FOXO4 Transactivation Domain Interaction with Forkhead DNA Binding Domain and Effect on Selective DNA Recognition for Transcription Initiation

The Involvement of Peroxiporins and Antioxidant Transcription Factors in Breast Cancer Therapy Resistance

Breast cancer is still the leading cause of death in women of all ages. The reason for this is therapy resistance, which leads to the progression of the disease and the formation of metastases. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a multifactorial process that leads to therapy failure. MDR involves multiple processes and many signaling pathways that support each other, making it difficult to overcome once established. Here, we discuss cellular-oxidative-stress-modulating factors focusing on transcription factors NRF2, FOXO family, and peroxiporins, as well as their possible contribution to MDR. This is significant because oxidative stress is a consequence of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, and the activation of detoxification pathways could modulate the cellular response to therapy and could support MDR. These proteins are not directly responsible for MDR, but they support the survival of cancer cells under stress conditions.

Protein disorder and autoinhibition: The role of multivalency and effective concentration

Regulation of protein binding through autoinhibition commonly occurs via interactions involving intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). These intramolecular interactions can directly or allosterically inhibit intermolecular protein or DNA binding, regulate enzymatic activity, and control the assembly of large macromolecular complexes. Autoinhibitory interactions mediated by protein disorder are inherently transient, making their identification and characterization challenging. In this review, we explore the structural and functional diversity of disorder-mediated autoinhibition for a variety of biological mechanisms, with a focus on the role of multivalency and effective concentration. We also discuss the evolution of disordered motifs that participate in autoinhibition using examples where sequence conservation varies from high to low. In some cases, identifiable motifs that are essential for autoinhibition remain intact within a rapidly evolving sequence, over long evolutionary distances. Finally, we examine the potential of AlphaFold2 to predict autoinhibitory intramolecular interactions involving IDRs.

The disordered MAX N-terminus modulates DNA binding of the transcription factor MYC:MAX

The intrinsically disordered protein MYC belongs to the family of basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) transcription factors (TFs). In complex with its cognate binding partner MAX, MYC preferentially binds to E-Box promotor sequences where it controls fundamental cellular processes such as cell cycle progression, metabolism, and apoptosis. Intramolecular regulation of MYC:MAX has not yet been investigated in detail. In this work, we use Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to identify and map interactions between the disordered MAX N-terminus and the MYC:MAX DNA binding domain (DBD). We find that this binding event is mainly driven by electrostatic interactions and that it is competitive with DNA binding. Using Nuclear Magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR), we demonstrate that the MAX N-terminus serves to accelerate DNA binding kinetics of MYC:MAX and MAX:MAX dimers, while it simultaneously provides specificity for E-Box DNA. We also establish that these effects are further enhanced by Casein Kinase 2-mediated phosphorylation of two serine residues in the MAX N-terminus. Our work provides new insights how bHLH-LZ TFs are regulated by intramolecular interactions between disordered regions and the folded DNA binding domain.

Intricate coupling between the transactivation and basic-leucine zipper domains governs phosphorylation of transcription factor ATF4 by casein kinase 2

Most transcription factors possess at least one long intrinsically disordered transactivation domain that binds to a variety of coactivators and corepressors and plays a key role in modulating the transcriptional activity. Despite the crucial importance of these domains, the structural and functional basis of transactivation remains poorly understood. Here, we focused on activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)/cAMP response element-binding protein-2, an essential transcription factor for cellular stress adaptation. Bioinformatic sequence analysis of the ATF4 transactivation domain sequence revealed that the first 125 amino acids have noticeably less propensity for structural disorder than the rest of the domain. Using solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy complemented by a range of biophysical methods, we found that the isolated transactivation domain is predominantly yet not fully disordered in solution. We also observed that a short motif at the N-terminus of the transactivation domain has a high helical propensity. Importantly, we found that the N-terminal region of the transactivation domain is involved in transient long-range interactions with the basic-leucine zipper domain involved in DNA binding. Finally, in vitro phosphorylation assays with the casein kinase 2 show that the presence of the basic-leucine zipper domain is required for phosphorylation of the transactivation domain. This study uncovers the intricate coupling existing between the transactivation and basic-leucine zipper domains of ATF4, highlighting its potential regulatory significance.

Biophysical investigation of the dual binding surfaces of human transcription factors FOXO4 and p53

Cellular senescence is protective against external oncogenic stress, but its accumulation causes aging-related diseases. Forkhead box O4 (FOXO4) and p53 are human transcription factors known to promote senescence by interacting with each other and activating p21 transcription. Inhibition of the interaction is a strategy for inducing apoptosis of senescent cells, but the binding surfaces that mediate the FOXO4-p53 interaction remain elusive. Here, we investigated two binding sites involved in the interaction between FOXO4 and p53 by NMR spectroscopy. NMR chemical shift perturbation analysis showed that the binding between FOXO4's forkhead domain (FHD) and p53's transactivation domain (TAD), and between FOXO4's C-terminal transactivation domain (CR3) and p53's DNA-binding domain (DBD), mediate the FOXO4-p53 interaction. Isothermal titration calorimetry data showed that both interactions have micromolar K_d values, and FOXO4 FHD-p53 TAD interaction has a higher binding affinity. We also showed that the intramolecular CR3-binding surface of FOXO4 FHD interacts with p53 TAD2, and FOXO4 CR3 interacts with the DNA/p53 TAD-binding surface of p53 DBD, suggesting a network of potentially competitive and/or coordinated interactions. Based on these results, we propose that a network of intramolecular and intermolecular interactions contributes to the two transcription factors' proper localisation on the p21 promoter and consequently promotes p21 transcription and cell senescence. This work provides structural information at the molecular level that is key to understanding the interplay of two proteins responsible for cellular senescence.

Toward a mechanistic understanding of DNA binding by forkhead transcription factors and its perturbation by pathogenic mutations

Forkhead box (FOX) proteins are an evolutionarily conserved family of transcription factors that play numerous regulatory roles in eukaryotes during developmental and adult life. Dysfunction of FOX proteins has been implicated in a variety of human diseases, including cancer, neurodevelopment disorders and genetic diseases. The FOX family members share a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD), which is essential for DNA recognition, binding and function. Since the first FOX structure was resolved in 1993, >30 FOX structures have been reported to date. It is clear now that the structure and DNA recognition mechanisms vary among FOX members; however, a systematic review on this aspect is lacking. In this manuscript, we present an overview of the mechanisms by which FOX transcription factors bind DNA, including protein structures, DNA binding properties and disease-causing mutations. This review should enable a better understanding of FOX family transcription factors for basic researchers and clinicians.