Retention of posterior resin bonded fixed dental prostheses with different designs after chewing simulation

Marginal fit and retention force of zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region with different designs

Background/purpose

Retainer debonding of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) is one of the major reasons for their lower survival rates than fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with full-coverage crowns. Recent advances in milling technology have enabled the fabrication of RBFDPs with complex retainers (D-shaped designs). This study aimed to assess the marginal fit and retention force of zirconia RBFDPs with inlay-, L-, and D-shaped designs to clarify their clinical applications.

Materials and methods

Three abutment teeth models without maxillary second premolars were created using inlay-, L-, and D-shaped retainer designs. The zirconia RBFDPs were designed and fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions (n = 10). The marginal gap was measured using the silicone replica technique. Zirconia frameworks were bonded to the abutment teeth using resin cement. Tensile test was conducted after thermal cycling and dynamic loading tests. The loads during debonding or fracture were recorded. The failure pattern was analyzed by observing the fracture surface using a scanning electron microscope.

Results

D-shaped RBFDPs showed a significantly larger marginal gap than inlay- and L-shaped RBFDPs (P < 0.05). However, the mean marginal values were clinically acceptable (<120 μm). The D-shaped model exhibited the highest tensile strength in the tensile tests. The inlay-shaped and most of the D-shaped RBFDPs experienced debonding with cohesive failure, whereas the L-shaped RBFDPs showed fractures near the connector.

Conclusion

The D-shaped retainer design was superior to the inlay- and L-shaped designs with respect to the inhibition of retainer debonding. However, the marginal fitness needs to be improved.

Influence of retainer design and number of inlay boxes on the biomechanical behavior of zirconia cantilever resin bonded fixed dental prosthesis

OBJECTIVES

The development of dental adhesives with enhanced bond strength has assisted minimally invasive dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture load and stress distribution pattern of two retainer designs for posterior cantilever resin bonded fixed dental protheses (RBFDPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty human mandibular molars were divided into two groups according to the retainer design; lingual coverage (LC) and occlusal coverage (OC) retainers. Each main group was then divided according to the number of inlay boxes (n = 10); one inlay and two inlay boxes. High translucency (3Y) zirconia was used to manufacture all restorations, and a dual-polymerizing adhesive resin cement was used for bonding. All specimens underwent 10,000 cycles of thermocycling (5-55°C), 240,000 cycles of dynamic loading (50 N, descending speed v = 30 mm/second, frequency = 1.6 Hz), and failure load test. Both one-way and two-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze the data. The four models included in the in-vitro study are part of the finite element analysis (FEA). When the restorations failed, maximal principal stress values on restorations, enamel, dentin, and luting resin were investigated.

RESULTS

A statistically significant (p = 0.018) higher failure load was recorded for OC1 (627.00 ± 153.4 N) than the other groups; (548.0 ± 75.6 N, 521.20 ± 11.3 N, and 509.20 ± 14.9 N for LC1, LC2, and OC2, respectively). With regard to failure mode, one inlay box designs showed more favorable failure pattern than those of two inlay boxes. FEA showed higher stress magnitude transmitted to the tooth structure in models LC2 and OC2.

CONCLUSIONS

Lingual coverage and occlusal coverage retainers are promising designs capable to withstand the normal occlusal force for cantilever RBFDP in premolar area. The use of two inlay boxes decreased the fracture load of the two retainer designs and increased the stress transmitted to the tooth and resulted in high incidence of catastrophic failure.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Monolithic high translucent zirconia RBFDP could be considered as a viable treatment option to substitute missing posterior tooth, with improved esthetics and biocompatibility.

Long-term clinical outcome of three-unit fixed-fixed posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term clinical outcome of posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs) with a modified design made from zirconia ceramic.

METHODS

In 30 patients thirty 3-unit IRFDPs were placed to replace 7 premolars (4 in the maxilla, 3 in the mandible), and 23 first molars (15 in the maxilla, 8 in the mandible). Preparations were accomplished in agreement with the general principles for ceramic inlay restorations and modified with a short retainer-wing bevel preparation within the enamel at the buccal and oral sides. The frameworks were milled from 3Y-TZP ceramic, and the pontics were veneered with feldspathic ceramic. All IRFDPs were bonded with a phosphate monomer containing luting resin after air-abrasion of the intaglio surfaces. The patients were recalled 6-12 months after placement, and then annually. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the survival and complication rates of the IRFDPs.

RESULTS

The mean observation time was 10.6 ± 1.5 years. The 10-year cumulative survival rate was 89% with 4 failures, two of them were due to deep secondary caries with loss of retention, one due to repeated debonding with enamel fractures, and one due to generalized progressive periodontitis. The most common complication was chipping of the veneering ceramic (20.1%). Eighteen IRFDPs were free of any type of complication up to 15.4 years, which corresponds to a 10-year cumulative success rate of 70.4%.

CONCLUSION

The long-term clinical performance of modified IRFDPs made of veneered zirconia ceramics was favorable after 10 years, therefore, they represent a treatment alternative to replace posterior single missing teeth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Zirconia-based IRFDPs fabricated in the modified design may represent a substance-preserving alternative to conventional posterior FDPs to replace posterior single missing teeth, particularly in cases where implants cannot be placed, and when the adjacent teeth already have small restorations or defects.

Cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis to substitute a single premolar: Impact of retainer design and ceramic material after dynamic loading

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of retainer design and ceramic materials on the durability of minimally invasive cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) after artificial aging.

METHODS

One hundred caries-free human mandibular molars were prepared as abutments for all-ceramic cantilevered fixed dental prostheses using the following retainer designs: One wing (OW), Two wings (TW), Inlay ring (IR), Lingual coverage (LC), and Occlusal coverage (OC). Two ceramic materials were used: monolithic high translucent zirconia(z) and zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate (ZLS2) (n=10). All restorations were adhesively bonded with resin cement. The thermocycling of the specimens were performed between 5°C and 55°C for 10,000 cycles and then exposed to 240.000 cycles of dynamic loading on a chewing simulator. All surviving specimens were loaded onto the pontic until failure using a universal testing machine.

RESULTS

The mean failure load ranged from 124.00 to 627.00 N for the zirconia groups and from 133.30 to 230.00 N for the ZLS2 groups. Regarding the materials, a significantly higher failure load was recorded in the zirconia groups than in the ZLS2 groups (P<0.001), except for OW (P=0.748). Regarding the retainer designs, a significant different failure load was recorded between the different designs except for IR and LC in the zirconia groups, IR and OC, OW and TW, and TW and LC in the ZLS2 groups (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Zirconia IR, LC, and OC can be used as cantilever RBFDP in the premolar region. The fracture resistance of the ZLS2 design was below the normal bite force and should not be recommended as the first option.

Evaluation of different designs for posterior cantilever zirconia inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses in missing tooth replacement: Stage one results with 18-month follow-up assessment

OBJECTIVES

This clinical study aimed to investigate the outcomes and survival rates of different variations of inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IR-FDPs) composed of monolithic zirconia ceramic. The IR-FDPs with a single-retainer design were used for replacing missing mandibular second premolars. The research evaluated the effectiveness and longevity of these prostheses in clinical settings.

METHODS

A total of 30 IR-FDPs (n = 30) were placed for 27 female patients who presented with missing mandibular second premolar teeth. For this study, the mandibular first molar was chosen as a retainer for the cantilever IR-FDPs and the study involved a random assignment of participants into three distinct groups, each comprising 10 individuals (n = 10). The criterion for the grouping was the retainer design: inlay ring (IR), lingual coverage (LC), and occlusal coverage (OC). The three groups included mesial inlay box with the same dimensions (3 mm height, 3 mm width and 2 mm depth). All IR-FDPs were manufactured using monolithic high translucent 3Y zirconia and the connector area to the cantilever pontic was adjusted to dimensions of 3 × 3 mm for all designs. The restorations were bonded using adhesive resin cement. The clinical and radiographic evaluations of the restorations were conducted for a duration of 18 months, following the modified FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.

RESULTS

The restorations were observed in stage one for a period of 18 months. Only one restoration in group LC was debonded after 10 months and re-bonded. The clinical quality of all crowns and the patient's satisfaction were high. No adverse soft tissue reactions around the crowns were observed and only one abutment in group IR was endodontically treated after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Zirconia cantilever IR-FDPs offer a viable short-term treatment option for replacing missing posterior teeth, providing esthetic and functional benefits while minimizing invasiveness. Over an 18-month observation period, these prostheses have demonstrated a remarkable survival rate of 100% and a success rate of 96.6%. These findings suggest the effectiveness and reliability of zirconia cantilever IR-FDPs as a short-term solution for replacing missing posterior teeth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Zirconia cantilever IR-FDPs could present a practical solution for addressing posterior tooth loss, especially in cases where implant placement is not recommended and conventional fixed dental prostheses entail excessive invasiveness.

Survival and debonding resistance of posterior cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses for moderately and severely worn dentition during thermomechanical loading

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival rate, the debonding resistance, and the failure modes of different occlusal veneer designs when used as a retainer for posterior cantilever, resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) at two tooth wear levels.

METHODS

Four test groups were assigned: two groups with occlusal-proximal preparation (PT1 and PT2 for grade 2 and 3 wear), and two groups for occlusal-proximal and lingual preparation (PLT1 and PLT2 for grade 2 and 3 wear) Monolithic zirconia ceramic (3Y-TZP) RBFDPs were luted with an adhesive bonding system (Panavia V5). The specimens underwent a chewing simulation for 1.200.000 cycles with a load of 5 kg and thermocycling for 7500 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C. The surviving restorations were debonded under quasi-static conditions. The results were analyzed with ANOVA.

RESULTS

The specimens exhibited a 100 % survival rate after thermomechanical fatigue loading. The debonding resistance was statistically significant higher for group PLT1 than for group PT1 (P = 0.004), and higher for group PT2 than group PT1 (P ≤ 0.001). However, the debonding resistance showed no statistically significant difference between groups PT2 and PLT2 (P = 0.343), and groups PLT1 and PLT2 (P = 0.222). Groups PT1 and PT2 showed favorable failure modes in 62.5 % and 0.00 % of the specimens, respectively. While groups PLT1 and PLT2 presented 25 % favorable failure modes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Occlusal veneers showed promising results as a retainer for cantilever RBFDPs. The lingual extension might increase debonding resistance. Nevertheless, conservative designs with lingual and proximal bevels are to be recommended, irrespective of the level of tooth wear.

Effect of different designs of minimally invasive cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses replacing mandibular premolar: Long-term fracture load and 3D finite element analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fracture load and stress magnitude of different retainer designs of minimally invasive cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) after artificial aging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty caries-free human mandibular molars were prepared as abutments for cantilever fixed dental prostheses using different retainer designs: one wing (OW), two wings (TW), inlay ring (IR), lingual coverage (LC), and occlusal coverage (OC). Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing were used for milling the RBFDPs using fiber-reinforced composite (FRC), and the restorations were adhesively bonded. The specimens were then subjected to thermomechanical aging and loaded until failure. The 3D finite element analysis (FEA) was performed with five models of retainer designs similar to the in vitro test. Modified von Mises stress values on enamel, dentine, luting resin, and restorations were examined. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.001).

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between all groups except between IR and LC and between OW and TW designs, with the highest mean failure load detected for OC (534.70 N) and the lowest detected for OW (129.80 N). With regard to failure mode, OW, TW, and LC showed more incidences of favorable failure patterns than IR and OC designs. FEA showed that FRC transmitted low stresses in tooth structure and high stresses to the luting resin.

CONCLUSIONS

LC and OC designs can be used to design cantilever RBFDPs in premolar area. IR design transmitted more stresses to the tooth structure and resulted in 30% catastrophic failure. OW and TW were below the normal occlusal force and should be carefully used.

Retention durability of one-retainer versus two-retainer posterior RBFDPs after chewing simulation

The clinical use of one-retainer RBFDPs in the anterior region has shown higher survival rates compared to conventional two-retainer RBFDPs. The motivation for this study was to assess the validity of this observation when extended to the posterior region. The aim was thus to evaluate different preparation and framework designs for replacing premolars, particularly one-retainer versus two-retainer designs, on the retention of monolithic zirconia posterior RBFDPs. Extracted caries-free human premolars and third molars were embedded in auto-curing resin to create models with an edentulous space of premolar width. Abutment teeth were prepared according to these six designs (n = 8 each): one or two upper retainers with narrow rests, one or two upper retainers with wide rests, and one or two-retainers with wide rests. RBFDPs were milled from monolithic zirconia (KATANA Zirconia HT), and were adhesively bonded using Panavia V5 with corresponding primers. After thermodynamic loading, the quasi-static tensile force required for failure was determined. Failure modes were evaluated using a microscope. Survival rates after thermodynamic loading were 75% for one group (one upper-molar retainer with narrow rest), 100% for the other groups. The debonding forces ranged from 310 ± 224 N (group one upper-molar retainer with narrow rest) to 927 ± 292 N (group two upper retainers with narrow rests). Two-retainer designs failed at significantly higher tensile forces than designs with one retainer (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences between upper and lower designs, or rest widths. Although RBFDPs with two retainers withstood higher debonding forces, RBFDPs with one retainer and wide rest still have a high potential for clinical treatment because of the high forces required for their debonding.