Prospective evaluation for the feasibility and safety of vaginal birth after laparoscopic myomectomy

The Impact of Laparoscopic Myomectomy on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the impact of laparoscopic myomectomy techniques on pregnancy outcomes, with a specific focus on the correlation between the type of suture used during the procedure and the incidence of uterine rupture. Additionally, the study aims to examine how the localization and size of myomas, key factors in laparoscopic myomectomy, may influence fertility outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

extensive searches were conducted using MDPI, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from 2008 to November 2023.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The study involved women of reproductive age diagnosed with fibroids who underwent surgical removal of fibroids using either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The evaluation of pregnancy outcomes focused on indicators such as live birth rates, miscarriage rates, stillbirth rates, premature delivery rates, and cases of uterine rupture. Quality assessment was systematically performed by employing the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools, with the subsequent formulation of clinical recommendations that were meticulously graded in accordance with the robustness of the underlying evidence.

RESULTS

The pregnancy outcomes post-myoma treatment, as reflected in one of the presented tables, show a promising number of pregnancies and live births, but also indicate the potential risks of miscarriages and preterm births. The diversity in outcomes observed among various studies underscores the imperative for tailored patient care, as well as the necessity for additional research aimed at optimizing fertility and pregnancy outcomes following myoma treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study offers insights into the criteria for patient selection and intraoperative methodologies specifically related to laparoscopic myomectomy. To enhance our understanding of the associations between fibroid characteristics (location, size) and reproductive outcomes, additional research is warranted, particularly through well-designed clinical trials.

Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review

The decision to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean delivery is complex and depends on patient preference, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, assessment of the risks vs benefits of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and available resources to support safe trial of labor after cesarean delivery at the planned birthing center. The most feared complication of trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture, which can have catastrophic consequences, including substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the absolute risk of uterine rupture is low, several clinical, historical, obstetrical, and intrapartum factors have been associated with increased risk. It is therefore critical for clinicians managing patients during trial of labor after cesarean delivery to be aware of these risk factors to appropriately select candidates for trial of labor after cesarean delivery and maximize the safety and benefits while minimizing the risks. Caution is advised when considering labor augmentation and induction in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. With established hospital safety protocols that dictate close maternal and fetal monitoring, avoidance of prostaglandins, and careful titration of oxytocin infusion when induction agents are needed, spontaneous and induced trial of labor after cesarean delivery are safe and should be offered to most patients with 1 previous low transverse, low vertical, or unknown uterine incision after appropriate evaluation, counseling, planning, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on clarifying true risk factors and identifying the optimal approach to intrapartum and induction management, tools for antenatal prediction, and strategies for prevention of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. A better understanding will facilitate patient counseling, support efforts to improve trial of labor after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates, and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Management of Uterine Fibroids and Sarcomas: The Palermo Position Paper

BACKGROUND

Uterine fibroids are benign monoclonal tumors originating from the smooth muscle cells of the myometrium, constituting the most prevalent pathology within the female genital tract. Uterine sarcomas, although rare, still represent a diagnostic challenge and should be managed in centers with adequate expertise in gynecological oncology.

OBJECTIVES

This article is aimed to summarize and discuss cutting-edge elements about the diagnosis and management of uterine fibroids and sarcomas.

METHODS

This paper is a report of the lectures presented in an expert meeting about uterine fibroids and sarcomas held in Palermo in February 2023.

OUTCOME

Overall, the combination of novel molecular pathways may help combine biomarkers and expert ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and sarcomas. On the one hand, molecular and cellular maps of uterine fibroids and matched myometrium may enhance our understanding of tumor development compared to histologic analysis and whole tissue transcriptomics, and support the development of minimally invasive treatment strategies; on the other hand, ultrasound imaging allows in most of the cases a proper mapping the fibroids and to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, which need appropriate management.

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

The choice of uterine fibroid management, including pharmacological approaches, surgical treatment, or other strategies, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), should be carefully considered, taking into account the characteristics of the patient and reproductive prognosis.

Towards a clinical consensus on the management of pregnancy and birth after laparoscopic and open myomectomy: A survey of obstetricians and gynaecologists

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim was to assess if a clinical consensus regarding the management of pregnancy post myomectomy existed amongst consultant obstetricians and gynaecologists. Secondary objectives were to evaluate factors which influence the clinician's decision making in this group of women.

STUDY DESIGN

Electronic survey sent to all consultants working in the North Central and East London deanery, Kent Surrey and Sussex deanery and Imperial NHS Trust to assess opinions on mode of birth post myomectomy, intervals advised to pregnancy post myomectomy, factors influencing the management of delivery in the scarred uterus post myomectomy, opinions on induction of labour and questions relating to operative notes.

RESULTS

209 consultant responses received between 07/03/2022-07/05/2022 (44% response rate); 77% (161/209) practicing obstetricians and gynaecologists, 10% (21/109) pure gynaecologists and 13% (27/209) pure obstetricians. The majority would support a vaginal birth after open myomectomy (75%) and laparoscopic myomectomy (79%). No consensus was found as to the optimal time interval between myomectomy and pregnancy. Higher frequency of performing myomectomy and a greater level of experience were significantly associated with a shorter interval to pregnancy advised. The most important operative factors influencing decision to support trial of labour post myomectomy were breach of uterine cavity; location of fibroids removed and number of incisions on the uterus. 77% believe women should be given a choice regarding mode of delivery post myomectomy in a similar way to previous LSCS. 82.8% would support enrolment of patients into a prospective trial to investigate delivery post myomectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a comprehensive survey of clinician opinions on pregnancy post myomectomy demonstrating that the majority of consultant obstetricians and gynaecologists sampled would support vaginal birth post myomectomy; counselling patients in a similar way to VBAC; a standardised myomectomy operation note and enrolment of patients in a future prospective trial. Wide variation in opinion regarding interval to pregnancy post myomectomy has been highlighted. We believe this information will facilitate counselling discussions and empower women with subsequent pregnancies after myomectomy to make an informed decision on mode of birth post myomectomy.

Reproductive Outcomes after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Conventional versus Barbed Suture

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To study the reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy comparing conventional (nonbarbed) suture with barbed suture used for myometrial defect closure.

DESIGN

Monocentric retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up survey for reproductive outcomes conducted in April and May 2020.

SETTING

Tertiary care center (center for advanced gynecologic laparoscopy and infertility).

PATIENTS

Women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy for uterine leiomyomas from January 2004 to December 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic myomectomy with closure of the myometrium using either conventional (nonbarbed suture) or barbed suture and follow-up survey regarding reproductive outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The outcomes measured included the rate of conception, pregnancy complications, mode of delivery, and perioperative complications for both kinds of suture materials used. Of the 399 women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy, 343 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were followed up; 235 patients responded. A total of 120 patients were included in the nonbarbed group (group A), and 115 patients were included in the barbed group (group B). A total of 182 (group A: 97 vs group B: 85; p = .204) women had actively sought pregnancy postoperatively, of whom 93 (51.09%) in total and 51 (54.8%) in group A vs 42 (45.1%) in group B reported at least 1 pregnancy with no significant difference in the incidence rate ratios between the 2 groups. Of the recorded pregnancies84.9% (group A: 88.2% vs group B: 80.9%) live births, 6.4% (group A: 5.8% vs group B: 7.1%) had first-trimester miscarriages, 2.1% (group A: 1.9% vs group B: 2.3%) had an ectopic pregnancy, and 6 were ongoing pregnancies at the time of the study analysis, which were compared statistically between both study groups. Pregnancy-related complications were noted in 12 of the 93 pregnant women (12.9%), which were comparable in both groups. No case of uterine rupture was reported.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports good reproductive outcomes in women after laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures. Furthermore, the inclusion of nonbarbed sutures as a control group in our study reinforces that barbed sutures in myomectomy are as safe as, and an easier alternative to, conventional sutures without affecting pregnancy outcomes.

Time to conceive after myomectomy: should we advise a minimum time interval? A systematic review

The optimal time interval between myomectomy and pregnancy is unclear and no specific guidelines exist. The aim of this review was to study the time interval from myomectomy to pregnancy and the occurrence of uterine rupture after myomectomy. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective studies were used to assess the primary objective, and case reports, cases series or letters to the editor for the secondary objective. Only articles reporting myomectomy performed via the vaginal route, laparotomy, laparoscopy or robot-assisted surgery were selected for inclusion. Among 3852 women who wanted to become pregnant after the surgery, 2889 became pregnant, accounting for 3000 pregnancies (77.9%) and 2097 live births (54.4%). Mean time between myomectomy and pregnancy was estimated at 17.6 months (SD 9.2) for 2451 pregnant women. Among 1016 women, a third were advised to delay attempting to conceive for between 3 and 6 months and another third for between 6 and 12 months. A total of 70 spontaneous uterine ruptures with a mean gestational age of 31 weeks at occurrence were identified. No linear relationship was found between gestational age at the event and time interval from myomectomy to conception (P = 0.706). There are insufficient data to advise a minimal time interval between myomectomy and conception.

Risk factors and outcomes of uterine rupture in Singapore: Emerging trends

ABSTRACT Introduction: Uterine rupture is uncommon but has catastrophic implications on the pregnancy. A scarred uterus and abnormal placentation are known contributory factors. The aim of our study was to review the contributing factors, clinical presentation, complications and management of uterine rupture in our population in light of the changing nature of modern obstetric practices. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital by studying proven cases of uterine rupture in the period between January 2003 and December 2014. These cases were analysed according to their past history, clinical presentation, complications, management and outcome. Results: A total of 48 cases of proven uterine rupture were identified. The incidence of uterine rupture was 1 in 3,062 deliveries. The ratio of scarred uterus rupture to unscarred uterus rupture was approximately 3:1. The most common factor was previous lower segment caesarean section for the scarred group, followed by a history of laparoscopic myomectomy. Abdominal pain was the common clinical presentation in the antenatal period, while abnormal cardiotocography findings were the most common presentation in intrapartum rupture. Conclusion: There is a notable shift in the trend of uterine rupture cases given the increasing use of laparoscopic myomectomy and elective caesarean sections. While ruptures from these cases were few, their presentation in the antenatal period calls for diligent monitoring with informed patient involvement in their pregnancy care. Keywords: Antenatal, laparoscopic myomectomy, birth after caesarean, rupture, VBAC

Is Uterine Myomectomy a Real Contraindication to Vaginal Delivery? Results from a Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The main goal of our research was to explore correlations between a history of uterine myomectomy and maternal-fetal outcomes, throughout a comparison between vaginal deliveries in patients with or without a history of uterine myoma excision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was carried out at two tertiary care hospitals between January 2019 and January 2020. Women were assigned into two groups according to the history of laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy (Group 1) or without myomectomy (Group 2).

RESULTS

80 women successfully delivered after myomectomy. Pregnancies with previous laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy were associated with a minor rate of spontaneous labor onset (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 - 1.31) and with an increased rate of emergency cesarean section (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.09 - 1.36). Moreover, myomectomy group had a significant number of indications to emergency cesarean section correlated to suspected uterine rupture (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.39). There were no uterine ruptures or neonatal deaths recorded. First stage of labor was longer in the myomectomy group (316 vs 204 mins, p = 0.01). No differences in the rates of the prolonged first and second stage of labor, postpartum hemorrhage and vaginal laceration, and no neonatal adverse outcomes were found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancies after myomectomy might be associated with an elevated rate of emergency cesarean section only due to a higher percentage of suspected uterine rupture, without a real hazard of adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes.

Non-hysteroscopic Myomectomy and Fertility Outcomes: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature to identify best practices for nonhysteroscopic myomectomy for women with myomas who desire future fertility. The focus areas included factors associated with conception and pregnancy outcomes after myomectomy, impact of surgical route (laparotomic, laparoscopic, and the incorporation of robot assistance), and preoperative findings and surgical techniques that have an impact on reproduction.

DATA SOURCES

Librarian-led electronic searches of the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were performed from inception to February 2020. A targeted reference review was performed to update the original searches.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The participants were women of reproductive age with myomas who underwent myoma removal surgery through laparotomic or laparoscopic approaches. The fertility outcomes included markers for ovarian reserve, clinical pregnancy rates, and pregnancy outcomes. We performed quality assessment using National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools and developed clinical recommendations graded according to the strength of the evidence.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 2163 studies, of which 51 met the inclusion criteria. These consisted of 11 studies that focused on the factors associated with conception or pregnancy outcomes after myomectomy, 10 studies that examined the route of nonhysteroscopic myomectomy, and 30 that were related to intraoperative techniques and findings. Overall, younger age, lower myoma number, and distortion of the endometrial cavity were associated with improved reproductive outcomes after myomectomy. The route of nonhysteroscopic myomectomy and intraoperative uterine artery occlusion did not significantly affect pregnancy rates or outcomes. Adhesion barriers present a possible target for further research.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into patient selection and intraoperative techniques for nonhysteroscopic myomectomy. Further research with well-designed clinical trials is needed to highlight the relationships between myoma characteristics (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics type, location, and size) and reproductive outcomes.

Robotic single-site myomectomy: A single-center experience of 101 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) for uterine myoma.

METHODS

Medical records of 101 consecutive women who underwent RSSM were retrospectively reviewed, and patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated. The surgical outcomes were compared by the phase in learning curve (early phase of <10 cases vs late phase of ≥10 cases) and time flow.

RESULTS

A total of 47 (46.5%) women had multiple myomas, and a median two (1-12) myomas were retrieved. The largest myoma was averagely measured as 6.2 ± 1.7 cm, and the mean weight of the total retrieved myomas was 114.0 ± 84.4 g. No patients received a transfusion or had operation-related complications. Cases in the late phase showed shorter port placement time and docking time than those in the early phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that robotic single-site surgery is a feasible therapeutic option for uterine myoma.

Vaginal birth after prior myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the obstetrical and perinatal outcomes of vaginal birth in case of pregnancies achieved after prior myomectomy. We also analyzed how operative characteristics at the time of surgery might influence the choice of obstetricians about mode of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed retrospectively all women who underwent laparoscopic (LPS) or laparotomic (LPT) myomectomy between January 2002 and December 2014, in a network of three Institutions belonging to the University of Milano Bicocca, Italy. Women were contacted by phone interview and only cases with available follow-up data and who had a subsequent pregnancy were included. Operative characteristics and subsequent obstetrical outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

469 women who underwent myomectomy were contacted by phone interview, and 152 pregnancies were achieved after surgery, 96 after LPS and 56 after LPT. A total of 110 pregnancies ended in deliveries at ≥24 weeks. Seventy-three (66.4%) women had trial of labor after myomectomy (TOLAM), while 24 (21.8%) had a planned cesarean delivery (CD). Sixty-six (90.4%) of the TOLAM cases successfully accomplished vaginal delivery. No cases of uterine rupture (UR) were reported, and all deliveries ended in live births. The incidence of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission was 14.5% (16/110), with no cases of perinatal death. Comparing the surgical details at the time of myomectomy, the incidence of uterine cavity entered was significantly higher in planned CD group compared to TOLAM cases (p < 0.001). No other significant difference between the two groups was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

A successful vaginal delivery was accomplished by 90.4% of women who had TOLAM, without any case of UR or severe maternal and perinatal complications. TOLAM may be considered and offered as feasible and relatively safe option. Obstetricians' attitude toward mode of delivery after prior myomectomy seems to be influenced by the reported entry into the uterine cavity at the time of surgery.

Uterine rupture at 28 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy - a case report

There are many reasons for sterility, and uterine malformations are of the greatest concern. Among uterine disorders, myomas play a significant role and are present in 27% of infertile women. The occurrence of myomas is frequent - 20-40% in women of reproductive age. Thus, for those infertile patients surgical treatment may be needed to preserve an opportunity to conceive. This case report refers to an uterine rupture at 28 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy (3 months before conceiving). The myomectomy was conducted correctly and two layers of sutures on the myometrium were performed. The purpose of the myomectomy in a young woman should be well considered. In cases of infertility, removal of the lesions is usually necessary to give the patient a chance of pregnancy. At the same time, the risk of uterine rupture is increased. There are some suggestions referring to myomectomy to reduce the risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy. It seems that the method of sewing the uterine closure is crucial. For example, multilayer uterine stitches, preservation of the endometrial cavity, and avoidance of using electrosurgery to prevent devascularization (to avoid haematoma formation) should be taken into consideration to prevent weakness of the wall of the uterus. Uterine scars differ histologically and biochemically.

Obstetric outcome in patients with a unicornuate uterus after laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn

AIM

Previous studies have shown adverse obstetric outcomes of the laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn. Our study aimed to investigate the obstetric outcome in our institution and to review previous studies.

METHODS

Using a retrospective analysis, data were reviewed from singleton pregnancies with maternal uterine anomalies at a medical center in Osaka, Japan, between January 2011 and March 2016. The uterine anomaly cases were divided into a 'postlaparoscopic resection of the rudimentary horn' group (study group) and an 'other uterine anomalies' (bicornuate uterus, uterine didelphys and unicornuate uterus) group (control group). Primary outcomes of interest were differences in obstetric outcomes, such as spontaneous preterm birth rate, small for gestational age (SGA) infant rate and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) rate between the study and the control group, and the secondary outcome of interest was mode of delivery in the study group.

RESULTS

Data from 40 deliveries were included in the study (7 deliveries: study group, 33 deliveries: control group). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of either mean gestational weeks at delivery (36.4 weeks vs 37.1 weeks; P = .38), cesarean delivery rate (57.1% vs 57.5%; P = 1.0), SGA infant rate (<10th percentile) (0% vs 24.2%; P = .31) and HDP rate (0.0% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0). Three of seven cases with postlaparoscopic resection of the rudimentary horn were able to deliver vaginally without complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the obstetric outcome observed in the study group was similar to that observed in the control group.

Patency of uterine wall in pregnancies following assisted and spontaneous conception with antecedent laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomies - a difficult case and systematic review

A case of uterine rupture at 24 weeks in a pregnancy succeeding myomectomy and triple embryo transfer is described and literature is reviewed systematically to evaluate the importance of uterine rupture in pregnancies after myomectomy in general and some important sub-populations. Systematic search identified 179 papers and following a strategical selection process 45 studies were analyzed in detail, including 6 cohort and 19 observational studies, 3 case series and 17 case reports. Comparison of risk of uterine rupture after abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy is made. In pregnancies after IVF number of embryos transferred are determined. Optimal contraceptive intervals and surgical techniques are discussed. The consequences of these observations are analyzed and conclusions are made which can assist individualizing treatment options and improve patient selection.

Laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation: A review of techniques, outcomes, and practice guidelines

Laparoscopic myomectomy is a minimally invasive surgical approach to treat symptomatic uterine fibroids in women wishing for a uterine-sparing procedure. With careful patient selection, these procedures are associated with favorable reproductive outcomes and low perioperative morbidity. Current available methods for specimen retrieval include power and hand morcellation. The 2014 FDA safety warnings regarding power morcellation arose from concerns about the spread of occult malignancy and prompted widespread use of containment systems that may limit spread of myometrial cells. Investigation into the clinical effects of laparoscopic myomectomy and uncontained morcellation on the prognosis and spread of occult leiomyosarcoma has yielded mixed results. Other complications of uncontained power morcellation exist, including the development of parasitic leiomyomas. The FDA safety warnings have greatly influenced trends in benign gynecologic surgery, and survey data reflect trends in providers' opinions of these trends. In conclusion, recommendations for the current practice of laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation are reviewed.

Laparoscopy or laparotomy as the way of entrance in myoma enucleation

PURPOSE

Uterine myomas are the main cause of benign uterine diseases in premenopausal women. Objective of the present paper is to investigate the current best treatment modalities of myomas, depending on age of the patient and her desire to preserve fertility, as well as on clinical presentation of this pathology, such as size, number, and location of fibroids and, furthermore, on surgical experience of the gynecologist.

METHODS

The design of our work is a systematic literature review of existing studies, reviews, and meta-analysis conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library to identify relevant literature. Commonly, the myomectomy is to be recommended in women desiring to preserve fertility when myomas are associated with symptoms such as excessive bleeding, pelvic discomfort, or palpable abdominally fibroids. The decision of surgical approach for myomectomy should be individualized, depending on size and location, as well as on surgeon's experience. The different modalities of myomectomy, laparoscopic, hysteroscopic, robotic-assisted, or laparotomic are in detail presented in the paper, according to Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) clinical practice guidelines and taking into consideration possible concerns of myomectomy such as uterine rupture, development of adhesions, and myomas' recurrence.

Management of uterine fibroids in pregnancy: recent trends

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review analyzes how fibroids may influence pregnancy and how myomas may be modified by pregnancy. The most important clinical aspect concerns the impact of myoma on pregnancy and the possibility of a well tolerated surgical treatment for the mother and her fetus, preserving maternal reproductive capacity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fibroids significantly increase in size during early pregnancy and then decrease in the third trimester. Although most women with uterine fibroids have a regular pregnancy, data from the literature suggest that they may have a higher risk of fertility problems and pregnancy complications.

SUMMARY

Myomectomy can increase the rate of pregnancy in women with infertility, attempting to restore a normal anatomy and reduce uterine contractility and local inflammation associated with the presence of fibroids, improving the blood supply. Current evidence does not suggest routine myomectomy during pregnancy or at the cesarean birth, as fibroids-related complications are rare and may be overcome by the risks of surgery. However, in selected cases, myomectomy is a feasible and safe technique and associated to a good outcome.The diagnosis of myomas in pregnancy may require attention for the adequate management to preserve maternal and fetal well-being.

Feasibility and Safety of Absorbable Knotless Wound Closure Device in Laparoscopic Myomectomy

Purpose. Myomectomy has been performed through laparoscopy. Suturing is known as rate-limiting step in laparoscopic myomectomy. The present study was aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of absorbable knotless wound closure device with the results of conventional suturing. Methods. This prospective study included 62 women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy at Taipei City Hospital, Zhongxiao Branch, from January 2010 through to August 2012. The patients were randomized into two groups according to suturing materials, the knotless group and the 2-0 Vicryl suture group. Patient demographics, overall operative time, and intraoperative blood loss were compared between two groups. Results. Demographic characteristics and laboratory variables before surgery were comparable. Operative time was significantly shorter in knotless group compared with that in 2-0 Vicryl suture group (112 ± 47 versus 147 ± 63 minutes; p < 0.05). The results revealed a significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between two groups (knotless versus 2-0 Vicryl: 112.8 ± 54.2 versus 143.6 ± 64.9). Use of absorbable knotless wound closure device was associated with greater hemostasis compared with that of 2-0 Vicryl. During a 2-year follow-up period, 12 patients (46.2%) from the group with absorbable knotless wound closure device and 14 patients (38.9%) from 2-0 Vicryl suture group became pregnant. Conclusion. Closure of myometrium using absorbable knotless wound closure device after laparoscopic myomectomy resulted in a shorter operative time and less blood loss.

Long unidirectional barbed suturing technique with extracorporeal traction in laparoscopic myomectomy

Background

Myomectomy is now often performed laparoscopically rather than by laparotomy to alleviate the risk of postoperative adhesions and reduce postoperative pain. However, intracorporeal knot-tying under direct laparoscopy is difficult and requires proficiency. We conducted a retrospective study comparing the results of a long unidirectional barbed suturing technique (with V-Loc180 suture) and the results of conventional suturing as applied to laparoscopic myomectomy.

Methods

In women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy in our university hospital between January 2011 and April 2013, uninterrupted suturing of 2 or more layers was performed. These women were divided into 2 groups according to the method of suturing: those in whom standard absorbable sutures were used (group P, n =42) and those in whom our suturing technique was used (group V, n =41). Patient characteristics and surgical variables were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

No significant between-group difference was observed in age (p = .975), body mass index (p = .778), GnRHa administration (p = .059), intraoperative vasopressin dose (p = .364), intraoperative blood loss (73.8 ± 64.1 vs. 59.3 ± 54.0 mL, respectively; p = .199), myoma mass (212.6 ± 133.3 vs. 208.3 ± 198.4 g, respectively; p = .134), ΔHb (p = .517), or postoperative hospital stay (p = .314). Operation time (mean ± SD) was significantly shorter for group V (71.2 ± 22.9 minutes; range, 28.0–110.0 minutes; p < .001) than for group P (94.4 ± 27.2 minutes; range, 53.0–165.0 minutes). No patient required intraoperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy.

Conclusions

Our suturing technique exploits the features of unidirectional barbed sutures and can be used in the same way as the conventional method when performing continuous suturing for laparoscopic myomectomy. Our data suggest that operation time can be reduced by as much as 25% with this new technique.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2482-14-84) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Perspectives of obstetricians on labour and delivery after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

Because of concerns about uterine rupture, many obstetricians recommend elective Caesarean section for women with a prior myomectomy. This practice has led to an increased rate of elective CS and subsequently of repeat Caesarean sections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of obstetricians on labour and delivery after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of 49 practising obstetricians from July 2012 to January 2013, using a standard questionnaire. This included questions on labour and delivery after myomectomy by laparotomy or laparoscopy.

RESULTS

Overall, the inter-respondent agreement was fair (kappa 0.3; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the likelihood that respondents would allow vaginal delivery after myomectomy by laparotomy and by laparoscopy (27% and 14% if the uterine cavity was entered and 76% and 71% if the uterine cavity was not entered, respectively). However, the likelihood that respondents would allow vaginal delivery was significantly reduced if the uterine cavity was entered, regardless of the surgical approach (P < 0.001). Entry into the uterine cavity during myomectomy also significantly increased the likelihood that obstetricians would recommend elective CS rather than induction of labour. There was no significant difference in practice regarding the use of oxytocin with amniotomy, oxytocin infusion, or prostaglandins.

CONCLUSION

Despite a lack of evidence, obstetricians consider entry into the uterine cavity at myomectomy to be an important factor in determining the method of delivery, the use of oxytocin, and delivery by elective Caesarean section. This was independent of the myomectomy approach.

Learning curve of minimally invasive two-port laparoscopic myomectomy

The authors report that the minimally invasive 2-port total laparoscopic myomectomy technique may be mastered after experiencing 7 operative cases.

Background and Objects:

To examine the learning curve of minimally invasive 2-port total laparoscopic myomectomy (TTLM).

Methods:

TTLM was performed by using only umbilicus and left inguinal ports, for 30 patients at our university affiliated hospital between May 2009 and February 2010. The times required for each of the 5 surgical phases of the early and late cases performed by the same surgeon were compared by using a DVD time counter.

Results:

The mean surgical time was 82.5±5.2 minutes, blood loss was 42.1±7.5mL, and weight of specimen was 65.3±13.3g. The eighth case was the first in which the surgical time fell below the overall mean surgical time. Comparison of the mean time of each phase between the 7 early and the subsequent (late) cases revealed significant differences in the times required for suturing.

Conclusions:

Although this was a feasibility study, the results suggest that this technique can be mastered after 7 cases.

Learning curve, Suturing.

Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations by minimally invasive surgery? A review on myomectomy

BACKGROUND

Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations are performed in congenital uterine anomalies or benign uterine conditions. Congenital uterine anomalies are relatively rare diseases with various approaches for surgical treatment. Therefore, to address the question of the usefulness of a minimally invasive approach in plastic uterus operations, the most common uterine condition which requires reconstructive surgery, namely myomectomy, is discussed.

METHOD

Searches were conducted in PubMed and The Cochrane Library to identify relevant literature.

FINDINGS

Compared with myomectomy by laparotomy and minilaparotomy, laparoscopic myomectomy is associated with improved short-term outcomes. Laparoscopy is further associated with less adhesion formation. Pregnancy rates after myomectomy in symptomatic patients might be higher after laparoscopy than after laparotomy. Although uterine ruptures following laparoscopic myomectomy are described in the literature, it seems to be a rare event. Concerning the recurrence, there is evidence that rates are similar after laparoscopy and laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

Myomectomy by laparoscopy has several advantages over abdominal myomectomy (by conventional laparotomy and minilaparotomy) and should be the standard procedure. Despite the advantages of laparoscopy, abdominal myomectomy is still a frequently performed procedure. Lack of training in advanced laparoscopic procedures hampers the wide-spread use of laparoscopic myomectomy. Due to the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, efforts should be made to implement this procedure into daily practice. To provide the best care, physicians should offer patients the opportunity of a laparoscopic treatment of myomas.

Myoma pseudocapsule: a distinct endocrino-anatomical entity in gynecological surgery

BACKGROUND

The myoma pseudocapsule is a structure formed surrounding the uterine fibroid, that in the uterus separates the myoma from normal tissue; because literature is lack of detailed information concerning myoma pseudocapsule, the author reviewed this important topic.

METHODS

An extensive literature review from 1980 to 2008 was performed on the myoma pseudocapsule, using: fibroid, myoma, myomectomy and reproductive outcome, as keywords.

RESULTS

The fibroid removal should always be performed inside its pseudocapsule and with a careful stretching, to extract fibroid from the surrounding fibromuscular skeleton, breaking up the fibrous bridges; because the vascular network generally surrounds the myoma, detachment of the myoma occurring inside the pseudocapsule should cause less bleeding. The maintenance of myometrial integrity during myomectomy allows the facilitation of uterine healing and is of benefit for future reproductive outcome.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of intracapsular myomectomy are evident, because it preserves myometrial integrity and allows for restoration of the uterine musculature. This correct myomectomy, if done by laparoscopy, confers significant advantages in less intraoperative blood loss, short duration of hospital stay, few therapeutic antibiotic administration and better future fertility.