RtsA that induce the expression of HilA, which then activates expression of the regulator InvF, a transcriptional regulator of the AraC/XylS family. InvF needs to interact with the chaperone SicA to activate transcription of SPI-1 genes including sicA, sopB, sptP, sopE, sopE2, and STM1239. InvF very likely acts as a classical activator; however, whether InvF interacts with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit RpoA has not been determined. Results from this study confirm the interaction between InvF with SicA and reveal that both proteins interact with the RNAP alpha subunit. Thus, our study further supports that the InvF/SicA complex acts as a classical activator. Additionally, we showed for the first time an interaction between a chaperone of T3SS effectors (SicA) and the RNAP.

Structural basis of three different transcription activation strategies adopted by a single regulator SoxS

Transcription activation is established through extensive protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions that allow an activator to engage and remodel RNA polymerase. SoxS, a global transcription activator, diversely regulates subsets of stress response genes with different promoters, but the detailed SoxS-dependent transcription initiation mechanisms remain obscure. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of three SoxS-dependent transcription activation complexes (SoxS-TAC^I, SoxS-TAC^II and SoxS-TAC^III) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), SoxS protein and three representative classes of SoxS-regulated promoters. The structures reveal that SoxS monomer orchestrates transcription initiation through specific interactions with the promoter DNA and different conserved domains of RNAP. In particular, SoxS is positioned in the opposite orientation in SoxS-TAC^III to that in SoxS-TAC^I and SoxS-TAC^II, unveiling a novel mode of transcription activation. Strikingly, two universally conserved C-terminal domains of alpha subunit (αCTD) of RNAP associate with each other, bridging SoxS and region 4 of σ⁷⁰. We show that SoxS interacts with RNAP directly and independently from DNA, remodeling the enzyme to activate transcription from cognate SoxS promoters while repressing transcription from UP-element containing promoters. Our data provide a comprehensive summary of SoxS-dependent promoter architectures and offer new insights into the αCTD contribution to transcription control in bacteria.

CRISPRactivation-SMS, a message for PAM sequence independent gene up-regulation in Escherichia coli

Governance of the endogenous gene regulatory network enables the navigation of cells towards beneficial traits for recombinant protein production. CRISPRactivation and interference provides the basis for gene expression modulation but is primarily applied in eukaryotes. Particularly the lack of wide-ranging prokaryotic CRISPRa studies might be attributed to intrinsic limitations of bacterial activators and Cas9 proteins. While bacterial activators need accurate spatial orientation and distancing towards the target promoter to be functional, Cas9-based CRISPR tools only bind sites adjacent to NGG PAM sequences. These circumstances hampered Cas9-guided activators from mediating the up-regulation of endogenous genes at precise positions in bacteria. We could overcome this limitation by combining the PAM independent Cas9 variant SpRY and a CRISPRa construct using phage protein MCP fused to transcriptional activator SoxS. This CRISPRa construct, referred to as SMS, was compared with previously reported CRISPRa constructs and showed up-regulation of a reporter gene library independent of its PAM sequence in Escherichia coli. We also demonstrated down-regulation and multi-gene expression control with SMS at non-NGG PAM sites. Furthermore, we successfully applied SMS to up-regulate endogenous genes, and transgenes at non-NGG PAM sites, which was impossible with the previous CRISPRa construct.

Structural basis of transcription activation by Rob, a pleiotropic AraC/XylS family regulator

Rob, which serves as a paradigm of the large AraC/XylS family transcription activators, regulates diverse subsets of genes involved in multidrug resistance and stress response. However, the underlying mechanism of how it engages bacterial RNA polymerase and promoter DNA to finely respond to environmental stimuli is still elusive. Here, we present two cryo-EM structures of Rob-dependent transcription activation complex (Rob-TAC) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), Rob-regulated promoter and Rob in alternative conformations. The structures show that a single Rob engages RNAP by interacting with RNAP αCTD and σ70R4, revealing their generally important regulatory roles. Notably, by occluding σ70R4 from binding to -35 element, Rob specifically binds to the conserved Rob binding box through its consensus HTH motifs, and retains DNA bending by aid of the accessory acidic loop. More strikingly, our ligand docking and biochemical analysis demonstrate that the large Rob C-terminal domain (Rob CTD) shares great structural similarity with the global Gyrl-like domains in effector binding and allosteric regulation, and coordinately promotes formation of competent Rob-TAC. Altogether, our structural and biochemical data highlight the detailed molecular mechanism of Rob-dependent transcription activation, and provide favorable evidences for understanding the physiological roles of the other AraC/XylS-family transcription factors.

Functional insights into Mycobacterium tuberculosis DevR-dependent transcriptional machinery utilizing Escherichia coli

DevR/DosR response regulator is believed to participate in virulence, dormancy adaptation and antibiotic tolerance mechanisms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by regulating the expression of the dormancy regulon. We have previously shown that the interaction of DevR with RNA polymerase is essential for the expression of DevR-regulated genes. Here, we developed a M. tuberculosis-specific in vivo transcription system to enrich our understanding of DevR-RNA polymerase interaction. This in vivo assay involves co-transforming E. coli with two plasmids that express α, β, β' and σA subunits of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase and a third plasmid that harbors a DevR expression cassette and a GFP reporter gene under the DevR-regulated fdxA promoter. We show that DevR-dependent transcription is sponsored exclusively by M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase and regulated by α and σA subunits of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase. Using this E. coli triple plasmid system to express mutant variants of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase, we identified E280 residue in C-terminal domain of α and K513 and R515 residues of σA to participate in DevR-dependent transcription. In silico modeling of a ternary complex of DevR, σA domain 4 and fdxA promoter suggest an interaction of Q505, R515 and K513 residues of σA with E178 and D172 residues of DevR and E471 of σA, respectively. These findings provide us with new insights into the interactions between DevR and RNA polymerase of M. tuberculosis which can be targeted for intercepting DevR function. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of this system for screening of anti-DevR compounds.

An update of the unceasingly growing and diverse AraC/XylS family of transcriptional activators

Transcriptional factors play an important role in gene regulation in all organisms, especially in Bacteria. Here special emphasis is placed in the AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators. This is one of the most abundant as many predicted members have been identified and more members are added because more bacterial genomes are sequenced. Given the way more experimental evidence has mounded in the past decades, we decided to update the information about this captivating family of proteins. Using bioinformatics tools on all the data available for experimentally characterized members of this family, we found that many members that display a similar functional classification can be clustered together and in some cases they have a similar regulatory scheme. A proposal for grouping these proteins is also discussed. Additionally, an analysis of surveyed proteins in bacterial genomes is presented. Altogether, the current review presents a panoramic view into this family and we hope it helps to stimulate future research in the field.

Novel Prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas12a-Based Tool for Programmable Transcriptional Activation and Repression

Transcriptional perturbation using inactivated CRISPR-nucleases (dCas) is a common method in eukaryotic organisms. While rare examples of dCas9-based tools for prokaryotes have been described, multiplexing approaches are limited due to the used effector nuclease. For the first time, a dCas12a derived tool for the targeted activation and repression of genes was developed. Therefore, a previously described SoxS activator domain was linked to dCas12a to enable the programmable activation of gene expression. A proof of principle of transcriptional regulation was demonstrated on the basis of fluorescence reporter assays using the alternative host organism Paenibacillus polymyxa as well as Escherichia coli. Single target and multiplex CRISPR interference targeting the exopolysaccharide biosynthesis of P. polymyxa was shown to emulate polymer compositions of gene knockouts. The simultaneous expression of 11 gRNAs targeting multiple lactate dehydrogenases and a butanediol dehydrogenase resulted in decreased lactate formation, as well as an increased butanediol production in microaerobic fermentation processes. Even though Cas12a is more restricted in terms of its genomic target sequences compared to Cas9, its ability to efficiently process its own guide RNAs in vivo makes it a promising tool to orchestrate sophisticated genetic reprogramming of bacterial cells or to screen for engineering targets in the genome. The developed tool will accelerate metabolic engineering efforts in the alternative host organism P. polymyxa and might be also applied for other bacterial cell factories.

Structural basis of non-canonical transcriptional regulation by the σA-bound iron-sulfur protein WhiB1 in M. tuberculosis

WhiB1 is a monomeric iron-sulfur cluster-containing transcription factor in the WhiB-like family that is widely distributed in actinobacteria including the notoriously persistent pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). WhiB1 plays multiple roles in regulating cell growth and responding to nitric oxide stress in M. tuberculosis, but its underlying mechanism is unclear. Here we report a 1.85 Å-resolution crystal structure of the [4Fe-4S] cluster-bound (holo-) WhiB1 in complex with the C-terminal domain of the σ70-family primary sigma factor σA of M. tuberculosis containing the conserved region 4 (σA4). Region 4 of the σ70-family primary sigma factors is commonly used by transcription factors for gene activation, and holo-WhiB1 has been proposed to activate gene expression via binding to σA4. The complex structure, however, unexpectedly reveals that the interaction between WhiB1 and σA4 is dominated by hydrophobic residues in the [4Fe-4S] cluster binding pocket, distinct from previously characterized canonical σ704-bound transcription activators. Furthermore, we show that holo-WhiB1 represses transcription by interaction with σA4in vitro and that WhiB1 must interact with σA4 to perform its essential role in supporting cell growth in vivo. Together, these results demonstrate that holo-WhiB1 regulates gene expression by a non-canonical mechanism relative to well-characterized σA4-dependent transcription activators.

Two zinc finger proteins from Mycobacterium smegmatis: DNA binding and activation of transcription

Single zinc finger domain containing proteins are very few in number. Of numerous zinc finger proteins in eukaryotes, only three of them like GAGA, Superman and DNA binding by one finger (Dof) have single zinc finger domain. Although few zinc finger proteins have been described in eubacteria, no protein with single C4 zinc finger has been described in details in anyone of them. In this article, we are describing two novel C-terminal C4 zinc finger proteins-Msmeg_0118 and Msmeg_3613 from Mycobacterium smegmatis. We have named these proteins as Mszfp1 (Mycobacterial Single Zinc Finger Protein 1) and Mszfp2 (Mycobacterial Single Zinc Finger Protein 2). Both the proteins are expressed constitutively, can bind to DNA and regulate transcription. It appears that Mszfp1 and Mszfp2 may activate transcription by interacting with RNA polymerase.

Structural basis of transcription activation

Class II transcription activators function by binding to a DNA site overlapping a core promoter and stimulating isomerization of an initial RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter closed complex into a catalytically competent RNAP-promoter open complex. Here, we report a 4.4 angstrom crystal structure of an intact bacterial class II transcription activation complex. The structure comprises Thermus thermophilus transcription activator protein TTHB099 (TAP) [homolog of Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP)], T. thermophilus RNAP σ(A) holoenzyme, a class II TAP-dependent promoter, and a ribotetranucleotide primer. The structure reveals the interactions between RNAP holoenzyme and DNA responsible for transcription initiation and reveals the interactions between TAP and RNAP holoenzyme responsible for transcription activation. The structure indicates that TAP stimulates isomerization through simple, adhesive, stabilizing protein-protein interactions with RNAP holoenzyme.

Conditional Epistatic Interaction Maps Reveal Global Functional Rewiring of Genome Integrity Pathways in Escherichia coli

As antibiotic resistance is increasingly becoming a public health concern, an improved understanding of the bacterial DNA damage response (DDR), which is commonly targeted by antibiotics, could be of tremendous therapeutic value. Although the genetic components of the bacterial DDR have been studied extensively in isolation, how the underlying biological pathways interact functionally remains unclear. Here, we address this by performing systematic, unbiased, quantitative synthetic genetic interaction (GI) screens and uncover widespread changes in the GI network of the entire genomic integrity apparatus of Escherichia coli under standard and DNA-damaging growth conditions. The GI patterns of untreated cultures implicated two previously uncharacterized proteins (YhbQ and YqgF) as nucleases, whereas reorganization of the GI network after DNA damage revealed DDR roles for both annotated and uncharacterized genes. Analyses of pan-bacterial conservation patterns suggest that DDR mechanisms and functional relationships are near universal, highlighting a modular and highly adaptive genomic stress response.

Residue substitutions near the redox center of Bacillus subtilis Spx affect RNA polymerase interaction, redox control, and Spx-DNA contact at a conserved cis-acting element

Spx, a member of the ArsC protein family, is a regulatory factor that interacts with RNA polymerase (RNAP). It is highly conserved in Gram-positive bacteria and controls transcription on a genome-wide scale in response to oxidative stress. The structural requirements for RNAP interaction and promoter DNA recognition by Spx were examined through mutational analysis. Residues near the CxxC redox disulfide center of Spx functioned in RNAP α subunit interaction and in promoter DNA binding. R60E and C10A mutants were shown previously to confer defects in transcriptional activation, but both were able to interact with RNAP. R92, which is conserved in ArsC-family proteins, is likely involved in redox control of Spx, as the C10A mutation, which blocks disulfide formation, was epistatic to the R92A mutation. The R91A mutation reduced transcriptional activation and repression, suggesting a defect in RNAP interaction, which was confirmed by interaction assays using an epitope-tagged mutant protein. Protein-DNA cross-linking detected contact between RNAP-bound Spx and the AGCA element at −44 that is conserved in Spx-controlled genes. This interaction caused repositioning of the RNAP σA subunit from a −35-like element upstream of the trxB (thioredoxin reductase) promoter to positions −36 and −11 of the core promoter. The study shows that RNAP-bound Spx contacts a conserved upstream promoter sequence element when bound to RNAP.

MarA, SoxS and Rob of Escherichia coli - Global regulators of multidrug resistance, virulence and stress response

Bacteria have a great capacity for adjusting their metabolism in response to environmental changes by linking extracellular stimuli to the regulation of genes by transcription factors. By working in a co-operative manner, transcription factors provide a rapid response to external threats, allowing the bacteria to survive. This review will focus on transcription factors MarA, SoxS and Rob in Escherichia coli, three members of the AraC family of proteins. These homologous proteins exemplify the ability to respond to multiple threats such as oxidative stress, drugs and toxic compounds, acidic pH, and host antimicrobial peptides. MarA, SoxS and Rob recognize similar DNA sequences in the promoter region of more than 40 regulatory target genes. As their regulons overlap, a finely tuned adaptive response allows E. coli to survive in the presence of different assaults in a co-ordinated manner. These regulators are well conserved amongst Enterobacteriaceae and due to their broad involvement in bacterial adaptation in the host, have recently been explored as targets to develop new anti-virulence agents. The regulators are also being examined for their roles in novel technologies such as biofuel production.

Activating transcription in bacteria

Bacteria use a variety of mechanisms to direct RNA polymerase to specific promoters in order to activate transcription in response to growth signals or environmental cues. Activation can be due to factors that interact at specific promoters, thereby increasing transcription directed by these promoters. We examine the range of architectures found at activator-dependent promoters and outline the mechanisms by which input from different factors is integrated. Alternatively, activation can be due to factors that interact with RNA polymerase and change its preferences for target promoters. We summarize the different mechanistic options for activation that are focused directly on RNA polymerase.

Transcription activation by Escherichia coli Rob at class II promoters: protein-protein interactions between Rob's N-terminal domain and the σ(70) subunit of RNA polymerase

Bacterial transcription activators regulate transcription by making essential protein-protein interactions with RNA polymerase, for example, with region 4 of the σ(70) subunit (σ(70) R4). Rob, SoxS, and MarA comprise a closely related subset of members of the AraC/XylS family of transcription factors that activate transcription of both class I and class II promoters. Recently, we showed that interactions between SoxS and σ(70) R4 occlude the binding of σ(70) R4 to the -35 promoter element of class II promoters. Although Rob shares many similarities with SoxS, it contains a C-terminal domain (CTD) that the other paralogs do not. Thus, a goal of this study was to determine whether Rob makes protein-protein interactions with σ(70) R4 at class II promoters and, if so, whether the interactions occlude the binding of σ(70) R4 to the -35 hexamer despite the presence of the CTD. We found that although Rob makes fewer interactions with σ(70) R4 than SoxS, the two proteins make the same, unusual, position-dependent interactions. Importantly, we found that Rob occludes σ(70) R4 from binding the -35 hexamer, just as does SoxS. Thus, the CTD does not substantially alter the way Rob interacts with σ(70) R4 at class II promoters. Moreover, in contrast to inferences drawn from the co-crystal structure of Rob bound to robbox DNA, which showed that only one of Rob's dual helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA binding motifs binds a recognition element of the promoter's robbox, we determined that the two HTH motifs each bind a recognition element in vivo.

Genetic evidence for a novel interaction between transcriptional activator SoxS and region 4 of the σ(70) subunit of RNA polymerase at class II SoxS-dependent promoters in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli SoxS activates transcription of the genes of the soxRS regulon, which provide the cell's defense against oxidative stress. In response to this stress, SoxS is synthesized de novo. Because the DNA binding site of SoxS is highly degenerate, SoxS efficiently activates transcription by the mechanism of prerecruitment. In prerecruitment, newly synthesized SoxS first forms binary complexes with RNA polymerase. These complexes then scan the chromosome for class I and II SoxS-dependent promoters, using the specific DNA-recognition properties of SoxS and σ(70) to distinguish SoxS-dependent promoters from the vast excess of sequence-equivalent soxboxes that do not reside in promoters. Previously, we determined that SoxS interacts with RNA polymerase in two ways: by making protein-protein interactions with the DNA-binding determinant of the α subunit and by interacting with σ(70) region 4 (σ(70) R4) both "on-DNA" and "off-DNA." Here, we address the question of how SoxS and σ(70) R4 coexist at class II promoters, where the binding site for SoxS either partially or completely overlaps the -35 region of the promoter, which is usually bound by σ(70) R4. To do so, we created a tri-alanine scanning library that covers all of σ(70) R4. We determined that interactions between σ(70) R4 and the DNA in the promoter's -35 region are required for activation of class I promoters, where the binding site lies upstream of the -35 hexamer, but they are not required at class II promoters. In contrast, specific three-amino-acid stretches are required for activation of class I (lac) and class II (galP1) cyclic AMP receptor protein-dependent promoters. We conclude from these data that SoxS and σ(70) R4 interact with each other in a novel way at class II SoxS-dependent promoters such that the two proteins do not accommodate one another in the -35 region but instead SoxS binding there occludes the binding of σ(70) R4.