Interaction Analyses of 14-3-3ζ, Dok1, and Phosphorylated Integrin β Cytoplasmic Tails Reveal a Bi-molecular Switch in Integrin Regulation

Structure, signal transduction, activation, and inhibition of integrin αIIbβ3

Integrins are heterodimeric receptors comprising α and β subunits. They are expressed on the cell surface and play key roles in cell adhesion, migration, and growth. Several types of integrins are expressed on the platelets, including αvβ3, αIIbβ3, α2β1, α5β1, and α6β1. Among these, physically αIIbβ3 is exclusively expressed on the platelet surface and their precursor cells, megakaryocytes. αIIbβ3 adopts at least three conformations: i) bent-closed, ii) extended-closed, and iii) extended-open. The transition from conformation i) to iii) occurs when αIIbβ3 is activated by stimulants. Conformation iii) possesses a high ligand affinity, which triggers integrin clustering and platelet aggregation. Platelets are indispensable for maintaining vascular system integrity and preventing bleeding. However, excessive platelet activation can result in myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Therefore, finding a novel strategy to stop bleeding without accelerating the risk of thrombosis is important. Regulation of αIIbβ3 activation is vital for this strategy. There are a large number of molecules that facilitate or inhibit αIIbβ3 activation. The interference of these molecules can accurately control the balance between hemostasis and thrombosis. This review describes the structure and signal transduction of αIIbβ3, summarizes the molecules that directly or indirectly affect integrin αIIbβ3 activation, and discusses some novel antiαIIbβ3 drugs. This will advance our understanding of the activation of αIIbβ3 and its essential role in platelet function and tumor development.

Phosphorylation Regulation Mechanism of β2 Integrin for the Binding of Filamin Revealed by Markov State Model

Leukocyte adhesion deficiency-1 (LAD-1) disorder is a severe immunodeficiency syndrome caused by deficiency or mutation of β2 integrin. The phosphorylation on threonine 758 of β2 integrin acts as a molecular switch inhibiting the binding of filamin. However, the switch mechanism of site-specific phosphorylation at the atom level is still poorly understood. To resolve the regulation mechanism, all-atom molecular dynamics simulation and Markov state model were used to study the dynamic regulation pathway of phosphorylation. Wild type system possessed lower binding free energy and fewer number of states than the phosphorylated system. Both systems underwent local disorder-to-order conformation conversion when achieving steady states. To reach steady states, wild type adopted less number of transition paths/shortest path according to the transition path theory than the phosphorylated system. The underlying phosphorylated regulation pathway was from P1 to P0 and then P4 state, and the main driving force should be hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interaction disturbing the secondary structure of phosphorylated states. These studies will shed light on the pathogenesis of LAD-1 disease and lay a foundation for drug development.

The structural basis of β2 integrin intra-cellular multi-protein complexes

In multicellular organisms, cell adhesion is a pivotal physiological process which is essential for cell-cell communications, cell migration, and interactions with extracellular matrix. Integrins, a family of large hetero-dimeric type I membrane proteins, are known for driving cell adhesion functions. Among 24 different integrins, four β2 integrins, αL β2, αM β2, αX β2 and αD β2, are specific for cell adhesion and migration of leukocytes. Many cytosolic proteins interact with short cytosolic tails (CTs) of β2 and other integrins which are essential in bi-directional signaling processes. Further, phosphorylation of CTs of integrins regulates binding of intra-cellular proteins and signaling systems. In this review, recent advances in structures and interactions of multi-protein complexes of integrin tails, with a focus on β2 integrin, and cytosolic proteins are discussed along with a proposed future direction.

New insights into the phosphorylation of the threonine motif of the β1 integrin cytoplasmic domain

Integrins require an activation step before ligand binding and signaling that is mediated by talin and kindlin binding to the β integrin cytosolic domain (β-tail). Conflicting reports exist about the contribution of phosphorylation of a conserved threonine motif in the β1-tail (β1-pT788/pT789) to integrin activation. We show that widely used and commercially available antibodies against β1-pT788/pT789 integrin do not detect specific β1-pT788/pT789 integrin signals in immunoblots of several human and mouse cell lysates but bind bi-phosphorylated threonine residues in numerous proteins, which were identified by mass spectrometry experiments. Furthermore, we found that fibroblasts and epithelial cells expressing the phospho-mimicking β1-TT788/789DD integrin failed to activate β1 integrins and displayed reduced integrin ligand binding, adhesion initiation and cell spreading. These cellular defects are specifically caused by the inability of kindlin to bind β1-tail polypeptides carrying a phosphorylated threonine motif or phospho-mimicking TT788/789DD substitutions. Our findings indicate that the double-threonine motif in β1-class integrins is not a major phosphorylation site but if phosphorylated would curb integrin function.

Binary and ternary complexes of FLNa-Ig21 with cytosolic tails of αMß2 integrin reveal dual role of filamin mediated regulation

BACKGROUND

Cytoskeletal protein filamin A is critical for the outside-in signaling of integrins. Although molecular mechanisms of filamin-integrin interactions are not fully understood. Mostly, the membrane distal (MD) part of the cytosolic tail (CT) of β subunit of integrin is known to interact with filamin A domain 21 (FLNa-Ig2). However, binary and ternary complexes of full-length CTs of leucocyte specific ß2 integrins with FLNa-Ig21 are yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

Binding interactions of the CTs of integrin αMß2 with FLNa-Ig21 are extensively investigated by NMR, ITC, cell-based functional assays and computational docking.

RESULTS

The αM CT demonstrates interactions with FLNa-Ig21 forming a binary complex. Filamin/αM interface is mediated by sidechain-sidechain interactions among non-polar and aromatic residues involving MP helix of αM and the canonical CD face of FLNa-Ig21. Functional assays delineated an interfacial residue Y1137 of αM CT is critical for in-cell binding to FLNa-Ig2. In addition, full-length ß2 CT occupies two distinct binding sites in complex with FLNa-Ig21. A ternary complex of FLNa-Ig21 with CTs has been characterized. In the ternary complex, αM CT moves away to a distal site of FLNa-Ig21 with fewer interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate a plausible dual role of filamin in integrin regulation. The molecular interactions of the ternary complex are critical for the resting state of integrins whereas stable FLNa-Ig21/αM CT binary complex perhaps be required for the activated state.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Filamin binding to both α and β CTs of other integrins could be essential in regulating bidirectional signaling mechanisms.

Regulation of cell adhesion: a collaborative effort of integrins, their ligands, cytoplasmic actors, and phosphorylation

Integrins are large heterodimeric type 1 membrane proteins expressed in all nucleated mammalian cells. Eighteen α-chains and eight β-chains can combine to form 24 different integrins. They are cell adhesion proteins, which bind to a large variety of cellular and extracellular ligands. Integrins are required for cell migration, hemostasis, translocation of cells out from the blood stream and further movement into tissues, but also for the immune response and tissue morphogenesis. Importantly, integrins are not usually active as such, but need activation to become adhesive. Integrins are activated by outside-in activation through integrin ligand binding, or by inside-out activation through intracellular signaling. An important question is how integrin activity is regulated, and this topic has recently drawn much attention. Changes in integrin affinity for ligand binding are due to allosteric structural alterations, but equally important are avidity changes due to integrin clustering in the plane of the plasma membrane. Recent studies have partially solved how integrin cell surface structures change during activation. The integrin cytoplasmic domains are relatively short, but by interacting with a variety of cytoplasmic proteins in a regulated manner, the integrins acquire a number of properties important not only for cell adhesion and movement, but also for cellular signaling. Recent work has shown that specific integrin phosphorylations play pivotal roles in the regulation of integrin activity. Our purpose in this review is to integrate the present knowledge to enable an understanding of how cell adhesion is dynamically regulated.

Cell Adhesion by Integrins

Integrins are heterodimeric cell surface receptors ensuring the mechanical connection between cells and the extracellular matrix. In addition to the anchorage of cells to the extracellular matrix, these receptors have critical functions in intracellular signaling, but are also taking center stage in many physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we provide some historical, structural, and physiological notes so that the diverse functions of these receptors can be appreciated and put into the context of the emerging field of mechanobiology. We propose that the exciting journey of the exploration of these receptors will continue for at least another new generation of researchers.

Platelet integrin αIIbβ3: signal transduction, regulation, and its therapeutic targeting

Integrins are a family of transmembrane glycoprotein signaling receptors that can transmit bioinformation bidirectionally across the plasma membrane. Integrin αIIbβ3 is expressed at a high level in platelets and their progenitors, where it plays a central role in platelet functions, hemostasis, and arterial thrombosis. Integrin αIIbβ3 also participates in cancer progression, such as tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. In resting platelets, integrin αIIbβ3 adopts an inactive conformation. Upon agonist stimulation, the transduction of inside-out signals leads integrin αIIbβ3 to switch from a low- to high-affinity state for fibrinogen and other ligands. Ligand binding causes integrin clustering and subsequently promotes outside-in signaling, which initiates and amplifies a range of cellular events to drive essential platelet functions such as spreading, aggregation, clot retraction, and thrombus consolidation. Regulation of the bidirectional signaling of integrin αIIbβ3 requires the involvement of numerous interacting proteins, which associate with the cytoplasmic tails of αIIbβ3 in particular. Integrin αIIbβ3 and its signaling pathways are considered promising targets for antithrombotic therapy. This review describes the bidirectional signal transduction of integrin αIIbβ3 in platelets, as well as the proteins responsible for its regulation and therapeutic agents that target integrin αIIbβ3 and its signaling pathways.