Cotranslational Translocation and Folding of a Periplasmic Protein Domain in Escherichia coli

Cotranslational folding of human growth hormone in vitro and in Escherichia coli

Human growth hormone (hGH) is a four-helix bundle protein of considerable pharmacological interest. Recombinant hGH is produced in bacteria, yet little is known about its folding during expression in Escherichia coli. We have studied the cotranslational folding of hGH using force profile analysis (FPA), both during in vitro translation in the absence and presence of the chaperone trigger factor (TF), and when expressed in E. coli. We find that the main folding transition starts before hGH is completely released from the ribosome, and that it can interact with TF and possibly other chaperones.

Cotranslational folding and assembly of the dimeric Escherichia coli inner membrane protein EmrE

In recent years, it has become clear that many homo- and heterodimeric cytoplasmic proteins in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells start to dimerize cotranslationally (i.e., while at least one of the two chains is still attached to the ribosome). Whether this is also possible for integral membrane proteins is, however, unknown. Here, we apply force profile analysis (FPA)-a method where a translational arrest peptide (AP) engineered into the polypeptide chain is used to detect force generated on the nascent chain during membrane insertion-to demonstrate cotranslational interactions between a fully membrane-inserted monomer and a nascent, ribosome-tethered monomer of the Escherichia coli inner membrane protein EmrE. Similar cotranslational interactions are also seen when the two monomers are fused into a single polypeptide. Further, we uncover an apparent intrachain interaction between E¹⁴ in transmembrane helix 1 (TMH1) and S⁶⁴ in TMH3 that forms at a precise nascent chain length during cotranslational membrane insertion of an EmrE monomer. Like soluble proteins, inner membrane proteins thus appear to be able to both start to fold and start to dimerize during the cotranslational membrane insertion process.

Bacterial Signal Peptides- Navigating the Journey of Proteins

In 1971, Blobel proposed the first statement of the Signal Hypothesis which suggested that proteins have amino-terminal sequences that dictate their export and localization in the cell. A cytosolic binding factor was predicted, and later the protein conducting channel was discovered that was proposed in 1975 to align with the large ribosomal tunnel. The 1975 Signal Hypothesis also predicted that proteins targeted to different intracellular membranes would possess distinct signals and integral membrane proteins contained uncleaved signal sequences which initiate translocation of the polypeptide chain. This review summarizes the central role that the signal peptides play as address codes for proteins, their decisive role as targeting factors for delivery to the membrane and their function to activate the translocation machinery for export and membrane protein insertion. After shedding light on the navigation of proteins, the importance of removal of signal peptide and their degradation are addressed. Furthermore, the emerging work on signal peptidases as novel targets for antibiotic development is described.

Upstream charged and hydrophobic residues impact the timing of membrane insertion of transmembrane helices

During SecYEG-mediated cotranslational insertion of membrane proteins, transmembrane helices (TMHs) first make contact with the membrane when their N-terminal end is ~45 residues away from the peptidyl transferase center. However, we recently uncovered instances where the first contact is delayed by up to ~10 residues. Here, we recapitulate these effects using a model TMH fused to two short segments from the Escherichia coli inner membrane protein BtuC: a positively charged loop and a re-entrant loop. We show that the critical residues are two Arg residues in the positively charged loop and four hydrophobic residues in the re-entrant loop. Thus, both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions involving sequence elements that are not part of a TMH can impact the way the latter behaves during membrane insertion.