Role of laparoscopic uterine artery coagulation in management of symptomatic myomas: A prospective study using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

Use of uterine vessel occlusion in the management of uterine myomas: two different approaches

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the difference between uterine artery occlusion alone (UAO) and combined (UVO) with simultaneous blockage of anastomosis between the uterine and ovarian vessels in the management of women with myomas in a 3-year follow-up.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

University-associated hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred ten patients with uterine fibroids.

INTERVENTION(S)

Forty-four patients underwent UAO and 66 patients UVO; patients were matched using a statistically generated selection of all UVOs performed during the same period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Outcomes were assessed by comparing surgical parameters, immediate postoperative recovery, and therapeutic outcomes.

RESULT(S)

During the 3-year follow-up, the majority of patients in both groups reported symptom relief (ranging from 61.5% to 84.6% in the UVO group and 31.6% to 77.3% in the UAO group, on the basis of different kinds of symptoms). However, symptom control seemed to be different between the two groups when the follow-up time was prolonged; for example, symptom control was better in the UVO group at the end of 3 years, especially for menorrhagia (76.5% vs. 34.5%). The fibroid size was smaller in the UVO group, resulting in a lower reintervention rate, compared with the UAO group (13.6% vs. 36.4%).

CONCLUSION(S)

If UVO is used for uterine fibroids, the 3-year efficacy might be better than that with UAO. This finding is worthy of further investigation.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus coagulation of uterine arteries (CUA) at their origin plus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the management of myoma and adenomyosis

We tried to evaluate the relative feasibility, surgical duration and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus coagulation of uterine arteries at their origin (CUA) plus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of myoma and adenomyosis, and to compare the estimated blood loss for both procedures. A total of 123 patients underwent TLH or CUA plus TLH for the treatment of symptomatic myoma and adenomyosis. Sixty-four women underwent TLH, whilst 68 women underwent coagulation of uterine arteries at their origin plus TLH. The mean weight and volume of the uterus as determined following TLH was 288.1+/-102.4 gm (range 182.1 approximately 396.2 gm.) and 451+/-340.6 cm(3) (range 107.4 approximately 792), respectively. The mean weight of the uterus following CUA plus TLH was 269.1+/-151.7 gm (range 215.8 approximately 430.1) whilst the mean uterine volume was 472.7+/-377.8 cm(3) (range 93.7 approximately 851.2). No significant differences with respect to surgical duration (95 vs. 96.5 minutes TLH vs. CUA + TLH; p>0.05), blood loss (177.2+/-80.1 ml for TLH and 154.9+/-30.21 ml for CUA+TLH; p>0.05) and mean+/-SD preoperative (12.05+/-1.70 gm/dl for TLH and 12.14+/-1.38 gm/dl for CUA+TLH; p>0.05) and post-operative hemoglobin level (11+/-1.03 for TLH and 11+/-1.49 for CUA + TLH; p>0.05) were observed between the two study groups. The blood loss for TLH is comparable to that for the CUA plus TLH procedure.