Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with prior cesarean section

Structured hysteroscopic examination of uterine niches: a modified Delphi procedure

Background

Uterine niches in the Caesarean section scar are seen in approximately half of women with a history of caesarean delivery. Whilst a structured ultrasound assessment of caesarean defects has been described, there is no consensus on a structured hysteroscopic evaluation.

Objectives

To propose a methodology for a structured hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine niches.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a modified Delphi procedure, including two online rounds and two face-to-face meetings of the members of the ESGE Uterine Niches Working Group. The taskforce members have extensive experience in hysteroscopic niche evaluation. The consensus was predefined as a Rate of Agreement of at least 75%.

Results

Thirteen experts participated in this modified Delphi procedure. There was consensus on the need for a standardised methodology and the hysteroscopic definition of a niche as any indentation in the myometrium at the site of a previous CS. There was consensus that a hysteroscopic evaluation of a niche must be combined with ultrasound to measure the residual myometrial thickness. In addition, it was agreed that niches should be subclassified as 'simple', 'simple with one branch', or 'complex'. There was consensus that the following items should be described during a hysteroscopic niche evaluation: the number of niches, the size in relation to the size of cervical canal, the presence of polyps, crypts, cysts, fibrotic tissue, blood, mucus, placental remnants, a dynamic valve, the appearance of the endometrium, the number of blood vessels and bleeding from blood vessels within the defect.

Conclusion

Using a modified Delphi procedure with international experts, consensus was achieved on the hysteroscopic evaluation and classification of niches in the uterine caesarean section scar.

What is new?

A structured registration form was developed to aid consistency in hysteroscopic niche reporting.

Isthmocele and Infertility

Isthmocele is a gynecological condition characterized by a disruption in the uterine scar, often associated with prior cesarean sections. This anatomical anomaly can be attributed to inadequate or insufficient healing of the uterine wall following a cesarean incision. It appears that isthmocele may impact a woman's quality of life as well as her reproductive capacity. The incidence of isthmocele can range from 20% to 70% in women who have undergone a cesarean section. This review aims to sum up the current knowledge about the effect of isthmocele on fertility and the possible therapeutic strategies to achieve pregnancy. However, currently, there is not sufficiently robust evidence to indicate the need for surgical correction in all asymptomatic patients seeking fertility. In cases where surgical correction of isthmocele is deemed necessary, it is advisable to evaluate residual myometrial thickness (RMT). For patients with RMT >2.5-3 mm, hysteroscopy appears to be the technique of choice. In cases where the residual tissue is lower, recourse to laparotomic, laparoscopic, or vaginal approaches is warranted.

The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - A systematic review

Of all neonates, 21% are delivered by cesarean section (CS). A long-term maternal complication of an SC is a uterine niche. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on imaging techniques and niche-related symptomatology. We performed systematic searches on imaging and niche symptoms. For both searches, 87 new studies were included. Niche evaluation by transvaginal sonography (TVS) or contrast sonohysterography (SHG) proved superior over hysteroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. Studies that used SHG in a random population identified a niche prevalence of 42%-84%. Niche prevalence differed based on niche definition, symptomatology, and imaging technique. Most studies reported an association with gynecological symptoms, poor reproductive outcomes, obstetrical complications, and reduced quality of life. In conclusion, non-invasive TVS and SHG are the superior imaging modalities to diagnose a niche. Niches are prevalent and strongly associated with gynecological symptoms and poor reproductive outcomes.

Pregnancy in an isthmocele: A rare case from Nepal

An infrequent form of ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy in an isthmocele can be hazardous due to hemorrhage or uterine rupture. With no clear guidelines for the management of this condition, surgery is the preferred option.

Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the published literature to better understand the association between cesarean scar defects (CSDs) and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). In particular, we aimed to evaluate the risk and pattern(s) of CSD-associated AUB in addition to exploring the relationship between defect morphology with bleeding symptoms.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Patients with CSD and reports of uterine bleeding as an outcome were identified in 60 studies from database searches.

INTERVENTIONS

Studies that investigated CSD (as defined by investigators) and reported uterine bleeding, menstrual bleeding, or AUB as an outcome were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence and risk of AUB (intermenstrual, postmenstrual, and unscheduled bleeding) in patients with confirmed CSD.

RESULTS

Nine studies reported on the prevalence of AUB in patients with a confirmed CSD. Patients with CSD were more likely to experience AUB, compared with those without CSD (relative risk, 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-5.97; 6 studies, 1,385 patients; I² = 67%). In a population of patients with at least 1 cesarean delivery, the prevalence of AUB in those with CSD was 25.5% (95% CI, 14.7-40.5; 6 studies, 667 patients, I² = 93%). However, symptom prevalence was much higher in patients presenting for imaging for a gynecologic indication where the prevalence of AUB in the presence of a CSD was 76.4% (95% CI, 67.8-83.3; 5 studies, 505 patients; I² = 71%). The mean menstrual duration in symptomatic patients with CSD was 13.4 days (95% CI, 12.6-14.2; 19 studies, 2,095 patients; I² = 96%), and the mean duration of early-cycle intermenstrual bleeding was 6.8 days (95% CI, 5.7-7.8 days; 9 studies, 759 patients; I² = 93%). The most common descriptor of CSD-associated AUB was "brown discharge". Patients with larger CSD experienced more bleeding symptoms.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong and consistent association between patients with CSD and AUB. These patients experience a unique bleeding pattern, namely prolonged menstruation and early-cycle intermenstrual bleeding. These data should provide impetus for including CSD as a distinct entity in AUB classification systems. High heterogeneity in our results calls for standardization of nomenclature and outcome reporting for this condition.

Assessment of in vitro fertilization outcomes after hysteroscopic isthmoplasty in recurrent implantation failure

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments outcomes of women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) after hysteroscopic isthmoplasty for isthmocele.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 61 patients with RIF and isthmocele who presented to IVF Unit of Hüma Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between January, 2018 and December, 2020. Thirty-one patient who underwent hysteroscopic isthmoplasty-before IVF procedure-were included. Remaining 30 patients underwent IVF without hysteroscopic isthmoplasty were included as controls. The fertility outcome were compared between groups.

RESULTS

After 3 months, spontaneous pregnancy was achieved in 18.4% (7/38) of patients with isthmocele who underwent hysteroscopic isthmoplasty. In the isthmoplasty group, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, and the miscarriage rate were 41.9% (13/31), 35.5% (11/31), 6.5% (2/31), and 9.7% (3/31), respectively. The live birth rate after in vitro fertilization was 25.8% (8/31) in the isthmoplasty group and 3.3% (1/30) in the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the IVF outcomes such as the biochemical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate between the isthmoplasty and control groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that hysteroscopic isthmoplasty improves pregnancy and live birth rates for women with a history of RIF and isthmocele. Reproductive results of the IVF cycles after hysteroscopic correction of isthmocele were comparable to those of the patients without any uterine abnormalities and those with diagnosis of unexplained infertility.

Historical Perspectives and Evolution of Menstrual Terminology

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in the reproductive years in non-pregnant women comprises a group of symptoms that include abnormal frequency and the irregular onset of flow as well as prolonged and heavy menstrual bleeding. It is a common, chronic, and debilitating condition affecting women worldwide with an adverse impact on their quality of life. Until the last decade, the "menstrual" terminology used to describe both normal and abnormal uterine bleeding and its underlying causes was inconsistent, creating considerable confusion. Using standardized terminology may potentially improve clinical management as well as help designing and interpreting basic, translational, epidemiological, and clinical research in women with menstrual problems. In this article, we explore the history and evolution of menstrual terminology and discuss the two International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) systems on i.e., (A) menstrual terminology and definitions (B) and the causes of AUB, achieved through international consensus of relevant stakeholders through a long multistage journey.

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery in patients with previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD).

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on women who underwent laparoscopic or hysteroscopic surgery for PCSD from 2016 to 2019 at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Among these participants, 13 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 33 received hysteroscopic surgery.

Results

Significant differences were displayed in the operative times (156.9±42.3 vs. 40.7±38.9 min, P<0.05), intra-operative blood loss (80.0±61.0 vs. 17.9±51.2 mL, P<0.05), hospital stay (7.1±1.6 vs. 4.1±2.1 days, P<0.05), postoperative hospital stay (4.3±0.8 vs. 1.5±1.1 days, P<0.05), and hospitalization expenses (22,240.3±249.9 vs. 9,547.1±4,747.2 yuan, P<0.05) between the laparoscopic surgery and hysteroscopic group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of clinical efficacy between the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery group. A total of 2 of the 4 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group, and 9 of 11 patients in the hysteroscopic surgery group delivered successfully. All 2 participants in the laparoscopic surgery group and 2 participants in the hysteroscopic surgery group were diagnosed with placenta previa. No uterine rupture was reported in our study.

Conclusions

Both laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery are safe and effective treatments for PCSD patients, and hysteroscopic surgery is more efficient for PCSD patients.

The effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection compared with Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on postmenstrual spotting in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection with a Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD, 52 mg) on postmenstrual spotting duration in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study was conducted at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. Patients with postmenstrual spotting symptomatic niches were allocated to hysteroscopy group or LNG-IUD group based on the shared medical decision-making approach, and were followed up for 1 year after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was reduced postmenstrual spotting days at 6th month after treatment. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness rate (proportion of patients with spotting days reduced by at least 50% from baseline), menstrual characteristics, menstruation satisfaction, direct medical costs, complications and side effects.

RESULTS

78 out of the 82 eligible patients were included, 36 patients in both group finished 1-year follow-up. Reduced spotting days at the 6th month was 7 days in LNG-IUD group, significantly higher than 5 days in hysteroscopy group, P = 0.004; The effectiveness rate increased over time within 1 year after the insertion of LNG-IUD (63.89%, 83.33%, 88.89%, 88.89%, P for trend = 0.006), while no trend change was observed in hysteroscopy group (71.05%, 71.05%, 66.67%, 61.11%, P for trend = 0.77). The mean direct medical costs were 817[785,856] $ in the hysteroscopy group and 243[239,255] $ in the LNG-IUD group (p＜0.001). 2 patients removed IUD and 2 patients reported weight gain of more than 5 kg and breast distended pain in LNG-IUD group; 2 patients got pregnant in hysteroscopy group. No serious complications were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LNG-IUD is more effective in the treatment of postmenstrual spotting from the 6th month onwards than a hysteroscopic niche resection in patients with a symptomatic niche at lower direct costs.

Safety and feasibility of trial of labor in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum

OBJECTIVE

Literature on trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in women with isthmoceles is scarce because of complications associated with the procedure. This study investigated TOLAC's safety and feasibility in patients with isthmoceles.

METHODS

The study group comprised 34 pregnant women with isthmoceles who vaginally delivered. The control group comprised 102 pregnant women without isthmoceles who vaginally delivered during the same period. Scar diverticula were measured using color Doppler ultrasonography; between-group delivery outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of the study group patients, 27/34 had isthmoceles diagnosed by ultrasound before pregnancy. Nineteen (70.37%) of these patients had mild defects and eight (29.63%) had moderate defects. The scar diverticula's mean length, depth, and width were 1.05 ± 0.62, 0.54 ± 0.28, and 1.20 ± 0.70 cm, respectively. The residual muscle layer's mean thickness was 0.27 ± 0.07 cm. The mean diverticulum depth/residual muscular thickness ratio was 2.39 ± 2.58. The duration of the first stage of labor was significantly shorter and the neonatal weight was significantly lower in the study group than control group.

CONCLUSION

Successful vaginal delivery is possible for women with mild and moderate isthmoceles. Further large-scale studies are needed to improve TOLAC's safety in pregnant women with isthmoceles.

Impact of previous Caesarean section on reproductive outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analyses

This meta-analysis investigated whether a previous Caesarean section has an impact on the outcomes of treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched. Clinical trials published in English up to May 2020 were included. Seven studies performed between 2016 and 2020 met all the inclusion criteria. It was found that previous Caesarean section leads to significantly decreased clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (risk ratio [RR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81, 0.92; P < 0.00001) and live birth rate (LBR) (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.73, 0.86; P < 0.00001). Caesarean section increased the miscarriage rate (RR 1.39; 95% CI 1.18, 1.64; P < 0.0001), and difficult transfer (RR 8.23; 95% CI 4.63, 14.65; P < 0.00001) after ART compared with women who had previous vaginal delivery. The combined results also showed similar endometrial thickness, number of oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, preterm birth and stillbirth between women with previous Caesarean section and women with previous vaginal delivery. In conclusion, Caesarean sections have a detrimental effect on CPR and LBR, and increase the risk of miscarriage and difficult transfer. The indications for Caesarean section should be strictly controlled, and full consultation should be provided to pregnant women. Further studies with stratification analysis of twin and single pregnancies are needed to evaluate the impact of Caesarean section.

Gynecological outcomes of uterine niche after cesarean section: A descriptive study

Objectives:

Our aim was to study the prevalence of isthmocele in cases with previous cesarean section scar presented to El Shatby maternity university hospital and its association with gynecological complications.

Material and Methods:

After approval of the ethics committee of Alexandria faculty of medicine, a sample of 300 patients delivered by cesarean section since 6 months or more presented by one or more of the following symptoms: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) dysmenorrhea, secondary infertility, and lower abdominal pain were selected from the gynecology clinic of El Shatby maternity university hospital. All patients were subjected to history taking, clinical, and gynecological examination. Post-menstrual 2D transvaginal ultrasonography was done. Where the niche or isthmocele was seen as triangular or dome- shaped echo-free space. Data were collected and entered to the computer using Statistical Package for the Social Science program for statistical analysis.

Results:

Niche was found in 44 cases. Most of them were symptomatic. Duration from the last (CS) was statistically significant. Symptoms were related to number of previous cesarean sections.

Conclusion:

The incidence of post-cesarean section niche in El Shatby Maternity hospital was 14.67%. Most common symptoms were AUB and dyspareunia.

Chinese herbal medicine for previous cesarean scar defect: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD) is a gynecological disease that can cause bleeding after intercourse, prolonging menstrual period, intermenstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and even lead to infertility. Chinese herbal medicine plays an important role in the treatment of gynecological diseases in China and East Asia. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine for PCSD.

METHODS

We search the following databases: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CB), Chinese Science and Technique Journals Database (VIP), EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), and the Wanfang Database. Other sources will also be searched like Google Scholar and gray literature. All databases mentioned above are searched from the start date to the latest version. Randomized controlled trials will be included which recruiting PCSD participants to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines against controls (placebo or other therapeutic agents). Primary outcomes will include the size of PCSD, menstrual cycle, menstrual phase, menstrual volume, duration of disease, security index. Two authors will independently scan the searched articles, extract the data from attached articles, and import them into Endnote X8 and use Microsoft Excel 2013 to manage data and information. We will assess the risk of bias by Cochrane tool of risk of bias. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or the participation of a third party. All analysis will be performed based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The meta-analysis in this review will use RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment that Chinese herbal medicine for PCSD.

CONCLUSION

This study of the meta-analysis could provide evidence for clinicians and help patients to make a better choice.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202090080.

Optimal Isthmocele Management: Hysteroscopic, Laparoscopic, or Combination

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature on the hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair of isthmocele.

DATA SOURCES

A thorough search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190668).

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies from the last 20 years that addressed isthmocele repair were collected. Both authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. All prospective and retrospective studies of more than 10 women were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 666 articles (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart) (see Supplemental Fig.). We excluded duplicates, case reports, reviews, video articles, and technique articles. We also excluded studies describing only laparotomy or vaginal repair as these were not in the scope of this review. A total of 31 articles met the inclusion criteria, 21 for hysteroscopic resection and 13 for laparoscopic or combined repair (4 articles tested both modalities and appear in both Tables 1 and 2).For abnormal uterine bleeding, hysteroscopic remodeling relived symptoms in 60% to 100% of cases and laparoscopy in 78% to 94%. Secondary infertility was not evaluated in all studies. After hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment, 46% to 100% and 37.5% to 90% of those who wished to conceive became pregnant, after the procedure, respectively. Pain and dysmenorrhea seem to be uncommon. All studies that tested improvement of pain had fewer than 10 women. However, between 66% and 100% of women who complain of pain or dysmenorrhea will note a marked improvement to full resolution.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an isthmocele or cesarean scar defect are usually asymptomatic. For symptomatic women, a repair is a valid option. For those with residual myometrial thickness >2 to 3 mm, hysteroscopic remodeling is the modality of choice with an improvement in abnormal uterine bleeding, secondary infertility, and pain. Women with a residual myometrial thickness <2- to 3-mm laparoscopic repair with simultaneous hysteroscopic guidance show similar results. Because available data are limited, no cutoff for the correct choice between hysteroscopy and laparoscopy can be concluded. We recommend 2.5 mm as the cutoff value based on common practice and expert opinion, although no significance between hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment was shown.

A comparison of the effects of Two suture materials on isthmocele formation: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Cesarean scar defects (CSD) are a problem that may lead to complications and excessive cost. The optimal way to suture the uterus is a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two suture materials on cesarean scar niches.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cohort study that allocated women into two groups: uterotomy closure with vicryl or catgut sutures. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was performed six months after the cesarean section (CS) to assess the scar.

RESULTS

Totally, 250 patients enrolled in this study. After six months, 20 (18.2 %) patients in the catgut suture group and 13 (9.3 %) patients in the vicryl group had isthmocele according to their sonography reports. The prevalence of isthmocele was higher in the catgut group (p = 0.03). The residual myometrial thickness was greater in the vicryl group (4.98 cm ± 2.18) compared to the catgut suture group (3.70 cm ± 1.50; p = 0.001). The prevalence of postoperative gynecological sequelae such as postmenstrual spotting and pain were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Vicryl sutures were associated with a lower risk of CSD formation in comparison with catgut sutures.

Uterine incision dehiscence 3 mo after cesarean section causing massive bleeding: A case report

BACKGROUND

The traditional definition of late postpartum hemorrhage is a massive uterine hemorrhage from 24 h after delivery to the puerperal period. Here, we report a case of late postpartum hemorrhage that occurred 3 mo after cesarean section and endangered the patient's life. The cause of the case we are reporting was poor incision healing. By reporting this case, we hope to make doctors aware that late postpartum hemorrhage due to poor incision healing may happen as late as 3 mo after cesarean section.

CASE SUMMARY

A 31-year-old woman complained of acute, severe vaginal bleeding for 1 h; the patient had a history of cesarean section 3 mo prior. After receiving anti-inflammatory treatment, fluid supplementation, blood transfusion, oxytocin administration, and hemostatic treatment, the vaginal bleeding ceased, and the patient’s clinical status improved. Unfortunately, she experienced recurrent massive vaginal bleeding, and uterine contractile agents did not decrease the persistent bleeding. To save the patient’s life, she was admitted for emergency laparotomy. At exploratory laparotomy, dehiscence and necrosis of the previous cesarean section scar were noted; the dehiscence penetrated through the entire thickness of the uterine muscle wall and extended to the left uterine artery. Ultimately, we performed a total hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

Late postpartum hemorrhage due to poor incision healing after cesarean section may occur in the 3 mo after cesarean section or even later. Therefore, obstetricians-gynecologists should monitor for this potential complication in all patients post–cesarean section. Such hemorrhages can be severe enough to endanger the patient's life.

Treatment of C-section diverticula with hysteroscopic resection in women without childbearing intention: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Diverticulum, one of the long-term sequelae of cesarean section, can cause abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain. Hysteroscopic resection of diverticula is thought to reduce abnormal uterine bleeding and chronic pelvic pain. In this study, we aim to describe the improvement after hysteroscopic resection of cesarean section diverticula (CSD) in women without childbearing intention, and to explore the variables associated with poor prognosis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of women aged 25–48 with CSD diagnosis by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and hysteroscopy that were enrolled at Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center between June 2017 and December 2018. A total of 124 women met the inclusion criteria and all patients had undergone hysteroscopic resection and accepted a follow-up interview at the 3rd and 6th months postoperatively to record symptom improvement.

Result

The mean of intraoperative blood loss and operative time of hysteroscopic resection were (12.94 ± 12.63) ml and (33.63 ± 6.87) min in 124 patients. Overall observed improvement rates of CSD symptom were 47.2 and 65.6% in the first 3 and 6 months, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed that timing of surgery < 14 days was a good prognostic factor associated with both 3-month improvement (OR, 16.59; 95% CI, 2.62–104.90; P = 0.003) and 6-month improvement (OR, 15.51; 95%CI, 1.63–148.00; P = 0.02); Patients with numbers of cesarean section (CS) ≥2 had a lower rate of improvement after 6 months of CSD repair surgery compared with patients who underwent one CS (OR, 8.29; 95%CI, 1.05–65.75; P = 0.04).

Conclusions

A hysteroscopic repair might be an appropriate method for CSD in women who no childbearing intentions. The timing of surgery and the number of CS seems to be factors influencing the postoperative improvement of CSD.

From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness and risks of different surgical therapies for isthmocele in symptomatic women with abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility, or for the prevention of obstetric complications, considering safety and surgical complications.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched (n° CRD4201912035) for original articles on the surgical treatment of isthmocele published between 1950 and 2018. Data synthesis was completed using MedCalc 16.4.3. The body of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

We retrieved 33 publications: 28 focused on a single surgical technique, and five comparing different techniques. Meta-analysis showed an improvement of symptoms in 85.00% (75.05-92.76%) of women after hysteroscopic correction, 92.77% (85.53-97.64%) after laparoscopic/robotic correction, and 82.52% (67.53-93.57%) after vaginal correction. Hysteroscopic surgery was associated with the lowest risk of complications (0.76%, 0.20-1.66%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found adequate evidence supporting the use of surgery for the treatment of symptomatic isthmocele, as it was found to improve the bleeding symptoms in more than 80% of patients. Differently, we found a lack of evidence regarding the role of surgery with the purpose of improving fertility or reducing the risk of obstetric complications in women with asymptomatic isthmocele. The hysteroscopic correction of isthmocele may be the safest and most effective strategy in those patients with adequate residual myometrial thickness overlying the isthmocele. Laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries may be the preferred options for patients with a thinner residual myometrium over the defect (< 2.5 mm) and when hysteroscopic treatment is inconclusive.

Association of Menstrual Extension and Surgery Effectiveness with Ultrasound Parameters of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticulum in Patients Undergoing Transvaginal Uterine Diverticulum Repair

The association of residual myometrium thickness (RMT) and scar defect depth (D) with menstrual abnormalities and the effectiveness of vaginal repair remain to be determined in patients with cesarean section scar diverticulum (CSD). To assess the value of ultrasound to predict vaginal repair effectiveness. This was a retrospective study of patients with CSD treated with vaginal repair between 01/2014 and 02/2016 at Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (Tongji University). Transvaginal ultrasound was performed before and 3 months after surgical repair. RMT, D, scar defect length (L), and scar defect width (W) were measured. Width (W), D, and L increased along the duration of menstrual period (P < 0.05). When the menstrual extension time was ≥15 days, RMT/D and RMT/(RMT + D) were smaller than in patients with period <15 days (P < 0.05). L was the most positively correlated ultrasonic parameter with menstrual prolongation (r = 0.492). RMT/D and RMT/(RMT + D) were negatively correlated with prolonged menstruation (r = ‐0.304 and -0.305, respectively). RMT/D and RMT/(RMT + D) were associated with the disappearance of CSD after vaginal repair (P < 0.05). The cutoff value of RMT/(RMT + D) was 0.496, with sensitivity of 53.0% and specificity of 61.4%. L of CSD is closely correlated with menstrual extension but has no relationship with the effectiveness of surgery. RMT/(RMT + D) is correlated with menstrual extension time ≥15 days and the effectiveness of vaginal repair.

Imaging findings of cesarean delivery complications: cesarean scar disease and much more

In the last years, there has been a significant increase in the number of cesarean deliveries and, with it, of the number of complications following the procedure. They can be divided into early and late ones. We will illustrate herein the most common complications following cesarean section to help radiologists to recognize them. To familiarize with these various pathologic conditions is crucial to alert referring clinicians for a prompt and appropriate maternal and fetal management. Special attention will be given to the cesarean scar defect (CSD), the most common but also the most unknown of such conditions. Although often asymptomatic, a severe CSD represents a predisposing factor for subsequent complications especially in future pregnancies.

Outcomes after Hysteroscopic Treatment of Symptomatic Isthmoceles in Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Pelvic Pain: A Prospective Case Series

Background

Isthmoceles are described as complications associated with caesarean section (CS). Only symptomatic isthmoceles should be treated. The main symptoms are abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in the absence of any other causes, pelvic pain and secondary infertility. There are several techniques described for the correction of isthmoceles. Isthmoplasty can be performed by hysteroscopy, laparoscopy or vaginal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of hysteroscopic surgical treatment of isthmoceles in women with associated symptoms such as pelvic pain and AUB.

Materials and Methods

A prospective case series study was performed; this study included all women with AUB, pelvic pain and ultrasonographic (US) diagnosis of isthmocele, who had undergone hysteroscopic correction between June 2014 and December 2017 in our Hospital.

Results

Thirty eight women underwent surgical hysteroscopy for correction of symptomatic isthmoceles. All patients presented AUB, 42.1% experienced pelvic pain and 28.9% had secondary infertility. US evaluation of isthmoceles was performed using 2D ultrasound. The residual myometrial thickness (RMT) above the isthmocele was measured in women who expected future pregnancy; if it was <2.5 mm the patient was not included in the study because the cor- rection was performed laparoscopically. Follow-up was performed one and two months after the surgery. In all cases, pelvic pain was resolved one month after the surgery. AUB disappeared within the first month in 87.5% of patients and in the second month in 96.8% of subjects; however, one patient needed further surgery to alleviate her symptoms. Secondary infertility was assessed one year after surgical isthmoplasty. Seven women completed the first year of fol- low up, and three of them (42.8%) reported pregnancy after treatment between six and eight months after the surgery.

Conclusion

Hysteroscopic correction of symptomatic isthmoceles may constitute a safe and effective technique for patients who present AUB and pelvic pain.

Isthmocele: From Risk Factors to Management

OBJECTIVE

 The aim of the present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the literature to provide a complete and clear picture of isthmocele-a hypoechoic area within the myometrium at the site of the uterine scar of a previous cesarean section-by exploring in depth every aspect of this condition.

METHODS

 A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify the most relevant studies about this topic.

RESULTS

 Every aspect of isthmocele has been studied and described: pathophysiology, clinical symptoms, classification, and diagnosis. Its treatment, both medical and surgical, has also been reported according to the actual literature data.

CONCLUSION

 Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed worldwide, and one of the consequences of this technique is isthmocele. A single and systematic classification of isthmocele is needed to improve its diagnosis and management. Further studies should be performed to better understand its pathogenesis.

Determination of Isthmocele Using a Foley Catheter During Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate a new technique of isthmocele repair via laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

Case report (Canadian Task Force classification III). The local Ethics Committee waived the requirement for approval.

SETTING

Isthmocele localized at a low uterine segment is a defect of a previous caesarean scar due to poor myometrial healing after surgery [1]. This pouch accumulates menstrual bleeding, which can cause various disturbances and irregularities, including abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility, pelvic pain, and scar pregnancy [2-6]. Given the absence of a clearly defined surgical method in the literature, choosing the proper approach to treating isthmocele can be arduous. Laparoscopy provides a minimally invasive procedure in women with previous caesarean scar defects.

INTERVENTION

A 28-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 2, presented with a complaint of prolonged postmenstrual bleeding for 5 years. She had undergone 2 cesarean deliveries. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed a hypoechogenic area with menstrual blood in the anterior lower uterine segment. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an isthmocele localized at the anterior left lateral side of the uterus, with an estimated volume of approximately 12 cm³. After patient preparation, laparoscopy was performed. To repair the defect, the uterovesical peritoneal fold was incised and the bladder was mobilized from the lower uterine segment. During this surgery, differentiating the isthmocele from the abdomen can be challenging. Here we used a Foley catheter to identify the isthmocele. To do this, after mobilizing the bladder from the lower uterine segment, we inserted a Foley catheter into the uterine cavity through the cervical canal. We then filled the balloon of the catheter at the lower uterine segment under laparoscopic view, which allowed clear identification of the isthmocele pouch. The uterine defect was then incised. The isthmocele cavity was accessed, the margins of the pouch were debrided, and the edges were surgically reapproximated with continuous nonlocking single layer 2-0 polydioxanone sutures. We believed that single-layer suturing could provide for proper healing without necrosis due to suturation. During the procedure, the vesicouterine space was dissected without difficulty. A urine bag was collected with clear urine, and there was no gas leakage; thus, we considered a safety test for the bladder superfluous. Based on concerns about the possible increased risk of adhesions, we did not cover peritoneum over the suture. The patients experienced no associated complications, and she reported complete resolution of prolonged postmenstrual bleeding at a 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Even though the literature is cloudy in this area, a laparoscopic approach to repairing an isthmocele is a safe and minimally invasive procedure. Our approach described here involves inserting a Foley catheter in the uterine cavity through the cervical canal, then filling the balloon in the lower uterine segment under laparoscopic view to identify the isthmocele.

Niches after cesarean section in a population seeking hysteroscopic sterilization

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of hysteroscopically evaluated disruptions of the integrity of the uterine wall ('niches') in women with and without a previous cesarean section.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study was performed in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Women seeking hysteroscopic sterilization were included. A hysteroscopic evaluation of the anterior wall of the uterus and cervix to identify the existence of disruptions (niches) was performed in a standard manner. Primary outcome was the presence of a uterine niche, defined as any visible defect, disruption, or concavity (gap) in the anterior wall. Secondary outcome was to develop a registration form of niche features for hysteroscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 713 women were included, 603 without and 110 with a previous cesarean section. In women with a previous cesarean Section 83 (75%) niches were observed using hysteroscopy. Anterior wall disruptions were not observed in women without a cesarean section. The following niche features were identified and incorporated in a registration form: polyps, cysts, myometrium defect, fibrotic tissue, (abnormal) vascular pattern, lateral branches, mucus production inside the defect, and bleeding.

CONCLUSION

In a prospective cohort study among women undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization, a uterine niche could be detected by hysteroscopy in 75% of women with a previous cesarean section.

Laparoscopic isthmocele treatment - single center experience

INTRODUCTION

A cesarean section is the most frequently performed surgery in modern obstetrics. In case of an incorrect wound healing process there is a risk of a persistent uterine wall defect. Nowadays, due to the high frequency of cesarean sections, obstetricians have to deal with the threat of uterine rupture due to pathological wound healing. It has been proven that isthmocele can cause abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), pelvic pain (PP), and secondary infertility (SI), and can be a place of improper pregnancy placement.

AIM

This article presents our experience with isthmocele treatment. We describe our diagnostic process scheme, method of corrective surgery and main therapeutic outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this manuscript we present a single center's experience in isthmocele therapy. We have operated on 16 patients who suffered from abnormal uterine bleeding, pain disorders or secondary infertility possibly due to a cesarean scar defect.

RESULTS

The results obtained in our center are promising. In 9 of 11 (81.8%) women with abnormal bleeding we obtained complete resolution of symptoms. We had slightly worse results in the case of pelvic pain. In 4 (66.6%) of 6 patients the pain resolved completely. We have obtained 7 pregnancies in 11 (63.6%) patients operated on due to secondary infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

In our opinion, laparoscopic treatment seems to be currently one of the most effective methods in isthmocele therapy. Further investigation is necessary to determine the indications for surgery, suitable treatment strategies and appropriate care.

Correlation or Causation? A Case Report of Endometriosis within a Caesarean Scar Defect

Introduction

Caesarean scar defect is a well-recognised complication of caesarean section. It can cause secondary infertility, although the mechanism is still poorly understood.

Case description

We present the case of a patient diagnosed with a caesarean scar defect on transvaginal ultrasound, following referral for secondary infertility. During laparoscopy performed with concurrent hysteroscopy, the caesarean scar defect was found to be continuous with an endometriotic nodule in the uterovesical peritoneum. This was excised along with other endometriosis implants. Histopathology of the resected defect also showed endometriosis.

Conclusions

This case illustrates a possible link between caesarean scar defect and endometriosis, and highlights the benefit of laparoscopy to allow additional treatment of coexisting pathology, such as endometriosis, that could also contribute to infertility.

[Interest of saline contrast sonohysterography for the diagnosis of cesarean scar defects]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the interest of saline contrast sonohysterography in the evaluation of number, size and shape of cesarean scar defects in comparison with 3D-transvaginal ultrasound examination.

METHODS

Patients who had surgical reparation of cesarean scar defect by operative hysteroscopy were included in this retrospective study. Before surgery, they all had 3D-transvaginal ultrasound examination and saline contrast sonohysterography to establish the diagnosis. Then those two exams were compared to determine which one is better for cesarean scar defect evaluation, in terms of diagnosis and severity.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled, they underwent transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography before the surgery. 3D-transvaginal ultrasound examination made the diagnosis in 50% of patients with cesarean scar defect, whereas saline contrast sonohysterography enabled to detect 86% of defects, in comparison with hysteroscopy (100%). In 29% of patients, the size and depth of the cesarean scar defect was more important with saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy than expected by 3D-transvaginal ultrasound examination. After surgical repair, symptoms improvement was found in 82% of case (pain or abnormal uterine bleeding), and fertility was restored in 67%.

CONCLUSION

Saline contrast sonohysterography is better to characterize cesarean scar defects than 3D-transvaginal ultrasound, with a higher sensibility. Moreover, it evaluates more precisely the size and shape of the defect, thus severity.

Laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of cesarean scar diverticulum

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical data of laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of cesarean scar diverticulum (CSD).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 49 patients with CSD in our hospital who had undergone laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy from January 2014 to June 2015. All patients had a history of cesarean section deliveries and prolonged postmenstrual spotting (duration 16.1 ± 3.4 days). The diagnosis of CSD was established by using 2-D transvaginal ultrasound.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the surgical repair successfully, without evident complications. The mean operation time was 90.4 ± 9.1 min, the mean volume of blood loss was 31.2 ± 14.3 mL, and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.1 ± 0.3 days. All patients were followed for 6 months after the operation; the mean duration of menstruation was 7.5 ± 2.5 days shorter on average than the pre-surgical menstrual days, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). According to the clinical symptoms assessment, 89.8% (44/49) of the surgeries were effective, while according to the anatomic assessment, 95.9% (47/49) were effective.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of CSD was confirmed to be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment, and should be widely used to treat patients with CSD.

Successful treatment of atypical cesarean scar defect using endoscopic surgery

Background

Cesarean scar syndrome results from a postoperative defect of the uterine isthmus, also known as an isthmocele. Patients present with gynecological symptoms, such as abnormal genital bleeding or infertility, after cesarean delivery. Although the cesarean rate is increasing worldwide, this syndrome is not widely known.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old G2P1 Japanese woman with atypical cesarean scar syndrome had a 3-year history of secondary infertility and postmenstrual brown discharge. Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic exploration revealed a cesarean scar defect connected to a small cavity in the myometrium: this was not an endometrial cavity or a uterine diverticulum. After endoscopic excision of the cavity, the brown discharge resolved, and the patient achieved ongoing pregnancy on her third attempt at intrauterine insemination.

Conclusion

Consensus is still lacking regarding the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar defect. However, the gynecologists should be aware that cesarean scar syndrome can have scar defects forming cavities of unusual shapes and features. Surgical correction of these defects will often improve postmenstrual bleeding and subfertility in these cases.

Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women

PURPOSE

Caesarean delivery (c-section) scar dehiscences may cause bleeding abnormalities, e.g. postmenstrual spotting, dysmenorrhea and abdominal pain, secondary sterility and at worst peripartum uterine rupture. The purpose of this study was firstly to identify the correlation of women's complaints after c-section with scar-related clinical symptoms. Secondly, the effects of corrective surgery on preoperatively existing complaints were analysed and assessed in the patient population of our clinic.

METHODS

We present data of a retrospective study of 13 premenopausal, non-pregnant women with symptomatic c-section scars. In 9 out of 13 patients, a microsurgical uterus reconstruction was performed by mini-laparotomy. The postoperative changes of scar-associated symptoms were assessed by a questionnaire as earliest as 4 months after surgery (N = 5).

RESULTS

The c-section scar was visualised by transvaginal sonography in 12 out of 13 women by a typical U- or V-shaped hypoechoic or anechoic fluid accumulation in the region of former uterotomy and in all 13 patients by hysteroscopy. Bleeding disorders were often accompanied by dysmenorrhea/abdominal pain (38.5%, N = 5) and secondary sterility (46.2%, N = 6). Blood residues in the scar pouch and bleeding disorders/postmenstrual spotting were found in 30.8% of patients (N = 4) and combined with secondary sterility in 38.5% of patients (N = 5). Reconstructive surgeries resulted in discontinuation of bleeding disorders in all women and a pregnancy in three out of five patients (60%) with secondary sterility.

CONCLUSION

Clinical symptoms, e.g. "bleeding disorders" like postmenstrual spotting, "pain/dysmenorrhea" and "secondary sterility" could be specific indicators for the diagnosis of uterine dehiscence after c-section. Scar dehiscences can be diagnosed by obtaining the patients medical history and asking for typical symptoms followed by vaginal sonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy. If a c-section scar defect is confirmed, microsurgical uterus reconstruction can stop postmenstrual spotting, reduce abdominal pain/dysmenorrhea and improve fertility.

Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis

A systematic review and metaanalysis were performed through electronic database searches to estimate the effect of uterine closure at cesarean on the risk of adverse maternal outcome and on uterine scar evaluated by ultrasound. Randomized controlled trials, which compared single vs double layers and locking vs unlocking sutures for uterine closure of low transverse cesarean, were included. Outcomes were short-term complications (endometritis, wound infection, maternal infectious morbidity, blood transfusion, duration of surgical procedure, length of hospital stay, mean blood loss), uterine rupture or dehiscence at next pregnancy, and uterine scar evaluation by ultrasound. Twenty of 1278 citations were included in the analysis. We found that all types of closure were comparable for short-term maternal outcomes, except for single-layer closure, which had shorter operative time (-6.1 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.7 to -3.4; P < .001) than double-layer closure. Single layer (-2.6 mm; 95% CI, -3.1 to -2.1; P < .001) and locked first layer (mean difference, -2.5 mm; 95% CI, -3.2 to -1.8; P < .001) were associated with lower residual myometrial thickness. Two studies reported no significant difference between single- vs double-layer closure for uterine dehiscence (relative risk, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.44-7.90; P = .40) or uterine rupture (no case). In conclusion, current evidence based on randomized trials does not support a specific type of uterine closure for optimal maternal outcomes and is insufficient to conclude about the risk of uterine rupture. Single-layer closure and locked first layer are possibly coupled with thinner residual myometrium thickness.

Arterial hemorrhage from cesarean scar: a rare cause of recurring massive uterine bleeding and successful surgical management

Abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications associated with a previous cesarean section scar are only recently being identified and described. Herein we report a rare case of a woman with recurring massive uterine bleeding after 2 cesarean sections. Curettage and hormone therapy were unsuccessfully used in an attempt to control the bleeding. After she was transferred to our hospital, she had another episode of vaginal bleeding that was successfully managed with oxytocin and hemostatic. Diagnostic hysteroscopy performed under anesthesia revealed an abnormal transected artery in the cesarean section scar with a thrombus visible. In the treatment at the beginning of laparoscopic management, we adopted temporary bilateral uterine artery occlusion with titanium clips to prevent massive hemorrhage. Secondly, with the aid of hysteroscopy, the bleeding site was opened, and then the cesarean scar was wedge resected and stitched interruptedly with 1-0 absorbable sutures. The postoperative recovery was uneventful. It would seem that the worldwide use of cesarean section delivery may contribute to the risk of gynecologic disturbances including some unrecognized and complex conditions as seen in this case.

Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesarean-induced isthmocele: a prospective study

An isthmocele, also known as a cesarean scar defect, is an emerging condition that typically affects women with a history of previous cesarean section, and its presence is a novel under-recognized cause of postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and/or pelvic pain. The incidence of symptoms and their resolution after hysteroscopic surgery were evaluated prospectively in 120 consecutive isthmocele patients. Patients included only symptomatic premenopausal women. Transvaginal ultrasound and office hysteroscopy were used to diagnose isthmocele. Operative hysteroscopy was performed to correct the cesarean scar defect, and histologic findings were evaluated. Correction of an isthmocele via operative hysteroscopy was successful in all cases evaluated. Isthmoplasty resulted in the resolution of postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and suprapubic pelvic pain in 80% of patients. In the remaining cases, 7% of patients had an improvement of symptoms, whereas 13% did not obtain any relief. Considering the recent diagnostic recognition of isthmoceles, we conclude that surgical treatment of this pathology by operative hysteroscopy may represent the best choice in symptomatic women because of its minimal invasiveness and beneficial therapeutic results.

Transvaginal management of cesarean scar section diverticulum: a novel surgical treatment

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of transvaginal management of cesarean section scar diverticulum.

Material/Methods

We evaluated 64 patients receiving transvaginal management of previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD).

Results

The PCSD was successfully treated by transvaginal surgery, without evident complications. The mean operation time was 33.6±4.1 min, blood loss was 37.9±16.8 ml, and the mean hospital stay after surgery was 6±2.9 days. Symptoms related to the prolonged menstruation in 53 patients were improved after surgery, vaginal bleeding time was reduced by an average of 7.3±2.8 days, and a significant difference was noted between the mean pre- and post-operative duration of menstruation (P<0.01). Of 11 patients with guttate between menstrual periods, guttate was absent in 9 patients and improved in 2. Clinical improvement was observed in 85.9% (55/64).

Conclusions

Transvaginal intervention is feasible and safe for the management of PCSD.

The definition, aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects

Caesarean sections are the most commonly performed surgical procedures involving the uterus in fertile women. Typically, this surgery involves a transverse incision in the anterior lower uterine segment. The incidence of caesarean sections is on the increase worldwide, and consequently, the complications associated with them are becoming more common. One such complication that is gaining more attention is previous lower uterine segment caesarean scar defect (PCSD). In this review, we sought to explore the definition, aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of PCSD.

Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review systematically the medical literature reporting on the prevalence of a niche at the site of a Cesarean section (CS) scar using various diagnostic methods, on potential risk factors for the development of a niche and on niche-related gynecological symptoms in non-pregnant women.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched. All types of clinical study reporting on the prevalence, risk factors and/or symptoms of a niche in non-pregnant women with a history of CS were included, apart from case reports and case series.

RESULTS

Twenty-one papers were selected for inclusion in the review. A wide range in the prevalence of a niche was found. Using contrast-enhanced sonohysterography in a random population of women with a history of CS, the prevalence was found to vary between 56% and 84%. Nine studies reported on risk factors and each study evaluated different factors, which made it difficult to compare studies. Risk factors could be classified into four categories: those related to closure technique, to development of the lower uterine segment or location of the incision or to wound healing, and miscellaneous factors. Probable risk factors are single-layer myometrium closure, multiple CSs and uterine retroflexion. Six out of eight studies that evaluated niche-related symptoms described an association between the presence of a niche and postmenstrual spotting.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported prevalence of a niche in non-pregnant women varies depending on the method of detection, the criteria used to define a niche and the study population. Potential risk factors can be categorized into four main categories, which may be useful for future research and meta-analyses. The predominant symptom associated with a niche is postmenstrual spotting.

[Uterine ishtmique transmural hernia: results of its repair on symptoms and fertility]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of the surgical repair (isthmorraphy) of the large scar dehiscence after cesarean on symptoms and fertility for women who desire pregnancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 14 symptomatic patients, who desire a new pregnancy underwent a surgical repair by laparotomy, laparoscopic or vaginal technique. Five women experienced failure of Assistance Reproductive Technique (IVF or ICSI) for idiopathic secondary infertility. The dehiscent scars were evaluated by ultrasound, hysterography, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.

OUTCOME

Symptoms improvement was found in 92% of case. Ten pregnancy (71%) was obtained after surgical repair, 6 spontaneous and 4 after Assistance Reproductive Technique. Among the 5 women initially followed in the reproductive unit, 4 became pregnant, 3 after IVF or ICSI and 1 spontaneous. No operative complication occurred. The subsequent pregnancy was unremarkable with no uterine rupture.

DISCUSSION

Large scar defect after cesarean can take shape of a complete absent of the anterior wall of the uterus. No incident has been proved in this condition. There is a lack of data concerning these isthmocele. The experience of hysteroscopic repair cannot be applied to these real large diverticule of the scar cesarean. The results of this study suggest a link between the isthmocele and reversible symptoms after surgery. The first results concerning the subsequent fertility after surgical repair seem interesting

CONCLUSION

When a large scare defect (isthmocele) is found in symptomatic woman (pelvic pain, bleeding uterine, infertility), a surgical repair can be proposed, especially for woman who desire a new pregnancy.

Hysteroscopic findings in patients with post-menstrual spotting with prior cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To identify uterine hysteroscopic findings among patients with prior cesarean section and whom had post-menstrual bleeding spotting type.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive and prospective study between June 2008 and December 2009 involving women admitted to our clinic in Ji-Paraná (RO), Brazil, and who complained of prolonged genital bleeding after menstrual period. A total of 20 women with the simultaneous following characteristics were selected: at least one prior cesarean section, aged between 18 and 45 years, no use of hormonal contraceptives, and no history of uterine surgery that could change the cavity anatomy. All participants underwent a hysteroscopic examination.

RESULTS

During hysteroscopy, in 90% of the patients, the presence of a cesarean section scar was observed in the last third of the cervix. This scarring causes an anomaly in the uterine cavity anatomy, characterized by the viewing of an enlargement followed by a retraction of the anterior wall, which affords the presence of a pseudocavity with depth and lumen narrowing in variable degrees. Two patients did not present the pseudocavity.

CONCLUSION

Pseudocavities in cesarean section scar are usually found in hysteroscopic examination of patients with prior cesarean section and abnormal uterine spotting.

Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the treatments of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility, associated techniques, and the risks of complications associated with their use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Isthmocele is a reservoir-like pouch defect on the anterior wall of the uterine isthmus located at the site of a previous cesarean delivery scar. The flow of menstrual blood through the cervix may be slowed by the presence of isthmocele, as the blood may accumulate in the niche because of the presence of fibrotic tissue, causing pelvic pain in the suprapubic area. Moreover, persistence of the menstrual blood after menstruation in the cervix may negatively influence the mucus quality and sperm quality, obstruct sperm transport through the cervical canal, interfere with embryo implantation, leading to secondary infertility. The removal of the local inflamed tissue may be performed by laparoscopic, combined laparoscopic-vaginal, or vaginal surgery, and operative hysteroscopy, a minimally invasive approach to improve symptoms and restore fertility.

SUMMARY

Isthmocele occurs after cesarean section, a common method of delivery and one of the most frequent surgical procedures, so that its upward incidence appears likely to continue in the near future. Because of its minimal invasiveness, resectoscopy may be the better choice for treatment, yielding good therapeutic results.