The antibacterial effect and physical performance of pit and fissure sealants based on an antibacterial core-shell nanocomposite

Novel pit and fissure sealant with nano-CaF2 and antibacterial monomer: Fluoride recharge, microleakage, sealing ability and cytotoxicity

Conventional resin-based sealants release minimal fluoride ions (F) and lack antibacterial activity. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a novel bioactive sealant containing calcium fluoride nanoparticles (nCaF2) and antibacterial dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM), and (2) investigate mechanical performance, F recharge and re-release, microleakage, sealing ability and cytotoxicity. Helioseal F served as commercial control. The initial F release from sealant containing 20% nCaF2 was 25-fold that of Helioseal F. After ion exhaustion and recharge, the F re-release from bioactive sealant did not decrease with increasing number of recharge and re-release cycles. Elastic modulus of new bioactive sealant was 44% higher than Helioseal F. The new sealant had excellent sealing, minimal microleakage, and good cytocompatibility. Hence, the nanostructured sealant had substantial and sustained F release and antibacterial activity, good sealing ability and biocompatibility. The novel bioactive nCaF2 sealant is promising to provide long-term F ions for caries prevention.

Influence of incorporation of nanostructured silver vanadate decorated with silver nanoparticles on roughness, microhardness, and color change of pit and fissure sealants

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the roughness, hardness, and color change of pit and fissure sealants of two commercial brands (Fluroshield ™ and Ultraseal XT ™) incorporated with nanostructured silver vanadate nanomaterial decorated with silver nanoparticles (β-AgVO3) in concentrations (0% - control, 2.5% and 5%).

Material and methods

Two commercial brands Fluroshield TM and Ultraseal XT ™ were used to make the samples with dimensions of 6 × 6 × 4 mm. The control group was made according to the manufacturer's instructions and in the groups with the addition of β-AgVO3, the nanomaterial was added proportionally by mass at percentages of 2.5% and 5%. Roughness properties were evaluated using a 3D Laser Confocal Microscope (n = 10), Knoop microhardness by Microdurometer (n = 10), and color change by Portable Color Spectrophotometer on the CIEDE2000 system (n = 10). Data were evaluated by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment and Tukey's mean comparison test at a 5% significance level.

Results

Ultraseal XT ™ sealant roughness showed a significant difference between concentrations with the highest mean for the 5% group (P = 0.010). Regarding the hardness, both sealants showed no significant difference between the groups. Fluroshield ™ sealant showed a significant difference in ΔE00 between the control-2.5% 24.93 (3.49) and control-5% 28.41 (2.58).

Conclusion

It may be concluded that the incorporation of β-AgVO3 influenced the increase in roughness for Ultraseal XT ™ pit and fissure sealant, did not interfere with the microhardness of both sealants, and promoted a change in the color of Fluroshield ™ sealant within clinically acceptable limits.

Caries Management with Non-Metallic Nanomaterials: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Non-metallic nanomaterials do not stain enamel or dentin. Most have better biocompatibility than metallic nanomaterials do for management of dental caries.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to review the types, properties and potential uses of non-metallic nanomaterials systematically for managing dental caries.

METHODS

Two researchers independently performed a literature search of publications in English using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. The keywords used were (nanoparticles OR nanocomposites OR nanomaterials) AND (caries OR tooth decay). They screened the titles and abstracts to identify potentially eligible publications of original research reporting non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management. Then, they retrieved and studied the full text of the identified publications for inclusion in this study.

RESULTS

Out of 2497 resulting publications, this study included 75 of those. The non-metallic nanomaterials used in these publications were categorized as biological organic nanomaterials (n=45), synthetic organic nanomaterials (n=15), carbon-based nanomaterials (n=13) and selenium nanomaterials (n=2). They inhibited bacteria growth and/or promoted remineralization. They could be incorporated in topical agents (29/75, 39%), dental adhesives (11/75, 15%), restorative fillers (4/75, 5%), dental sealant (3/75, 4%), oral drugs (3/75, 4%), toothpastes (2/75, 3%) and functional candies (1/75, 1%). Other publications (22/75, 29%) do not mention specific applications. However, most publications (67/75, 89%) were in vitro studies. Six publications (6/75, 8%) were animal studies, and only two publications (2/75, 3%) were clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

The literature showed non-metallic nanomaterials have antibacterial and/or remineralising properties. The most common type of non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management is organic nanomaterials. Non-metallic nanomaterials can be incorporated into dental sealants, toothpaste, dental adhesives, topical agents and even candies and drugs. However, the majority of the publications are in vitro studies, and only two publications are clinical studies.

Development of antibacterial composite resin containing chitosan/fluoride microparticles as pit and fissure sealant to prevent caries

OBJECTIVE

Develop a fissure sealant containing chitosan/fluoride microparticles (C/F) with antibacterial, fluoride release and recharge ability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chitosan/fluoride microparticles were synthesized and added to Bis-GMA as C/F. The experimental group comprised 0%, 2%, 4% C/F, with ClinproTM fissure sealant as control. Antibacterial activity was detected by Alamar Blue assay and colony-forming units (CFU). Biocompatibility was determined by WST-1 and LDH test. Curing depth, flowability, tensile strength and flexural strength were measured according to the ISO standard; microhardness by Vickers hardness test. Fluoride release and recharge were recorded through ionic chromatography. Statistical analysis was performed with an independent t-test, one-way and two-way ANOVA. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

2% and 4% C/F showed antibacterial ability with CFU ratios decreasing to 10% and 25% respectively (P < 0.01). Nonetheless, 4% C/F was concerned because biocompatibility revealed cytotoxicity compared to medium (P < 0.001). 2% C/F had superior mechanical properties to ClinproTM fissure sealant in terms of curing depth (P < 0.001), microhardness and tensile strength (P < 0.01). It had good fluoride release and recharge ability (P = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

2% C/F could be an antibacterial sealant with good mechanical strength, fluoride release and recharge ability.