Robotic Radical Parametrectomy With Upper Vaginectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Occult Cervical Carcinoma After Extrafascial Hysterectomy

Complementary surgery for cervical cancer patients inadequately treated with extrafacial hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate surgical outcomes and survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients who underwent complementary surgery after an extrafacial hysterectomy METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer, who underwent extrafacial hysterectomy initially and thereafter underwent complementary surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Complementary surgery consisted of radical parametrectomy, proximal vaginectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were evaluated. Histopathologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma in twelve patients, adenocarcinoma in six patients and adenosquamous carcinoma in two patients. Route of surgery was laparotomy in 19 patients and laparoscopy in one patient. Two patients were staged as stage 1A2, nine were staged as stage 1B1, four were staged as stage 1B2, one was staged as stage 2A1, one was staged as stage 2B and three were staged as stage 3C1. The median tumor size was 16.5 (Range, 4-40) mm. Grade ≥ 3 complications related to surgery occured in 8 (40%) patients. Four of them were managed intraoperatively and recovered problem free. Remaining four (20%) needed reoperation. Pathology reports revealed involvement of parametrium in one (5%) patient, involvement of the proximal vagina in one (5%) patient, matastasis to pelvic lymph nodes in 3 (15%) patients. Five (25%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Consequently, 5-year and 10-year cumulative survival was calculated as 94%.

CONCLUSION

Complementary surgery and radiotherapy show similar oncologic outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone simple hysterectomy initially. Complementary surgery is associated with slightly higher rate of morbidity compared with radiotherapy, however significant proportion of complications can be noticed and repaired intraoperatively.

Radical parametrectomy after 'cut-through' hysterectomy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Time to consider this procedure obsolete

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to identify predictive factors in patients with a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy in order to avoid a radical parametrectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent radical parametrectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center and at the Instituto de Cancerologia Las Americas in Medellin, Colombia from December 1999 to September 2017. We sought to determine the outcomes in patients diagnosed with low-risk factors (squamous, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous lesions<2cm in size, and invading<10mm) undergoing radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The median age was 40.4years (range; 26-60) and median body mass index (BMI) was 26.4kg/m² (range; 17.7-40.0). A total 22 patients had tumors<1cm and 8 had tumors between 1 and 2cm. A total of 6 (33%) of 18 patients had evidence of lymph-vascular invasion (LVSI). No radical parametrectomy specimen had residual tumor, involvement of the parametrium, vaginal margin positivity, or lymph node metastasis. None of the patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 99months (range; 6-160) only one patient recurred.

CONCLUSION

Radical parametrectomy may be avoided in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer detected after a simple hysterectomy. Rates of residual disease (parametrial or vaginal) and the need for adjuvant treatments or recurrences are very low.