The role of preoperative urodynamics in urogynecologic procedures

In women with incontinence, the need for pressure-flow study before surgery and abnormalities in the voiding phase. An up-to-date comment on the available problem accompanied by literature

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences between urodynamic findings and history in women with urinary incontinence before surgery and clarify the need for preoperative pressure-flow studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 1018 women who underwent urodynamic examination for urinary incontinence between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated retrospectively. Stress (n = 442), urge (n = 334) and mixed (n = 242) were classified as type urinary incontinence according to urodynamics. The voiding phase findings of the patients were examined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 47.85 ± 0.27 years. 18.4% of patients (n = 187) had voiding phase problems. Furthermore, this condition was seen in the most urge incontinence type urinary incontinence (35%). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups' voiding phase findings (p < 0.0001). The relationship between the patient's history and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire form scoring (ICIQ) and the urodynamics results showed no excellent correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Voiding phase abnormalities are not uncommon in patients with urinary incontinence. They should be considered in the evaluation of patients. Voiding phase findings may show significant differences between urodynamic data and history. Besides, the data obtained with the questionnaire forms were significantly different from the findings obtained by urodynamics. Consequently, urodynamics may change pre-operative clinical decision.

Impact of preoperative urodynamics on women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Preoperative urodynamic studies (UDS) are frequently performed before pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery to assess urethral and bladder function. The primary goal of this study is to examine how preoperative UDS are utilized and what value these studies have in patient treatment and/or counseling.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent prolapse surgery and had preoperative UDS between June 2010 and February 2015. Indications for UDS were classified into four categories: (1) occult stress urinary incontinence only, (2) overactive bladder symptoms, (3) mixed or insensible urinary incontinence, and (4) voiding symptoms and/or elevated post-void residual. We identified changes in management or counseling that were directly attributable to UDS results prior to surgery.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-two patients underwent urodynamic testing for indications 2-4 above, and 316 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent (180/316) had OAB symptoms (34.4% wet, 65.6% dry), 40.2% (127/316) had mixed incontinence, and 17.1% (54/316) had voiding symptoms and/or elevated PVR. A total of 3.5% (11/316) patients had alteration in their management or counseling based on the results of the UDS; 29.4% (50/170) of the women evaluated for occult SUI alone or with other symptoms demonstrated it and 41 underwent sling placement.

CONCLUSIONS

UDS did not have a significant impact on preoperative management or counseling in POP surgery if demonstration of occult SUI was not the indication for preoperative study in women committed to POP surgery. Major alterations in treatment were rare and occurred mostly in women with stress incontinence that also had concomitant voiding symptoms and/or elevated PVR.

Urodynamics and diagnosis of urinary incontinence

The urinary incontinence diagnostic process should include a medical history focused on ailments related to it and their impact on the quality of patient’s life. The lack of proper control over the function of the lower urinary tract creates a lot of troubles for sufferers and prevents them from living an active professional, social, and family life. The patient with a suspicion of urinary incontinence is recommended to record in a voiding diary the number of mictions per day, the volume of urine, and episodes of incontinence. The invasive test called urodynamics is based on cystometry, profilometry, and uroflowmetry. A urodynamic examination performed in patients with incontinence allows for correct diagnosis and proposal of specific surgical or pharmacological treatment.

Impact of preoperative urodynamic testing for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse on clinical management in Chinese women

AIM

To assess the impact of preoperative urodynamic testing on the clinical management of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

Urodynamic testing was performed prior to surgery in 307 patients with pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. The resulting changes to planned treatment were recorded and retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

Results of urodynamic testing prompted changes to the treatment plan in 136 cases (44.2%), including 86 cases of no or slight-stress urinary incontinence, 28 cases of bladder outlet obstruction, 12 cases of occult stress urinary incontinence and 10 cases of detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence. Urodynamic testing excluded disadvantageous factors in 69 cases (22.4%), including 46 cases of overactive bladder and 23 cases of voiding dysfunction. The information provided to patients when seeking informed consent was augmented by the results of urodynamic testing in 63 cases (20.5%). Urodynamic testing was of no value in 39 cases (12.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative urodynamic testing for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse can result in changes to treatment plans, exclusion of disadvantageous factors, and augmentation of information provided to patients when seeking informed consent.