1
|
Chin J, Settell ML, Brucker-Hahn MK, Lust D, Zhang J, Upadhye AR, Knudsen B, Deshmukh A, Ludwig KA, Lavrov IA, Crofton AR, Lempka SF, Zhang M, Shoffstall AJ. Quantification of porcine lower thoracic spinal cord morphology with intact dura mater using high-resolution μCT. J Neuroimaging 2024; 34:646-663. [PMID: 39390716 DOI: 10.1111/jon.13239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating chronic intractable pain in the back, trunk, or limbs through stimulation of the dorsal column. Numerous studies have used swine as an analog of the human spinal cord to better understand SCS and further improve its efficacy. We performed high-resolution imaging of the porcine spinal cord with intact dura mater using micro-computed tomography (μCT) to construct detailed 3-dimensional (3D) visualizations of the spinal cord and characterize the morphology of the dorsal and ventral rootlets. METHODS We obtained spinal cords from Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine (N = 7), stained samples with osmium tetroxide, and performed μCT imaging of the T12-T15 levels at isotropic voxel resolutions ranging from 3.3 to 50 μm. We measured the anatomical morphology using the 3D volumes and compared our results to measurements previously collected from swine and human spinal cords via microdissection techniques in prior literature. RESULTS While the porcine thoracic-lumbar spinal cord is a popular model for SCS, we highlight multiple notable differences compared to previously published T8-T12 human measurements including rootlet counts (porcine dorsal/ventral: 12.2 ± 2.6, 26.6 ± 3.4; human dorsal/ventral: 5.3 ± 1.3, 4.4 ± 2.4), rootlet angles (porcine ventral-rostral: 161 ± 1°, ventral-caudal: 155 ± 6°, dorsal-rostral: 148 ± 9°, dorsal-caudal: 142 ± 6°; human ventral-rostral: 170 ± 3°, ventral-caudal: 22 ± 10°, dorsal-rostral: 171 ± 3°, dorsal-caudal: 15 ± 7°), and the presence and count of dorsal rootlet bundles. CONCLUSIONS Detailed measurements and highlighted differences between human and porcine spinal cords can inform variations in modeling and electrophysiological experiments between the two species. In contrast to other approaches for measuring the spinal cord and rootlet morphology, our method keeps the dura intact, reducing potential artifacts from dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Chin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation Research and Development, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Megan L Settell
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Meagan K Brucker-Hahn
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel Lust
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation Research and Development, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jichu Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Aniruddha R Upadhye
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation Research and Development, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bruce Knudsen
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ashlesha Deshmukh
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kip A Ludwig
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Igor A Lavrov
- Department Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrew R Crofton
- Department of Anatomy, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation Research and Development, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muniz NO, Baudequin T. Biomimetic and Nonbiomimetic Approaches in Dura Substitutes: The Influence of Mechanical Properties. TISSUE ENGINEERING. PART B, REVIEWS 2024. [PMID: 38874958 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2024.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
The dura mater, the furthest and strongest layer of the meninges, is crucial for protecting the brain and spinal cord. Its biomechanical behavior is vital, as any alterations can compromise biological functions. In recent decades, interest in the dura mater has increased due to the need for hermetic closure of dural defects prompting the development of several substitutes. Collagen-based dural substitutes are common commercial options, but they lack the complex biological and structural elements of the native dura mater, impacting regeneration and potentially causing complications like wound/postoperative infection and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. To face this issue, recent tissue engineering approaches focus on creating biomimetic dura mater substitutes. The objective of this review is to discuss whether mimicking the mechanical properties of native tissue or ensuring high biocompatibility and bioactivity is more critical in developing effective dural substitutes, or if both aspects should be systematically linked. After a brief description of the properties and architecture of the native cranial dura, we describe the advantages and limitations of biomimetic dura mater substitutes to better understand their relevance. In particular, we consider biomechanical properties' impact on dura repair's effectiveness. Finally, the obstacles and perspectives for developing the ideal dural substitute are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathália Oderich Muniz
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Centre de recherche Royallieu, Compiègne Cedex, France
| | - Timothée Baudequin
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Centre de recherche Royallieu, Compiègne Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tamura A, Sakaue C. Effects of surface profile on porcine dural mechanical properties. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2024; 112:106189. [PMID: 38295572 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cerebrospinal fluid leakage through the spinal meninges is difficult to diagnose and treat. Moreover, its underlying mechanism remains unknown. Considering that the dura mater is structurally the strongest and outermost membrane among the three-layered meninges, we hypothesized that a dural mechanical tear would trigger spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leakage, especially when a traumatic loading event is involved. Thus, accurate biomechanical properties of the dura mater are indispensable for improving computational models, which aid in predicting blunt impact injuries and creating artificial substitutes for transplantation and surgical training. METHOD We characterized the surface profile of the spinal dura and its mechanical properties (Young's moduli) with a distinction of its inherent anatomical sites (i.e., the cervical and lumbar regions as well as the dorsal and ventral sides of the spinal cord). FINDINGS Although the obtained Young's moduli exhibited no considerable difference between the aforementioned anatomical sites, our results suggested that the wrinkles structurally formed along the longitudinal direction would relieve stress concentration on the dural surface under in vivo and supraphysiological conditions, enabling mechanical protection of the dural tissue from a blunt impact force that was externally applied to the spine. INTERPRETATION This study provides fundamental data that can be used for accurately predicting cerebrospinal fluid leakage due to blunt impact trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsutaka Tamura
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Japan.
| | - Chikano Sakaue
- Department of Engineering, Graduate School of Sustainability Science, Tottori University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavelier S, Quarrington RD, Jones CF. Tensile properties of human spinal dura mater and pericranium. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE. MATERIALS IN MEDICINE 2022; 34:4. [PMID: 36586044 PMCID: PMC9805418 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-022-06704-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Autologous pericranium is a promising dural graft material. An optimal graft should exhibit similar mechanical properties to the native dura, but the mechanical properties of human pericranium have not been characterized, and studies of the biomechanical performance of human spinal dura are limited. The primary aim of this study was to measure the tensile structural and material properties of the pericranium, in the longitudinal and circumferential directions, and of the dura in each spinal region (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) and in three directions (longitudinal anterior and posterior, and circumferential). The secondary aim was to determine corresponding constitutive stress-strain equations using a one-term Ogden model. A total of 146 specimens were tested from 7 cadavers. Linear regression models assessed the effect of tissue type, region, and orientation on the structural and material properties. Pericranium was isotropic, while spinal dura was anisotropic with higher stiffness and strength in the longitudinal than the circumferential direction. Pericranium had lower strength and modulus than spinal dura across all regions in the longitudinal direction but was stronger and stiffer than dura in the circumferential direction. Spinal dura and pericranium had similar strain at peak force, toe, and yield, across all regions and directions. Human pericranium exhibits isotropic mechanical behavior that lies between that of the longitudinal and circumferential spinal dura. Further studies are required to determine if pericranium grafts behave like native dura under in vivo loading conditions. The Ogden parameters reported may be used for computational modeling of the central nervous system. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha Cavelier
- Adelaide Spinal Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0C3, Canada
| | - Ryan D Quarrington
- Adelaide Spinal Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
- School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| | - Claire F Jones
- Adelaide Spinal Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
- School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|