The Austrian Sacrocolpopexy Registry: Surgical Techniques, Perioperative Safety, and Complications

Comparison of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with vaginal reconstructive procedures and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Vaginal vault prolapse, also known as apical prolapse, is a distressing condition that may affect women following hysterectomy, necessitating surgical intervention when conservative measures prove ineffective. The surgical management of apical compartment prolapse includes procedures such as laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP), abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASCP) or vaginal reconstructive procedures (VRP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of these interventions.

Methods

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify eligible studies. Fourteen studies comprising a total of 1,289 women were included. The selected studies were analyzed to evaluate outcomes such as duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, blood loss, complication rates, and patient satisfaction.

Results

LSCP did not demonstrate significant advantages over VRP in terms of perioperative or long-term outcomes. However, when compared to ASCP, LSCP showed shorter hospital stay, reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, and lower rates of ileus.

Discussion

This systematic review contributes to evidence-based decision-making for the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. While LSCP did not exhibit substantial benefits over VRP, it emerged as a preferable option compared to ASCP due to shorter hospital stays and reduced postoperative complications. The findings from this study provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical approach for vaginal vault prolapse. However, future research should focus on long-term follow-ups, standardizing outcomes, and outcome measures, and evaluating cost-effectiveness to further enhance clinical practice.

Efficacy of a portable interface pressure sensor for robotic surgery in preventing compartment syndrome

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study determines whether the use of a portable interface pressure sensor (Palm Q) for robotic surgery could prevent compartment syndrome.

METHODS

In the present single center, non-trial observational study, patients diagnosed with gynecological diseases between April 2015 and August 2020 treated with laparoscopic or robotic surgery were enrolled. We assessed 256 cases involving surgery performed in the lithotomy position with an operative time >4 h. The Palm Q device was placed preoperatively on both sides of the patients' lower legs. The pressure was measured every 30 min preoperatively and intraoperatively and adjusted to ≤30 mmHg. If the pressure reached ≥30 mmHg, the operation was stopped, the patient was repositioned, the leg position was released, the pressure was reduced to ≤30 mmHg, and the procedure was resumed. We compared the maximum creatine kinase levels of the Palm Q and non-Palm Q groups. We also analyzed the correlation between the patients' symptoms postoperatively (shoulder and leg pain) and compartment syndrome.

RESULTS

Our data showed that immediate postoperative creatine kinase levels predict compartment syndrome. Propensity score matching of the 256 enrolled patients resulted in 92 cases (46 per group), balanced for age, body mass index, and lifestyle disease. Creatine kinase levels differed significantly between the Palm Q and non-Palm Q groups (p = 0.041). None of the patients in the Palm Q group experienced well-leg compartment syndrome complications.

CONCLUSION

Palm Q can potentially help to prevent perioperative compartment syndrome.