1
|
Raimondo D, Ianieri MM, Raffone A, Ferla S, Raspollini A, Virgilio A, Govoni F, Pavone M, Neola D, Guida M, Del Governatore M, Scambia G, Seracchioli R. Feasibility of Intraoperative Proctosigmoidoscopy after Discoid Bowel Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Pilot Multicenter Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024:S1553-4650(24)00208-5. [PMID: 38761918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Although surgery is the gold standard treatment for pain refractory to medical management or partial occlusion owing to rectosigmoid endometriosis, surgical resection can be associated with major perioperative complications. From general surgery experience, intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe, and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis after segmental resection. Unfortunately, there are no studies evaluating its role after discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. DESIGN A pilot, multicentric, observational, prospective, cohort study. SETTING Two academic hospitals, from March 1 to December 31, 2022. PATIENTS We enrolled all consecutive fertile-age patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 18 and 50 years, (2) diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis performed by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and (3) women scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection of endometriosis at low risk of segmental resection. INTERVENTIONS During data analysis, enrolled patients were divided into 2 study groups for comparisons based on whether or not the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy was performed upon surgeons' discretion after discoid resection for treating endometriosis, in addition to standard integrity tests. Primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success. Secondary study outcomes were the differences between the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group and the nonintraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group in (1) mean of total operative time and (2) rate of perioperative complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 28 patients were enrolled and equally distributed in the 2 groups. The rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success was 86%. No significant difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of total operative time (p = .1) and intraoperative and postoperative complications (p = .5 and p = 1, respectively), with no surgical complication related to intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy. CONCLUSION Intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy seems as a feasible and non-time-consuming intraoperative procedure in women undergone discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Larger studies with longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and assess clinical benefits over standard procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuel Maria Ianieri
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS (Drs. Ianieri, Pavone, Scambia, and Seracchioli), Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II (Drs. Raffone, Neola, and Guida), Naples, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna (Drs. Raffone, Ferla, Raspollini, and Virgilio), Bologna, Italy.
| | - Stefano Ferla
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna (Drs. Raffone, Ferla, Raspollini, and Virgilio), Bologna, Italy
| | - Arianna Raspollini
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna (Drs. Raffone, Ferla, Raspollini, and Virgilio), Bologna, Italy
| | - Agnese Virgilio
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna (Drs. Raffone, Ferla, Raspollini, and Virgilio), Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Govoni
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Pavone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS (Drs. Ianieri, Pavone, Scambia, and Seracchioli), Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Neola
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II (Drs. Raffone, Neola, and Guida), Naples, Italy
| | - Maurizio Guida
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II (Drs. Raffone, Neola, and Guida), Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Del Governatore
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Dr. del Governatore), Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS (Drs. Ianieri, Pavone, Scambia, and Seracchioli), Rome, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS (Drs. Ianieri, Pavone, Scambia, and Seracchioli), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arena A, Degli Esposti E, Pazzaglia E, Orsini B, Cau I, Govoni F, Raimondo D, Palermo R, Lenzi J, Casadio P, Seracchioli R. Not All Bad Comes to Harm: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:49-56. [PMID: 37839779 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the length of hospitalization in women undergoing laparoscopy for rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING An academic referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. PATIENTS Women aged between 18 and 50 years scheduled for laparoscopic excision (shaving, full-thickness anterior wall resection, segmental resection) of rectosigmoid endometriosis between February 2017 and February 2023. INTERVENTIONS We divided patients into 2 groups (non-ERAS and ERAS) based on the timing of surgery (before or after March 5, 2020). Starting from this day, restrictions were issued to limit the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, inducing our group to implement an ERAS protocol for patients hospitalized after surgery for posterior DIE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We included 579 patients in the analysis, 316 (54.6%) in the non-ERAS group and 263 (45.4%) in the ERAS group. In the ERAS group, we observed a shorter length of hospital stay (5.8 ± 3.1 days vs 4.8 ± 2.9 days; p <.001) and lower complications rates (33, 12.5% vs 60, 19.0%; p = .04), despite a decreased frequency of conservative surgical approaches (shaving procedures 121 vs 196; p <.001). Repeated surgery or hospital readmissions owing to postdischarge complications were infrequent, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. The multiple linear regression analysis strengthened our results given the higher prevalence of bowel resection surgeries (both full-thickness anterior wall or segmental), showing that patients managed with a multimodal protocol had an overall reduction of hospital stay by 1.5 days. CONCLUSION The implementation of an ERAS program in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DIE is associated with a significant reduction in hospital stay, without an increase in perioperative or postoperative complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Arena
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli); Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli)
| | - Eugenia Degli Esposti
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli); Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli)
| | - Enrico Pazzaglia
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli); Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli).
| | - Benedetta Orsini
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli); Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli)
| | - Irene Cau
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli)
| | - Francesca Govoni
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli)
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli)
| | - Roberto Palermo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli); Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli)
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of biomedical and neuromotor sciences, Alma mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Dr. Lenzi)
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli)
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, Bologna 40138, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Govoni, Raimondo, Palermo, Casadio, and Seracchioli); Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Arena, Degli Esposti, Pazzaglia, Orsini, Cau, Palermo, Seracchioli)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Raimondo D, Maletta M, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, Scambia G, Falcone F, Coppola M, Turco LC, Borghese G, Raffone A, Casadio P, Fabbri C, Corsi C, Seracchioli R. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography after full-thickness bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis: A multicentric experience with quantitative analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 158:679-688. [PMID: 34875108 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate effectiveness and reproducibility of qualitative and quantitative near-infrared indocyanine green (NIR-ICG) analyses as a tool for anastomotic perfusion assessment after full-thickness bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE). METHODS Symptomatic women with RSE undergoing minimally invasive full-thickness surgical excision of RSE and NIR-ICG evaluation from November 2019 to July 2020 were included. Study outcomes were the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative NIR-ICG analyses in predicting bowel fistula and their reproducibility. NIR-ICG predictive accuracy was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve on receiver operating characteristic curves with 95% confidence intervals (CI). NIR-ICG reproducibility was assessed through Cohen's k coefficient to determine interoperator agreement between two observers. RESULTS Of 33 patients, 2 (6%) developed bowel fistula. In predicting bowel fistula, qualitative and quantitative NIR-ICG evaluations showed sensitivity of 100% and 100%, specificity of 71% and 93%, and area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI 0.67-1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI 0-1.00), respectively. Regarding interoperator agreement rate, it was reported as excellent for the qualitative analysis and very good for the quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION Qualitative and quantitative NIR-ICG evaluations might be effective and reproducible tools for anastomotic perfusion assessment after discoid or segmental resection for RSE. Quantitative evaluation might be even more effective than qualitative evaluation in predicting bowel fistula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuela Maletta
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "V. Tiberio" Unimol, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Falcone
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Marina Coppola
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Luigi C Turco
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Borghese
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Fabbri
- Computational Physiopathology Unit, Department of Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristiana Corsi
- Computational Physiopathology Unit, Department of Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raimondo D, Alboni C, Orsini B, Aru AC, Farulla A, Maletta M, Arena A, Del Forno S, Sampogna V, Mastronardi M, Petrillo M, Seracchioli R. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:1740-1746. [PMID: 33999408 PMCID: PMC8453718 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has gained widespread application in several surgical specialties. Previous studies on the feasibility and safety of RALS vs standard laparoscopy (S-LPS) for rectosigmoid endometriosis are limited and reported conflicting data. This study aims to compare S-LPS and RALS in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis in terms of perioperative surgical and clinical data. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a multicentric, observational, prospective cohort study including 44 patients affected by rectosigmoid endometriosis referred to two tertiary referral centers for endometriosis from September 2018 to September 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients underwent S-LPS, and 22 underwent RALS. Our primary outcome was to compare operative time (from skin incision to suture) between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included: operative room time (patient entry into operative room and patient out), estimated blood loss, laparotomic conversion rate, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and evaluation of endometriosis-related symptoms at 12-month follow up. RESULTS The two groups were comparable regarding preoperative and surgical data, except for higher rates of hysterectomies and bilateral uterosacral ligament removal procedures in the RALS group. Also after adjusting for these discrepancies, operative time was similar between S-LPS and RALS. Operative room time was statistically longer in the RALS group compared with that of S-LPS. No statistically significant difference was found concerning other study outcomes. Pain and bowel symptoms improved in both groups at 12-month follow up. CONCLUSIONS If performed by expert teams, RALS provides similar perioperative outcomes compared with S-LPS in rectosigmoid endometriosis surgical treatment, except for longer operative room time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Alboni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Benedetta Orsini
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Aru
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonino Farulla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Manuela Maletta
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Del Forno
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Veronica Sampogna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Manuela Mastronardi
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Petrillo
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Science, Gynecologic and Obstetric Clinic, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raimondo D, Maletta M, Borghese G, Mastronardi M, Arena A, Del Forno S, Salucci P, Giaquinto I, Casadio P, Seracchioli R. Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography after Full-thickness Bowel Resection for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis-A Feasibility Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:1225-1230. [PMID: 33352315 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate feasibility of near-infrared (NIR)-indocyanine green (ICG) imaging for bowel vascularization assessment after full-thickness bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE). DESIGN This is a prospective, single-center, preliminary study on consecutive patients who were symptomatic submitted to discoid or segmental resection for RSE and NIR-ICG evaluation for vascular assessment of the anastomotic line from May 2018 to January 2020. SETTING Tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS Thirty-two women with RSE meeting eligibility criteria were included for study analysis. INTERVENTIONS NIR-ICG evaluation of anastomotic line vascularization after RSE removal. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Fluorescence degree of the anastomotic line was assessed with a 0 to 2 Likert scale, as follows: 0 or "absent" (no fluorescence observed), 1 or "irregular" (not uniform distribution or weak fluorescence), and 2 or "regular" (uniform distribution of fluorescence and similar to the proximal colon). In all the patients included in the study (100%), NIR-ICG imaging allowed the evaluation of fluorescence degree of the anastomotic line. No adverse reaction related to ICG use was recorded. The protocol did not greatly lengthen operating time (median, 4 [range, 3-5] minutes). Excellent interoperator agreement was observed. Most of the patients (31 of 32, 96.9%) showed regular fluorescence on the anastomotic line; in 1 patient with irregular fluorescence at NIR-ICG after discoid excision, the anastomotic suture was reinforced through interrupted stitches. We had 1 case of anastomotic leakage after segmental resection with intraoperative good fluorescence at NIR-ICG evaluation. CONCLUSION NIR-ICG imaging for anastomotic perfusion assessment after discoid or segmental resection for RSE seems to be a feasible, safe, and reproducible method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)..
| | - Manuela Maletta
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Giulia Borghese
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Manuela Mastronardi
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Simona Del Forno
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Paolo Salucci
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Ilaria Giaquinto
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (all authors)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Post-operative management and follow-up of surgical treatment in the case of rectovaginal and retrocervical endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302:957-967. [PMID: 32661754 PMCID: PMC7471187 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05686-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) affects between 3.8% and 37% of all endometriosis patients, mostly affecting rectovaginal septum or retrocervical space and characterized by the severe endometriosis-related complaints. Nowadays, generally managed with surgery. However, this is associated with a risk of postoperative complications. To better evaluate intra- and postoperative complications and outcomes for rectovaginal (RVE) and retrocervical endometriosis (RCE), the preoperative management should be accurately described and compared. Methodology This is a cohort retrospective study performed at the Endometriosis Centre of Charité-University Clinic, Berlin. 34 patients were investigated in their reproductive age, n = 19 with RVE and n = 15 RCE, operated between 2011 and 2015. The surgical approach was divergent in both groups. Single laparoscopy was performed in RCE patients (RCEP) and vaginal assisted laparoscopy in RVE patients (RVEP). Long-term postoperative outcome included complications, fertility rate and recurrence rate. Results The median follow-up time was three years (y). Symptom-free status was revealed in n = 12 RVEP and n = 9 RCEP. Postoperatively, endometriosis-related complaints were presented in n = 7 RVEP and n = 6 RCEP, but with significant pain relief. From n = 8 RVE patients seeking fertility, pregnancy occurred in n = 7 and from n = 9 RCEP pregnancy appeared in n = 5 patients in the meantime of 6 months. Postoperative complications were reported in n = 1 RVEP with early postoperative bleeding, after ureter leakage and n = 1 RCEP with postoperative anastomotic insufficiency. The postoperative recurrence rate was equivalent to zero. Conclusion The appropriate surgical approach for each group, preserving anatomy and functionality of the organs, seems to be very essential and efficient.
Collapse
|