Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy

Transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse after total/subtotal hysterectomy: Chinese surgeons' initial experience

BACKGROUND

To introduce a novel technique of transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (ESLS) for apical prolapse and to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of this technique.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were enrolled to undergo ESLS between January 2020 and May 2021. Perioperative outcomes were included. Short-term results were assessed by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) scores, mesh exposure and prolapse recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 14/16 cases (87.5%) were successfully completed. The mean operation time was 118 min (range 85-160), and the mean blood loss was 68 ml (range 20-100). The mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 24 h was 0.7. No intraoperative complications occurred except for one patient who developed subcutaneous emphysema. All patients gained a significant improvement in both physical prolapse and quality of life at 12 months after surgery, and there was no mesh exposure or prolapse recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed that transvaginal ESLS is a feasible and effective technique for apical prolapse with a previous hysterectomy. However, this technique should be performed by surgeons with extensive experience both in vaginal surgery and laparoscopic single-port surgery.

A Review of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: Extraperitoneal Approach May Have the Advantage over Intraperitoneal Approach

The importance of lymphadenectomy, including para-aortic nodes, for the accurate staging of endometrial cancer, is well established. Although the therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrial cancer is still under debate, some studies support its usefulness for survival benefit. To predict the necessity of lymphadenectomy, several preoperative scoring systems have been proposed as being effective. For endometrial cancer, there is a trend towards minimally invasive surgery, including para-aortic lymphadenectomy. For para-aortic lymphadenectomy, there are two different approaches: the extraperitoneal approach and the transperitoneal approach. The extraperitoneal approach has advantages over the transperitoneal approach in terms of better access to the left aortic nodes, no interference of the bowel, and possibly better options for obese or elderly patients. However, the extraperitoneal approach may have a longer learning curve than the transperitoneal approach. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe and may be suitable for patients irrespective of their baseline characteristics.

Docking for robotic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with Da Vinci Xi surgical system

Regarding extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy, installation is key when performed with the assistance of the Da Vinci Xi robotic system. We developed a step-by-step guide, from patient installation to placement of the trocars to patient cart docking, to perform in the efficient and safest installation possible this procedure. The operation does not differ from standard laparoscopic extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The benefits of robotic surgery in this indication are comparable to those of the standard laparoscopic approach. Those benefits imply a precise knowledge of the management and installation of the da Vinci Xi robotic system.

A new technique of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy optimizes perioperative outcome

Objective

The aim of the present study was to introduce a new technique for laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL): an invented retroperitoneum suspension needle combined with modified trocar placement.

Methods

This prospective pilot study randomly categorized women with cervical cancer of stage I–II into 2 groups. The patients in the study group would have laparoscopic PAL with our new technique, while those in the control group with control method. Patients' characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

A total of 37 patients were included in our study, of which 20 cases in the study group and 17 cases in the control group. As a result, the mean number of para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) resected in the study group was significantly more than that in the control group (p<0.001). The time for resecting PALNs (p<0.001) and total operative time (p<0.001) in the study group decreased significantly than those in the control group.

Conclusions

For laparoscopic PAL, this new technique was effective and practical.

Robot-assisted extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (RAePAL) performed with the bipolar cutting method

Objective

In comparison with laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy, the advantages of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (ePAL) are that the operative field is not obstructed by bowel and the Trendelenburg position is not required [1]. The ePAL technique has been adopted to the robotic surgery with the da Vinci Xi. There are only a few reports demonstrating the technical feasibility of robot-assisted ePAL (RAePAL) [23]. This report describes the new surgical technique of RAePAL with the bipolar cutting method.

Methods

The patient was a 53-year-old woman diagnosed as ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) after left salpingo-oophorectomy. As the re-staging surgery, robot-assisted right salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy were planned following ePAL. The patient was placed in the supine position and tilted 5 degrees to the right. Three da Vinci arms were docked at the patient's left side (Fig. 1). The bipolar cutting method was performed by with the surgeon's right hand. An AirSeal^® port (ConMed, Utica, NY, USA) was placed on the side near the assistant. After the para-aortic space was expanded, lymphadenectomy was performed up to the renal veins with the bipolar cutting method.

Results

The PAL operative time was 155 minutes, estimated blood loss was 25 mL. The patient developed no perioperative complications, and the postoperative diagnosis was stage IC1 ovarian CCC with no pelvic (n=0/42) and para-aortic lymph nodes (n=0/59) metastasis.

Conclusion

RAePAL with the bipolar cutting method was technically feasible. Performing lymphadenectomy between the aorta and the vena cava was facilitated by the articulated robotic arm.

Comparison of surgical and pathological parameters after laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomies

OBJECTIVE

Lymphadenectomy is an integral part of surgical staging and treatment for patients with gynecologic malignancies. Since its introduction, laparoscopic lymphadenectomy has proved feasible, safe, and oncologically adequate compared with open surgery while morbidity is lower and hospital stay considerably shorter. The aim of this study was to examine if surgical outcomes may be improved after the initial learning curve is complete.

METHODS

An analysis of 2535 laparoscopic pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomies was performed between July 1994 and March 2018 by one team of gynecologic oncology surgeons but with the consistent supervision of a consultant surgeon. Data were collected prospectively evaluating operative time, intra-operative and post-operative complications, number of lymph nodes, and body mass index (BMI). Previously published data of 650 patients treated after introduction of the method (period 1, 1994-2003) were compared with the latter 524 patients (period 2, 2014-2018).

RESULTS

The median age of the 2535 patients was 43 years (IQR 34-57). The most common indication for pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy was cervical cancer (n=1893). Operative time for para-aortic lymph node dissection was shorter in period 2 (68 vs 100 min, p<0.001). The number of harvested lymph nodes was increased for pelvic (19.2 (range 2-52) vs 21.9 (range 4-87)) and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (10.8 (range 1-52) vs 14.4 (range 4-64)), p<0.001. BMI did not have a significant influence on node count or operative time, with BMI ranging from 14.6 to 54.1 kg/m². In contrast to period 1 (n=18, 2.9%), there were no intra-operative complications in period 2 (n=0, 0.0%, p<0.001) whereas post-operative complications were similar (n=35 (5.8%) in period 1; n=38 (7.6%) in period 2; p=0.32).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal lymphadenectomy, lymph node count and peri-operative complications improved after the initial learning curve.