GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures

G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Pose and Functional Class Prediction

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) transmembrane protein family members play essential roles in physiology. Numerous pharmaceuticals target GPCRs, and many drug discovery programs utilize virtual screening (VS) against GPCR targets. Improvements in the accuracy of predicting new molecules that bind to and either activate or inhibit GPCR function would accelerate such drug discovery programs. This work addresses two significant research questions. First, do ligand interaction fingerprints provide a substantial advantage over automated methods of binding site selection for classical docking? Second, can the functional status of prospective screening candidates be predicted from ligand interaction fingerprints using a random forest classifier? Ligand interaction fingerprints were found to offer modest advantages in sampling accurate poses, but no substantial advantage in the final set of top-ranked poses after scoring, and, thus, were not used in the generation of the ligand-receptor complexes used to train and test the random forest classifier. A binary classifier which treated agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists as active and all other ligands as inactive proved highly effective in ligand function prediction in an external test set of GPR31 and TAAR2 candidate ligands with a hit rate of 82.6% actual actives within the set of predicted actives.

GPR101: Modeling a constitutively active receptor linked to X-linked acrogigantism

GPR101 is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) implicated in a rare form of genetic gigantism known as X-linked acrogigantism, or X-LAG. In particular, X-LAG patients harbor microduplications in the long arm of the X-chromosome that invariably include the GPR101 gene. Duplications of the GPR101 gene lead to the formation of a new chromatin domain that causes over-expression of the receptor in the pituitary tumors of the patients. Notably, GPR101 is a constitutively active receptor, which stimulates cells to produce the second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP) in the absence of ligands. Moreover, GPR101 was recently reported to constitutively activate not only the cAMP pathway via Gs, but also other G protein subunits (Gq/11 and G12/13). Hence, chemicals that block the constitutive activity of GPR101, known as inverse agonists, have the potential to be useful for the development of pharmacological tools for the treatment of X-LAG. In this study, we provide structural insights into the putative structure of GPR101 based on in-house built homology models, as well as third party models based on the machine learning methods AlphaFold and AlphaFold-Multistate. Moreover, we report a molecular dynamics study, meant to further probe the constitutive activity of GPR101. Finally, we provide a structural comparison with the closest GPCRs, which suggests that GPR101 does not share their natural ligands. While this manuscript was under review, cryo-electron microscopy structures of GPR101 were reported. These structures are expected to enable computer-aided ligand discovery efforts targeting GPR101.

Structure-based pharmacophore modeling 2. Developing a novel framework for structure-based pharmacophore model generation and selection

Pharmacophore models are three-dimensional arrangements of molecular features required for biological activity that are used in ligand identification efforts for many biological targets, including G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Though GPCR are integral membrane proteins of considerable interest as targets for drug development, many of these receptors lack known ligands or experimentally determined structures necessary for ligand- or structure-based pharmacophore model generation, respectively. Thus, we here present a structure-based pharmacophore modeling approach that uses fragments placed with Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search (MCSS) to generate high-performing pharmacophore models in the context of experimentally determined, as well as modeled GPCR structures. Moreover, we have addressed the oft-neglected topic of pharmacophore model selection via development of a cluster-then-predict machine learning workflow. Herein score-based pharmacophore models were generated in experimentally determined and modeled structures of 13 class A GPCR and resulted in pharmacophore models exhibiting high enrichment factors when used to search a database containing 569 class A GPCR ligands. In addition, classification of pharmacophore models with the best performing cluster-then-predict logistic regression classifier resulted in positive predictive values (PPV) of 0.88 and 0.76 for selecting high enrichment pharmacophore models from among those generated in experimentally determined and modeled structures, respectively.

Application of computational methods for class A GPCR Ligand discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are integral membrane proteins of considerable interest as targets for drug development due to their role in transmitting cellular signals in a multitude of biological processes. Of the six classes categorizing GPCR (A, B, C, D, E, and F), class A contains the largest number of therapeutically relevant GPCR. Despite their importance as drug targets, many challenges exist for the discovery of novel class A GPCR ligands serving as drug precursors. Though knowledge of the structural and functional characteristics of GPCR has grown significantly over the past 20 years, a large portion of GPCR lack reported, experimentally determined structures. Furthermore, many GPCR have no known endogenous and/or synthetic ligands, limiting further exploration of their biochemical, cellular, and physiological roles. While many successes in GPCR ligand discovery have resulted from experimental high-throughput screening, computational methods have played an increasingly important role in GPCR ligand identification in the past decade. Here we discuss computational techniques applied to GPCR ligand discovery. This review summarizes class A GPCR structure/function and provides an overview of many obstacles currently faced in GPCR ligand discovery. Furthermore, we discuss applications and recent successes of computational techniques used to predict GPCR structure as well as present a summary of ligand- and structure-based methods used to identify potential GPCR ligands. Finally, we discuss computational hit list generation and refinement and provide comprehensive workflows for GPCR ligand identification.

Structure-based pharmacophore modeling 1. Automated random pharmacophore model generation

Pharmacophores are three-dimensional arrangements of molecular features required for biological activity that are often used in virtual screening efforts to prioritize ligands for experimental testing. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are integral membrane proteins of considerable interest as targets for ligand discovery and drug development. Ligand-based pharmacophore models can be constructed to identify structural commonalities between known bioactive ligands for targets including GPCR. However, structure-based pharmacophores (which only require an experimentally determined or modeled structure for a protein target) have gained more attention to aid in virtual screening efforts as the number of publicly available experimentally determined GPCR structures have increased (140 unique GPCR represented as of October 24, 2022). Thus, the goal of this study was to develop a method of structure-based pharmacophore model generation applicable to ligand discovery for GPCR that have few known ligands. Pharmacophore models were generated within the active sites of 8 class A GPCR crystal structures via automated annotation of 5 randomly selected functional group fragments to sample diverse combinations of pharmacophore features. Each of the 5000 generated pharmacophores was then used to search a database containing active and decoy/inactive compounds for 30 class A GPCR and scored using enrichment factor and goodness-of-hit metrics to assess performance. Application of this method to the set of 8 class A GPCR produced pharmacophore models possessing the theoretical maximum enrichment factor value in both resolved structures (8 of 8 cases) and homology models (7 of 8 cases), indicating that generated pharmacophore models can prove useful in the context of virtual screening.

Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors

BACKGROUND

Molecular docking is in regular practice to assess ligand affinity on a target protein crystal structure. In the absence of protein crystal structure, the homology modeling or comparative modeling is the best alternative to elucidate the relationship details between a ligand and protein at the molecular level. The development of accurate homology modeling (HM) and its integration with molecular docking (MD) is essential for successful, rational drug discovery.

OBJECTIVE

The G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are attractive therapeutic targets due to their immense role in human pharmacology. The GPCRs are membrane-bound proteins with the complex constitution, and the understanding of their activation and inactivation mechanisms is quite challenging. Over the past decade, there has been a rapid expansion in the number of solved G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) crystal structures; however, the majority of the GPCR structures remain unsolved. In this context, HM guided MD has been widely used for structure-based drug design (SBDD) of GPCRs.

METHODS

The focus of this review is on the recent (i) developments on HM supported GPCR drug discovery in the absence of GPCR crystal structures and (ii) application of HM in understanding the ligand interactions at the binding site, virtual screening, determining receptor subtype selectivity and receptor behaviour in comparison with GPCR crystal structures.

RESULTS

The HM in GPCRs has been extremely challenging due to the scarcity in template structures. In such a scenario, it is difficult to get accurate HM that can facilitate understanding of the ligand-receptor interactions. This problem has been alleviated to some extent by developing refined HM based on incorporating active /inactive ligand information and inducing protein flexibility. In some cases, HM proteins were found to outscore crystal structures.

CONCLUSION

The developments in HM have been highly operative to gain insights about the ligand interaction at the binding site and receptor functioning at the molecular level. Thus, HM guided molecular docking may be useful for rational drug discovery for the GPCRs mediated diseases.

A two-stage computational approach to predict novel ligands for a chemosensory receptor

Olfactory receptor (OR) 1A2 is the member of largest superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). OR1A2 is an ectopically expressed receptor with only 13 known ligands, implicated in reducing hepatocellular carcinoma progression, with enormous therapeutic potential. We have developed a two-stage screening approach to identify novel putative ligands of OR1A2. We first used a pharmacophore model based on atomic property field (APF) to virtually screen a library of 5942 human metabolites. We then carried out structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) for predicting the potential agonists, based on a 3D homology model of OR1A2. This model was developed using a biophysical approach for template selection, based on multiple parameters including hydrophobicity correspondence, applied to the complete set of available GPCR structures to pick the most appropriate template. Finally, the membrane-embedded 3D model was refined by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in both the apo and holo forms. The refined model in the apo form was selected for SBVS. Four novel small molecules were identified as strong binders to this olfactory receptor on the basis of computed binding energies.

BIO-GATS: A Tool for Automated GPCR Template Selection Through a Biophysical Approach for Homology Modeling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane proteins with more than 800 members. GPCRs are involved in numerous physiological functions within the human body and are the target of more than 30% of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs. At present, over 400 experimental GPCR structures are available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) representing 76 unique receptors. The absence of an experimental structure for the majority of GPCRs demand homology models for structure-based drug discovery workflows. The generation of good homology models requires appropriate templates. The commonly used methods for template selection are based on sequence identity. However, there exists low sequence identity among the GPCRs. Sequences with similar patterns of hydrophobic residues are often structural homologs, even with low sequence identity. Extending this, we propose a biophysical approach for template selection based principally on hydrophobicity correspondence between the target and the template. Our approach takes into consideration other relevant parameters, including resolution, similarity within the orthosteric binding pocket of GPCRs, and structure completeness, for template selection. The proposed method was implemented in the form of a free tool called Bio-GATS, to provide the user with easy selection of the appropriate template for a query GPCR sequence. Bio-GATS was successfully validated with recent published benchmarking datasets. An application to an olfactory receptor to select an appropriate template has also been provided as a case study.

Homology Modeling of Class A G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in the Age of the Structure Boom

With 700 members, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the rhodopsin family (class A) form the largest membrane receptor family in humans and are the target of about 30% of presently available pharmaceutical drugs. The recent boom in GPCR structures led to the structural resolution of 57 unique receptors in different states (39 receptors in inactive state only, 2 receptors in active state only and 16 receptors in different activation states). In spite of these tremendous advances, most computational studies on GPCRs, including molecular dynamics simulations, virtual screening and drug design, rely on GPCR models obtained by homology modeling. In this protocol, we detail the different steps of homology modeling with the MODELLER software, from template selection to model evaluation. The present structure boom provides closely related templates for most receptors. If, in these templates, some of the loops are not resolved, in most cases, the numerous available structures enable to find loop templates with similar length for equivalent loops. However, simultaneously, the large number of putative templates leads to model ambiguities that may require additional information based on multiple sequence alignments or molecular dynamics simulations to be resolved. Using the modeling of the human bradykinin receptor B1 as a case study, we show how several templates are managed by MODELLER, and how the choice of template(s) and of template fragments can improve the quality of the models. We also give examples of how additional information and tools help the user to resolve ambiguities in GPCR modeling.

Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) comprise the largest family of membrane proteins and are of considerable interest as targets for drug development. However, many GPCR structures remain unsolved. To address the structural ambiguity of these receptors, computational tools such as homology modeling and loop modeling are often employed to generate predictive receptor structures. Here we combined both methods to benchmark a protocol incorporating homology modeling based on a locally selected template and extracellular loop modeling that additionally evaluates the presence of template ligands during these modeling steps. Ligands were also docked using three docking methods and two pose selection methods to elucidate an optimal ligand pose selection method. Results suggest that local template-based homology models followed by loop modeling produce more accurate and predictive receptor models than models produced without loop modeling, with decreases in average receptor and ligand RMSD of 0.54 Å and 2.91 Å, respectively. Ligand docking results showcased the ability of MOE induced fit docking to produce ligand poses with atom root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values at least 0.20 Å lower (on average) than the other two methods benchmarked in this study. In addition, pose selection methods (software-based scoring, ligand complementation) selected lower RMSD poses with MOE induced fit docking than either of the other methods (averaging at least 1.57 Å lower), indicating that MOE induced fit docking is most suited for docking into GPCR homology models in our hands. In addition, target receptor models produced with a template ligand present throughout the modeling process most often produced target ligand poses with RMSD values ≤ 4.5 Å and Tanimoto coefficients > 0.6 after selection based on ligand complementation than target receptor models produced in the absence of template ligands. Overall, the findings produced by this study support the use of local template homology modeling in combination with de novo ECL2 modeling in the presence of a ligand from the template crystal structure to generate GPCR models intended to study ligand binding interactions.

Importance of protein dynamics in the structure-based drug discovery of class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

Demand for novel GPCR modulators is increasing as the association between the GPCR signaling pathway and numerous diseases such as cancers, psychological and metabolic disorders continues to be established. In silico structure-based drug design (SBDD) offers an outlet where researchers could exploit the accumulating structural information of GPCR to expedite the process of drug discovery. The coupling of structure-based approaches such as virtual screening and molecular docking with molecular dynamics and/or Monte Carlo simulation aids in reflecting the dynamics of proteins in nature into previously static docking studies, thus enhancing the accuracy of rationally designed ligands. This review will highlight recent computational strategies that incorporate protein flexibility into SBDD of GPCR-targeted ligands.