Effects of DNA Superhelical Stress on the Stability of H2B-Ubiquitylated Nucleosomes

Characterizing and exploiting the many roles of aberrant H2B monoubiquitination in cancer pathogenesis

Monoubiquitination of histone H2B on lysine 120 (H2Bub1) is implicated in the control of multiple essential processes, including transcription, DNA damage repair and mitotic chromosome segregation. Accordingly, aberrant regulation of H2Bub1 can induce transcriptional reprogramming and genome instability that may promote oncogenesis. Remarkably, alterations of the ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinating enzymes regulating H2Bub1 are emerging as ubiquitous features in cancer, further supporting the possibility that the misregulation of H2Bub1 is an underlying mechanism contributing to cancer pathogenesis. To date, aberrant H2Bub1 dynamics have been reported in multiple cancer types and are associated with transcriptional changes that promote oncogenesis in a cancer type-specific manner. Owing to the multi-functional nature of H2Bub1, misregulation of its writers and erasers may drive disease initiation and progression through additional synergistic processes. Accordingly, understanding the molecular determinants and pathogenic impacts associated with aberrant H2Bub1 regulation may reveal novel drug targets and therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be exploited to develop innovative precision medicine strategies that better combat cancer. In this review, we present the normal functions of H2Bub1 in the control of DNA-associated processes and describe the pathogenic implications associated with its misregulation in cancer. We further discuss the challenges coupled with the development of therapeutic strategies targeting H2Bub1 misregulation and expose the potential benefits of designing treatments that synergistically exploit the multiple functionalities of H2Bub1 to improve treatment selectivity and efficacy.

The Effects of Histone H2B Ubiquitylations on the Nucleosome Structure and Internucleosomal Interactions

Eukaryotic gene compaction takes place at multiple levels to package DNA to chromatin and chromosomes. Two of the most fundamental levels of DNA packaging are at the nucleosome and dinucleosome stacks. The nucleosome is the basic gene-packing unit and is composed of DNA wrapped around a histone core. Nucleosomes stack with one another for further compaction of DNA. The first stacking step leads to dinucleosome formation, which is driven by internucleosomal interactions between various parts of two nucleosomes. Histone proteins are rich targets for post-translational modifications, some of which affect the structure of the nucleosome and the interactions between nucleosomes. These effects are often implicated in the regulation of various genomic transactions. In particular, histone H2B ubiquitylation has been associated with facilitated transcription and hexasome formation. Here, we employed semi-synthetically ubiquitylated histone H2B and single-molecule FRET to investigate the effects of H2B ubiquitylations at lysine 34 (H2BK34) and lysine 120 (H2BK120) on the structure of the nucleosome and the interactions between two nucleosomes. Our results suggest that H2BK34 ubiquitylation widens the DNA gyre gap in the nucleosome and stabilizes long- and short-range internucleosomal interactions while H2BK120 ubiquitylation does not affect the nucleosome structure or internucleosomal interactions. These results suggest potential roles for H2B ubiquitylations in facilitated transcription and hexasome formation while maintaining the structural integrity of chromatin.

H2B Lys34 Ubiquitination Induces Nucleosome Distortion to Stimulate Dot1L Activity

Ubiquitination-dependent histone crosstalk plays critical roles in chromatin-associated processes and is highly associated with human diseases. Mechanism studies of the crosstalk have been of the central focus. Here our study on the crosstalk between H2BK34ub and Dot1L-catalyzed H3K79me suggests a novel mechanism of ubiquitination-induced nucleosome distortion to stimulate the activity of an enzyme. We determined the cryo-electron microscopy structures of Dot1L-H2BK34ub nucleosome complex and the H2BK34ub nucleosome alone. The structures reveal that H2BK34ub induces an almost identical orientation and binding pattern of Dot1L on nucleosome as H2BK120ub, which positions Dot1L for the productive conformation through direct ubiquitin-enzyme contacts. However, H2BK34-anchored ubiquitin does not directly interact with Dot1L as occurs in the case of H2BK120ub, but rather induces DNA and histone distortion around the modified site. Our findings establish the structural framework for understanding the H2BK34ub-H3K79me trans-crosstalk and highlight the diversity of mechanisms for histone ubiquitination to activate chromatin-modifying enzymes.

Histone Modifications, Internucleosome Dynamics, and DNA Stresses: How They Cooperate to “Functionalize” Nucleosomes

Tight packaging of DNA in chromatin severely constrains DNA accessibility and dynamics. In contrast, nucleosomes in active chromatin state are highly flexible, can exchange their histones, and are virtually “transparent” to RNA polymerases, which transcribe through gene bodies at rates comparable to that of naked DNA. Defining mechanisms that revert nucleosome repression, in addition to their value for basic science, is of key importance for the diagnosis and treatment of genetic diseases. Chromatin activity is largely regulated by histone posttranslational modifications, ranging from small chemical groups up to the yet understudied “bulky” ubiquitylation and sumoylation. However, it is to be revealed how histone marks are “translated” to permissive or repressive changes in nucleosomes: it is a general opinion that histone modifications act primarily as “signals” for recruiting the regulatory proteins or as a “neutralizer” of electrostatic shielding of histone tails. Here, we would like to discuss recent evidence suggesting that histone ubiquitylation, in a DNA stress–dependent manner, can directly regulate the dynamics of the nucleosome and their primary structure and can promote nucleosome decomposition to hexasome particles or additionally stabilize nucleosomes against unwrapping. In addition, nucleosome repression/ derepression studies are usually performed with single mononucleosomes as a model. We would like to review and discuss recent findings showing that internucleosomal interactions could strongly modulate the dynamics and rearrangements of nucleosomes. Our hypothesis is that bulky histone modifications, nucleosome inherent dynamics, internucleosome interactions, and DNA torsions could act in cooperation to orchestrate the formation of different dynamic states of arrayed nucleosomes and thus promote chromatin functionality and diversify epigenetic programming methods.

"Direct" and "Indirect" Effects of Histone Modifications: Modulation of Sterical Bulk as a Novel Source of Functionality

The chromatin-regulatory principles of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) are discussed with a focus on the potential alterations in chromatin functional state due to steric and mechanical constraints imposed by bulky histone modifications such as ubiquitin and SUMO. In the classical view, PTMs operate as recruitment platforms for histone "readers," and as determinants of chromatin array compaction. Alterations of histone charges by "small" chemical modifications (e.g., acetylation, phosphorylation) could regulate nucleosome spontaneous dynamics without globally affecting nucleosome structure. These fluctuations in nucleosome wrapping can be exploited by chromatin-processing machinery. In contrast, ubiquitin and SUMO are comparable in size to histones, and it seems logical that these PTMs could conflict with canonical nucleosome organization. An experimentally testable hypothesis that by adding sterical bulk these PTMs can robustly alter nucleosome primary structure is proposed. The model presented here stresses the diversity of mechanisms by which histone PTMs regulate chromatin dynamics, primary structure and, hence, functionality.

The intrinsic stability of H2B-ubiquitylated nucleosomes and their in vitro assembly/disassembly by histone chaperone NAP1

BACKGROUND

Apart the gene-regulatory functions as docking sites for histone 'readers', some histone modifications could directly affect nucleosome structure. The H2BK34-ubiquitylation deposited by MOF-MSL complex, increases nucleosome dynamics in vitro and promotes donation of one H2A/H2B dimer to histone acceptors.

METHODS

We evaluated temperature-depended stability of H2BK34-ubiquitylated nucleosomes under 'physiological' ionic conditions in the presence or absence of histone acceptor, and examined assembly and disassembly of ubiquitylated nucleosomes in vitro by recombinant mouse NAP1.

RESULTS

H2BK34ub modification is sufficient to promote selective eviction of only one H2A/H2B dimer independently of histone-binding agents. Despite the robust H2A/H2B dimer-displacement effect of mNAP1 with the H2BK34ub (but not unmodified) nucleosomes, NAP1 could assemble symmetrically- or asymmetrically ubiquitylated nucleosomes under 'physiological' conditions in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS AND GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

The increased mobility of one nucleosomal H2A/H2B dimer is an intrinsic nucleosome destabilizing property of H2BK34 ubiquitylation that has the intranucleosome bases. The ability of NAP to reasonably efficiently assemble H2BK34-ubiquitylated nucleosomes supposes a potential mechanism for deposition/distribution of H2BK34ub mark in the MOF-MSL independent manner (for example, during histone dimer exchange upon transcription elongation).