1
|
Maior MDCFS, Souza ASR, Souza GFDA, da Costa AAR. Comparison between 200 μg and 800 μg of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 158:205-212. [PMID: 34695232 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare between 200 and 800 μg of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy. METHODS Quadruple-blind randomized clinical trial conducted between November 2019 and September 2020 involving 76 patients undergoing cervical dilatation before surgical hysteroscopy at teaching hospitals in Pernambuco, Brazil. Women received the vaginal misoprostol dosage of 200 or 800 μg,10-12 h before operative hysteroscopy. The cervical width was the primary outcome, and secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, adverse effects, surgical complications, and duration of cervical dilatation. Chi-square tests of association, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used with an α error of <5%. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the groups in the mean of the cervical width (800 μg: 6.5 ± 1.6 mm vs 200 μg: 5.8 ± 1.8 mm, P = 0.055), patient satisfaction, and surgical findings, but the duration of cervical dilatation was lower in the 800-μg group (28.16 ± 28.5 s vs 41.97 ± 31.0 s, P = 0.035). Among the adverse effects, diarrhea was more frequent in the 800-μg group with statistical difference (100% vs 0%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION For cervical ripening, 200 μg misoprostol is equally effective with fewer adverse effects than 800 μg before operative hysteroscopy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04152317. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04152317.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria da Conceição Farias Souto Maior
- Postgraduate Program in Integral Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.,Biological Sciences and Health Center, Catholic University Pernambuco (UNICAP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.,Department of Health Science, University Center Maurício de Nassau (UNINASSAU), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.,Department of Gynecology, Hospital Agamenon Magalhães (HAM), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | - Alex Sandro Rolland Souza
- Postgraduate Program in Integral Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.,Biological Sciences and Health Center, Catholic University Pernambuco (UNICAP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.,Department of Maternal and Child Healthcare, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | | | - Aurélio Antônio Ribeiro da Costa
- Postgraduate Program in Integral Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.,Department of Maternal and Child Healthcare, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rund NMA, El Shenoufy H, Islam BA, El Husseiny T, Nassar SA, Mohsen RA, Alaa D, Gad Allah SH, Bakry A, Refaat R, Gehad MA, Kotb MMM, Osman OM, Ashour ASA, Ali AS, Taher A, Kholaif K, Hashem AT, Elsallamy AAH, Nour DA, Dahab S, Talaat B, Almohammady M. Determining the Optimal Time Interval between Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration and Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 29:85-93. [PMID: 34217851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine the optimal timing of vaginal dinoprostone administration before office hysteroscopy (OH) in nulliparous women. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS A total of 180 nulliparous women undergoing diagnostic OH. INTERVENTIONS We randomly allocated the women to long-interval or short-interval dinoprostone groups: three mg dinoprostone was administered vaginally 12 hours before OH in the long-interval group and 3 hours before OH in the short-interval group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was pain during OH measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 = no pain; 100 = worst pain imaginable). The secondary outcomes were ease of hysteroscope passage, patient satisfaction score, and drug-related adverse effects. The patients in the long-interval dinoprostone group had lower pain scores during OH (p <.001). Contrarily, pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar in both groups (p = .1). The patient satisfaction score was higher and clinicians found hysteroscope passage through the cervical canal easier and quicker in the long-interval dinoprostone group than in the short-interval group (p <.001, p = .003, and p <.001, respectively). Side effects were comparable in both study groups. CONCLUSION Vaginal dinoprostone administered 12 hours before OH was more effective than that administered 3 hours before OH in reducing pain during OH in nulliparous women, with easier hysteroscope insertion, shorter procedure duration, and higher patient satisfaction score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nansy Mohamed Ali Rund
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (Drs. Rund, Islam, and Nassar), Cairo
| | - Hossam El Shenoufy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Bassem Aly Islam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (Drs. Rund, Islam, and Nassar), Cairo
| | - Tarek El Husseiny
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Salma Ashraf Nassar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (Drs. Rund, Islam, and Nassar), Cairo
| | - Reham A Mohsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Doaa Alaa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Sherine H Gad Allah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Ahmed Bakry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Rania Refaat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology, 6th October City, Giza (Drs. Refaat and Elsallamy)
| | - Mahmoud Ahmed Gehad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha (Drs. Gehad and Talaat), Egypt
| | - Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Kotb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Omneya M Osman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Ahmed S A Ashour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Ahmed Said Ali
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University (Dr. Ali), Cairo.
| | - Ayman Taher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Khaled Kholaif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Ahmed T Hashem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Ayman Aly Hamed Elsallamy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology, 6th October City, Giza (Drs. Refaat and Elsallamy)
| | - Dalia Adel Nour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Sherif Dahab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| | - Bassem Talaat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha (Drs. Gehad and Talaat), Egypt; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, (Dr. Talaat) Egypt
| | - Maged Almohammady
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Drs. El Shenoufy, El Husseiny, Mohsen, Alaa, Gad Allah, Bakry, Kotb, Osman, Ashour, Taher, Kholaif, Hashem, Nour, Dahab, and Almohammady), Cairo
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Silva PM, Wilson L, Carnegy A, Smith PP, Clark TJ. Cervical dilatation and preparation prior to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2020; 128:1112-1123. [PMID: 33219606 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are uncertainties about the benefit of routine cervical preparation and/or cervical dilatation before outpatient hysteroscopy. OBJECTIVE To determine if cervical preparation and/or routine mechanical dilatation reduces pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. SEARCH STRATEGY MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched on 19 October 2020, using keywords 'hysteroscopy', 'cervical preparation', 'cervical ripening', 'cervical dilatation', 'outpatient', 'office' and/or 'ambulatory' and associated medical subject headings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials investigating the benefit of cervical preparation and/or cervical dilatation on pain in women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two independent reviewers selected eligible trials and extracted data on pain, feasibility, adverse events and satisfaction/acceptability for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS The literature search yielded 807 records, of which 24 were included for review and 19 provided data for meta-analysis. No trials investigated the role of routine mechanical cervical dilatation. Cervical preparation significantly reduced pain during outpatient hysteroscopy; standard mean difference (SMD) -0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.05 to -0.29. Feasibility also improved as priming provided significantly easier hysteroscopic entry (SMD 0.89, 95% CI 0.32-1.46), greater cervical dilatation (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.08-1.53) and shorter procedural times (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.13). Cervical preparation, however, incurred significantly more adverse effects, mainly comprising genital tract bleeding, abdominal pain and gastrointestinal symptoms (odds ratio 2.94, 95% CI 1.58-5.47). There were limited data regarding satisfaction, acceptability and complications. CONCLUSIONS Cervical preparation reduces pain and improves feasibility associated with outpatient hysteroscopy but increases the risk of adverse effects. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduces pain, enhances feasibility but increases adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M De Silva
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Wilson
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A Carnegy
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - P P Smith
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - T J Clark
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|