Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resection for the Treatment of Uterine Cavitary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Manually driven versus motor driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system for polypectomy: Long-term results

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this follow-up study is to compare a manually driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system (ResectrTM 9 Fr) with a motor driven system (TruclearTM) in terms of long-term clinical outcomes such as abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a follow-up of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing a manually and motor driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system for polypectomy. This prospective cohort study was performed at Ghent University Hospital (Ghent, Belgium) and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (Eindhoven, the Netherlands). The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial ID = NCT05337605, April 2022). Seventy-five women with abnormal uterine bleeding who participated in the randomized controlled trial and had pathological confirmation of the diagnosis of an endometrial polyp, were contacted. Fifty-five women (70.67 %) were willing to participate in this follow-up study. The primary outcome was the recurrence and/or persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding and the time to the recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding. Secondary outcomes were polyp recurrence and time to polyp recurrence, symptom relief, satisfaction score regarding symptom relief and general satisfaction score regarding the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

In the manually driven group, the mean time to the recurrence or persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding was 26 months (95 % CI 20 - 32). In the motor driven group, the mean time to the recurrence or persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding was 29 months (95 % CI 23- 34). A log-rank test showed a non-significant difference between both groups (P =.77). There was no significant difference in polyp recurrence (P =.22) or symptom relief between the two groups (P =.67). Additionally, the groups did not differ in satisfaction scores regarding symptoms or polypectomy (P =.16 and P =.61, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This long-term follow-up study showed no statistically significant difference in the recurrence and persistence of abnormal uterine bleeding between a manually and motor driven hysteroscopic tissue removal system for polypectomy.

Evaluation of whether there is residual polyp tissue after hysteroscopic morcellation at Cam and Sakura City Hospital: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In polypectomy with mechanical hysteroscopic morcellators, the tissue removal procedure continues until no polyp tissue remains. The decision that the polypoid tissues were removed completely is made based on visual evaluation. In a situation where the polyp tissue was visually completely removed and no doubt that the polyp has been completely removed, short spindle-like tissue fragments on the polyp floor continue in most patients. There are no studies in the literature on whether visual evaluation provides adequate information at the cellular level in many patients in whom polypoid tissues have been determined to be completely removed. The aim of the present study was to analyze the pathological results of the curettage procedure, which was applied following the completion of polyp removal with operative hysteroscopy, and to evaluate whether there was residual polyp tissue in the short spindle-like tissue fragments that the mechanical hysteroscopic morcellator could not remove. The secondary aims of this study were to compare conventional loop resection hysteroscopy with hysteroscopic morcellation for the removal of endometrial polyps in terms of hemoglobin/hematocrit changes, polypectomy time and the amount of medium deficit.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients with a single pedunculate polypoid image of 1.5-2 cm, which was primarily visualized by office hysteroscopy, were included in the study. Patients who had undergone hysteroscopic polypectomy were divided into two groups according to the surgical device used: the morcellator group (n = 35, Group M) and the resectoscope group (n = 35, Group R). The histopathological results of hysteroscopic specimens and curettage materials of patients who had undergone curettage at the end of operative hysteroscopy were evaluated. In addition, the postoperative 24th hour Hb/HCT decrease amounts in percentage, the polypectomy time which was measured from the start of morcellation, and deficit differences were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 7 patients in the morcellator group had residual polyp tissue detected in the full curettage material. The blood loss was lower in the morcellator group than in the resectoscope group (M, R; (-0.07 ± 0.08), (-0,11 ± 0.06), (p < 0.05), respectively). The deficit value of the morcellator group were higher (M, R; (500 ml), (300 ml), (p < 0.05), respectively). The polypectomy time was shorter in the morcellator group (M, R; mean (2.30 min), (4.6 min), (p < 0.05)).

CONCLUSIONS

Even if the lesion is completely visibly removed during hysteroscopic morcellation, extra caution should be taken regarding the possibility of residual tissue. There is a need for new studies investigating the presence of residual polyp tissue.

Manual morcellation (Resectr™ 9Fr) vs electromechanical morcellation (TruClear™) for hysteroscopic polypectomy: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

Meta-analyses comparing hysteroscopic electromechanical morcellation with electrosurgical resection showed a shorter operating time for electromechanical morcellation, mainly for polypectomy. The Resectr™ 9Fr is a new hysteroscopic manual morcellator, designed to simplify this procedure. We aimed to compare manual with electromechanical morcellation for hysteroscopic polypectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This two-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was performed from 2018 to 2021 in the Catharina Hospital and the Ghent University Hospital. The study was registered at the Dutch Trial Register (NL6922; ICTRP ID: NTR7118). One hundred and forty women with polyps (between 8 and 20 mm) scheduled for hysteroscopic removal were randomized between manual (Resectr™ 9Fr) or electromechanical (TruClear™) morcellation. The primary outcome was time (instrumentation set-up, resection, and total procedure time).

RESULTS

The non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome time was 1.3. Mean instrumentation set-up time was 10% shorter with the manual compared with the electromechanical morcellator (estimated mean ratio manual/electromechanical = 0.9; 97.5% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.1). Mean resection time was 30% longer with the manual compared with the motor-driven system (estimated mean ratio manual/electromechanical = 1.3; 97.5% CI 0.9-1.9). Mean total procedure time was 10% longer with the manual compared with the electromechanical morcellator (estimated mean ratio manual/electromechanical = 1.1; 95% CI 0.91-1.298). The estimated odds (electromechanical/manual) of better surgeon's safety, effective and comfort scores were, respectively, 4.5 (95% CI 0.9-22.1), 7.0 (95% CI 1.5-31.9), and 5.9 (95% CI 1.1-30.3) times higher with the motor-driven compared with the manual morcellator. Conversion rates and incomplete resection rates were comparable in both groups (manual vs electromechanical) (7.6% [4/66] vs 2.9% [2/68] and 6.1% [4/66] vs 3.0% [2/66], respectively). No intraoperative and postoperative complications were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

The manual morcellator was non-inferior to the electromechanical morcellator for hysteroscopic polypectomy in terms of mean instrumentation set-up time and total procedure time. Results on resection time were inconclusive. Conversion and incomplete resection rates were within the range reported in the literature. Surgeon's reported rating for both devices was high, however, in favor of the motor-driven tissue removal system.

Hysteroembryoscopy and hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss: A feasible procedure in selected cases

Hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss using tissue removal devices seems to be a safe and feasible procedure in selected cases. The hysteroscopic approach allows the precise localisation of the gestational sac inside the uterine cavity. The endoscopic approach allows one to perform hysteroembryoscopy before uterine evacuation and this technique appears to be more accurate than dilatation & curettage for fetal chromosome karyotyping, with lower maternal cell contamination. This “under vision” procedure may reduce retained products of conception rates and risk of intrauterine adhesions formation.

The effects of hysteroscopic morcellation of endometrial polyps on frozen embryo transfer outcomes

OBJECTIVE(S)

To determine if hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, specifically via morcellation of polyps, affects implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate, and live birth rate (LBR) in first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review, with data abstracted from the charts of all first autologous oocyte frozen embryo transfer (FET) cases (n = 135) at a single fertility center from January 2018 through June 2020. Subjects were grouped into (A) hysteroscopic polypectomy prior to first FET (n = 25) or (B) no hysteroscopic polypectomy prior to first FET (n = 110). The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes were implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate.

RESULTS

We found no difference between the groups in terms of the primary outcome (LBR) or the secondary outcomes IR, CPR, and SAB rate.

CONCLUSION(S)

The data analyzed here suggest that hysteroscopic morcellation of endometrial polyps has no adverse effect on IR, SAB rate, CPR, or LBR among first FET cases after this type of polypectomy.

Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The management of retained products of conception (RPOC) is not well standardised due to a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Hysteroscopic resection has been proven to be safe and is hypothesised to have lower risk than dilation and curettage, but data comparing the two directly are limited.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes for hysteroscopic resection for the management of RPOC in comparison to current standard management techniques.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in September 2019 using MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The key search terms were 'hysteroscopy'/'hysteroscopic resection' and 'retained products of conception'/'RPOC'. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included. A total of 19 studies were included (n = 2314). Due to a critical risk of bias in all studies with a comparison arm, a meta-analysis was not performed. Meta-analysis techniques were still used to provide summary estimates for primary and secondary outcomes, including conception rate, time to conception, live birth rate, intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), surgical complications and future pregnancy complications.

RESULTS

The overall conception rate for hysteroscopic resection was 81.1% (live birth rate 87.3%) compared to 65.4% for non-hysteroscopic management (live birth rate 93.8%). After hysteroscopic resection the overall complication rate was 1.9% and the IUA rate was 6.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the poor quality and overall scarcity of comparative data, the question whether hysteroscopic resection is superior to traditional curettage for the management of RPOC remains unanswered. This review provides summary data, which will enable the design of adequately powered future studies.

Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal or hysteroscopic morcellator: understanding the past to predict the future. A narrative review

Background

In recent years, the available evidence revealed that mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal (mHTR) systems represent a safe and effective alternative to conventional operative resectoscopic hysteroscopy to treat a diverse spectrum of intrauterine pathology including endometrial polyps, uterine myomas, removal of placental remnants and to perform targeted endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation. This innovative technology simultaneously cuts and removes the tissue, allowing one to perform the procedure in a safer, faster and more effective way compared to conventional resectoscopic surgery.

Objective

To review currently available scientific evidence concerning the use of mechanical hysteroscopic morcellators and highlight relevant aspects of the technology.

Material and Methods

A narrative review was conducted analysing the available literature regarding hysteroscopic tissue removal systems.

Main outcome measures

Characteristics of available mHTR systems, procedures they are used for, their performance including safety aspects and their comparison.

Results

A total of 7 hysteroscopic morcellators were identified. The diameter of the external sheet ranged from 5.25 to 9.0 mm, optics ranged from 0.8 to 6.3 mm with 0o angle. The cutter device diameter ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 mm most of them with rotation and reciprocation.

Conclusion

We conclude that the adoption of mHTR has shown to reduce operating time, simultaneously cutting and suctioning tissue fragments avoiding the need for multiple removal and reinsertions of the device into the uterine cavity as well as reducing the volume of distension media required to complete the procedure compared to using the hysteroscopic resectoscope.

Endometrial polyps: diagnosis and treatment options - a review of literature

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Endometrial polyps (EPs) are a common gynecologic condition, associated with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infertility, and premalignant and malignant conditions. Technologies for diagnosis and treatment of EPs are constantly evolving. We aim to provide an updated review on diagnosis and management options for patients with EPs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register and others. We included 68 publications regarding EPs, their clinical burden, diagnostic modalities, treatment options and new technologies.

RESULTS

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is the common modality for EP detection and color doppler increases its diagnostic accuracy. Dilation and curettage (D&C) should be avoided for diagnosis and treatment of EPs. Hysteroscopy shows high diagnostic value in EPs and allows for both histological diagnosis and effective treatment. Office hysteroscopy and see and treat hysteroscopy without anesthesia is feasible and safe for EP diagnosis and treatment, gaining more trained surgeons globally. Effective and safe technological tools for EP resection include Laser, resectoscopes, morcellators, MyoSure, Truclear and scissors\graspers.

CONCLUSIONS

EPs are safely and effectively diagnosed and treated with the hysteroscopic tools reviewed in this article. More research is needed to define the best treatment modality.

A Pilot Study of Guided Conservative Hysteroscopic Evacuation of Early Miscarriage

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate initial feasibility and experience with guided hysteroscopic morcellation for uterine evacuation of early miscarriage.

DESIGN

A prospective pilot study of 10 cases.

SETTING

A tertiary university hospital in Israel.

PATIENTS

Women with confirmed early miscarriage at a gestational age of below 10 weeks from the last menstrual period.

INTERVENTIONS

From May 2020 to October 2020, the hysteroscopic TruClear tissue removal system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was used for evacuation of early miscarriage in 10 women. The procedures were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data including the length of the procedure, visibility, complete evacuation, bleeding, complications, and follow-up ultrasonography (US) were recorded. The mean duration of the procedure was 24 minutes. Complete evacuation was recorded in all cases. No adverse events were recorded in any of the 10 procedures. Normal uterine cavity without evidence of retained products of conception was documented in follow-up evaluation by US in all cases. Four patients underwent a follow-up office hysteroscopy that demonstrated a normal cavity without evidence of adhesions. In 4 cases (40%), an additional suction curettage was performed immediately after the hysteroscopic procedure owing to obscured visibility or an abnormal US scan at the end of the procedure. However, retained products of conception were found in only 1 of these 4 suction specimens (25%).

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic morcellation under vision seems to be a safe and feasible technique for management of early missed abortion. This method may have potential as an innovative treatment of miscarriage in selected cases. Further studies are needed to refine the indications and the surgical technique.

Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine adhesion seriously affects reproductive health in women. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold scissors or electrosurgery is the main treatment, although there is no consensus on the preferable method. This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these methods for treating moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched on April 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that were published in all languages (must contain English abstracts) and compared hysteroscopic cold scissors with electrosurgery for the treatment of intrauterine adhesion were included. Mean differences, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Data were analyzed using RevMan software (Review Manager version 5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. If a consensus was not reached, a third researcher was consulted.

RESULTS

Nine studies (n = 761; 6 randomized controlled trials and 3 retrospective studies) were included. The intrauterine adhesion recurrence rate with second look hysteroscopy was significantly lower (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.16-0.56; P = .0002) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. The total operation time was significantly shorter (mean difference = -7.78, 95% confidence interval = -8.50 to -7.07; P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (mean difference = -9.88, 95% CI = -11.25 to -8.51; P < .00001), and the menstrual flow rate was significantly higher (odds ratio = 4.36, 95% confidence interval = 2.56-7.43; P < .00001) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. There were no significant differences in the pregnancy rate. One complication (1 perforation case, hysteroscopic cold scissors group) was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic cold scissors is more efficient in preventing intrauterine adhesion recurrence, increasing the menstrual flow, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and shortening the operation time.

Hysteroscopic morcellation for removal of persistent placental remnants in the uterine cornu: Two case reports

RATIONALE

Hysteroscopic morcellation is an alternative approach for the removal of placental remnants, given its advantages of safety, efficiency and good reproductive outcomes. This superiority can be even more obvious for removing persistent placental remnants in the lateral angle of the uterine cavity after repeated dilation and curettage (D&C) of an angular pregnancy, which is rarely reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Two patients who were both initially misdiagnosed as having missed intrauterine miscarriages underwent repeated suction-assisted D&C procedures and were found to have persistent placental remnants in the lateral angles of the uterine cavity.

DIAGNOSES

Ultrasound and hysteroscopy evaluations showed that placental remnants in both cases were in the lateral uterine angles and protruding to the interstitial myometrium around the fallopian tube. We corrected the diagnosis to that of angular pregnancy according to a comprehensive consideration of the ultrasound, hysteroscopy and pathology results.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed MyoSure hysteroscopic morcellation for both patients and the placental remnants were removed completely without any complication.

OUTCOMES

The patients were both scheduled for a second-look hysteroscopy 1 to 3 months after surgery, which revealed normal morphology of the uterine cavities and tubal ostia. The patients both achieved normal intrauterine pregnancies several months after surgery.

LESSONS

Hysteroscopic morcellation is a good alternative approach for the removal of placental remnants and should be considered in cases in which there might be a high risk of incomplete evacuation or a high risk of uterine perforation, especially in cases of angular pregnancy.

Successful management of a submucosal fibroid using a hysteroscopic morcellator system in a patient with a history of total proctocolectomy: A case report

Transcervical resection is widely used in the management of submucosal fibroids. However, uterine perforation and thermal bowel injuries are known complications associated with the procedure. This is a case report of a 44-year-old woman who presented with heavy menstrual bleeding and anemia. Magnetic resonance imaging and hysteroscopy revealed multiple fibroids, including a submucosal type 1 fibroid. She had previously undergone a total proctocolectomy with intestinal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Because there was a high risk of permanent colostomy in the event of a bowel injury, an electrode-free, operative hysteroscopy using the Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver (IBS), a hysteroscopic morcellator system, was employed to prevent thermal bowel injury. The fibroid was completely removed using the IBS system with no complications. Therefore, we recommend the electrode-free use of a hysteroscopic morcellator system in patients with a history of extensive pelvic surgery.

The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800

This Committee Opinion provides guidance on the current uses of hysteroscopy in the office and the operating room for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathology and the potential associated complications. General considerations for the use of diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy include managing distending media, timing for optimal visualization, and cervical preparations. In premenopausal women with regular menstrual cycles, the optimal timing for diagnostic hysteroscopy is during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle after menstruation. Pregnancy should be reasonably excluded before performing hysteroscopy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine cervical ripening before diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy, but it may be considered for those patients at higher risk of cervical stenosis or increased pain with the surgical procedure. In randomized trials, patients reported a preference for office-based hysteroscopy, and office-based procedures are associated with higher patient satisfaction and faster recovery when compared with hospital-based operative hysteroscopy. Other potential benefits of office hysteroscopy include patient and physician convenience, avoidance of general anesthesia, less patient anxiety related to familiarity with the office setting, cost effectiveness, and more efficient use of the operating room for more complex hysteroscopic cases. Appropriate patient selection for office-based hysteroscopic procedures for women with known uterine pathology relies on thorough knowledge and understanding of the target pathology, size of the lesion, depth of penetration of the lesion, patient willingness to undergo an office-based procedure, physician skills and expertise, assessment of patient comorbidities, and availability of proper equipment and patient support. Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) agree that vaginoscopy may be considered when performing office hysteroscopy because studies have shown that it can significantly reduce procedural pain with similar efficacy. The office hysteroscopy analgesia regimens commonly described in the literature include a single agent or a combination of multiple agents, including a topical anesthetic, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, acetaminophen, a benzodiazepine, an opiate, and an intracervical or paracervical block, or both. Based on the currently available evidence, there is no clinically significant difference in safety or effectiveness of these regimens for pain management when compared to each other or placebo. Patient safety and comfort must be prioritized when performing office hysteroscopic procedures. Patients have the right to expect the same level of patient safety as is present in the hospital or ambulatory surgery setting.

No 371 - Le morcellement durant la chirurgie gynécologique: Son utilisation, ses complications et les risques liés à la présence de tumeurs malignes insoupçonnées

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique conseille les gynécologues quant au recours au morcellement tissulaire pendant une chirurgie gynécologique. RéSULTATS: Le morcellement effectué au cours d'une chirurgie gynécologique peut permettre l'ablation de masses utérines volumineuses, offrant ainsi aux femmes une solution chirurgicale à effraction minimale. Les conséquences oncologiques indésirables du morcellement tissulaire devraient être atténuées par l'amélioration de la sélection des patientes, la tenue d'examens préopératoires et l'adoption de techniques novatrices réduisant au minimum la dispersion tissulaire. ÉVIDENCE: La littérature publiée a été récupérée au moyen de recherches menées dans PubMed et Medline au printemps 2014 à l'aide d'une terminologie contrôlée (« leiomyosarcoma », « uterine neoplasm », « uterine myomectomy », « hysterectomy ») et de mots-clés (« leiomyoma », « endometrial cancer », « uterine sarcoma », « leiomyosarcoma », « morcellation »). Les résultats retenus provenaient de revues systématiques, d'essais cliniques randomisés, d'essais cliniques contrôlés et d'études observationnelles de langue anglaise ou française. Aucune restriction de date n'a été imposée. Les recherches ont été refaites régulièrement, et les résultats ont été incorporés à la directive clinique jusqu'en juillet 2017. Nous avons également tenu compte de la littérature grise (non publiée) trouvée sur les sites Web d'organismes d'évaluation des technologies de la santé et d'autres organismes liés aux technologies de la santé, dans des collections de directives cliniques et dans des registres d'essais cliniques, et obtenue auprès d'associations nationales et internationales de médecins spécialistes.

VALEURS

La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée en fonction des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs. AVANTAGES, INCONVéNIENTS ET COûTS: Les gynécologues offrent aux femmes une chirurgie à effraction minimale pouvant comprendre le recours à un morcellateur électromécanique pour faciliter le retrait des tissus. Les femmes devraient être informées que l'utilisation d'un morcellateur en présence de tumeurs utérines (sarcomes, tumeurs endométriales), cervicales ou tubo-ovariennes jusque-là insoupçonnées est associée à un risque accru de dissémination. Le morcellement tissulaire devrait être précédé d'une évaluation complète, d'une sélection appropriée des patientes et de l'obtention du consentement éclairé de ces dernières, et devrait être effectué par des chirurgiens ayant une formation adéquate en matière de pratiques de morcellement tissulaire sûres. DéCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

No. 371-Morcellation During Gynaecologic Surgery: Its Uses, Complications, and Risks of Unsuspected Malignancy

OBJECTIVE

This guideline provides guidance to gynaecologists regarding the use of tissue morcellation in gynaecologic surgery.

OUTCOMES

Morcellation may be used in gynaecologic surgery to allow removal of large uterine specimens, thus providing women with a minimally invasive surgical option. Adverse oncologic outcomes of tissue morcellation should be mitigated through improved patient selection, preoperative investigations, and novel techniques that minimize tissue dispersion.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and Medline in the spring of 2014 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (leiomyosarcoma, uterine neoplasm, uterine myomectomy, hysterectomy) and key words (leiomyoma, endometrial cancer, uterine sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and morcellation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English or French language materials. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to July 2017. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Gynaecologists offer women minimally invasive surgery, and this may involve tissue morcellation and the use of a power morcellator for specimen retrieval. Women should be counselled that in the case of unexpected uterine (sarcoma, endometrial), cervical, and/or tubo-ovarian cancer, the use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of tumour dissemination. Tissue morcellation should be performed only after complete investigation, appropriate patient selection, and informed consent and by surgeons with appropriate training in the safe practices of tissue morcellation.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comparison of techniques and review of current evidence in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Submucosal uterine leiomyomas are a common benign pelvic tumor that can cause abnormal uterine bleeding and may contribute to infertility and miscarriage. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is the treatment of choice to alleviate bleeding from these myomas and to normalize the uterine cavity. This review discusses the techniques and recent evidence for hysteroscopic myomectomy and examines the two primary surgical tools employed today: the bipolar resectoscope and hysteroscopic mechanical morcellator.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hysteroscopic myomectomy has been a popular treatment for symptomatic submucosal fibroids for decades; it is a minimally invasive, low-cost, low-risk procedure, and is associated with high patient satisfaction. There have been rapid advances in the surgical technology available for this procedure. Both the bipolar resectoscope and the hysteroscopic mechanical morcellator are appropriate tools to remove submucosal myomas. Although the hysteroscopic morcellators have been associated with shortened operative time and a decreased learning curve, the data are limited for their use on type 2 fibroids. The strength of the bipolar resectoscope lies in its ability to resect deeper type 2 fibroids.

SUMMARY

The evidence suggests that no one technique should be used for all patients, but rather a choice of technique should be taken on a case-by-case basis, depending on the myoma number, size, type, and location. Gynecologists must become knowledgeable about each of these techniques and their associated risks to safely offer these surgeries to their patients.

Identifying the superior surgical procedure for endometrial polypectomy: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the superior surgical procedure for endometrial polypectomy based on network meta-analysis.

METHOD

Literature retrieval was conducted in globally recognized databases, namely, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central, to address relative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the clinical effects of respective surgical procedure for endometrial polypectomy. Surgical parametric data, including operative time, success rates and complications, were quantitatively pooled and estimated based on the Bayesian theorem. The values of surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities regarding each parameter were calculated and ranked by various procedures. Node-splitting analysis was performed to test the inconsistency of the main results and publication bias was assessed by examining funnel-plot symmetry.

RESULTS

After a detailed review, 8 RCTs containing 5 different procedures were finally included for network meta-analysis. The results indicated that hysteroscopic morcellation possessed the highest possibility of revealing best clinical effects on operative time (SUCRA, 0.49), success rate (SUCRA, 0.90) and complications (SUCRA, 0.50). Moreover, node-splitting analysis and funnel-plot symmetries illustrated no inconsistency or obvious publication bias in the current study.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence demonstrated that hysteroscopic morcellation showed optimal potential superior clinical effects for endometrial polypectomy compared to other procedures. However, high-quality large sample trials are still expected, and new investigations on other relative procedures in this field should be included in the future.

Office treatment of large endometrial polyps using truclear 5C: Feasibility and acceptability

AIM

This retrospective multicenter study was carried out to evaluate feasibility, effectiveness and patient acceptability of a small diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal system in the treatment of large endometrial polyps (≥20 mm), usually not removed in an office setting.

METHODS

Hundred and forty-six women with a single greater than 10-mm diameter polyp considered for polypectomy between April 2016 and August 2017. Sixty-five of these patients had a polyp size greater than 20 mm. All hysteroscopic polypectomy, using Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal system (TruClear 5C System Medtronic), were performed in an office setting with vaginoscopic approach.

RESULTS

Procedural success, time to complete the polypectomy and patient pain scores were evaluated. Polyps less than 20 mm were completely removed in 79/81 cases (97.53%). The completeness of greater than or equal to 20-mm polyp removal was achieved in 63/65 cases (96.92%). The median time for polypectomy was 4.19 ± 1.03 min for polyps less than 20 mm and 4.97 ± 1.30 min for polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm, respectively. Pain was minimal and brief, and the mean pain score measured on a 10-point visual analog scale at the end of polypectomy showed no significant difference between the two groups. In 4/79 (5.06%) cases with polyps less than 20 mm and in 4/63 (6.35%) cases with polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm women reported moderate pain. All specimens were adequate for pathologic measurements.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic treatment of polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm in size with TruClear 5C is feasible and well tolerated in an office setting with no significant difference regarding completeness compared to polyps less than 20 mm, but with a minimal increase in procedure times.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Clinical Evaluation of the Hysteroscopic Morcellator System for Endometrial Polypectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Parallel Group Comparison Study

Objective:

To evaluate the TRUCLEAR™ system (Smith and Nephew Inc., London, UK), a hysteroscopic system that morcellates and aspirates masses, in terms of the operating time, surgeon's convenience, and effect on patients compared with conventional electrosurgical resection.

Methods:

Patients undergoing hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps were randomly allocated to undergo hysteroscopic morcellation or electrosurgical resection (UMIN-CTR identifier: UMIN000019649). The primary outcome was the operating time. Secondary outcomes were the removal success, fluid deficit, convenience with the technique, insertion time, number of insertions during the operation, visibility of the operative field, recurrence of the patient's chief complaint, and adverse events.

Results:

Sixty-seven women were randomly allocated to the morcellation arm (n = 34) or electrosurgical resection arm (n = 33) from November 2015 to November 2016. The polyps were completely removed, and no adverse events were observed in all 67 patients. The average operating time (8.3 min vs. 12.0 min, P = 0.014), insertion time (5.0 min vs. 9.0 min, P < 0.001), and number of insertions (1.0 vs. 8.2, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the morcellation arm than in the electrosurgical resection arm. Surgeons' subjective evaluation measured on a 10-cm visual analog scale was higher in the morcellation arm than in the electrosurgical resection arm in terms of easiness of removal (8.4 vs. 6.5, P < 0.001) and visibility of the operative field (7.8 vs. 6.4, P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Surgeons gave the hysteroscopic morcellator system a better evaluation compared than electrosurgical resection, and the system shortened the operating time.

Resectoscopic Surgery for Polyps and Myomas: A Review of the Literature

Resectoscopic surgery is routinely performed to remove endometrial polyps and uterine myomas. A search of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through November 2016 for studies written in English, regardless of sample size or study type. The studies were then filtered by selecting those evaluating resectoscopic surgery. An analysis of peer-reviewed, published literature was performed to examine the clinical application of this treatment modality on patients requiring polypectomy and myomectomy. Different surgical techniques were also compared: hysteroscopy with scissors, forceps, or a cold loop; resectoscopy with radiofrequency energy; and mechanical resection. The literature finds that operative time during resectoscopic surgery is significantly longer than with mechanical resection. Resectoscopic myomectomy, however, may be necessary for removal of larger or more deeply embedded myomas. Ultimately, both techniques result in symptom resolution and a low recurrence rate.

Advanced Hysteroscopic Surgery: Quality Assurance in Teaching Hospitals

Advanced hysteroscopic surgery (AHS) is a vitally important technique in the armamentarium for the management of many day-to-day clinical problems, such as menorrhagia, surgical excision of uterine myomata and septa in the management of female infertility, hysteroscopic excision of chronically retained products of conception (placenta accreta), and surgical removal of intramural ectopic pregnancy. In today's climate of accountability, it is necessary that gynecologists take a more active role in assuring the quality of their work. In this article, we discuss the quality assurance system from the point of view of the surgical audit meetings in some of the major teaching hospitals affiliated with the University of Queensland (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia).