4
|
Makary MS, Zane K, Hwang GL, Kim CY, Ahmed O, Knavel Koepsel EM, Monroe EJ, Scheidt MJ, Smolock AR, Stewart EA, Wasnik AP, Pinchot JW. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Uterine Fibroids: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S203-S218. [PMID: 38823944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumor in women of reproductive age and can present with symptoms including bleeding, bulk related symptoms, and infertility. Several treatment options are available for the management of uterine fibroids, including medical management, minimally invasive therapies such as uterine artery embolization and MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation, and surgical interventions ranging from laparoscopic myomectomy to open hysterectomy. Given this wide range of therapeutic interventions, it is important to understand the data supporting these interventions and to be able to apply it in different clinical settings. This document provides a summary of recent trials supporting various therapies for uterine fibroids, including recent evidence for MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation and a detailed discussion of fertility outcomes in myomectomy and uterine fibroid embolization. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina S Makary
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Kylie Zane
- Research Author, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gloria L Hwang
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Charles Y Kim
- Panel Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Amanda R Smolock
- Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Elizabeth A Stewart
- Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | - Jason W Pinchot
- Specialty Chair, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brun JL, Plu-Bureau G, Huchon C, Ah-Kit X, Barral M, Chauvet P, Cornelis F, Cortet M, Crochet P, Delporte V, Dubernard G, Giraudet G, Gosset A, Graesslin O, Hugon-Rodin J, Lecointre L, Legendre G, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Marcellin L, Miquel L, Le Mitouard M, Proust C, Roquette A, Rousset P, Sangnier E, Sapoval M, Thubert T, Torre A, Trémollières F, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, Vidal F, Marret H. Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 288:90-107. [PMID: 37499278 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). DESIGN A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding (i.e. pharmaceutical or medical device companies). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS The last guidelines from the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français on the management of women with AUB were published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescents; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; type 0-2 fibroids; type 3 or higher fibroids; and adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and evidence profiles were compiled. The GRADE® methodology was applied to the literature review and the formulation of recommendations. RESULTS The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 are strong and 17 weak. No response was found in the literature for 14 questions. We chose to abstain from recommendations rather than providing advice based solely on expert clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS The 36 recommendations make it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for various clinical situations practitioners encounter, from the simplest to the most complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Brun
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
| | - G Plu-Bureau
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal Cochin, AP-HP, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - C Huchon
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France
| | - X Ah-Kit
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - M Barral
- Service de radiologie interventionnelle, hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - P Chauvet
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 1 Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Cornelis
- Service de radiologie interventionnelle, hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - M Cortet
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Croix Rousse, CHU Lyon, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
| | - P Crochet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital de la Conception, CHU Marseille, 147 boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - V Delporte
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHU Lille, 49 rue de Valmy, 59000 Lille, France
| | - G Dubernard
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Croix Rousse, CHU Lyon, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
| | - G Giraudet
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHU Lille, 49 rue de Valmy, 59000 Lille, France
| | - A Gosset
- Centre de ménopause et maladies osseuses métaboliques, hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU, 330 Avenue de Grande-Bretagne, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - O Graesslin
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, institut mère enfant Alix de Champagne, CHU Reims, 45 rue Cognac-Jay, 51092 Reims, France
| | - J Hugon-Rodin
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal Cochin, AP-HP, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Legendre
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933 Angers, France
| | - L Maitrot-Mantelet
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal Cochin, AP-HP, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - L Marcellin
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal Cochin, AP-HP, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - L Miquel
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital de la Conception, CHU Marseille, 147 boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - M Le Mitouard
- Service de gynécologie, hôpital Croix Rousse, CHU Lyon, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
| | - C Proust
- Service de chirurgie pelvienne gynécologique et oncologique, hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - A Roquette
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal Cochin, AP-HP, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - P Rousset
- Service de radiologie, hôpital Sud, CHU Lyon, 165 chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Benite, France
| | - E Sangnier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, institut mère enfant Alix de Champagne, CHU Reims, 45 rue Cognac-Jay, 51092 Reims, France
| | - M Sapoval
- Service de radiologie interventionnelle, hôpital europeen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - T Thubert
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, Hotel Dieu, CHU Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - A Torre
- Centre de procréation médicalement assistée, centre hospitalier Sud Francilien, 40 avenue Serge Dassault, 91106 Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - F Trémollières
- Centre de ménopause et maladies osseuses métaboliques, hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU, 330 Avenue de Grande-Bretagne, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - H Vernhet-Kovacsik
- Service d'imagerie thoracique et vasculaire, hôpital Arnaud-de-Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, 371 avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - F Vidal
- Centre de ménopause et maladies osseuses métaboliques, hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU, 330 Avenue de Grande-Bretagne, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - H Marret
- Service de chirurgie pelvienne gynécologique et oncologique, hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Al-Mashadi Dahl S, Ernst E, Dueholm M. The effect of transcervical endometrial resection on clinical symptoms related to intrinsic adenomyosis and junctional zone changes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2019; 3:100029. [PMID: 31404400 PMCID: PMC6687372 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess the effect of transcervical endometrial resection on clinical symptoms related to histopathological findings of the junctional zone. Study design This prospective study took place at a university hospital. Premenopausal women suffering from abnormal uterine bleeding and/or pelvic pain and scheduled for transcervical endometrial resection were enrolled (n = 112). Histopathological findings of the endomyometrial biopsies were categorized as follows: Adenomyosis of the inner myometrium (intrinsic adenomyosis): ≥ 2 mm myometrial invasion without contact to the basal endometrium, serrated junctional zone: > 3 mm myometrial invasion with contact to the basal endometrium and linear junctional zone: No or marginal myometrial invasion (≤ 3 mm) with contact to the basal endometrium. All study participants received a baseline and two follow-up questionnaires (6 and 18 months after surgery) regarding symptom severity, health-related quality of life and pelvic pain. Data regarding reintervention surgery was obtained from the National Database Patoweb. The rate of reintervention surgery and the improvement in symptom severity, health-related quality of life and pelvic pain were correlated to histopathological findings. Results Twenty-four patients had intrinsic adenomyosis, 31 had serrated junctional zone and 57 had linear junctional zone. Fifteen patients (13%) underwent reintervention surgery; three (20%) within 6 months, nine (60%) between 6–18 months and three (20%) > 18 months after transcervical endometrial resection. Reintervention surgery was more common in women with intrinsic adenomyosis compared to women without (33% (95% CI: 16–55) vs 8% (95% CI: 3–16)) (p-value: < .05). Nine patients (38%) with intrinsic adenomyosis were asymptomatic based on low symptom severity score, high health-related quality of life and no pelvic pain at 18 months follow-up. Patients with linear junctional zone had a higher improvement in symptom severity and health-related quality of life than patients with intrinsic adenomyosis or serrated junctional zone at 6 months follow-up after surgery (p-value < .05). However, there was no significant difference in pelvic pain reduction. Conclusion The effect of transcervical endometrial resection may depend upon the degree of junctional zone changes, and patients with intrinsic adenomyosis are more likely to undergo reintervention surgery than patients with either linear or serrated junctional zone. However, intrinsic adenomyosis may also be successfully treated with endometrial resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Estrid S Hansen
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sham Al-Mashadi Dahl
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Erik Ernst
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Margit Dueholm
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cramer MS, Klebanoff JS, Hoffman MK. Pain is an Independent Risk Factor for Failed Global Endometrial Ablation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25:1018-1023. [PMID: 29374620 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine whether pain, as part of an indication for global endometrial ablation, is an independent risk factor for failure. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING Academic-affiliated community hospital. PATIENTS Women undergoing global endometrial ablation with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), hydrothermablation (HTA), or uterine balloon ablation (UBA) between January 2003 and December 2015. INTERVENTIONS Procedure failure was defined as subsequent hysterectomy after the index ablation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 5818 women who underwent an endometrial ablation were identified, including 3706 with RFA (63.7%), 1786 with HTA (30.7%), and 326 with UBA (5.6%). Of the 5818 ablations, 437 (7.5%) involved pain (i.e., pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, lower abdominal pain, endometriosis, or adenomyosis) before ablation, along with abnormal uterine bleeding. Pain as part of the preoperative diagnoses before endometrial ablation was a significant risk factor for subsequent hysterectomy compared with all other diagnoses (19.2% vs 13.5%; p = .001). Consistent with previous studies, women who underwent ablation at an older age were less likely to fail, which held true even when one of the indications for ablation was related to pain (odds ratio, 0.96/year; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.97). When the pathology reports of women who underwent a hysterectomy were examined, women in the pain group had lower rates of adenomyosis than women without pain (38.1% vs 50.1%; p = .04). However, there was a trend toward a higher rate of endometriosis on pathology reports (14.3% vs 8.7%; p = .09) and even higher rates of visualized endometriosis identified by operative reports in women who had pain before their ablation (42.9% vs 15.8%; p < .001). Patients who had pain before their ablation were less likely to have myomas/polyps (p = .01). CONCLUSION Pelvic pain before global endometrial ablation is an independent risk factor for failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan S Cramer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.
| | - Jordan S Klebanoff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
| | - Matthew K Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
| |
Collapse
|