Optimal Interval of Time from Operative Hysteroscopy to Embryo Transfer in an In Vitro Fertilization Cycle

Guideline No. 446: Hysteroscopic Surgery in Fertility Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the indications, benefits, and risks of hysteroscopy in the management of patients with infertility and provide guidance to gynaecologists who manage common conditions in these patients.

TARGET POPULATION

Patients with infertility (inability to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse) undergoing investigation and treatment.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Hysteroscopic surgery can be used to diagnose the etiology of infertility and improve fertility treatment outcomes. All surgery has risks and associated complications. Hysteroscopic surgery may not always improve fertility outcomes. All procedures have costs, which are borne either by the patient or their health insurance provider.

EVIDENCE

We searched English-language articles from January 2010 to May 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (see Appendix B for MeSH search terms).

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Gynaecologists who manage common conditions in patients with infertility.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

When offering hysteroscopic surgery to patients with infertility, ensure it improves the live birth rate.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

The effects of hysteroscopic morcellation of endometrial polyps on frozen embryo transfer outcomes

OBJECTIVE(S)

To determine if hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, specifically via morcellation of polyps, affects implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate, and live birth rate (LBR) in first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review, with data abstracted from the charts of all first autologous oocyte frozen embryo transfer (FET) cases (n = 135) at a single fertility center from January 2018 through June 2020. Subjects were grouped into (A) hysteroscopic polypectomy prior to first FET (n = 25) or (B) no hysteroscopic polypectomy prior to first FET (n = 110). The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes were implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate.

RESULTS

We found no difference between the groups in terms of the primary outcome (LBR) or the secondary outcomes IR, CPR, and SAB rate.

CONCLUSION(S)

The data analyzed here suggest that hysteroscopic morcellation of endometrial polyps has no adverse effect on IR, SAB rate, CPR, or LBR among first FET cases after this type of polypectomy.

Hysteroscopic endometrial peeling as a different approach to endometrial scratching. Case series report

STUDY QUESTION

Does hysteroscopic endometrial peeling improve reproductive outcomes in women with implantation failure?

DESIGN

In this case series, 66 women underwent an hysteroscopic endometrial peeling and subsequently, a single frozen embryo transfer.

RESULTS

After the exclusion of patients with intraoperative incidental findings, pregnancy was achieved in 63% (42/66) of the women who underwent hysteroscopic endometrial peeling and subsequently a single frozen embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rate was observed in 57% (38/66) of the patients and, clinical pregnancy loss occurred in 10% (4/38).

CONCLUSION

this novel surgical technique seems to increase implantation as well as clinical pregnancy rates in women with repeated implantation failure. We can hypothesize that the controlled and subtle degree of endometrial injury generated by the peeling generates an inflammatory cascade that enhances implantation.

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception

BACKGROUND

Retained products of conception following delivery or early pregnancy failure are often treated by operative hysteroscopy. We aimed to evaluate reproductive and obstetric outcomes following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception. We also investigated the effect of time interval between operative hysteroscopy and pregnancy on these outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study conducted at the gynecology department of a tertiary teaching hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. Included were women who underwent operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception and became pregnant following the procedure. Reproductive and obstetric data were retrieved from electronic medical records and by telephone questionnaire. The effect of time interval between operative hysteroscopy and pregnancy on reproductive outcomes was also evaluated by comparing women who conceived 6 months or less and women who conceived more than 6 months following surgery.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine women who underwent operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception and who conceived later were included. Mean time from women's attempt to conceive to conception was 4.6 (SD=6.4) months. Conception rate was 84.8% at 6 months and reached 92.4% at 12 months postsurgery. Miscarriage rate for the consecutive pregnancy following hysteroscopy was 15.2% and delivery rate was 84.8%. Two cases of obstetric complications including one case of retained placenta and one case of post-partum hemorrhage were noted. Time interval between operative hysteroscopy and pregnancy did not affect reproductive or obstetric outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Women treated by operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception have no negative reproductive and obstetric outcomes. Time interval between the procedure and pregnancy has no effect on these outcomes.

Optimal time interval between hysteroscopic polypectomy and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: A retrospective study

The optimal timing of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer following hysteroscopic polypectomy is an important and unanswered clinical question. In this study, we conducted a retrospective survey of cases from an infertility center at an academic hospital. We reviewed the charts of all patients who received in-vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers (FBT) at the center from January 2009 to November 2019. One hundred and two patients with prior diagnosis of endometrial polyp that were treated with hysteroscopic polypectomy before received their first FBT at the center were identified as cases. Patients without prior diagnosis of endometrial polyp, and who received their first FBT at the center were defined as controls. Controls were enrolled at a 1-to-1 ratio to the cases. The cases and controls did not show differences in baseline characteristics, endometrial thickness, or the number of good blastocysts transferred. The clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were similar. Regarding the optimal interval between polypectomy and FBT, a cut-off of 120 days was identified from the ROC curve. A stratified analysis showed that when FBT was performed within an interval of 120 days after polypectomy, there were higher biochemical pregnancy rates (73.2%, 45.2%; OR 3.3; P = .007) and clinical pregnancy rates (64.8%, 41.9%; OR 2.54; P = .032), when compared with intervals greater than 120 days. There were no significant differences in implantation and live birth rates. In conclusion, pregnancy rates following FBT in patients who had received prior endometrial polypectomy were comparable to pregnancy rates after FBT in patients without endometrial polyp. Subgroup analysis showed that an interval greater than 120 days between hysteroscopic polypectomy and FBT was associated with decreased pregnancy rates. Patients who wish to receive embryo transfer after polypectomy should wait no longer than 120 days.