Crystal Structures of Csm2 and Csm3 in the Type III-A CRISPR–Cas Effector Complex

The structural biology of type III CRISPR-Cas systems

CRISPR-Cas system is an RNA-guided adaptive immune system widespread in bacteria and archaea. Among them, type III CRISPR-Cas systems are the most ancient throughout the CRISPR-Cas family, proving anti-phage defense through a crRNA-guided RNA targeting manner and possessing multiple enzymatic activities. Type III CRISPR-Cas systems comprise four typical members (type III-A to III-D) and two atypical members (type III-E and type III-F), providing immune defense through distinct mechanisms. Here, we delve into structural studies conducted on three well-characterized members: the type III-A, III-B, and III-E systems, provide an overview of the structural insights into the crRNA-guided target RNA cleavage, self/non-self discrimination, and the target RNA-dependent regulation of enzymatic subunits in the effector complex.

Characteristics of subtype III-A CRISPR-Cas system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: An overview

CRISPR-Cas systems are the only RNA- guided adaptive immunity pathways that trigger the detection and destruction of invasive phages and plasmids in bacteria and archaea. Due to its prevalence and mystery, the Class 1 CRISPR-Cas system has lately been the subject of several studies. This review highlights the specificity of CRISPR-Cas system III-A in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the tuberculosis-causing pathogen, for over twenty years. We discuss the difference between the several subtypes of Type III and their defence mechanisms. The anti-CRISPRs (Acrs) recently described, the critical role of Reverse transcriptase (RT) and housekeeping nuclease for type III CRISPR-Cas systems, and the use of this cutting-edge technology, its impact on the search for novel anti-tuberculosis drugs.

Functional PAM sequence for DNA interference by CRISPR-Cas I-B system of Leptospira interrogans and the role of LinCas11b encoded within lincas8b

Pathogenic species of Leptospira are recalcitrant for genetic manipulation using conventional tools, and therefore there is a need to explore techniques of higher efficiency. Application of endogenous CRISPR-Cas tool is emerging and efficient; nevertheless, it is limited by a poor understanding of interference machinery in the bacterial genome and its associated protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). In this study, interference machinery of CRISPR-Cas subtype I-B (Lin_I-B) from L. interrogans was experimentally validated in E. coli using the various identified PAM (TGA, ATG, ATA). The overexpression of the Lin_I-B interference machinery in E. coli demonstrated that LinCas5, LinCas6, LinCas7, and LinCas8b can self-assemble on cognate CRISPR RNA to form an interference complex (LinCascade). Moreover, a robust interference of target plasmids containing a protospacer with a PAM suggested a functional LinCascade. We also recognized a small open reading frame within lincas8b that independently co-translates LinCas11b. A mutant variant of LinCascade^-Cas11b that lacks LinCas11b co-expression erred to mount target plasmid interference. At the same time, LinCas11b complementation in LinCascade^-Cas11b rescued target plasmid interference. Thus, the present study establishes Leptospira subtype I-B interference machinery to be functional and, soon, may pave the way for scientists to harness it as a programmable endogenous genetic manipulation tool.

Structural and biochemical characterization of in vivo assembled Lactococcus lactis CRISPR-Csm complex

The small RNA-mediated immunity in bacteria depends on foreign RNA-activated and self RNA-inhibited enzymatic activities. The multi-subunit Type III-A CRISPR-Cas effector complex (Csm) exemplifies this principle and is in addition regulated by cellular metabolites such as divalent metals and ATP. Recognition of the foreign or cognate target RNA (CTR) triggers its single-stranded deoxyribonuclease (DNase) and cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) synthesis activities. The same activities remain dormant in the presence of the self or non-cognate target RNA (NTR) that differs from CTR only in its 3'-protospacer flanking sequence (3'-PFS). Here we employ electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM), functional assays, and comparative cross-linking to study in vivo assembled mesophilic Lactococcus lactis Csm (LlCsm) at the three functional states: apo, the CTR- and the NTR-bound. Unlike previously studied Csm complexes, we observed binding of 3'-PFS to Csm in absence of bound ATP and analyzed the structures of the four RNA cleavage sites. Interestingly, comparative crosslinking results indicate a tightening of the Csm3-Csm4 interface as a result of CTR but not NTR binding, reflecting a possible role of protein dynamics change during activation.

Diverse CRISPR-Cas Complexes Require Independent Translation of Small and Large Subunits from a Single Gene

CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems provide prokaryotes with defense against viruses by degradation of specific invading nucleic acids. Despite advances in the biotechnological exploitation of select systems, multiple CRISPR-Cas types remain uncharacterized. Here, we investigated the previously uncharacterized type I-D interference complex and revealed that it is a genetic and structural hybrid with similarity to both type I and type III systems. Surprisingly, formation of the functional complex required internal in-frame translation of small subunits from within the large subunit gene. We further show that internal translation to generate small subunits is widespread across diverse type I-D, I-B, and I-C systems, which account for roughly one quarter of CRISPR-Cas systems. Our work reveals the unexpected expansion of protein coding potential from within single cas genes, which has important implications for understanding CRISPR-Cas function and evolution.

Crystal structure of the Csm5 subunit of the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

The Csm complex eliminates foreign RNA and DNA in the microbial defense CRISPR-Cas system. Csm5, one of the five subunits in the complex, facilitates crRNA maturation and target RNA binding in the type III system. However, the exact functional mechanism of Csm5 has remained elusive. Here, we report the crystal structure of the apo form of the Csm5 subunit at a resolution of 2.6 Å. Structural comparison of amino acids in the complex bound to RNA exhibits notable conformational changes in the crRNA and the target RNA binding sites. Shifts in the β-hairpin motif (β5-β6), α13 helix (resides 352-383), and G-rich loop (residues 335-337) in the C-terminal domain indicate an induced movement by crRNA binding. The positively charged residues (Lys 92, Arg 95 and Lys 96) located in the β-α4 loop of the target RNA interface show high conformational flexibility, while three-helix bundles (α1-α3) of the N-domain involved in Csm2 binding exhibit a rotational shift. The altered architecture of the Csm5 subunit demonstrates remarkable versatility of the ferredoxin-like fold in the RNA binding protein and provides a structural basis for the mechanism for crRNA and target RNA binding in the type III-A Crispr-Cas system.

Structural organization of a Type III-A CRISPR effector subcomplex determined by X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and their associated Cas proteins provide an immune-like response in many prokaryotes against extraneous nucleic acids. CRISPR-Cas systems are classified into different classes and types. Class 1 CRISPR-Cas systems form multi-protein effector complexes that includes a guide RNA (crRNA) used to identify the target for destruction. Here we present crystal structures of Staphylococcus epidermidis Type III-A CRISPR subunits Csm2 and Csm3 and a 5.2 Å resolution single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstruction of an in vivo assembled effector subcomplex including the crRNA. The structures help to clarify the quaternary architecture of Type III-A effector complexes, and provide details on crRNA binding, target RNA binding and cleavage, and intermolecular interactions essential for effector complex assembly. The structures allow a better understanding of the organization of Type III-A CRISPR effector complexes as well as highlighting the overall similarities and differences with other Class 1 effector complexes.